SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 03, 2004
POSTED: Tuesday, February 03, 2004
Now that Bob Snyder, “Board of Regents Scholar” with the Nouveau Riche Corporation has been so kind as to “shed light” on these allegations, I would be most glad to respond to his accusations. I'm so very glad that “The General” as Bob is known in the Nouveau Riche Corporation, and is the most heavily endorsed representative, would take the time to address some of the issues at hand.
#1). The reference to the “Starter Kit” that Bob speaks of is actually accurate in disclosing the cost of $75.00. “There is no product purchase or any other purchase required at any level of participation beyond the starter kit and that is not even necessary in North Dakota.” As Mr. Snyder so very well knows, after his supposed investigation of the matter, all the colleagues involved have specifically disclosed the FACT that this was not presented to them within the context of Mr. Gillespie's sales presentation. This FACT has been most conveniently omitted from Mr. Snyder's response.
#2). Mr. Snyder attests to the FACT that I and numerous other colleagues have been contacted in order to obtain proof of the allegations levied against Mr. Gillespie. Mr. Snyder conveniently neglects to inform the reader that after initial consultation with the CEO of the Nouveau Riche Corporation, I immediately gained Legal Counsel in the matter and was strongly advised NOT to provide this information at that time. Mr. Snyder again conveniently omits that I also informed him of this FACT upon our initial consultation in Denver. Also Mr. Snyder conveys that “Jonathan could not provide anything other than a he said/she said type of debate”. It was not that I “could not provide” the information requested, it was that I was strongly advised by counsel not to. I also trusted the Management to resolve this issue fairly and provided every opportunity and adequate time for them to do so. Again, Mr. Snyder wishes to diminish the severity of the allegations presented by numerous colleagues against Pat Gillespie by personalizing the enormity of the transgressions submitted for his investigation by numerous colleagues. Rather than subscribing to the “he said/she said” theory, Mr. Snyder would be much more accurate to truthfully state the FACT, ie ……THEY SAID/ HE SAID!
#3). It is very true that I met with Mr. Snyder in Denver in regards to this matter. He most readily asserts that “I flew from my home in Utah to Denver for our meeting”. The readers of this forum are led to believe that he flew all the way here just to have an appointment with me to investigate the matter further. The FACT of the matter was that he and other representatives of Nouveau Riche Corporation had a scheduled “sales presentation” at the same time to increase the enrollment of the Nouveau Riche roster.
#4). Mr. Snyder continues to try to diminish the allegations against the Nouveau Riche Corporation submitted by numerous other colleagues in labeling them as “Jonathan's supporters” even after they personally stated to him that I am certainly not the focal point of these allegations, and that they certainly did not require my assistance in bringing this matter to the attention of Corporate Management. This constant assertion as me being the “ringleader” of a group of “disgruntled colleagues” was first postulated in Mr. Gillespie's rebuttal to the many and numerous allegations and charges presented to Company Management, and continue to resonate in an attempt to purvey these charges as my personal vendetta. Mr. Snyder conveniently and continuously omits the FACT that
numerous colleagues involved are from both the United States and Canada, and ALL levy the same charges against Mr. Gillespie.
#5) Mr. Snyder asserts that “I personally attest to the fact that Nouveau Riche went above and beyond the call to remedy Jonathan's issues”. Again Mr. Snyder skews the allegations and tries to impress upon the reader that the allegations presented are “Jonathan's issues”, subverting the FACT that there are numerous colleagues involved in these proceedings. Here are the FACTS…
Upon initial submission of documented letters from numerous colleagues within the Nouveau Riche Corporation, we were told that the information would NOT be handled by the CEO. We were told that these proceedings would then be investigated by Mr. Bob Snyder and the “Board of Regents”. Upon your initial contact with me, (taped and recorded),you Mr. Bob Snyder,” Board of Regents Scholar”, conveyed to me that the Nouveau Riche Corporation and yourself, admitted that there was a serious problem with Mr. Gillespie and that you would resolve the matter in conjunction with the “Board of Regents”. You also stated to me and other colleagues involved in the matter that, and I quote, “Mr. Gillespie is in complete denial “. You communicated to me and other colleagues the company “has reservations about firing Mr. Gillespie as he would in turn file a “wrongful termination” lawsuit against the company. You also subverted the FACTS to me and other colleagues by insisting this was an isolated incident involving two or three people, when in fact there are many.
After 8 weeks of trying to have the matter resolved, and after several attempts to contact you do you remember the scheduled appointments that you didn't even bother to return my phone calls, and after finally making contact I inquired as to whether the “Board “had come to a decision and you informed me that there was no need to inform them? You informed not only me, but other colleagues that you and the CEO would meet with Mr. Gillespie on January 1st at the Masters symposium and present him a final ultimatum or ask for a resignation. Oh I see Mr. Snyder, again something you conveniently omit. Do you remember telling each of us that you would contact each of us after the Master's Symposium to let us know the outcome? Perhaps you might explain to the reader why none of us has ever had contact with you after that date after numerous attempts. Just let me know Mr. Snyder, and I'll be more than happy to send you the tape.
Now, in your terms, let's “shed light” on what the Nouveau Riche Corporation has done to “remedy” OUR concerns. A few of the colleagues have been contacted in regards to this matter, not all. The Nouveau Riche Corporation, in admission of allegations, has offered a few colleagues the cash settlement of $5,000 and a Non-Disclosure agreement with the stipulation that they cease and desist, which prevents any further legal action against the Corporation. The initial investment of $15,685.00 at the Regents is divided between scholar and company. The company is given $5,685.00 for the products and the scholar is given $10,000 for his “training and assistance”. Mr. Snyder conveniently omits the allegations against Mr. Gillespie include but are not limited to “not providing the assistance and training “ agreed upon. Mr. Snyder asserts that Mr. Gillespie is an “independent contractor” yet within his sales representation Mr. Gillespie uses his affiliation as “a hand-picked Board of Regents Scholar” to lure and induce investors. The CEO of the Corporation also said to me that” we're sorry that this has happened by someone we so strongly endorse”. Even after various colleagues suggested different means this problem might be resolved, we have yet to be contacted by the Company or any of it's representatives. As of this date, colleagues including myself have found the offer to be insubstantial and inadequate. Numerous phone calls have been placed with no response. Also Mr. Bob "The General" Snyder, you conveniently omit an explanation as to how Mr. Gillespie was paid $10,000.00 by these many colleagues for “assistance and training” and each of them has separately filed grievances about misrepresentation, deception and other violations both here in the United States and Canada. Also, Bob "The General" omitted the FACT that after relinquishing the expendable income of ALL the colleagues involved, Mr. Gillespie then set in motion his own li-tle loan company,offering loans to those who had not made qualifying sales, so as to conceal the FACTS of his so-called "assistance and training". Afterall General Bob, "it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what's going on here". Also, Mr. Bob "The General" conveniently omitted the FACTS concerning the heavy endorsement given Mr. Gillespie by the Nouveau Riche Corporation and Pat's involvement in setting up seminars, collecting large ammounts of capital from numerous colleagues as investors ($2,500.00)refusing to share the leads generated or return the monies he absconded with. Also omitted were the FACTS and complaints from numerous colleagues alledging the purchase of leads from Mr. Gillespie and never receiving either the leads or the return of their capital. After all General Bob, once again it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what's going on here!!!!!
#6) In conclusion, I would very much like to respond to Mr. Bob Snyder's personalization of the issues at hand. “C'mon Jonathan! You know better, you marketed these products for months and because you failed to make any sales you are now grasping at straws to request a refund on product that you have used and positively testified to on numerous occasions”. When you and I spoke Bob, I challenged you to find ANYONE in Mr. Gillespie's “work group”, either here in the United States or Canada who joined in the year 2003 that had made $1.00 from his supposed “assistance and training”. At that time you agreed that would be difficult, and instead, take the opportunity of this forum to personally attack me.
Most importantly is your comment, “Are you saying that you lied to people for six months and you openly admit to your lack of integrity”. I have never lied or “positively “testified on numerous occasions” that the opportunity presented was anything more than what it is. That with the sporadic and negligible training provided by “Mr. Pat Gillespie, a hand picked Board of Regents Scholar” contributed to no sales. After meticulously following the instructions of this “Scholar”, I am now $30,000 in debt. If you really want to “shed light” on the situation Bob, after your investigation of the allegations, why not convey to the reader the amounts involved,( averaging $30,000.00 per claim) and the financial ruin of the numerous colleagues who did nothing more than trust your representative and so called "independent contractor" who by admission of the CEO is "strongly endorsed by Nouveau Riche". How interesting that it is now WE (me and numerous other colleagues)who are being maligned, as we inform the public of these allegations.
One more thing General Bob, it was so very kind of you to offer me any assistance you could when we met in Denver. Of course I understand your need to attack me and defend the Nouveau Riche organization; after all, you are the NUMBER ONE income earner. Might I add that your assumptions are just that, YOUR ASSUMPTIONS! Your assumption is the EXACT duplicate and replication used by Mr. Pat Gillespie in his rebuttal to ALL the numerous colleagues involved! Do you really think your (or should I say Pat's) assumption is something that has any validity in the course of these proceedings? As you constantly wish to evade the acknowledgement of the many other colleagues involved, and have already more than sufficiently proven that your judgment in these crucial issues is tainted by your prejudice against a singular entity, me, I and the numerous other colleagues involved, most assuredly realize that your evaluation is definitely NOT impartial. Do me a favor General Bob and make sure you convey your assumptions to ALL the other colleagues seeking relief from this. I'm sure they'll be joyous that you have done your best at ignoring their concerns and focusing your attention on one individual.
Please allow me to educate you Mr. Bob “The General” Snyder, the free legal counsel from various government and local authorities you refer to in your last paragraph has nothing to do with being a disabled veteran. It is FREE to any citizen either here in the United States or in Canada with a grievance against questionable business practices such as fraud, deceit, misrepresentation as are the complaints of NUMEROUS colleagues within the Nouveau Riche Corporation. After all Bob, "it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out"! It's called "Consumer Protection"!
Mr. Bob “The General” Snyder, I wish to personally thank you for participating in this forum as you have given every reader the opportunity to evaluate the situation for themselves. You have also provided exactly what was necessary, a controversial position that will cause anyone assessing the Nouveau Riche Corporation or their “Income Opportunity” to seriously consider and closely scrutinize any involvement with your organization. Again Bob, you have certainly provided the necessary response to enable anyone with a sense of logic to completely avoid entanglement in a Company that says they are “building a company that is GENUINELY interested in helping others succeed and the enrolling scholars are motivated FINANCIALLY to help in your success”.
This is my last communication in this forum as I do not wish to continually hear the rhetoric continuously bantered by self-serving “FINANCIALLY” motivated scholars…
Write to your heart's content, it doesn't change the fact that anyone reading this material submitted by me and others will most definitely alert anyone to a company that refuses to assist in the resolution of a problem. FOR THE PUBLIC, THIS IS ONLY THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG. IS THIS A COMPANY YOU WISH TO BE AFFILIATED WITH????? WELL, GO AHEAD AND LET THEM “MAKE YOUR DAY”. SEE YOU NEVER "GENERAL BOB".