SUBMITTED: Thursday, June 16, 2005
POSTED: Thursday, June 16, 2005
Bank of America offers a Visa check-card that allows ATM withdrawals/deposits using bank machines and point-of-sale purchases with the Visa functionality of the card. All of these transactions are tied directly to a checking account with a cash balance (not a credit line).
The bank's web site, www.bankofamerica.com, displays an "Available Balance" on the account, along with "pending transactions" and "posted transactions." As a misleading tactic, the web site will often list very recent purchases in the "pending transactions" section, but the amounts are not subtracted yet from the "Available Balance" figure.
A typical consumer would think that since the bank "knows" about the transaction in the pendings list, surely the amount is subtracted from the "Available Balance." Normal credit cards subtract purchase amounts instantly from the "Available Credit."
Also, the "Available Balance" is not always updated "up to minute" as the banks advertising and web site format leads customers to believe. Surely, there is something in fine print to cover the Bank's ass.
Bank of America has even further supported this notion of instaneous balance transactions by airing a television commerical in which a customer charges a cup of coffe in a cafe. The coffee drinker's "friend" in the cafe is using a wireless laptop at a table while the customer charges the cup of coffee on the card. When the customer returns to the table, his friend is viewing the Bank of America on-line web site and is amazed that the bank has already listed the transaction on the web site.
Surely the bank "knows" about the transaction. Why wouldn't they update the available balance at that point in time? Well, of course, it's to trick the customer! The television commercial mood further evidences Bank of America's intention to lead customers to believe on-line account activity, and therefore balances, are instantaneously updated.
For customers who have a balance in their accounts that is approaching the zero mark, Bank of America's system is designed to confuse and trick consumers "faster than the eye" to leverage hefty and multiple $34 overdraft fees. Customers believe they can make additional purchases because the balance is displayed as higher than it should be because known pending transactions list on the web page are not posted, are pending, but aren't subtracted from the available balance. Note that these transactions are often listed in the "pending" section, leading users to believe they are reflectd in the available balance.
Given the scenario above, customers continue to make minor purchases for amounts such as $20, $10, etc. knowing they are close to zero, but thinking there is still "enough" money in the account as reflect on the "Available Balance". Over the next day or so, Bank of America subtracts amounts in descending order rather than transaction time to ensure the maximization of their own profits. Overdraft fees are currently $34 for each transaction. A few minor transactinos like a cup of coffee, lunch, gas, etc. in a given "gray period" day can end up costing a customer up to five $34 fess in a single day, or $170. For example, if you purchased a coffee for $3.00, sandwich at deli for $6.50, and filled your tank up with $30 in gas, but your true balance was only $29, they will subtract the $30 first so that three overdraft fees apply rather than a single one. Advocates of the bank claim they do this to help with mortgage payments and car payments. That is not the fact. They don't care about their consumers.
If you are being ripped of like I have been, please take action, complain, and cancel your business with Bank of America. They have now merged with Fleet bank which has practiced very similar tactics with credit card payment receipts and lost a class action lawsuit. I received a $75 check last summer from the Fleet lawsuit.