Kathryn of American Dream Mortgage & Realty of California, Inc. has announced that she has filed formal charges against me and my business, Best Resumes of New York.
That is a very serious statement. If she means it and is not blowing smoke, she better explain to a judge that she is the one who threw the first libelous stone -- telling everyone that I pose as an employer and sift through resumes and put the ones I like on my website as samples of my work, and that I do not write my resumes -- that I steal them and sell them as my own. First of all, I don't sell resumes. I write them as a service working very closely with my clients.
In her first onslaught, she called me a fraud, amongst the approximate 15 other slanderous synonyms. Courts do not favor those who initiate the libel, especially when they only have accusations and not proof.
Boy, talk about the hypocritical pot calling the kettle black.
Let's examine the facts:
2001: Ann Baehr writes a resume (has client testimonial in writing)
2002: Ann Baehr adds the resume sample to her website.
2003. The WayBack Machine makes a PDF of it (and the entire website)
2005: Kathryn supposedly writes her own resume.
2008: Kathryn claims her resume is on Ann Baehr's website.
What? How can I write a resume two years before she wrote her resume? That just doesn't make sense.
SHE FAILS TO ACKNOWLEDGE MY PROOF
Kathryn keeps telling everyone that I only have bogus news releases as proof, but never acknowledges that I have presented the archive.org link.
SHE FAILS TO PRESENT HER PROOF
Where are the date-stamped envelopes that she claims exist from the resume she sent to companies three years ago? They better have the cancelled stamps from the U.S. Post Office dating before October 2002 because the WayBack Machine's archives are typically posted six months after they are actually cached.
CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report. There it is! Proof that I have been in possession of the resume at least two years before she wrote her resume -- the resume that I wrote seven years ago.
Please do an Internet search on how the WayBack Machine or archive.org in combination with the search term 'evidence in court' to see how this valuable resource is helping attorneys fight cases in court.
Since I have never seen Kathryn's resume that she supposedly wrote, the only writing samples I have seen have been her complaints and blog posts.
In her profile at LinkedIn, she actually used a part of the profile from my resume sample for her summary (to see the summary, you will need to be a member of LinkedIn to view her profile. There is no fee).
You can clearly see where my writing ends and hers begins. Please do a side-by-side to see what I mean. Resume writing is a well-honed craft that she obviously has not developed. Her wording is terrible. In fact, it doesn't even make sense. The sentence structure is a mess and the grammar and punctuation is horrible.
She will probably rush to change it or delete it after reading this. But that won't do her any good. I have taken a screenshot of it.
As for me going berserk and posting my accusations on 14 sites, those sites include the one WebWire I wrote, two of my own websites, and sites that she has posted to first. I only followed suit. She has taken out at least one known free website and filed a duplicate complaint to at least three consumer complaint sites. The rest include sites that have picked up the story using news aggregators.
Thank you for reading my side of this story.