SUBMITTED: Sunday, May 08, 2005
POSTED: Sunday, May 08, 2005
Brenda says:
===========================
To begin with, Thursday Plantation has been known as TP Health Ltd. since 2003. If you were such an expert, you would know that they changed their name 2 years ago. They have operated under a New South Wales Crown Land's Lease since 1977 in the Bungawalbyn Reserve. They do NOT have exclusive rights to the Bungawalbyn Reserve, and do not own the land.
===========================
TP Health Ltd. was created because THURSDAY PLANTATION bought a few other companies. TP Health was formed as a parent company due to those purchases. The Tea Tree oil is still marketed, sold, and bottled under THURSDAY PLANTATION. In fact, you yourself linked to their website. www.thursdayplantation.com.au. Gee, I guess I do know a thing or two about the company. By the way, the lease was granted in 1976, not '77. It's ok, I won't chastise you like you did me. And I never said they owned the entire reserve. Eric White (who founded the Plantation) found a particularly potent 'patch' of the most genetically pure trees in the Bungawalbyn basin. He called these either 'mother trees', or 'father trees', I can't remember which. It was HERE that thursday Plantation was formed. Thursday Plantation did then, and STILL DOES TODAY have EXCLUSIVE rights to the most GENETICALLY PURE Melaleuca Alternifolia trees IN THE WORLD. These 'Mother/Father' trees span about a 200 square mile radius.
Brenda Says:
======================
Melaleuca's tea tree oil also comes from the Bungawalbyn Reserve in New South Wales, Australia and is STEAM DISTILLED WITHOUT USING CHEMICALS OF ANY KIND.
======================
You know, I did a little research of my own, and guess what... You're right. Melalauca Plantation is in the Bungawalbyn basin a few hundred miles from where Thursday Plantation operates(And yes, the plantation is still called THURSDAY. The PARENT is TP Health). Now here's the difference.
Melaleuca Plantation was founded after 1987, more than a full 10 years after Thursday. Also, the founder Craig Chapman didn't have the luxury of finding the most genetically pure trees. He PLANTED HIS! Some sources of information site that he purchased the seeds from Thursday Plantation, but there is no concrete evidence to support this, and it's largely irrelevant anyway... or is it? I haven't been able to find ANY evidence that the growing conditions in Melaleuca are as ideal as the small area that Thursday has. Obviously (to me anyway) it is NOT as ideal because Maleleuca had to intervene, and their trees are PLANTED by HUMAN INTERVENTION, as opposed to nature growing the best trees in a small area... occupied by Thursday Plantation. But that's just my opinion, and apparantly i'm ignorant. ;)
Brenda Says:
==========================
You make a lot of statements, but back it up with nothing. Show me documentation that says TP Health Ltd. (formerly Thursday Plantation) is INTERNATIONALLY recognized as the BEST.
==========================
Well, I don't see you backing anything up. I remember just last month reading an article by Dr. Julian Whitaker (an internationally recognized Dr.) speaking about Thursday Plantation, and how it was the first, and to this day is the best Tea Tree oil in the world. I also seem to remember an article by Otto Greither (From Germany of the International company Salus Haus) speaking about GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices), and praising companies like THURSDAY PLANTATION for pioneering, and maintaining the best standards for manufacturing in the world. I'm afraid that you will have to find these sources for yourself however. I read them from information made available to me at my job. I'm sure if you looked yourself though you will find many more international authorities proclaiming their opinions that Thursday Plantation is still the #1 manufacturer of Tea Tree oil. I suppose that it's POSSIBLE that Melaleuca Plantation follows them in 2nd place. But you know what they say, 2nd place is the 1st loser.
Brenda Says:
===============
You can't.
===============
I'm pretty sure I just did.
Brenda Says:
=====================
The person you quoted who does trainings is not an employee of Melaleuca. She is an independent marketing executive who trains the people she works with in her organization...just as many others do for their teams. It's called leadership.
====================
Another quote, by Gaylene:
======================
I am much too busy working my successful Melaleuca business, as a lifelong member of The M.O.M Team.
======================
I'm pretty sure that these words, written BY Gaylene herself, says that she IS an employee of Melaleuca. Unless you don't consider running a Melaleuca business, and being a member of the MOM team as being employed by them. Don't make me pull out the definition of 'employed'.
Brenda, so politlely says:
==============================
Again...you show your ignorance.
==============================
I know, i'm such a putz.
==============================
First you say that T36-C5 is not the best, and even go so far as to say that it is "screwed with" (verbalization of an expert? I think not!)
==============================
I never said that t36-c5 was screwed with. I said that many companies nowadays DO screw with their batches to come to an agreeable potency. I ASKED if t36-c5 was screwed with, by asking how it was sourced, and distilled. And it seems, now that I have done the research myself, that t36-c5 is not screwed with(that I could find). It is distilled from manufactured sources of trees, that have been unnaturally (as in how nature had it before man intervened) planted.
And I never claimed to be an expert. I said that I was a Registered Nutritional Product Advisor. And I stated it in the context to show that I did not work for Thursday Plantation, or any other product company. The intent was to show no bias, rather than to attempt to procalim expertise.
=============================
by using a standardized amount of chemical ingredients. And yet...you say that Thursday Plantation products are far better. Do you even have any idea what the T and C stand for? And do you have any idea what the international stardards are, and WHY there are specific standards for Terpinen-4-ol and Cineole. By the way...that's what the T and C stand for...Terpinen-r-ol and Cineole.
=============================
Oh, I know, and knew what they stood for. I'll even do you one better. These are paraphrased for relevant content.
Terpinen-4-ol: A flammable, oxygen stable gas, or liquid found as a primary compound in nutmeg, many citrus plants, and some exotic foliage such as the Melaleuca Tea Tree. Used as a flavoring, or active compound. Found to be anti-fungal, antiseptic, and mildy anti-bacterial.
Cineole: Also called Eucalyptol due to it's role as a main active molecule found in Eucalyptus oil. Also found in Cajeput oil, and many other aromatic foliage such as Bay leaves, and Tea Trees. Found to be pro-circulatory when applied dermal as a constituent of an oil. Also found to be effective for relieving symptoms of inflammation, and minor pain.
You get all sorts of fun texts when you get an education. but I suppose I should tell you something other than what I copied from my texts, so i'll tell you why cineole is found in such low concentrations. cineole, in addition to affecting dermal absorbtion of oils, is itself toxic. Therefore repeated usage, or a high potency of cineole can easily result in a toxic overload.
Brenda's still talking:
==========================
Now read this very closely...Thursday Plantation's tea tree oil is 36% terpinen-4-ol, and their cineole is 5%.
=========================
Not true. Thursday plantation GUARANTEES a MINIMUM (that's what < this sign means) 5% cineole, and MINIMUM 36% Terpinen-4-ol. I've seen indivudual batch testings(perk of my job), and their batches come off at much closer to 38-40% T-4-ol, and 2-3% Cineole. I never was good at math, but that seems superior to t36-c5. See, Melaleuca's oil is a STANDARDZED oil. Thursday's batches must come from more potent sources, so they do not need to standardize every batch. They simply guarantee a minimum, while actually delivering above and beyond that minimum.
Brenda again:
====================
Sooo...you try to discredit Melaleuca by saying that T36-C5 is less than standard, yet the company you say has the best also uses the same percentages. Just another clue that you have NO CLUE what you are talking about.
====================
Yeah, i'm clueless. You know me well. It's a tough life.
Brenda:
=================
Australian product regulations and the International Standards Organization require that tea tree oil must have at least 30 percent terpinen-4-ol and not more than 15 percent cineole.
=================
Yup. Standards that were set in COOPERATION with Thursday Plantation. And by the way, they don't REQUIRE anything. The oil just has to meet that criteria in order to claim to be standardized. I can spit in a jar filled with the crappiest tea tree in the world and call it tea tree oil. But I wouldn't be able to call it standardized.
Brenda gets personal:
===================
Registered by who? LOL Your so-called title is either a joke, or you are incompetent at what you do.
===================
Jeez, you're just rude. I've rebutted everything you've said so far effectively, but I would still not be so presumptuous, and rude as to call you ingorant, incompetent, or any other attack that I would have to know you personally to rightly conclude. I'm not about to dignify your personal attack with stating my entire educational history. I'll sum it up for you.
Pre-school->grade school->High School->University->Supplement Certification->My job
Brenda slips up:
=======================
Here again...you show your ignorance. ProFlex's proprietary diverse proteins are "the best, most-bioavailable blend",
=======================
What's with the quote? You read that off the label?
=======================
which includes all 11 essential branch chain amino acids needed for maintaining and repairing muscle tissue. The proteins in ProFlex's proprietary forumula rank as follows in BV (Biological Value): Whey - 159, Casein - 77, Egg albumin whites - 88, Soy - 74.
=======================
Funny, i've only heard of 8 essential amino acids. Maybe I better check my books, and make sure. Hmm, yup, here they are: isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine,tryptophan and valine. I suppose if you consider histidine, which is only essential for children, you get 9. That's still not 11. Also, there are only 3 BRANCHED CHAIN amino acids. Leucine, Isoleucine, and Valine. And your Biological Values are the typical values for these protein sources. This isn't anything special. The Biological value speaks to general SOURCES of proteins, not the quality of an individual BRAND of protein. MOST protein from whey Isolate has a BV of 159. That only speaks to it's general absorbability. But if you have a crappy isolate that is only 80%< protein it isn't as good a quality of say a 86% isolate, and the former can have a higher potential for things such as... oh, i dunno, say CHOLESTEROL. And if your meal replacement is so good, then tell me how the animal cholesterol got there, and what source it's from. And why do they need so many bloody sources of protein to begin with? It sounds like you typed this off of a product brochure. I don't think you actually knew what all this meant. Please, prove me wrong... for pitty sake.
Brenda slipped up again:
===============
Kris continues to show her ignorance.
===============
I'm a guy. Mom liked Kris Kristofferson. A fact I was never proud of until I saw Blade. It's allright though, honest mistake.
Brenda slips again... AGAIN!?
============================
Chemically, calcium cannot be given by itself, but must be connected to another substance called a salt.
============================
Are you referring to the process of esterifying? I know what it is. And no, it does not have to be esterified. Ever hear of chelation, oxides, or the more rare hydroxides?
============================
These salts are simply carriers of the calcium. A variety of different carriers are commonly used, some being carbonate, citrate, gluconate and glubionate. The carrier is important for several reasons.
============================
Well, I guess in VERY simple terms that's accurate.
============================
Although calcium citrate is more readily absorbed by some people (primarily those over 65 and lacking hydrochloric acid in their stomachs), calcium carbonate contains more ELEMENTAL calcium. For example, calcium supplements using carbonate as the carrier supply 40% ELEMENTAL CALCIUM, while citrate carriers supply 20%-24%. Others supply significantly less, 9% IN THE CASE OF GLUCONATE.
============================
Although that is (partially) true you are making the same mistake that many people do. You're looking at total amount of elemental calcium instead of AVAILABLE, and ABSORBABLE calcium. Carbonate contains the most elemental calcium, with Lactates, and Gluconates bringing up the rear. However, the general nutritional rule of thumb with calcium is that the more concentrated the source, the less available the source.
I'll use your figures. Carbonate may have 40% elemental calcium, but of that 40% only 50% of it is AVAILABLE. That gives us 20%. Of that 20% only 10% is ABSORBABLE. That leaves you with what? 2% usable calcium in the body? Now, i'll use a brand name here so you know that I'm not spouting off. I mentioned them before. Salus Haus makes a Calcium Gluconate/Lactate blend solution. I'll use your numbers again. We'll low ball for arguements sake and start with 9% even though Lactates are slightly higher in Elemental levels than Gluconates. Salus' solution is 99% AVAILABLE. That leaves us with 8.91% Available. Of that 8.91% approximately 80% is ABSORBABLE giving us 7.1% usable calcium. Hell, even if it was only 50% absorbable it's STILL better than your carbonate.
Brenda, Brenda, Brenda:
=======================
Go back to school, Kris. And tell the WHOLE story when making statements about ingredients in products you know nothing about. I do not claim to be an expert, but I HAVE spent THOUSANDS OF HOURS researching the ingredients in MELALEUCA'S PRODUCTS.
=======================
There you go being rude again. You won't hear me berating your thousands of hours of research. I commend you for researching your product. It's just unfortunate that the research you did was biased, and misleading.
Brenda, again:
==================
As for the ferrous fumarate, it is one of the most stable, least toxic and easily assimilable salts of iron. Melaleuca's formulation is the result of years of research by top scientists.
==================
Yeah, it's better than an inorganic ester of iron like Sulfate. But again, i'll refer you to Salus Haus and their Ferrous Gluconate called Floradix. Fumarate can be constipating. Floradix sure isn't.
Oh Brenda,
==========================
I'm not going into the details of Melaleuca's patented process of Fuctose Compounding, which allows nutrients to more easily be absorbed in the bloodstream and delivered to cells, and thus, to tissues, organs, and the rest of the body. And I won't go into Melaleuca's unique timed-release technology that insures that your body gets what it needs WHEN it needs it, which prevents overdosing and underdosing. However, the use of PARTICULAR ingredients in this product are formulated in the safest, most bioavilable way.
===========================
Sure, Melaleuca patented an UNPROVEN technology called Fructose compounding. The research was 'supposedly' done my a Dr. Marcus Cobb? Funny thing is that you can't find any information on these studies. In fact, I found a source that claimed to have contacted Dr. Cobb at Ohio State University, and he denied having ever being involved in this process. When you can show me UNBIASED, THIRD PARTY testing, and studies then I will submit to the superiority of your claims. I admit that it's an interesting theory, but until PUBLIC studies, and INDEPENDANT studies come to light on this technology, that's all it is, theory. Right now it's a nice marketing tool for Melaleuca to say, "Hey, look! We have a patented technology that is super absorbable, and no one else has it! Buy our crap instead! Calcium Carbonate and all!"
Brenda:
=====================
Melaleuca's formulas are the result of years and years of scientific research by top scientists, and provide the most balanced and bioavailable product available.
====================
Years of studies performed, and funded by Melaleuca maybe.
Brenda is rude again:
====================
YOUR opinion means nothing. You have repeatedly shown your ignorance in your post. Get the facts before posting in a public forum.
====================
I hope I satisfied your request for facts. Have a good day Brenda. I would never wish you ill will.