Aside from all of the random interjection of mrsmomma's detached opinion and speculation along with Katina's comments, the core root of the issues remain the same. Katina Morrow sold me a lame horse and documents, emails, and data can easily prove her statements false. Unsure why mrsmommalady chooses to hide behind an alias, somewhat ironic when trying to speak on "credibility". And if time were taken to read details, one would clearly see that some people had not been informed that a format such as ripoff reports existed until recently to warn others.
mrsmommas attempt to reason through issues is nearly impossible since this individual is not directly involved and cannot interject anything but comments based on inaccurate assumptions about underlying facts, and an acute lack of understanding about codified law, in conjunction with the intracacies of veterinary medicine, when the issue is between two parties and I have a plethora of documentation proving Katina's statements false.
Mrsmomma may have tried to portray a different angle, however it seems as though she may not comprehend the implications and effect of how her approach and misguided opinion, and attempts to overrule liscensed veterinary diagnosis, which she tries to make into fact have actually helped paint a more solid structure for each valid complaint.
For example when mrs.m tries to justify why a young horse would have collapsed cartilege, she points out that breeding is horrible today. REALLY? Then mrs.m can blame Katina for that one, because Katina stated that she brought that horse into the world as offspring from her stud, Bay Boy's Raven. Moreover, how a horse is used and cared for has a larger part to play in the breakdown of tissue. Katina clearly stated that they used that horse for extensive trail riding out west and when they rode they rode for hours at a time, and went on to include she had used her with cattle.
In addition, perhaps mrs.m and Katina should look into how the state would recognize her sales, and make sure ALL details of all transactions are fully disclosed, and further understand how transactions are viewed and how express and implied warranty are recognized and how they were in fact given. First and foremost, Katina was using various forms of advertising including the internet to offer services and animals for sale on her property. Just because a sale is on her property does not mean it is private, and may be recognized as a business sale. The fact that she engages in multiple sales and used an electronic venue to offer animals for sale for long periods of time allows the state to recognize her as a vendor in the business of selling horses. Farmers are tax exempt, however Katina's sales have not been isolated to farmers. Sorry to disappoint, but in a horse sale, express and implied warranty are part of each transaction, which extend to protecting the consumer their decision to buy. Katina gave an express warranty that the mare was fit for such purpose as I intended, and falsely represented and warranted that the horse was of such quality and health for my intended purpose. And each time Katina gave a one liner response when confronted with the lameness issue, is also another stated express warranty given that the horse was fine.........Moreso, the receipt is also a contract recognized by law. There is ten years available for a contract to be rescinded. In addition, the tax code also states that " Any individual in the business of breeding for the purpose of selling falls into the category of Animal Production. Accordingly, after an animal is bred for the purpose of selling, title of tangible personal property is transferred. This consititutes an Ohio taxable sale. As a result you are required to register as a vendor, collect the proper amount of sales tax, timely file tax returns with payment of tax collected, and maintain complete records of transactions." If Katina is hauling animals for sale out of state, perhaps she should check into a transient or delivery vendor's liscense.
And no, it is not my fault that I was sold a lame horse that I was responsible enough to see that it needed veterinary intervention. That's what responsible people do...they see to it that their horse gets the care it needs. I had to stop the loss and mitigate my continual maintenance of the horse by finding alternate care for the poor animal. That also is what responsible people do. Mrsmomma tries to commend katina for trying to self vet her horses. Katina's vet is less than 10 minutes from her location, if she is using the one she has claimed she has been using. There's not a need for her to self vet, unless she is stingy with spending money on the health of her horses. Furthermore, unsure how mrs.m has suddenly become qualified to override the diagnosis and analysis of licensed veterinarians on my horse's conditions, including one specialized in equine orthopedics. Diagnosis across the board had veterinarians concurring that the horse's pastern soreness on the pigeon toed leg was due to excessive WEAR AND TEAR OVER TIME...AND HAD BEEN GOING ON FOR A LENGTHY AMOUNT OF TIME BEFORE MY PURCHASE TO HAVE BONE AND TISSUE WORN DOWN LIKE IT WAS.....Responsible people seek more than one opinion on serious diagnosis, whether human or animal. Furthermore, I find it more amusing that mrs.m. tries to portray herself as "savvy" while making comments about the horse's EPM condition when three vets also concurred that the degree of the horse's syptoms (also on dated video in correlation with vet assessments) portrayed MID STAGE EPM. It takes quite a long time for a horse to manifest neurological problems such that horse did, from the time EPM is contracted. And discovery of this issue was immediately after the purchase.
More amusing is mrs.m's approach to questioning why anyone would care where Katina stored hay. "Savvy" horse people care about hay storage and horse living conditions because unfavorable hay storage can lead to moldy or contaminated hay which would be detrimental to horse health, as well as living conditions. Such as living outside in all forms of weather with no protection available. Loved how mrs.m tried to draw a parallel with horses living in wild with no shelter to a domestic horse kept in someone's back lot in Ohio. Difference being, wild horses have the ability to move in groups, huddle, and move to tree lines or different ground levels for protection...horses that are kept in square pens on someone's back lot in all kinds of weather are not afforded the luxuries of a wild horse.
Mrs.m's attempt to discredit the horse's threshold to lameness from a typographical error of 10 minutes to 20 (and as one can see, mrs.m's exchange was not free of typo mistakes either) minutes really sounded more like an act of desperation and nitpicking, when the crux of the issue is that the horse should not have been lame in any amount of time, period. 1 and 2 are in close proximity on keyboards, and futhermore, I think mrs. m has just proven herself officially irrelevant after that one.
And what kind of sense is mrs m. making when she tries to draw a parallel with how things are done at the "local university" and having students do a vet's work? Don't know where this person is from, but you cannot draw the same conculsions for how veterinary medicine is handled everywhere else....Sorry to disappoint, but under penalty of law, only liscensed vets around Ohio are able to perform surgical procedures such as you describe. I am sure federal law extends to how universities operate and each university has a legal risk department. I guantee you that no respectable university is going to allow for such risk to animals without the proper supervision of a qualified veterinarian. I'm sure that mrs m. doesn't realiize by saying this, she is putting that local university under scrutiny , and I am sure that she also does not realize that making a blanket statement about savvy horse people being able to make a diagnosis without a vet has really painted a clearer picture of her mentality.
To reply to mrs. m's question regarding how I was buying that horse when I was limited to riding in snow drifts....specifically "Why pray tell, did you buy that horse under that kind of inspection? WELL, MRS. M...BECAUSE YOUR WONDERFUL FRIEND KATINA MORROW MADE A WARRANTY THAT THE HORSE WAS SOUND, AND NEVER HAD ANY HEALTH PROBLEMS. SILLY ME....I BELIEVED HER....I think the more prudent question would be...Why, pray tell was Katina Morrow choosing to limit my riding and trying out to only snow drifts?
And mrs. m. states she thinks it's lovely that I would offer to get rid of a mare causing problems with a pony and not allowing it to settle in? if mrs.momma is a momma, and has a mothering bone in her body, she would understand that heck yes, my daughter's feelings for her new pony was a heck of a lot more important than any other horse that may not be a good match for the pony. Furthermore, if mrs. m has such disdain for people's decsions to sell a horse that has been on thieir property a week, then she should at least be consistent with those feelings and extend them to people such as katina who pick up a horse and slap an ad for them on the internet to turn around and sell.
Katina lied again...surprise suprise suprise.... when she recently tried so redeem herself as credible because she said she saw the pony otherwise how would she know? Right...LOL....my barn was Empty when she brought the mare. The pony was to be arriving the following week and guess what...I have the check and receipt and dated home video of the pony being delivered 8 days after the mare. And no, sorry to disappoint but the horse's medical conditions were from no injury sustained on my property, as they were not turned out together. Again, verifiable.
It's really also irrelevant for mrs. m to try to disclaim to mrs. camacho's transaction and the bit story. From what mrs. camacho said...katina agreed to providing a certain other bit or equipment that she promised to send then defaulted on. That is the crux of the issue.
Loved how mrs. m chose to skirt around my prior gelding story and fail to recognize how I clearly laid out the verifiable details of how Katina morphed that story into a spun web of deceit. REALLY? MRS. M? YOU DONT' SEE HOW THERE WERE LIES INVOLVED FROM WHAT I EXPLAINED? Katina stated I said I told a story to her about that gelding and it was sick and lame and its' owners didn't tell me the truth about it and I had to give it away? LOL! I have the emails and correspondence where Katina was trying to look up his bloodlines and have me send photos of him and putting the word out that I had a handsome gelding for sale. That, my dear is called LYING. Again, provable evidence. And especially love the spin that mrs. m tacks on that I sold the horse because I was not comfortable handling....and if you READ it was my husbands horse and did not really like him therefore we sold him. For the record, I've handled and ridden plenty of hot horses and I was the only one who COULD ride him and do anything with him around this place. Loved the attempted spin though...dynamite.
Loved Katina's recent reply also claiming that anyone who has these complaints about the horse dealings should grow up and deal with grown up decisions and that she had been sold bad horses also and never complained. What did she do with them? SELL them? As far as nasty comments, if facts seem nasty and evidence seems nasty, then that is her doing. Katina should speak well of her enemies, because after all she made them. Everything that she deals with is golden, and she makes no mistakes...right? Pre-transaction and post-transaction behavior of a seller who has remained in the same trade are very telling....in addition, good sellers have every incentive to do the right thing and do good to promote good will and professionalism. Mrs. Morrow by her examples, may have failed. She never once offered money back to me, only to re-sell the horse. She can verbally say what she wants but Email exchanges prove it, and also prove her lack of professionalism along the way. I too know many horse and animal people who view this as amazing and typical behavior of a seller unloading a horse with problems. There are 20 ways to tell a story but the one that matters is the one that's the truth. Fact remains fact.