" BBB" Reason for Decision
Customer: Shadow Farrell
Business (es): MGA Roofing, LLC
Arbitration No, : 7689356
Date: May 20, 2009
Note to arbitrators: Please cite the testimony and evidence that support your decision.
The photos furnished by me roofer indicated that a roof replacement needed to be done if not when it was done, but in the near future.
The work appears to be done in a proper manner. The existing leaks prior to the replacement of the roof were to be cured per the roofing company. As of this writing, a major leak exists. The roofer is unable to cure this leak. Prior to the roof
Being installed the consumer put a furnace unit in the attic causing an unusual heat loads in the attic.
This larger than normal heat load resulted in an uneven snow melt on the roof, resulting in leaks If due diligence was done by the roofer is unknown. If the roofer was aware of the attic unit and problem with heat he should have made consumer aware of this prior to the new roof and more ventilation or other remedies could have being made.
MGA disagree with BBB decision,and this is why we hire a legal representation. Customer is well aware of problem with heat being generated by the furnace in his attic, and he wants MGA to pay him over $ 2000 ,so he can move his furnace back to his closet in his house, since house has no basement. Farrell only experiencing problem with his roof when ice dam builds-up on it . No roofing company can guaranty against ice dams leaks !!!
Mr Farrell you can call me what you want, I do stand by my company work and we take care of our problems ,as we have being for all this years. But I will not allow you or any one else to take advantage of me and my company!!!!!!!!
This is NOT about $ 2000 you trying to still from me, but about wright and wrong, and this is why I decided to have legal representation and I will take this matter to the highest Court I'm allowed.