Submitted: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Posted: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Steve
Bradenton
U.S.A.
A debt of that age usually sells for about a quarter of one cent on the dollar.
An $8725 debt of that age would sell in a portfolio for about $22.
This is how lucrative this business is for these lowlife bottomfeeders.
You still might be able to stay the judgement, if you can prove there was something such as improper service, or a material misrepresentation, etc..
Get a lawyer from the NACA to work on it for you. this can be done very cheap and sometimes free.
There are still alot of ways you can screw them.
Great Seneca are some real lowlife scumbags, as are those "attorneys" they use. Those dumb asses couldnt find the inside of a courtroom if they fell through the roof!
Good luck!
Submitted: Wednesday, June 04, 2008
Posted: Wednesday, June 04, 2008
Rachel
Williamson
U.S.A.
They can't sue ya, I believe the statute of limitations are up on that case.
Also, some good advice with them proving the debt is yours also to your favor. If you have to...go to court...make them prove the debt is yours but before you go through all that...raise the stature of limitations...if it's up, case dismissed!
Submitted: Thursday, June 05, 2008
Posted: Thursday, June 05, 2008
Sherri
Emeryville
U.S.A.
Just for the record, Wolpoff & Abramson will deliberately sewer serve you, especially in cases that have no legal merit. They tried this on a case they filed against my husband, supposedly attempting to serve him at an address that doesn't even exist. Their "process server" perjured herself stating that it was a three unit building and she spoke to the residents there. Uh, dear..no such address, so whatever you were tweeked out on must have been very strong. Too bad for them that my husband has contacts at the courthouse and we got served (three months after they filed). Too bad for them that when we saw that they had pulled a hard inquiry on my husband's credit months before, they got a Permissible Purpose letter by Certified Mail RRR and signed for it, so we had documentation that they had a correct address (as well as numerous green cards signed by their "client". Filed our answer with attached documentation as to why their claim was non-valid. Got the Case Management notice from the Clerk's office. Cool, the presiding judge has a reputation of being very fair and thorough.
We get their Case Management statement in the mail and all I can say is that they did a BEAUTIFUL job of hanging themselves. Steve, if you are reading this, get my email addy through Ed..you will LOVE what I want to send you. And...they tried their damndest to send us to the wrong place for the Case Management conference. We filed our Case Management Statement and for some reason, poof, the case is dismissed.
W&A can be defeated if you challenge them. Their filings are so vague and generic that a first quarter paralegal student could do a better job of putting one together.
Submitted: Sunday, August 12, 2007
Posted: Sunday, August 12, 2007
Wtr
Staten Island
U.S.A.
they had a judgement against me for two years. i went down to the civil court, researched the file. then i filed an order to show cause which was granted. Then i sent them a certified letter asking them to validate the debt. and that I find them in direct violation of the FTC statues and the must cease and desist on collection and have all reported information removed from my credit report including the judgement against me. They agreed drop the case ect. If anyone on this forum needs a copy of the letter i sent them email me.
CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.