FAKE Psychic:Jan Windglows;hurt me; called my boyfriend-told about spell request; does not answer calls;I also did not recieve photo of spells

This is my last and Final Response to Celeste Morgan's Slanderous ALLEGATIONS or ACTUATIONS against Jan and Myself as I don't wish to keep wasting the Viewers or our time any longer responding back and over and over to Celeste Morgan's or Mary T. Prantil false allegations and or others in her camp. In the past I have conveyed to the Public with the utmost clarity as to what my relationship has been to these three Individuals and what has transpired between us all up on this site.

Celeste's last posting had some inconsistencies that I felt needed to be addressed as she's still trying to deceive the Public in light of what I've read. Again, This is my final statement in clarifying these false statements made on her part. I just don't have the time to keep repeating my same statements over and over again. If Celeste or others want to keep posting, then this is their prerogative, however I just refuse to reply to their
dubious allegations and or conjectures any longer.

Celeste has stated that I've painted her in a negative light and that my facts and or statements about her aren't true, however I can assure you that my statements are pure fact and zero percent fiction. My statements are NOT coming from a heart broken soon to be ex-husband more so then their originating from someone with a great sense of relief who has moreover been freed from a very long and emotionally abusive relationship with Celeste Morgan, ( "Lady Dragoness" ) to which all most cost me my life in the way of a nervous break down and heart problems.

Celeste has done everything within her power to not only interfere with my present life circumstances with Jan, but has also attempted to defame and verbally attack a completely innocent business and the personal lives of Jan and myself as a direct result of her not accepting personal responsibility for her part in the failure of our marriage and or her part contributed to that failure of this same union. Celeste has written and taken part in this conspiracy to avenge not only her own hurt feelings against Jan and her Company but by further enlisting the support of less then desirable persons mainly speaking in regards to Mary T. Prantil AKA "Honest Person" etc.who has posted any and every kind of false and harmful statement that she could against us on this site until we started posting Mary T. Prantil's criminal records that clearly show Prantil to be guilty of the same things that she has falsely accused us of.This conflict started as a result of Cahill's copyright infringement issue with my site of Dragon Spells.

Celeste saw this as a perfect opportunity to cause conflict to Jan Windglows and her site of Blood Love And Lust Spells.She not only carried this out through her ill fated legal advice to Mike Cahill ( by means of her "Black's Law Dictionary" lol ) to which all most cost him $700,000 a night in fines, but did in fact almost cost him his freedom, as the violation of Copyright Infringement is a Felony Offense punishable by no less than Five years in a Federal Prison if convicted. My Legal Firm served Mike Cahill with a "cease and desist" letter, legally ordering him to take my written material off of his web site, which he did- otherwise I would have had him convicted in a Federal Court Of Law thereby having him sentenced accordingly thus Cahill would have in fact been sent to a Federal Prison had he not removed my Copyrighted material from his web site.

Celeste Morgan also chose to engage the services of Mary Prantil to do her dirty work for her while eventually and personally posting her own highly negative comments against Jan's and my Sites not to mention our personal characters,to which she knows nothing about. Celeste's and Prantil's statements were geared to cause great financial loss to Miss Windglows and her site as is reflected in their postings.Celeste feels that Jan some how had stolen me away from her and caused our marriage to fail, when the fact of the matter concerning the failed marriage was in existence many years before Miss Windglows and I met,

which in fact is another clear indication of Celeste not wanting to admit her shortcomings and mistakes that caused the marriage to fail, however instead of admitting to her abusive, hateful, chaotic behavior that in fact did eventually lead to my leaving her, but targeted Miss Windglows as the reason why her relationship with me failed when in fact Miss Windglows had nothing to do with my failed relationship with Celeste Morgan to begin with. Again, Celeste had failed to take responsibility for her own mistakes during the marriage and then tried to place this responsibility or blame on anyone she could other then herself. Celeste primarily vented her anger at Jan who really had nothing to do with anything concerning my failed marriage to Celeste Morgan. Celeste directed her hatred at us while using anyone she could to accomplish her goals however I'm happy to say that these efforts on her part were and ARE a complete failure.

After I had resolved the copyright issue via legal remedy against Cahill and disproved all of Prantil's insane accusations not to mention showing everyone what a Criminal she is and what she was trying to do, I now find myself authoring yet another long posting to illustrate the inconsistencies of yet another one of Celeste Morgan's postings. A lot of you reading this are more then likely asking yourselves why is he taking the time to sit down to write these rather long and winded rebuttals and why should we even care? It's true that these rebuttals are long and some what winded but I feel it important to present a true and correct version of the whole story to the Public but more importantly to confront these deceptive people making all this lunacy up.

My personal goal here is not in defaming a given site or obtaining and exacting any kind of revenge toward a particular site. It's not in obtaining any sort of revenue by speaking badly of another site for gain as frankly Jan does enough business all ready and I'm retired, so there's no need for any of this even if it were in our personalities to carry out this kind of negative behavior. However, it is in presenting the cold hard facts of both deeds performed and exposing false statements made against the innocent. As you the reader move over these following paragraphs below it will become very apparent to you who is telling the truth here and what the motives of these certain Individuals would be .

Please be sure to read over everything very carefully before making your decision either for or against us or the ones in question attacking us. Below you will observe the names of Celeste Morgan and James Morgan at the beginning of each statement. This is of course what she is stating and what I am conveying as my points of interest. At the end of Celeste Morgan's statements you will notice a link to another page on this site that does in fact show inconsistencies and contradictions in what Celeste Morgan is stating currently as fact.

The primary statements of Celeste Morgan currently would be in the way that she wishes Jan and I " all the best", and that she would never do anything to harm Jan's business. Celeste goes on to state that she never had anything to do with, nor does she personally know a person by the name of Mary Prantil AKA "Honest Person." And she would NEVER LIE to the Public etc.And still yet, Celeste is charging me with raging against Mike Cahill via slanderous statements and moreover says that I'm stating false facts against all of them here blah blah blah. I will prove beyond a reasonable doubt all these statements on Celeste Morgan's part to be fictitious and dubious at best,

and thereof exposing the Plot against Jan and myself by Celeste Morgan and others. Why should you the Viewer care about this case ?. You should care because this case involves and exposes rogue spell casters who have gone nuts out of Greed. Jealousy and Pride. Who present themselves as something they're not. Who will do anything to bring down a reputable site and moreover ruin the lives of two innocent people. So please care and take the time to read this completely and be sure to cross reference the links included that back up and prove who is actually making false statements here.

CELESTE MORGAN : "Yes it is true I have emailed this woman several times and told her not to involve me in her and Jim and Janhett's problems- I have never spoke to this woman, did work for her, or intend to do anything connected with her, as I have stated here before." http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

JAMES MORGAN: Below is a few email headers from Mary Prantil AKA "Honest Person", CC to both Celeste and myself committing attempted Black Mail and Extortion against me personally. She is clearly acting out on this in
Celeste's behalf. Prantil's goal here is to apparently scare me into leaving Celeste Morgan my home of 14 years in a divorce property settlement in exchange for her not turning me in for alleged tax evasion etc. There Is NO tax evasion on my part and I can prove this. It would seem that Prantil and Celeste are better friends then Celeste has portrayed above in her statement above. Celeste is also lying in the way that her Daughter did in fact perform magical work for Prantil and that Celeste had counseled and or had spoken to Mary Prantil over the phone on occasions, of which I have copies of e-mails to prove this also.To further support this relationship other Prantil statements can be found

on this site of rip off reports under "Honest Person" AKA "Enforcer Of Justice" AKA "Marc" AKA "Enforcer Of Truth" etc. to which is actually Mary Prantil defending Celeste Morgan & Mike Cahill and further stating that Celeste is beautiful while calling Jan Windglows fat and ugly to which is definitely Not The Case. Please view Mary T. Prantil's Criminal Record at :

http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/294/RipOff0294295.htm. You can also find
more statements by Prantil by typing in the key words of dragon spells. blood love and lust spells or just type in Jan Windglows and or James Morgan and this will bring it up for you.

From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
cc morgan_celeste@yahoo.com
Sent: 12/13/2007 5:57:31 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
Subject: Advice - Leave Celeste Morgan the house to avoid Tax Evasion

From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
cc morgan_celeste@yahoo.com
Sent: 12/14/2007 6:45:43 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
Subject: Give CELESTE the house - report your tax earnings

From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
cc morgan_celeste@yahoo.com
Jim, The FCC is involved and is aware of your perjury on Ripoff Report.com.
I never denied being Honest Person or Enforcer of truth. I filed honest
reports on Ripoff Report .com

CELESTE MORGAN : "Jim will slander and discredit good and honest people just for trying to defend his jealous and out-raged attacks, where is your professionalism you once had when you started Dragon Spells years ago?"
http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

JAMES MORGAN: Who are you defending here Celeste ?. Prantil or Cahill or perhaps both ?. Good & Honest People YOU SAY ?. Your kidding Right ?. I'm going to post this one more time so you can get it through your thick skull Celeste. This was Cahill's warning from MSN to which he didn't listen to it because of your bad legal advice that caused him to eventually to lose his msn site of Angelic Seals at http://communities.msn.com/angelicseals Not to

mention causing him to all most lose his site of : www.magicangelspells.com through a law suit and so fourth. If your referring to Mary as a GOOD and Honest Person then your a bigger idiot then I thought you were in the first
place lol. Please view Mary T. Prantil's Criminal Record at : http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/294/RipOff0294295.htm. Mike Cahill's warning and site disable letters from MSN following immediately below.

SRX1047180129ID - MSN Groups Warning - Action Required (Angelic Seals)? From: Microsoft Customer Support (GRUPS.FREE.WW.00.EN.SYK.MNL.AU.T01.SPT.00.EM@css.one.microsoft.com) Sent: Mon 10/15/07 11:27 PM To: Archer926@msn.com Hello Managers, We have found materials involving Copyright Infringement in your Group, Angelic Seals. Please refer to the following links for reference: Please remove these materials and any other images, messages or links in your Group that violate the MSN Groups Code of Conduct within 48 hours.Violations include, but are not limited to, nudity, partial nudity, pornography, harassment, and illegal or offensive behavior.

For a complete description of content that is not allowed on MSN Groups, please visit our Code of Conduct at: http://groups.msn.com/conduct If you remove all violating content, your Group will again be in accordance with the MSN Groups Code of Conduct, and will remain accessible for your use. Otherwise, we will be forced to close down your Group.

Thank you for helping MSN Groups provide a friendly and safe experience for all of our customers. Sincerely, MSN Groups Customer Support RE: SRX1047214752ID - URGENT PLEASE READ? From: Microsoft Customer Support (GRUPS.FREE.WW.00.EN.SYK.MNL.AU.T01.SPT.00.EM@css.one.microsoft.com Sent: Wed 10/17/07 7:50 AM To: james morgan (wizardmorgan2@hotmail.com)

Hello James, Thank you for writing back to MSN Groups. We appreciate your effort in informing us about the inappropriate activity at the "angelicseals" Group. We are pleased to inform you that the Group "angelicseals" has already been disabled for non-compliance of our warning regarding the copyright infringement you reported to us.We want your MSN Groups experience to be positive and we will do our best to restrain illegal behavior. We appreciate your continued support as we strive to provide you with the highest quality service available. Thank you for using MSN Groups. Sincerely, Jeffrey MSN Groups Customer Support.

JAMES MORGAN : The following statements below will show Celeste Morgan's intentions that are specifically directed to Defame the good names of both of our sites and personal characters. Celeste Morgan's forth coming statements are clearly and maliciously intended to Mislead. Misinform. Distort. Lead. Defame and Slander our professional sites and personal characters on the open air ways in her efforts to destroy our personal names and reputations as you the reader can see. These statements will also show connection and motive on the parts of Celeste Ann Morgan. Stanley Michael Cahill and Mary T. Prantil in the way of attempting to cause Jan and I physical stress and financial loss through their combined and consorted efforts,

so please be sure to follow the links provided as this will present the full conversation coming from all sides. Just to give you the Reader a Update: Celeste A. Morgan was served twice with a dissolution of marriage law suit papers. The first legal team was a little tame with her and was fired as a result however the second Firm hired was just what I was looking for in the way of being a more aggressive law firm.The second law suit served on Celeste Morgan has and will force her to answer for all of her past statements and deeds performed against Philip Dee Mollenhour. Janhett T. Windglows, and myself over the last year and five years back. Celeste had asked me to "bring it on", and I did lol. Celeste will also be served with other law suits dealing with her statements up here as well.Mike Cahill was legally Forced to remove EIGHT PAGES off of his 14 page web site of www.magicangelspells.com as these eight pages were copyrighted material under the copyright of James R. Morgan ll,

and the former Dragon Spells LLC found at http://communities.msn.com/dragonspells. Had Mr. Cahill not removed these pages from his site and maintained his listening to Celeste's advice then he would have been subjugated to paying out Huge fines to the tune of $ 700,000, to $800,000 a night per his infractions and would have faced no less then five years and no more then ten years in a federal prison had he been convicted of these charges.

He would have been convicted as his criminal offense was witnessed by hundreds of thousands of people on the net. The Attorney General's Office. The Law Firm that I employed and so on, lol. After Cahill was forced to remove these pages from his sites Celeste Morgan voluntarily removed a page of mine that she had copied and pasted on her site from Dragon called What Is Magick. Mary T. Prantil has been exposed in the way of her Criminal Records posted up on this site and others plus through her and connection to Celeste Morgan and Mike Cahill. Below is a recent email that I received from Stanley Michael Cahill of

www.magicangelspells.com admitting that he is still working for Mary Prantil and that Celeste had been communicating with her up to a point at least as seen below. Mary T. Prantil's Criminal Records have been turned into the very County. State and Federal Agencies that she had turned Jan and myself into regarding her false police reports of tax evasion etc.I would imagine that it's only a matter of time before they pick her up for something pertaining to not only this situation but concerning her past infractions of the law. Two out of the three will have further law suits filed on them in the very near future for the record. Cahill's Recent Email following immediately below.

Wizardmorgan2@aol.com wrote: You had called my phone a minute ago Mike. What can I do for you. Your not blocked so write your reply back here.

From: archery926@yahoo.com
To: Wizardmorgan2@aol.com
Sent: 12/27/2007 4:42:50 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
Subj: Re: You had called my phone
In a message dated 12/27/2007 4:42:50 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
archery926@yahoo.com writes:

hope jan, phil and you had a great holiday and happy new year to you - i was just concerned as your e mail i'm going away seemed a little strange and i wanted to make sure your ok and to explain about mary and her games - she
ignores me when i chew her out and tell her to stop bothering you and then sher cc's everything to me and celeste like we are part of it - lesty blocked her because lesty doesn't even know her period nor does she want to after what --- had to say about her etc. - if you need to talk i'm always here - sorry i won't bother you againsincerely mike

JAMES MORGAN : Below are the links that will clearly show Celeste Morgan's conflicting statements concerning what she had said in the past and what she's now saying . Notice how Celeste Morgan is quoting law from her OUTDATED "Black's Law" legal dictionary regarding copyright and slander liable laws, then view the out come of her bad legal advice above as previously mentioned above in copyright infringement. Notice her definition of Slander, and then look through her past and current statements below and this should pretty much show you who the Slanderous person is here.

Notice how she's speaking for not only herself here but for others when she says ("Bring It on") in the third link below. Notice how she has very little if any regard pertaining to others in this matter. In short. As long as she can use others and can get them to do her dirty work for her, then she has no problems in throwing them to the wolves in the end when others she has used to accomplish her dirty work for her no longer prove to be useful. In the fourth link Celeste is stating that she has told nothing but the truth and that everything she's said in rebuttal against my charges is nothing but fact. As you can see in her statements above they are clearly not facts but attempts to guard or protect someone that was in the wrong being Mike Cahill, and Mary T. Prantil. Please see Link five and how she's speaking in regards to slander suits
coming back on me as a result of my statements made against Prantil and Cahill. What Slander I ask you ?.

The proof is posted above. Stanley Michael Cahill was guilty of 8 counts of copyright infringement. Mike Cahill was a previous Client of mine approximately five years ago, that didn't listen to advice and as a result his case failed. Mike Cahill used to call me up asking advice about all his relationships to which happened to be with what I consider to be Prostitutes on crack cocaine. Mike Cahill didn't complete his magical lessons with me and quit the course I offered after two or three days of study under my instruction. Mike Cahill is a Low magick Practioner as a result of not finishing his lessons with me. Cahill stated to me that he learned his magical art off of the Internet

( which I find very humorous ) in light of the fact that the Internet is full of magical mis - information. Stanley Michael Cahill spoke badly of me to Clients to which I referred to him. That moreover Cahill begged me to send him because his business was doing poorly. Cahill did in fact start working for this Client that Jan Windglows had dropped her after countless warnings against her violent and numerous infractions of misconduct against us and others in her spell situation. This client was Mary T. Prantil that had hired Cahill. She received his contact information off one of Jan's referral slips before

Prantil's case was actually terminated by Jan. It's funny because Cahill was asked if he wanted to handle this problem Client before hand but rejected her because as he said: ( "I have enough insane clients and I don't need anymore"). Also this particular case wasn't paying him enough to take on from what I had understood from him as stated in his previous emails to me.. Cahill and Celeste Morgan used this person of Mary Prantil to eventually slam us in every possible negative and untruthful way on this site of Rip Off Reports. After all she was a disgruntled client and was more then willing after having her case terminated by Jan. Prantil found a new friend in Cahill who was in turn close to Celeste and there's the connection,motive, and intent. So,

What's not factual about these statements I ask you, Celeste? Incidentally Celeste, Cahill is YOUR friend and not mine. Again, Please let me remind you the Reader that Cahill's recent email to me is stating that he warned Mary Prantil not to play her head games as mentioned above at the starting of this rebuttal. In link six the Viewer can see where Mary T. Prantil is actually working with Cahill while stating that he is the best thing that ever happened to her. Link seven Celeste states that I seem to have all the facts against Prantil however I am in some way performing a criminal act by exposing these three people. Link 8 Celeste Morgan is stating that I will lie and do anything to get people to believe me. Or I will say anything to harm another's reputation and so fourth.

Let's talk about you Celeste. I stated fact when I said that you and Mike are low grade magick sites due to your lack of magical knowledge. Fact. You have very little to no high magical knowledge other then what I left behind text wise to which wasn't very much. Fact. You have performed death spells on Jan and love spells on myself to which didn't work. Fact. Your site was started up and financed by myself in order to give you gainful employment to which you have abused.

Fact.You were the manager of Dragon Spells LLC and bailed on me because you wanted to see everything go to sh_t because you forced me to leave you with your unbridled, rageful, and chaotic behavior which did not give me a second's peace. When I left, you couldn't deal with it and this was the way you took your revenge. I can prove it all Celeste. What can you prove? Let's look at Mary Prantil, Celeste. You stated that you did not know her in the beginning of your postings regarding your reply's back to "Honest Person". You're obviously lying when you say that you don't know her as in your first statements because you turn around and in the same breath state in your current posting that you e-mailed Prantil back and fourth several times, and that you've had numerous e-mail communications with her on a regular basis ,

as can be seen at the beginning of this posting. You say that you never spoke to her however this is obviously not true either- as your daughter who was counseling Prantil was sharing her cell phone with you at the time Celeste. When Mary Prantil would call your daughter's cell phone anywhere from ten to fifteen times per day on occasion and since your daughter and yourself were sharing the same cell phone at times, of course you would have had to answer calls from Prantil. How could you NOT? I have e-mails in their entirety to prove that your daughter did magical spell-

work, PLUS telephone and e-mail counseling with Mary Prantil.Prantil made numerous postings referring to you and Cahill being good people etc. Prantil has proven herself to be a Liar. Black Mailer and Extortionist in your behalf while attempting to get me to leave you my home in a property settlement. All this is posted so What Haven't I proven so far ?. I've proven that all of you are Dirt Bags and that Prantil like yourself is mentally unstable with a side order of criminal intent. Again, Viewer please pay close attention to the links below as they will prove my point further.

(1)-CELESTE MORGAN : As for Copy wright infringement...when Jim dissolved his company back in March of this year, that voided the Copywrights he held, which by the way he did not own, he owned the company; Dragon Spells LLC
owned the Copywrights-one can't infringe on something that is no longer valid...sorry Jim. ,http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/280/RipOff0280918.htm#267279

(2)-CELESTE MORGAN : As for a slander suit that is suppose to be filed or put against Mike and/or any others, according to the Blacks Law dictionary slander is only the case if it is meant to defame one's reputation by use of words which would affect one's means of livelihood, community standing, office, trade or business...this can be done by speaking false and malicious words concerning another, etc.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/280/RipOff0280918.htm#267279

(3-CELESTE MORGAN: You want to take the whole world to court, then bring it on, I have now and never have had anything to hide, as well as others... http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

(4)-CELESTE MORGAN: at this point I have only stated facts about the accussations you made about our freind, Mike Cahill, that is all I did. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

(5)-Celeste MORGAN: Jim if I were you I would be careful, because Slander suits can work both ways, and I am not just addressing Jim Morgan/Janhett Windglows. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/280/RipOff0280918.htm#267279

(6)-MARY T PRANTIL: Jim Morgan is a complete liar about Mike Cahill. Jim Morgan is committing slander about Mike Cahill. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/280/RipOff0280918.htm#266417

(7)-CELESTE MORGAN: Please don't talk about the other criminal attacks others make Jim, even though you have a good point and facts it appears to back up what you are stating,http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

(8)-CELESTE MORGAN : if he can't report the truth his paranoid mind will make it up and try to get others to believe him...you call yourself a man of God http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

JAMES MORGAN: Ok, Let's move on to Celeste Morgan's statements below. Firstly she states that she has no intentions or desire to interfere with the lives of James Morgan and Jan Windglows however she has done nothing but interfere with our lives concerning her unlawful court actions against myself and or useing the system for her gain and in her negative postings against Jan Windglows and myself up here on rip off reports. Celeste has not accepted the changing situation in our lives and continues to Defame our personal and site names as can be viewed in her links below.

Tell me Celeste, Who exactly are you making these charges against in these previous postings of yours? I wonder because you not only mention Jan and myself but our sites solely in your rebuttals but no other magick web sites in a derogatory way. So, everything negative that your saying is attached to us without you actually saying or speaking our site name etc. This is leading and suggestive speech geared to defame in a indirect way.

Then you go on to speak in such a way to insinuate that we were the ones that acted in a less then professional way concerning this particular Client Mary Prantil AKA "Honest Person".The same "Honest Person" to whom you were responding back to in your defamatory postings that you said that you didn't know, when obviously you knew Prantil all along- through Mike Cahill ( your VERY good and CLOSE
friend, LOL. ) Moreover after you were finished trashing and or making your accusations against whomever, you start plugging Cahill and your sites in a positive light, while plugging our web sites in a negative light. What's this about? And lastly your proclaiming to ( "Know How It All Works" ) along with Stanley Michael Cahill. How Does it All Work Celeste? Please tell us all as I'm sure many would love to hear your so called "magical wisdom's", LOL.

Celeste states that she isn't out to defame or slander our sites and still yet states everything she says is factual information however if you read down on the links you can view her statements against my personal character in the way that I'm not the professional man that I used to be and so on. My question would be : How would you know this Celeste? You haven't been around me in over a year. How exactly would you know about anything Jan and myself do as we don't tell you anything about Jan's business or our personal lives for that matter.

Celeste's other statements are : That I (Jim ) don't have anymore to offer to the public because I have some how fallen from Divine grace. She further states or implies that she wouldn't go to anyone who likes to hurt people and so fourth. Are you speaking in regards to Jan and I, Celeste, or someone else? Please clarify your statements here or we will assume that your speaking in regards to us and our sites. By the way Celeste , who ever said that I was a God? I never implied this to anyone nor have I ever led or suggested this to anyone at any time in my entire life. Where are you getting THIS from?

I SERVE DIVINITY period, unlike you. You serve yourself and have made the physical world and money your God. You will be judged according to your level of involvement in everything that has transpired on and off the net and moreover to your degree of sin. Who do you think your Fuc_ing with here? Your actually defaming Divinity and Their Work with your SLANDERIOUS words. Your the one who is Shamed here, so take responsibility for your own negative actions against Divinity and other innocent people that got caught in your web of chaos, hatred, jealousy, and lies. I am not a

God, however I AM a Messenger of Divinity.Therefore, please allow me to give you this message: What your 'e doing up here on this site and moreover what you've caused others to do around you hasn't gone un - noticed by Divinity. Divinity's Court has all ready judged you for all your deeds, actions, speech, and all of your crimes against Divinity and other innocent people. Soon you will be judged by the Public and the Courts of this land. You and your friends through your treacherous statements up here and actions in private have only caused the Lost to stray that much further from the light of Divinities teachings.

The Shame is yours forever, Celeste....YOU OWN IT. This is the most unforgivable Sin that one could ever commit here upon this earth. If your implying that we hurt or mislead people to which I think you are, then please just let me just say that this is simply untrue and not the case. You are the enemy of The Faith and further are leading the lost into oblivion with your speech and actions. You have become the False Prophet; so get out of my face. What your doing is a great dis-service to both Heaven and man so come back down to earth, mother superior.So, in the links below you say that : You've chosen not to attack us ?. Is this correct ? You say this isn't the right place to do this, correct? And all you did was to present the facts. Is this correct? You further state that you have accepted Jan and I being together and that you've moved on with your life. We have your "blessing" as is stated in links 1, 2, and 3.

You have attacked us daily without stopping while saying every Negative. Hurtful and despicable thing that you could come up with against us, exactly as Mary T. Prantil has done in her postings up here. Also, Your still talking sh_t as my charges have been proven against Cahill. I will up load the cease and desist letter and court action here on rip off report for all the world to read if you like. Your stating that you have presented nothing but Facts however anyone can see that your statements and postings are anything but the facts as all can clearly seen. Lastly, We don't need your fuc_ing blessings OK ? Your A Monster and a Fake so again. Get out of my face you little punk. Your definitely NO ONE and mean NOTHING to us so why would we be looking for YOUR "blessings" ?.

Readers, please read Celeste's statements below, then go to the links included with each of her statements that will prove the complete opposite of what Celeste is stating here and how her statements in these following links contradict everything Celeste has stated below.

(1)- CELESTE MORGAN: I have chosen not to attack you or Janhett, as this is not the place to do this, and at this point I have only stated facts about the accusations you made about our friend, Mike Cahill, that is all I did. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

(2)-CELESTE MORGAN: I have no intentions or desire to interfere with your lives or businesses, you started this all remember by defaming an honest person who was just trying to do things his way, Divinities way, http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

(3)-CELESTE MORGAN: I have accepted you and Janhett are moving on together-and I have moved on as well with my life...what you two do as a couple is strictly your business, both private and personal...and I couldn't care less, in fact you both have my blessing. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

JAMES MORGAN : Let's look at links starting at link four, then working our way down to link thirteen concerning Celeste Morgan's negative statements. Remember Viewer, that this is a person who proclaims to be Spiritual person who knows what Divinity wants and how a person should conduct themselves. Moreover how magick should be performed. This is a person that says one thing on their site of www.blackandwhitemagickspellsrituals.com but then comes on a site like this while saying the exact opposite. This is the same person that states that they have moved on in life and that they would never perform anything un- ethical or unlawful against another.

This is a Individual that teaches love and peace on their site but then appears on this site slamming innocent people who tried to do nothing but help her in life in the past. The fourth link states that I didn't give these folks the opportunity to address my charges against them. Not True. They have had every available opportunity to address my charges on and off the air. Also, It would seem that Celeste is the one attempting to discredit others on the air instead of the other way around - just for the record. In links five, six, and seven, Celeste is speaking to and defending Mary T. Prantil AKA "Honest Person", AKA "Enforcer Of Justice", AKA "Enforcer Of Truth", AKA "Marc"; the person that admitted posting against us and the one that we found to have a long criminal record ETC.

In this posting by Celeste against us she is trying to drop every negative seed and or to plant considerable doubt in the Viewers minds against us. How Spiritual of her to do this for us wouldn't you say, Viewer? Celeste Morgan AKA "Lady Dragoness" AKA "Lesty" thinks we are unaware of what she's doing here, but we know better do we not, Viewers?

(4)-CELESTE MORGAN : Well it appears Jim has plenty of time to defend his
girl friend and her site He doesn't return calls when we try to defend his
accusations, as he dosen't have time to discuss anything like a rational
person or business would do...it is far better to make all attempts to
discredit others personal and professional lives on the international
airways... http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

(5)-CELESTE MORGAN'S :(A)-I feel for these people who feel thay have been mistreated, neglected, ripped off etc. from Jim and/or Janhett (B): The reason I withdrew my position at that time was I felt at the time that possible unethical or unhealthy actions, (C): I have my own Magic site, and wish to keep Magic as a good name, meant to help people through the help of Divinity. One needs to draw their own conclusion(D): If you wish to contact me I do have a Magic site, or you can contact me by wrting me at (morgan_celeste@yahoo.com)...I will give you a link to what my site says how Magic is truly suppose to be, and another site which Mike Cahill owns, as he has many of the same beliefs, (E)-I can not recommend any other site from my personal experience at this time http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm

(6)- CELESTE MORGAN : (H): Like I said, I am sorry for this person's poor experience with Magic sites, please don't compare a few sites that could be out for a quick buck, and wish or choose to ignore their responsibilty as a truly blessed spell caster of Divinity, by providing the services they agreed too: it takes patience and understanding on the spell casters part to have empathy, and be sypathetic to the plight of these individuals who come to them as their last resort, with hard earned money, and work with them, not when it is only convenient to them, http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm

(7)-CELESTE MORGAN :I know it works, one has to believe and realize that magic was and is meant to be a religion that truly helps those in need, but is not to be used just for one's own individual wants, meaning to hurt others or to curse others by unjustified means. Makes one wonder about her (their)honesty when facts are put on the public Internet, that are less than accurate and/or misleading... http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm

(8)-CELESTE MORGAN : What a shame-you had so much to offer the world and man kind working with Divinity and you turned into what you have become today-an enraged person who can't even give Divinity the respect by supporting what
true Magick is, but instead causes this 'rebuttal' to go on and on and on attacking those who go against your ways, because you have different views and can't control them any more. http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

(9)-CELESTE MORGAN : It truly saddens me to even have to write this as a man I once had much respect for has come to this of accusing others falsely, even past clients, and used name calling to get his point across...who is
truly out of control here, you make that decision http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/280/RipOff0280918.htm#267279

(10-CELESTE MORGAN : you were once such a great Wizard and were blessed with many gifts from Divinity who would have never done what you are doing today -Celeste Ann Morgan http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

(11)-CELESTE MORGAN : you are not a God! And where has your professionalism gone? http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

(12)- CELESTE MORGAN :Divinity, doing God's work? You should be ashamed of your self http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

(13)- CELESTE MORGAN : I wouldn't go to anyone who makes it his/her goal to hurt people http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

JAMES MORGAN'S IMPORTANT SPECIAL NOTE: ( IN REFERENCE TO THESE ABOVE STATEMENTS OF HOW A COMPASSIONATE SERVANT OF DIVINITY AND "GIFTED" SPELLCASTER SHOULD CONDUCT THEMSELVES, AGAIN, VIEWERS, PLEASE NOTE IN MIKE CAHILL'S RECENT E-MAIL TO ME AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS REBUTTAL CLEARLY STATING THAT CELESTE ANN MORGAN HAS MARY T. PRANTIL BLOCKED FROM HER E-MAIL

ADDRESS....WHAT A "COMPASSIONATE AND UNDERSTANDING SPELL CASTER" AND "SERVANT OF DIVINITY" CELESTE ANN MORGAN AKA "LADY DRAGONESS" OBVIOUSLY IS.......oh please.....WHAT A JOKE, LOL. ) Yes Celeste, How low will someone go to prove their point ?. This is a question you should be putting to yourself and not the Public or myself. Another question you should be asking yourself is how many more people are left for you to pull into your madness just so you can use them to do your fighting for you?. Your a absolute disgrace to the laws of fairness and Magick over all. As far as airing dirty laundry goes. Do you call defending one's self from dirt bags like you, Prantil, and Mike airing dirty laundry ?. If so, then I'm airing away, lol. As I keep saying over and over to you.

( You started this Miss Chaos Queen ) by interfering with a conflict that was going on between Cahill and myself with the copyright infringement issue. Am I suppose to sit here and let your little low life Prantil make false accusations against us and then do nothing about it in the way of defending ourselves especially when we're trying to warn the public about a imposter? ANSWER: NO I DON'T THINK SO. Are we supposed to sit back and let you come on this site while making your little false statements trying to defame us? ANSWER: I DON'T THINK SO. You started this conflict on air just like you started numerous other conflicts one right after another all through the 14 year span of time that I've known you. Your a busy body. A Gossip and a lover of Chaos.

This is why I left your ass. BECAUSE YOU LIKE STARTING TROUBLE for any and everyone that you come in contact with. No one has ever benefited from being around you and that's the God's honest truth. You talk about what magick is and ( "How You Know What It's supposed To Be" ) but you really don't have a clue do you? Obviously not.

You talk about how this is hurting other Magick sites. If the truth be known no one is being hurt here but you every time you open your mouth up on the air. When this happens everyone sees just how pathetic you really are in the
way of what your trying to do up here. Your right with one thing though and that's when you STATED that Divinity isn't happy with what's going on up here. Divinity Isn't happy with YOU, False Prophet and Lover of Conflict. Concerning the name calling. Yes, It pisses me off to know that someone like you can come up here and talk sh_t without being made to take responsibility for your statements. Yah, Name Calling. Just like when you make any and every kind of negative statement you can about me such as:

("Oh I wouldn't go to anyone that hurts people") or ( "Boy, Your not the Wizard you used to be") and yet (" I feel so sorry for those POOR people that didn't get the services promised by Jim and Jan" ). IS THAT NAME CALLING, OR just out right deception and slander, Celeste? What kind of statements are these, YOU fuc_ing Moron? You think this is a game but it's not, and obviously you are finding this out for yourself. You think the people on this site are absolute Retards but they're not. You think that no one sees what you and your little dirt bag friends are doing up here but they do.

Your games are over so why don't you just slither back into your little hole where you belong ;OR don't you have ANY kind of a LIFE at all??? You are a Vile woman with a great sense of EGO that will do anything to get her way to which is your downfall in this life. You're a Bully who has screwed up her life with your Pushy. Jealous and domineering attitude. A "know it all"- who really knows nothing. Your a Hypocrite and a Liar Celeste not to mention a poisonous and venomous creature for anyone to be around. Please Viewer see the links 1 through 4 below to further my point.

(1)-CELESTE MORGAN: How low will someone go to defame someone, you may ask, I guess pretty darn low as that is what happened here... http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

(2)-CELESTE MORGAN: You have been determined to air dirty laundry, which the readers who are looking for Spell work done, couldn't care less, this is not showing anything but your intentions to discredit me in any way, shape or
form, just because you feel you have the right to do so. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

(3)-CELESTE MORGAN: I know this has hurt many Magick sites and Divinity is not happy with this-as we are suppose to be providing spiritual guidance to
those who need it,http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

(4)-CELESTE MORGAN: Name calling is childish and only shows one's ignorance...you may ask how I know Jim posted a picture and false statement about me, posing as me joining that site, and picked out the worse picture he still had in his files, when I was overweight and severly depressed at a time in our marriage was at an all time low-just because I know he took that picture and had it in his computer, so therefore it had to be him or Janhett-since she lives with him. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm

JAMES MORGAN : Regarding the posting of your pictures. I was sent a link to this site that had your ugly ass picture posted and then it disappeared thank God. It oddly enough was under the fictitious name of "Honest Person", lol. The same name Prantil uses up on this site. In light of her criminal activities would it be such a far stretch of the imagination to wonder if she could be a hacker on top of her other criminal attributes? Perhaps she retrieved this picture out of your computer and posted it up on this site for the purpose of creating further conflict.

I also noticed that Prantil had posted some crap about me up on this same site of www.meetup.com as well about me stating that I "had a small weiner" and that I "should come out of the closet", but you don't hear me telling you that you posted this sh_t about me do Yah? Who's the paranoid one here Celeste? I don't like you Celeste because of what you've become and thus I have erased just about

every picture I have of you other than the ones I sent down to you lol. If your going to accuse me of this on air then perhaps I should post the few pictures I do still have of you all over the Internet. What do yeah think about that Idea?
In fact maybe I will just SUBMIT all of our conversations back and fourth up here on Rip Off Reports all over the Internet just so people can see who and what you REALLY are, and be warned to stay away from you. As far as Prantil's statements go on this comedy. She's stating that, "Celeste is hot".

How is one to take that Celeste? "Hot" in what way? "Hot "in the way of a summers day? "Hot" in the way of being sexually attracted to you. ? Perhaps she just thinks your good looking. Hmmmmm...... Makes one wonder doesn't it?. Mary Prantil does seem to like you enough to attempt black mail and extortion in your behalf. She likes you enough to express this numerous times up on this site in her various postings. She apparently likes you enough to post all kinds of false statements about Jan and I in your behalf up here,

calling Jan a "lesbian"....calling me "gay".......etc. A person that goes to this length for another person would in my opinion go way beyond common friendship. Does This bother you Celeste, because I know that you hate gays or anything to do with them right - despite what you state about gays and moreover Drag Queens on your web site, ( as "those people" ).

Again, This is despite your postings on your site concerning how you love (( those people )) referring to not only Gays but Drag Queens and so fourth. If the truth be known Celeste doesn't like anyone that is not Catholic or that thinks the way she thinks. Like you say, Celeste, "draw your own conclusions". Celeste says that she's not a judgmental person but I know differently Viewer. Perhaps it was a Enemy of yours that

posted the picture of yours in question as you have many and still yet perhaps it could have been a loyal Client of mine who did this without my consent. People will do what people will do, and neither one of us have control over this as you very well should know. I've seen other sites on the air with your pictures posted in a rather bad light.

I'm assuming by a ex boyfriend or other friends you've made since I left. Actually, one site in particular was pretty funny with such comments directed at you as: ("Her Knickers go up and down like a Yo Yo") and ("Watching her eat is like watching a garbage truck being loaded") and still yet ( " she only drinks when you're buying" ) .....and lastly ( "she has the personality of a ROCK") lol. What have you been up to down there in the Florida swamplands, Celeste lol?. Apparently you've made some enemies out there if you ask me. If you think I posted anything concerning a picture or otherwise sending emails under different names then produce the proof or stop making your weak allegations towards me.

Produce the IP addresses and statements if you think it was me, and make sure they match. If you do produce this proof and your incorrect then be ready for yet another charge to your long list of preexisting charges. We'll turn your proof into my Internet law firm whom I've employed that specialize in IP addresses, computer key strokes, and everything concerning Internet criminal Law, Computer Law, and Fraudulent Computer Activity. Better yet, why don't you turn this proof into the State's Attorney's Office if you think you have a case against me?.

You are stating that you don't want these good folks to think of you in the bad light that I have painted around you. I'm sorry to say that you have panted this light around yourself Celeste by hanging out with criminals and committing criminal acts yourself up here with your postings not to mention the things you've done and tried to do to us in private. Regarding Your statement that lying on your part would be "Political Suicide.

We'll you've been caught not only lying but in contradicting yourself all over the place up here on Rip Off Reports. Congratulations for your "outstanding" achievements, Miss Perry Mason, LOL. It's going to be great to watch my Attorneys cross examine you during the (Trials ) you have coming up pertaining to our divorce and other legal issues lol. Especially when they want to know where all the money went back when you were the Manager of the Former Dragon Spells LLC Company. You never let me see the books Celeste however I will get to see them soon. Let's not forget about that little property matter of who owns what and the damage incurred to the property and home after I was forced to leave you lol.

What about the Wells Fargo credit card and the $3000 out of the 10,000 that you spent that no one was suppose to touch because it belonged to the home?. It's going to be good to watch but not for you.Tell Me Celeste. Why were you going to shut your site down? Was it because I'm doing a really good job of Exposing you up here or was it for some other reason like lack of finance because you can't CON or GUILT me into paying your bills for you any more? For your information, since I am in fact retired, It was really not ME paying ANY of your bills for you at the time money was being sent down to pay your Food, Lodging and other however it was Phil and Jan

( the very same one in Jan that you've been attacking here on this web site ) I can prove this as well. We have Jan's Pay Pal account history that states what monies went where and to what they were spent on in the way of helping you to buy food and pay your House payment. Home insurance, Credit card. Car payment and Web Site fees etc. As a result of your malicious, vindictive, and hostile actions and postings against Jan on this site.

Jan and Phil have since absolutely refused to send you any further financial aide whatsoever. Why should they ?. Your living in my home down there in Florida through bills Jan and Phil have paid for you to stay there while typing out and posting harmful statements against Jan and myself on a computer that I gave to you as a gift before I left. Talk About Biting The Hand That Feeds You.And in light of this, since I am retired and do not have any money, you are pretty much financially screwed now, aren't you? In my own opinion and observation, you can add INGRATE to you long list of negative"attributes." You should probably close your site down just to save yourself A LOT of embarrassment huh?

After all, it's only a matter of time before you say something else negative about us that causes me to reveal more about you on this and other sites concerning your activities. Real Facts unlike your bull sh_t that you've posted about me on Rip Off Reports. Please see Celeste Morgan's statements below 1 through 6. Does this sound like a person that doesn't want to defame another person? Does this sound like a person that likes to tell the truth? Clearly, this is a hateful and miserable woman named who likes to twist and distort the facts to her advantage in her futile efforts to save face in the wake of not only her slanderous accusations about Jan and myself, but also in the onslaught of the factual information that is in fact shedding a huge light and dismantling light on Celeste's illegitimate postings on this web site.

(1)-CELESTE MORGAN: Just like the incident of Jim posting an old picture of me on a site she is connected too inferring I am having a relationship/freindship of some sort with this woman I don't even know, just to try to prove I am involved with her some kind of a conspiracy to defame his and Janhett's sites, couldn't be furthest from the truth, as I couldn't care less-this is not the way I operate, as I said I am a professional in every way and my clients will attest to that.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.html

(2)-CELESTE MORGAN: I caught you posing as MARY and you even answered to it, stating such. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.html

(3)- CELESTE MORGAN: Just like the incident of Jim posting an old picture of me on a site she is connected too inferring I am having a relationship/freindship of some sort with this woman I don't even know, just to try to prove I am involved with her some kind of a conspiracy to defame his and Janhett's sites, couldn't be furthest from the truth, http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.html

(4)-CELESTE MORGAN: Please don't talk about the other criminal attacks others make Jim, even though you have a good point and facts it appears to back up what you are stating, http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.html

(5)-CELESTE MORGAN : You know you don't have to worry about anyone making an ass out of yoursself-you're doing a great job all by yourself, stop this needless vendetta by giving Magick and Divinity a bad name... http://ripoffreport.com/reports/0/258/RipOff0258135.htm#271988

(6)-CELESTE MORGAN: so please don't think of me as the way Jim is trying to represent me to the public. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.html

(7)-CELESTE MORGAN: as it would be political suicide to lie http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.html

JAMES MORGAN : Ok. Here we have Celeste latest posting so let's address and dismantle it as we've done with all her other Ignorant postings. Firstly, Jimmy Boy? ( excuse me, are you referring to me? ) I see that you really don't have respect for anyone do you? Where did you get this from? Your friend Mike Cahill no doubt, as this is what he called me in some of his nasty emails before I legally took his ass down for his copyright infringement.

So your ecstatic are Yah ?. Is that why you keep bothering us in every way all most everyday Bit_h? . Is that why you keep posting your crap on Rip Off ? Is That why you keep trying to ride on my name as long as you can by including my name in your few testimonials ? Your stating that I don't know how to conduct myself when people disagree with me. (WRONG) People disagree with me everyday but I don't go off on them. However, I do like intelligence, and LOATHE ignorance......which is another reason I'm posting this against you, you ignoramus. Read the Dragon Spells web site that you "managed" for so long- as it's all about free thought and spiritual growth Duhhh.

Concerning your statement that I'm closed minded. Here you go again planting your negative little seeds huh ?. Your a False Prophet and Traitor Celeste not to mention a Slenderest. I am the most open minded person that you'll ever meet and you know it. Yes, I do get angry when low life human trash like you gets up here on air while talking all kinds of sh_t hoping that people will believe you because you think everyone's a stupid ass etc. News Flash:They're Not, as they can see right through you and all of your pathetic games. As far as unethical information. Firstly, What the hell is unethical information ?. Did you mean not factual information or un-true information ?.

Maybe false information ?. I think you better read this posting from the beginning concerning false statements and your definition of slander Celeste. If anyone is un-factual here it's YOU. Your a real piece of Sh_t aren't you ?. Hacking into emails ?. I've never hacked into anything personally. Don't know how. Wished I did but I don't . However I have been sent information by others THAT DON'T LIKE YOU. I don't know where some of it comes from however I don't doubt the validity of it when I put it together with what I know as fact about you. What's the matter Celeste, are you mad that you've been caught with your bull Sh_t ?.Open up false email accounts ?.

Like I said there's a lot of people that don't buy into your deception and this could be anyone doing this to you. That is if it is in fact happening at all as I'm finding your statements to be not credible like Prantil's. Again, If you think I did something like this then prove it. Identity theft you say. Mmm What about signing my name to obtain credit cards so you could max them out and leave them for me to pay? Incidentally Discover card and Chase are performing a investigation on you currently for Identity Theft filed by myself when I left because you were buying sh_t and signing my name to it etc..

Yes, Let's talk about Identity Theft Celeste. Just like the 3000 you've spent out of the 10,000 off a credit card that was not supposed to be used-- that Jan was attempting to pay off for me. This is why your blocked from this account now. Let's talk about Identity Theft Celeste. This will be brought up as well in one of the court hearings that you'll be going to in the future. For your information my life is blessed and orderly as Jan and I are both doing great. This also bothers you doesn't it Celeste? After people get through reading this about you they certainly won't want to come to for spell work that's for sure.

Your nothing but a real scam and a fraud Celeste and you know it......and so are your lowly little friends Mike Cahill and Mary T. Prantil.You are anything but professional and your destroying yourself. I have no need to destroy anything of yours Celeste as all I want is to get the hell away from you. It would seem that your the one who keeps attacking US-- not the other way around. Look at your statements in the previous postings you've made. Tell me who started this and who is slamming who here in the start ?

ANSWER IS : YOU. Your destroying yourself with your uninformed statements. Ask Anyone out side your little circle of scum bucket friends and they will tell you straight up. Another thing, Celeste. You should get over YOURSELF first - then perhaps people would take you seriously. When working such long hours not to mention working six days a week at your insurance job, How do your find all the extra time to perform spells and energy to HAUL around that HUGE EGO of yours?. I have news for you Celeste and that is that You DON'T INTIMIDATE us either with all your little plots and bull Sh_t games.

The only person that is discrediting and deceiving themselves up here is YOU. Yes, Jan and I do have a lot in common more so then I ever had in common with you especially now in light of the way that you've turned out from when I first met you fourteen years ago. Or what you have evolved to in this present day. The name of the Spiritual game is that you move forward in life and not to step backwards in time like you have done Celeste.

I have my good, reputable, extremely happy and very content life with Divinity and Phil and Jan now, however it would seem that your the one that NEEDS a life, being that your under going a divorce and are sitting down there alone for the most part, outside of your one nights stands once in a while. Big Brother is watching me? Good because when or if he comes calling I will send him to your ass for the tax and business records. You'll be speaking to Big Brother sooner then you know.

You have so many skeletons in your closet you are the one that should be worried about "Big Brother" calling.......LOL. After witnessing your behavior up on this site and over the last year I am convinced that I made the right decision in leaving and divorcing you. How can one so screwed up in a relationship or in life even think that they can help another? Your like the blind leading the blind Celeste and I feel sorry for the Clients that come to you.

I'm not out to harm anyone here, however after reading your postings and listening to your constant accusations not to mention suffering your attacks against Jan and myself over and over again throughout the last couple of months you leave me no other choice except to prove the real truth about you and defend myself and Jan because we have in fact done nothing wrong. I now in retrospect believe that a person like you shouldn't be on the air at all not alone casting spells for someone's life especially when you cannot even get your own sh_t together and get on with your own life.

You've done and said a lot of things on air and in private that Divinity will and is judging you for Celeste. BAD KARMA is your portion BIG TIME. GET ON WITH YOUR LIFE AND LEAVE US ALONE both on and off air. Quit using people to take revenge out for your hurt feelings. Quit throwing the innocent to the wolves. I'M NOT COMING BACK TO YOU so YOU get over it. I don't Even Want you as a friend as you have proven yourself to be derelict in every conceivable area of friendly and or remotely decent interaction. As I said at the starting of this posting that I'm not wasting my time any more responding back to you or your scum ass friends as I believe I've made my points crystal clear up here on Rip Off Reports.

JAMES MORGAN : Furthermore please let me just address Celeste Morgan personal charges against me in the way that I can't Intimidate. Scare or Control her any longer especially through my postings and alleged illegal activities . It would seem that Celeste has some kind of a Napoleon Complex going on here in the way that she hates any kind of Authority especially in the case of Male Authority over a household. She always did even with her first Husband. Her Attitude is reflected on her site of www.blackandwhitemagickspellsrituals.com and more specifically on the page of :

http://www.blackandwhitemagickspellsrituals.com/philosphysectionmagick/poetry.html Under the: ( Philosophy Section). This page should really appeal to some of you guys out there lol. Celeste has charged me with trying to Control her during our Marriage however please let me say that Celeste can't be reasoned with or remotely controlled at any time. She does her own thing regardless to if it's good for the Family or Not. Regardless to if a given action on her part is good for her or not. I believe that what one does effects the entire Family and that the Family should work together however Celeste doesn't see it this way. It's her way or the Highway in short. If I would ask her to not do something she would do it any way despite my request. In other words she only listened to herself as no one else could tell her anything including her own immediately blood kin.

If I had to describe Celeste Morgan I would say that she is a text book case of Feminism gone awry who again hates ANY KIND of Authority be it Man. Woman or Law of the land. It wasn't and isn't in my personality to Control. Look or Speak down to on anyone however it is and was my responsibility to keep my family members safe not to mention co-existing with one another peacefully to which was virtually impassable to accomplish with Celeste in the house. Always causing problems was she as mentioned above in this report several times.

Yes, I did yell at Celeste quite a bit due to her causing problems for the entire Family however even I can be taken to my ropes end that ultimately caused me to loose my patients with her. Celeste could cause a Saint to curse. Even I got tired of repeating myself over and over just like anyone else would. Celeste likes to make herself out to be this Great Savor of the Better Half but if the truth be known and if others listened to her advice then they would no doubt end up in the same way she has with this
pending divorce.

So, In response to your last charges against me Celeste I would say your full of Sh_t. I've lived with Jan now over a year and we've only had two small 15 minute augments that were as a result of you. Jan wanted to send you money because of your poor mouthing and I didn't because I knew you were full of it. Other then that we co-exist perfectly with peaceful days and nights. With you Celeste it was a HUGE Conflict every day ALL day and night because you couldn't work with the rest of us in trying to get through daily life in a mutual manner.

Again, I'm not about looking or speaking down to people as my site reflects. I'm not about belittling other people or causing them conflict however I have made certain statements in my postings regarding Celeste that weren't so nice as a result of her Deceptive and despicable false postings against Jan and Myself for the last two months however you would do the same thing Viewer if you were in my shoes. All that can be said concerning my personality would be in the way that the Viewer should read over my web site. What you see is what you get unlike the duel personality of Celeste Morgan's self and site.

CELESTE MORGAN : Temper, temper Jimmy boy-Now I know why I am happy this working and private relationship with you that has been severed has made me estatic! You do not know how to conduct your self with clients, friends, or
any one who disagrees with you, you fly off the handle-use insulting and unfactual information to try to prove your point is the only one that is true, no matter how you got the information you received; hacking into people's private computers, to get emails private and personal, (oh is that against the law, I didn;'t know that???), using false information to open up email accounts and saying they are someone they are not (could that be Identiy theft, imagine that???) , and opening up site accounts, by using someone elses name etc.

to do so...the list goes on and on...How can you get on your site and say you are a man of Divinity or God/Goddess, and direct someone who would want to pay you money and put their life in your hands with their life, when you are apparently having trouble keeping yours in tact? I tried to be professional here, something you should try to practice up on, and you just won't accept anything from me as all you want to do is destroy my name, business and by any and all means you can...get over it Jim, you DON'T INTIMIDATE ME AND YOU ARE NOT GOING TO CONTROL me by using illegal ways to try to keep discrediting me-I am happy Janhett is with you both privately and professionally, you two seem to have a lot in common...get on with your life and quit blasting mine and my business etc. Big brother is watching you...Celeste Morgan
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/293/RipOff0293514.htm#279042

JAMES MORGAN'S SUMMARY : What we have going on here is: A Bitter. Resentful and Vindictive EX- Wife in Celeste Morgan whom I'm divorcing. Moreover that doesn't want the divorce to go through no matter what she says on air about it one way or the other. A Guy named Cahill whom is Very Good friends with Celeste Morgan and Prantil that was either wasn't creative enough to write his own web site material or was to damn lazy to do it whatever the case may be. A guy who didn't have good sense to stay away from Celeste Morgan and who moreover listened to her bad legal advice to which got him in a lot of legal trouble.

We have a EX- Client by the name of Prantil from Jan's site who most certainly has some mental and criminal issues going on that ended up employing the services of Stanley Michael Cahill for her love situation etc. So we have Celeste Morgan. Mary T. Prantil and Stanley Michael Cahill who have all had legal action taken against them in some form or another by ourselves.We have three people with motive and intent for vengeance who all have something to be gained by smearing not only our names but our web sites.

We have three people that are all very good friends carrying grievances against Jan and myself by whatever means that is available to them.Two persons out of the three actually own their own magick sites that aren't doing very well who tried to interfere with our lives and Jan's business in any way open to them in a effort to steal Client base. These persons have filed numerous false government reports against us in their total disregard for the law.

They have attempted to smear our good names on and off the net for over a year and still continue to presently cover up their deeds by saying that my reports against them are false and or I don't have the facts straight etc. These same three people will no doubt continue to blast us up on this site until Ed or government agencies stop them however you the Viewer now have both sides of the story so we're not worried about their ramblings in the future at any point. I believe that I've done a more than ample job in exposing all three of these Jokers and that you the Public now see their deceptions in action.

These are three people who have been helped extensively by myself in the past who have now all turned on me because I've chosen to pursue my happiness in life with Jan Windglows and have further decided to free myself from a horrible and abusive relationship that I had with Celeste Morgan. In short It's all about Jealousy. Greed and Ego with these folks that drive them on with their attempts to constantly and unjustifiably hassle or torment totally innocent people minding their own business. Think about it Consumer.

This could be you under attack by people that simply don't like you for whatever reason and who have decided to come up on a site like this to wreak their havoc in your life by posting all kinds of untrue crap about you. In other words this could happen to anyone including you given the right circumstances. If you have decided in our favor or against our opposition being Cahill. Celeste and Prantil please let us and them know by writing us, or them.

If you find these acts to be despicable on the parts of our Opposition then write and let them know what you think about what they've carried out against us up here on Rip Off Reports. If you find them guilty of Treachery and Deceit then again Send them a email to let them know that they haven't fooled you or anyone. Thank You All so much for taking the time to read this final but long rebuttal. Stay Safe and blessings to one and all. James R. Morgan II & Janhett T. Windglows.

Janhett T. Windglows
James R. Morgan Il
246 Apsaroke Trail
Tetonia Idaho 83452
Jan's Email : Passionspells@aol.com
Jan's Web Site: Blood Love And Lust Spells : www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
Jim's Email : Wizardmorgan2@aol.com
Jim's Web Site : Dragon Spells : http://communities.msn.com/dragonspells
Bussiness & Home Telephone : 208-639-2224

Celeste Ann Morgan
8811 CR 622B
Bushnell Florida 33513
Email : Morgan_Celeste@yahoo.com
Email: CelesteMorgan823@yahoo.com
Hiome Telephone: 352-214-0769
Web Site: www.blackandwhitemagickspellsrituals.com

Stanley Michael Cahill
29720 67 Th Street
Clearwater Florida 33761
Email : Archery926@yahoo.com
Telephone: 727-787-0988
Web Site: www.magicangelspells.com

Mary Theresa Prantil
3285 33 rd Street Apt C-2
Astoria NY 11106
Phone: 917-224-6605
Email: Prant99@aol.com

celeste, we are not all mindless idots out here, we can make up our own minds to what is real and what is misrepresented so i just wanted to say i don't beleive everything that has been posted about you, you should just ignore these idiots who are never wrong, sometimes people just don't know when to stop, we keep hearing the same old song only with different tunes, well its kinda getting long winded and boring, and makes me wonder about their motives real believer would hardly do such things, i mean real beleivers,they would conduct themselves differently, still that is the way some want to be, to have the last word with every thing no matter what, don't waste your time or energy even looking at this let them get on with what ever they feel they need to do, after all, who is the one that's going to look stupid. i can see you are more than capable of doing what you say and more, and i would defenitly trust you more to do a spell for me, be truth to yourself and that is all divinity would want from you. well god bless and hope all this stupidity ends soon, it really is silly no matter what anyone says

Hey CC or whatever your name is. Either you can't read or your just stupid. Maybe you don't want to see the truth. Your postings have placed her in jail Fool as she's under a restraining order presently that you have just violated for her by posting in her behalf LOL LOL LOL. Keep posting Dummy. Were currently collecting all your post calling us criminals and con's so keep it up and see where it goes. Maybe you can go to jail with her.

well i can't stop myself laughing, how on earth am i going to do that, when there's no injuction going on, its just one lie after another, please stop making a fool out of yourself, im not having that accusing me of something that is'nt even real, why don't you just stop with all this rubbish and try and get on with your life, do something constructive with your time instead of all this, how can you do this to yourself. please stop, you are only hurting yourself goodbye

Hey I'm Anonymous heee hee hee. Can you guess who I am or where I'm really from ?. I bet you can't guess that my name is Morgan The Dragon huh ?. Oh Dam, Did I just give myself away ? I'm so stupid at times hee hee hee. Just call me Air Headed Dragon from now on.

Well, So much for my Anonymity. Don't you just love these Gripe Sites ?. You can say anything you want while hiding behind some F_cked Up Fake name like JJ.

Mud Mud. Muggy or CC or all the above and state that your from some place like the U.K. U.S or South America in your profile when in fact your posting from some Fuc_ed Up location like New York or even worse etc.

You don't even have to produce the proof in what your saying on air while taking very uneducated guesses and pot shots at those who do take the time and or bother to post the real facts on a given situation not necessarily for public viewing but in response to the Attacking A_s Hole counterpart who decided to come up and post crap about innocent people one day not to very long ago. Don't you love it ?.

A place where the Disgruntled can come to vent all their hate on the guilty and innocent alike with no fear of retribution for their speech or statements made on air. A place for the Guilty to come a persecute the Innocent in some cases. Wow, is this justice for you or what ?.

These sites are FUN huh ?. If your wife didn't give you any pussy the night before and your all piss_d off about it with no where else to turn then don't worry because all is not lost as you can come up on a site like this and talk shit about anyone you like just so you can ease your personal anxieties and personal self-loathing complex etc.

Maybe someone's Husband left their wife because they were a raging Bitch after all that was so out of control that the Husband just couldn't live with her any more and thus the head screwed wife became very angry after he left and decided to send others out to do her dirty work for her.

When this failed she eventually came out of hiding and tried to bring down two innocent people and a business while talking sh*t hoping to avenge her hurt feelings.

After trying everything in the way of cruel head games she just couldn't get her Hubby back and in light of nothing working out for her and in her frustration she decided : Wow, If I can't have him then no one else will and I'll do my very best in making not only his life but whoever he's with miserable on and off the air. Sites like this are full of HATE Mongers. HYPOCRITES. TROUBLE MAKERS.

THIEVES. AS_ HOLES and DUMB AS_SES. People with Vendettas and so on in my opinion and it's very hard to tell the legitimate people or postings from all the bull sh_it postings at times isn't it ?. This is when Intelligence comes into play. Logic and Reason.

Ask yourself this, Is he telling the truth or is she. Don't strain your brain past the proof that I provided Reader as as all you have is my proof and nothing from them but garbage. If you can't tell by now who's telling the truth then you'll never know so why bother as it really doesn't effect you any way in the end right ?.

But no matter because sites like this are no more then on line Tabloid magazines that no one really takes stock in any old way for the fact that it is a free for all. Folks for the most part just want to be amused.

This is The modern day Babylon of the internet if you will. You will no doubt be or have been reading all kinds of crazy shit up here huh ?. Everyone is BASHING Everyone on these sites such as the people bashing Wendy's. Wall Mart and places like Mc Donald's for Christ sakes. What kind of a Moron would post against these places unless they just didn't have a life to live to begin with ?.

Hey, it's a Fuc_king free for all and How Fun is this right ?. Oh, I went to Mc Donald's and eat double cheesed hamburgers everyday and now I'm a Fat Ass. Dam, I'm going to go and tell everyone what that Nasty old Mc Donald's did to me lol. Hell I'm going to sue their a**.

I'm going to get even with that Evil Fuc_king Wall Mart for not giving my money back for the $ 12 sneakers that I ruined after buying and having for a week. I found a dam hair in my soup at Wendy's that didn't look like mine so I'm going to fix their as_ses up on Rip Off by slamming them.

Rather then say geeze I don't have any control or to actually ask Mc. Donald's to bar you from their restraints in a effort to save you from yourself a person gets mad a blames their short comings on someone else to the point of suing etc.

Oh, before anyone says why are you making fun of us Fatties out here I would just say relax as I'm not exactly skinny these days and I love double cheese burgers. Burger King and Mc Donald's should band me for life from steeping foot in their parking lots forever lol.

I love this site in particular as where else can you go to get a huge laugh when you see a small few reading half the story and then turn around and judge an entire event on the very little they've read. The resounding Ignorance astounds me and all most makes me Pis_ my paints from laughing so God Dam hard especially when I read a certain response or responses regarding my situation.

The Half As_ed assumptions coming from some of the uninformed amaze me Really beyond the point of belief. Even when people see a posting that pretty much lines up the facts for them along with verifiable proof in a situation some out there will still talk sh*t for the sake of talking shit or to just to hear the sound of their own voices I would assume. How pathetic is this ?.

Even when given the opportunity to check out the facts through information provided they don't because they would rather believe in smut rather then the truth not to mention them being to dam lazy to evaluate all the facts in their entirety before making their retarded statements regarding a matter.

Sites like this are for the person that believes: if it's on T.V then it must be true kind of like watching a Soap Opera or something. If someone else emails another person with some smut or they read a post that really doesn't offer any proof then they tend to think Wow it must be true any way even though a field cricked couldn't make sense of it.

Still, it's on T.V so it must be true. Here you go: I think Santa is a Bum and a Jack A** because he doesn't where socks lol. Is this statement true ?. Answer is: ((( You don't know for sure do you ?)). How do we prove this ?. You could just go on my word to which wouldn't be very smart on your part because I might not like Santa or you could correlate the information I've provided you along with pictures of his bare feet.

Even with the proof that I've provided some will put it together and say: Yah he's right and and Santa really is a Jack A** Bum and yet others will say oh, He doctored those pictures or twisted the facts because they either identify with Santa or they have some vested interested in the toy factory lol.

Moreover maybe this is Santa himself responding back under a fictitious name to the charges I've made against him lol. Maybe the response is coming from someone that work for Santa like those little Elves that I catch in my garbage from time to time.

The Opposition says: Oh, it's not true. Oh, He's lying. Oh, He's a mean hateful Bastered who didn't get his own way blah blah blah. He Twisted the facts. My name is Negative Poster and I'm in Denial lol lol lol.

I hate that Jim Morgan because he's so mean and nasty. I think he's the Devil. He's not just a man trying to get on with his life. He's not just trying to defend himself against lies and unjustified attacks.

He's the B*stered Devil LOL. Hey, We all just stepped back into the Dark Ages. Man, Those were A BLAST huh ?. Kind like the Witch Hunts HUH ?.

Ah, It feels good to be back home when Chaos ruled the land besides who wants to evolve any way ?. Hey, Didn't they have Mob Rule back in the day ?. You know, Guilty or Innocent if you were unpopular they just hung your a** depending on how many friends or enemies you had in the crowd.

Well, It looks like the world has found a New Boo Hooing ground to B*tch and Moan about whatever and whomever they will. Dam I stubbed my toe so let's go on a gripe site and blame everyone else for my stupidly.

This is A place where a person doesn't have to take responsibility for what they have said or tried to accomplish on air unless you find out who they are and take their a** to court which incidentally isn't that hard to do.

This is a place where a person not only doesn't have to take responsibility for what they say but can also remain hidden while accusing others from behind the safety of shadows. How COWARDLY is this. I would say Earn your Humanity and face the one your accusing.

I would say Weee Weee and have fun people. Continue to talk about whom ever you wish on these sites as nothing you say will ever amount to a pile of shit in the end and what you say is neither here nor there for the Target of your ridicule. Your nothing more then Hecklers in the peanut gallery like me at times.

It's all Temporary self-gratification through on-line Gossip if you will. So in closing I will say to those who have read the proof fully that I've provided and have come to their own conclusions either for or against me then BRAVO. You are the informed and I will take what you say seriously.

To those who have not read the proof or have made a feeble attempt in reading the proof and yet make Judgments. Accusations or just down right uninformed and Ignorant statements as a result then you should consider yourself to be the village Idiot and know that I won't take you seriously.

give it a rest, its crap, you won't get away with the stuff you have cause, you are a deceitful person, trying to off load your guilt on to others twisting and turning so you come up on top, you know who you are and you not a very nice person, we all are children of divinity including the others, you will have to anwer to what you have become one day, everyone with a magickal site will agree you do something in the name of justice when its revenge and destruction they all know you will pay for what you have done, so no amount of crap will alliviate your guilt for what you have done, anyone out who has been conned or mistreated will have their justice one way or another, no one gets away with it cause its the law of cause and effect that hold this universe, if you want this to stop and stop posting

I would encourage anyone interested in the out come of this scandal to visit this link of http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/280/RipOff0280918.htm. I think this will clear it all up for most, thank you. Jim Morgan

I THINK YOU GOT WHAT YOU DESERVE.

AND THIS SOUNDS LIKE TWO FEUDING GYPSY CLANS GOING AT IT OR SOMETHING.

WHAT A BUNCH OF (EXPLETIVE DELETED)!

DEATH SPELL, MY ***!

YOU SHOULD HAVE TAKEN THE MONEY YOU WASTED ON THE FAKE PSYCHIC AND SPENT IT ON A PSYCHIATRIST TO FIND OUT WHY YOU STILL BELIEVE IN CHILDREN'S STORY TALES...

THIS ENTIRE THING IS STUPID.

YOU KNOW THIS STUFF IS FAKE, THERE ARE A LOT OF POSTS ABOUT THIS STUPIDITY ON THE RIP OFF REPORT AND YOU WERE WARNED AND YOU DID IT ANYWAY.

WHO'S THE FOOL?

YOU THE FOOL!

THESE GUYS ARE JUST CONTINUING TO SCAM PEOPLE LIKE THEY HAVE DONE SINCE BEFORE RECORDED TIME.

AND YOU GOT YOURSELF RIPPED OFF WITH ONLY YOURSELF TO BLAME.

The jokers: www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/deathspells.html

The above link takes you to a webpage that is the work of deranged, power loving idiots - they have no power, they live in a world of fantasy, but it makes them $$.

Their website states: Do you seek rapid and permanent removal of an enemy.....have tried everything..... and do not know where to turn?  here are our fastest acting black magickal death spells.... Manifestation time takes place  in less than three to four weeks.

Anyone stupid enough to fall for their lies deserves to be scammed. As the old saying goes: ‘like attracts like.'

In reality spells do not kill anyone, it's just a huge scam to take money off those jealous and evil enough to believe in such rubbish. James Morgan hasn't been able to solve his own troubles by spell casting, instead the fool chooses to post a female's details on ROR as revenge, hardly the work of a powerful magician, he couldn't fix her troubles and couldn't control her either. If James Morgan had any power he'd not be posting on ROR, he would not need to, instead www.bloodloveandlustspells.com charges very high prices so he can live like a lord, they only need one fool to order from them each week.
Joe is correct, Joe is clearly SANE.

Hello Erikah, firstly, Jan doesn't have any record of you as a Client at this point matching the first name Erikah under death spell castings. Have you ever been a client of Miss Windglows and would you mind sending us in some information to further go on via email as this would be greatly appreciated ?. If you've never been a client and are just going off what you've heard off this site, then let us know this as well, I personally think this is the case. Concerning my troubles, I have resolved my problems quit satisfactorily via legal means and didn't need the use of magick to to do this. As far as Prantil goes, all you have to do is to call the N.Y.P.D to see what's happened to her, lol. As far as you questioning my magical capabilities, well, this is your opinion that isn't shared by many others on the net both past and present. You can always send me your real name and a recent picture of yourself to determine to if I am real or not, Like Joe, I'll make you an offer, I perform a free spell for you of your liking, no strings attached and you can come back up here to report your findings. I don't think you will though because your more interested in badmouthing then knowing the truth.

As far as living like a lord, LOL. I lead a very meager existence and have for quite some time. Your misinformed , as I don't run blood love and lust spells nor do I perform death or any spells directly for the public any longer, haven't done this for two years, however I will assist Jan from time to time in some spells she may wish to cast jointly. I'm sorry to say, that I believe that you and Joe are very misinformed concerning magical practice that are moreover up here venting your thoughts concerning the subject. I've tried in assisting Joe as much as I could in the way of addressing all his questions, but it would seem that the both of you have made up your minds to no matter what has been explained etc, I've made myself open to your calls and emails however I've heard nothing back from Joe other then these post, more then likely won't hear anything back from you either, Erikah. As far as I'm concerned, please go ahead and vent your concerns up here all you like, as after all that is what this site is for, but please know that I'm not going to keep wasting my time in going back and fourth with you guys. Especially when you haven't taken the time or trouble to fully read the sites or scandal. Your obviously are missing some very important facts and giving into speculation.

Thank you for your comments. Jim Morgan

To Erikah:

This is Miss Windglows- the owner of Blood Love And Lust Spells. I read your post, and am not sure what you are so upset about. In addition, I do not even know you, nor do you know me. Nor do you know James as far as I know. Other than this post, IF you are a client of ours, then instead of posting up here under fake name, what you need to do is contact us directly by e-mail or telephone.

You are not a client of mine as far as I know, nor do you have any idea of how I live my life, etc. nor do you have any clue how spells do and do not work. I invite you to either write me an e-mail or call me on my personal cell phone so that I can educate you about spells and what magick is and what it is not.

The fact of the matter is that any fool can log onto this web site and write anything they like, whenever they like, LOL. In closing, if I do not hear from you either via my e-mail or by your having the courtesy of calling me if you have a problem with my web sites, then you are just like anyone else up here who has nothing better to do with yourself other than slam other people's businesses whom you know absolutely nothing about LOL.

So until I hear from you by your writing me an e-mail or calling me, as far as I am concerned, you are just another misinformed poster who probably got ripped off by another magick site and decided to complain about ours, LOL. Your comments are RUDE and we are entitled to our opinions just like you are entitled to yours.......so happy trails, LOL.

Greetings. My name is James R. Morgan II of the former Dragon Spells L.L.C. This post is a attempt to assist and resolve the unfortunate instances of persons being scammed out their money by fraudulent and or fake spell casters, psychic readers and others.

I've researched and practiced the arts of magick for twenty-eight years now, with eight or nine of those years being on the net as a spell caster myself before my business officially closed down a couple of years back. Janhett T. Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com is now my trusted lady and confidant whom has been gifted the remainder of Dragon Spells in the capacity of free magical information source for all to view.

Enchantress Windglows, has now included all 199 pages of this copyrighted material into her her current sites to which can be viewed via the link above. Both Jan and myself thought it extremely important to address these topics regarding magical practice and the fraud occurring in and around this profession.

And so, in the name of Divinity do we write this post in order to help, assist and save Divinities children from these would be Imposters. I would also strongly encourage other up right magick sites to stand against these same imposters as our very good names are now under attack as a result of the negative and harmful deeds against the innocent via these rouge sites.

The art of magick is a holy matter to both Jan and I, not to mention both of us being great lovers of Divinity and all things spiritual. The scamming of innocents on the Internet must stop, however we in the magical community can't do it alone, and urgently need your assistance in resolving this matter through your own self- education and efforts.

Only you can stop the scam before it turns into a scam. Think about it, Expose the scam artist, cut off their money supply through this espouser, then sit back and watch the internet become clean and free of them. They will leave because there's no more blood to suck or ignorance to pray off of in short.

The content of this post will typically convey not only my personal observations and beliefs, but the shard experiences of others regarding the subject of magical practice. Some practicing persons of the art may not agree with some or all of my statements; however, they are always free to dispute what I personally know to be long held truths concerning this subject.

Let me first start off by saying that magical practice is a discipline, like any other discipline, that moreover takes unending dedication and on going sacrifice demanded of the Practitioner over the span of many years as the rule of thumb goes. It's just not something that you can learn overnight or from one or two books from the mall in other words.

Also, Spell casting its self is a very small aspect to the over all faith system concerning most men and women of the magical arts, that some may or may not choose to incorporate into their over all belief system.

A strict code of spiritual conduct is in play a great deal of the time and must be followed inherently in order to maintain one's communication and or working relationship to the Divine, this is done through a person's right thought, speech and action and therefore causing this relationship endure become strong between the the caster, private person and the Divine Source, or Divinity as I like to address Them.

This same relationship must also be taught and passed to the Client of any magical operation to have any hope for spell success as it is Divinity that grants a prayer and not the caster. A common person may achieve their dreams without the use of magick through a proper relationship to the divine source,

however it does take a lot of hard spiritual work and honesty to get there. Nothing is free in Heaven or earth and their is a price to pay for everything that we want out of life, however this price has nothing to do with money that is paid to a caster more so then it has to do with self-growth and change.

There are numerous faith systems skirting the three mainstream religions better known as Islam, Judaism and Christianity, and it is these more recent faith systems or disciplines past these three systems mentioned above that go on to be represented on the net as spiritual spell casting sites for the most part. Some examples of these more recent sites are predominately the Voo Doo and Wicca sites just to name a few that we see all over place these days.

These particular new age sites typically have their origins deeply rooted in the past predating the three main religions above, but in essence have developed more so into free style, or liberal type systems of belief and not really emanating the dogma of the prototype earth faith based from which they were derived.

In light of these varying systems of faith stemming from the past, please also note that these same faith systems also varied in practice from region to region down to village to village. It only stands to reason that the predecessors of these much older or ancient systems of faith would expand and or project a wide and diverse array of beliefs and magical technique as time went on as can be seen currently on the Internet;

especially when a general structured systems such as the bible and others weren't existent at the time that these other systems of faith were being developed. Whenever you start something without any type of structure then it keeps unfolding down through time in the hopes of structuring its self etc.

Ok, what does all this mean? It means that when a person goes on the net looking for a spell caster, this is like being lost in the chaotic jungle of numerous faiths and practices. It means that a person can be taken in quite easily; especially if their not familiar with magical practice of any kind. A person can become open and subject to the scam artist pretending to be a legitimate spell casters or psychics.

The Internet is a place where one can find old world witchcraft merging in with Voo Doo and Wicca on occasion even though these are two very different belief systems, where old testament magick intertwines with the new testament and Chinese faith systems. Further, where you can find a place for the ancient Babylonian Gods and Goddesses coinciding with the angels of King Solomon, lol? A bit confusing, isn't it?

This is why you should ask numerous questions to guard yourself against fraud as anyone can make up a fake magical system and bedazzle you with promises of future happenings and what they can do for you. Take the time to read the site, then step back to see if any of it makes sense to you, check the site out by speaking to the site owner while cross referencing what he and his site says with known magical practices if you can. There's plenty of material on the net outlining the magical disciplines and the magical techniques they use.

I hear the word "scam" being screamed out and echoed across the universe these days regarding white and black magic or magick sites, but what does this word really mean, (( A quote from Wikipedia)) -

A scam is a confidence trick. 1. A ploy by a shyster to raise money. 2. A fraudulent business scheme. To "scam" means to victimize, deprive of by deceit; "He swindled me out of my inheritance"; "She defrauded the customers who trusted her"; "the cashier gypped me when he gave me too little change" 3. A confidence trick, confidence game, or "con" for short (also known as a scam) is an attempt to intentionally mislead a person or persons (known as "the mark") usually with the goal of financial or other gain. The confidence trickster, con man, scam artist or con artist often works with an accomplice called the "shill", who tries to encourage the mark by pretending to believe the trickster. By Jennifer S.F., end of quote.

Obviously, no real spell caster or person that follows any kind of a spiritual pursuit will engage in this sort of activity, this goes against the very nature of walking a spiritual path and is more so highly contradictory to what a person is trying to accomplish in their life in the first place such as achieving spiritual peace through divine knowledge and conduct. The type of activity stated and quoted above belongs solely to the unscrupulous person who has no fear or respect for Divinity, not to mention fearing any karmic retribution coming back from the negative acts they tend to carry out on a daily basis.

These are just a few things that separate the scam artist from the legitimate spell caster and or spiritual person. Ok, now that we have established the difference between the spiritual person and the scam artist, lets explore the conflict that has been taking place on the net between the Client and Spell Caster for some years now, let's do this via the definition of a binding contractual agreement as follows:

Again, a quote by Wikipedia, That depends. First, the agreement must be a contract, which means there must be an offer, an acceptance, consideration (value exchanged) and a lawful purpose. The exact definition of each of those terms depends on state law. Second, some contracts can only be enforced in court if they have been signed.

For example, contracts that cannot be performed in one year, or for an interest in land must be signed. Each state has slightly different rules on which contracts must be signed. Those rules are known, collectively, as the "Statute of Frauds". However, even if you have a valid oral contract that does in fact violate the statute of frauds, you may have a difficult time proving it without some sort of documentary evidence such as witnesses to contract. In conclusion its best to get everything signed and in writing, end of quote.

In light of the definition above referring to the verbal agreement, I would speculate, that in some instances of reported fraud up here on Rip Off Report are more or less misunderstandings of the contractual agreements made between Client and Caster, and not likely fraud itself. In other instances where fraud has actually occurred as stated above in the definition, it is hard to prove, unless the victim of the crime has a witness to the contract, recorded or written evidence to support their claim of wrong doing such as emails, phone records, receipts, etc.

Let me further yield my definition and example of fraud. For example: Let's assume that a person comes in to a site looking for spell work, let's continue to say that the caster makes guarantees to that perspective client of a given spell casting in saying that will work for you within three days, moreover without mentioning any possibilities of it not working for the perspective client at all, or telling them directly that there isn't any possibilities of it not working for them.

This is a statement and promise to the client at this point that further convinces that client to come in for the spell through a verbal or gentleman's agreement based on what they've been told. The client sends the requested funds to the caster via postal mail or wire and the caster begins work upon receiving the needed payment and items.

If the Caster "GUARANTEED" the casting and the spell doesn't work as the caster said it would for the client in three days, then this is technically fraud as this client would have never contracted the caster had he or she told them that there was a possibility of the spell not working for them at all.

The client was under the impression that it was going to work and wasn't told any different; or was told directly that the spell couldn't fail. If the caster implied that the spell would work, but made no guarantees to the client, and said nothing about the possibility of the spell not working for whatever reason.

Then this this is the obtainment of moneys through misleading speech via not disclosing all the facts that the client needed to base their decision on concerning the spell casting. This falls under unethical practices more so than fraud as there was misleading speech taking place against the person looking for the spell work. Perhaps, it falls under both terms depending on the actual agreement.

The caster failed in educating the perspective client concerning much needed facts in this case, and this is why it is so important to ask a lot of hard and direct questions before giving any monies over to a on-line caster or land based spell caster. In other words, if your looking for spell work then be smart and don't let anyone take advantage of your ignorance pertaining to the matter of magical operation. Don't pay dearly for your ignorance folks.

It's very important for a perspective client to understand what is needed and or expected from them regarding any spell work offered FROM THE START; Not during or after the work is complete, But From The Start. It's Again, very important that a client has a very realistic view and or goals of what is, or could be obtained from spell work before entering into any spell process.

Lastly, It is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to stay within the guidelines of the site regarding the offered spell criteria should the client decide to engage in any kind of magical operation with a spell casting site or land based casting business. Don't come in if you don't think you can adhere to the rules as this isn't fair to the spell caster or you, this will only cause major problems and bad feelings down the road, not to mention senseless postings on this site..

The best way to avoid being scammed or misunderstanding the contract in which you might be getting yourself into, is to ask a lot of pertinent questions. To check the site out via the B.B.B. and licensing commission of the state in which the magick site is registered in. Of course, you may use Rip Off Report as a indicator of what kind of site you may be wanting to work with, however don't let your investigation stop here as the information your getting may or may not be entirely correct.

An example, Questions a perspective Client can ask: 1- How long has your business been in practice? 2- Do you have a license to practice and in what state? 3- What exactly will be expected of me personally regarding my spell?

4- What can I SPECIFICALLY expect in the way of spell results? ( get this answer from the potential caster in a email.) 5- Can you send me a policy sheet regarding the things I should do and the things to stay away from during this process? 6- May I have a copy of your disclaimer? 7- What happens if my spell doesn't work, and will I be charged again? 8- Do you guarantee your spells? (If they say they do actually guarantee a spell, THEN RUN.)

Guaranteeing sub services that come with the spell in some instances such counseling or pictures are things that can be easily carried out or guaranteed as "services". You can't guarantee the spell operation itself; as this is like guaranteeing that it will rain tomorrow. Knowledge is power folks, so be a smart shopper.

As I've stated in many other reports up on Rip Off Report, Any legit spell casting services will have no problem in addressing these questions for you. You can then distinguish the scam artist from the real spell casters through your knowledge obtained. Fake casters won't address these questions for you and will moreover become evasive concerning these questions and issues put before them.

Perform a background check on a potential spell caster to be safe and don't feel pressured in sending your funds off right away no matter what the caster says or does until your completely satisfied with what you have learned and feel comfortable with it all, no matter how badly you want a certain spell ritual. It's better to be safe then scammed, wouldn't you say? ONLY YOU CAN STOP SCAMS before they occur.

Moving on, What is magick you ask? Magick is a holy communication that takes place between You, the Caster and Divinity. A prayer to the Divine Powers that be made in your behalf by the Caster, A positive joint effort of souls regarding the out come of one's life through a spiritual request. It's not a joke, no more then it's fun time or parlor tricks; it's something serious that a person should think long and hard about before jumping into, be they a new caster looking to cast spells for the public or a client.

Real magick is not to be played with nor taunted; least your ready to pay the price. To those that scam people out there, well, your on notice and will be dealt with in good time. To those who fight the good fight and carry on Divinity's teachings, my hat is off to you.

Another thing I'd like to mention, I don't advocate spell castings paid or otherwise unless a person has exhausted every other avenue of resolving a problematic situation in their personal life, so be sure you've done everything you could do to resolve your situation before contracting someone to perform spell work for you.

Most magical people love their clients in which they work and become good friends with them as time passes, they will, in fact go the extra mile for the client however It's important for the client to realize that magical people are just that, (( PEOPLE )), just like you.

We're not Demy Gods more so then just ordinary people living in a extraordinary ways, yes, we have gifts, or curses that might be considered gifts when looking from the out side in, but still, just people. People that deal with nothing but crisis most of the time and only see the harsh realities of what goes on in other peoples lives around the clock, month after month and year after year.

We are not perfect ourselves, all though this is our goal at times, lol. We have the same likes and dislikes as most other people not to mention our down sides or mood swings so please be as understanding as you can with us when dealing with a real spell caster.

We have dedicated our lives in serving Divinity and you, that have in many instances gone through the same things that our clients are coming to us to fix for them now. Sometimes a client can learn more by listening to their caster rather then trying to speak over them.

People, if you find fraudulent spell casters on the net, then exposé them for the sake of all of us out here, but do it the right way. Make sure they are fakes before you condemn them on the open air ways as being scams, make sure your reasons for reporting anyone are correct. Think about it, what if you are condemning the wrong caster that is moreover acting in the capacity of a diplomat between heaven and earth.

This would most certainly have long reaching effects in your life be you a Atheist, Christian or other, to if you believe in magick or not. I've had my conflicts up here on this site with others, however I've tried to present the facts as I've seen them and moreover proved my case for the most part and thereof exposing what I believe to be fake magick sites.

In short, it's not about pointing the finger or hurt feelings so much as it is proving your case beyond a reasonable doubt to the public should a conflict occur, if at all possible, and given the circumstance and nature of Rip Off Report. Coming up here to vent and or just to blast another site or person is absolutely the biggest waste of time ever; especially when you don't have much or anything in the way of substantiating your case, so why do it?

Why upset yourself or expose your statements to public ridicule from those who have drawn their own conclusions via the lack of proof from either side?. Why come up here a vent your own opinion on a subject that you don't understand as this has very little influence and causes one to look foolish.

HAVE YOU BEEN SCAMMED? If you feel that you have been scammed by a given magick site, be it on-line or off, here are a few options that you can pursue. Let's first look at land based psychic spell caster scams. If you again, feel like you've been scammed, then the first option is to report this activity to your local police along with a in-depth report outlining the offense that has taken place, you will also be required to back up your statements with verifiable and creditable proof in the way of eye witness accounts, recordings or documentation.

This information will be passed over to the District Attorney's Office and he or she will investigate it through the Department Of Justice depending on the amount of money lost and or other offences that may have taken place. Should the D.A. find that a report has substance to it , then this office may turn a company over to the county licensing and zoning not to mention the U.S Marshal's office.

In the many instances that a report is found creditable, the business bureau authorities will pull the licenses and close the establishment until the investigation is complete and or the accused is either found guilty or innocent to some varying degree by the courts. The codes and penalties of fraud are clear and decisive in most counties and states however may differ from state to state in who will pick up and carry the charge against the offender.

Most law enforcement agencies will also make a clear distinction between actual criminal act and civil matters; and thus, a complaintent might have to pursue their grievance through the civil courts solely should law enforcement find the complaint in the civil arena instead of the criminal realm.

Again, file your report with your local police department then follow it up with the local district or state attorney's office in the instance of a land based business infraction. In the case of Internet fraud, The Internet is a HUGE legal gray area to start off with and often times land based laws, simply can't or won't apply or transverse across the air ways from state to state.

Many states have varying laws regarding what they consider to be fraudulent act; and will handle it concerning what local and state laws dictate concerning this issue, not all states agree in short and have a lot of trouble with jurisdiction issues.

In light of this fact, most counties and states would rather not deal with such internet issues or crimes as: on-line stalking, on-line harassment, Internet fraud, phone and email harassment or slander issues in most cases and thus these offenses become the property of federal jurisdiction and not county or state. Many out there on the net will tend to turn their complaints into the F.B.I., I.R.S, A.T.F., and other government agencies;

however, these law enforcement agencies may look at, but won't really investigate Internet complaints,, they deal with actual physical or tax crimes referred to as "capital crimes" in some cases that occur against the state or federal government in short.

The B.B.B. is neither a federal or state agency, but rather a company like any other in the private sector operating under federal guidelines much like a bank, or firm that has been contracted by the government. The B.B.B. is ineffectual at best as they are subject to the contributions of business and tend to perform half-assed investigations concerning any a reported business.

They're not for the client in short, despite what they say. Regarding the illegal actions above, a complaintent would need to turned in to the Department Of Justice via filling out a complete report of the recent incident with the attached evidence or documentation backing up the complaint. This complaint will need to have a special and legal NOTARY SEAL on the documentation before the D.O.J. will enter it into investigation status.

Once received, they will contact you and more then likely then turn over a valid case to the Attorney General's Office for prosecution; he will in turn pass copy of it to the state and then district attorney for prosecution. The U.S Marshals office and local police will be set into motion in the instance that a bench warrant is sworn out against the offender by the Department Of Justice. Again, the process may differ from state to state; however, this is the jest of it all.

When the offender is charged and convicted of the crime, only then may the complaintent file civil charges in a civil court for suit against the offender in a effort to recover monies lost through misrepresentation or fraud. As stated above, you may file a charge through a civil court against a perceived offender however this is considered a weak case in this instance without the backing of a law enforcement agency.

If you've been scammed and would like to see justice prevail, then these are the options you should consider. If your just a person out to cause trouble for a ethical site by bad mouthing them for whatever reasons on the open air ways, then this system of justice can be used against you via the accused as it is a double edged sword that only serves justice.

Rip Off Reports has some flaws in it, and I'll be the first to admit it, however the site its self isn't a bad site over all. What makes this site so unpleasant to be on or work with is the people who charge others then fail to present their evidence to back up what their saying against another. In the event that some do produce their evidence then the system and site will work for them.

Lastly, and in closing, I would say, that if you have been taken advantage of or abused in any way be you the caster or the client then I would strongly recommend that you seek justice against the offender. Don't be afraid or nerves as justice will stand behind you along with truth and Divinity. Be safe, Have peace, Love Divinity with all your mind, body and soul. -------- Jim Morgan

hello everyone i won't waste my time with this endless rubbish about this man's magical ability, i have had a few spells done by mike, some paid and some free, and i have always found him to be polite, respectful and more then capable off doing what he says, i've read these reports on him and frankly the whole thing's disgracefully tasteless, but that's nothing to do with me, i personally do not have any thing bad to say about him, yes his site is small in comparison to others, it to the point without all the frills, and yes it would be nice to see more up there, but that is the way he likes it i guess, his a good man and has faith in what he does, before anyone says anything, no i'm not bashing anyone. Let me tell you about this man, his very helpful and generous and i have respect for him, and as someone who has been helped by him, what goes on in his personal life is off no concern of mine, he might not have been on air for extensively very long years, but that does not mean his incapable of doing what he says, every one stands at their own level of skill, nothing wrong with that. its very sad how people can become, i will never understand why its so hard for some folks to hold their hands up and admit, to have misrepresented a few facts to get even because they feel hurt, every one gets hurt, we're all human and we do make some horrible mistakes, but as far as i'm concerned what has happened is of a personal nature and not how magicaly capable he is, i see nothing wrong with his magic, his helped me and im very grateful

WHERE DO YOU LIVE

EVERYONE HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW THEIR SPELL CASTER BUSINESS YOU SAID, DON'T THEY? YOU ARE A SPELL CASTER, OR YOU DO LIVE WITH A SPELL CASTER TOO WHO PROFESSES THIS ADDRESS, NOTHING TO SAY NO! NOT YOU SURELY NOT, ARE YOU DECEIVING US? WITH REGARDS TO WHERE YOU LIVE MR MORGAN, WELL, WELL, NOT AS HONEST AS WE LEAD TO BELIEVE NOW ARE YOU?, YOU WERE VERY INSISTENT ON OTHER CASTER'S BUSINESS NOW IT SEEMS YOU CAN'T BE TRUSTED. QUICK ENOUGH TO RIP INTO PEOPLE IT SEEMS, UNNECESSARILY TOO IT SEEMS, THE RIP OFF REPORT IS RIDDLED WITH MAYBE'S AND ASSUMPTION, AND I GUESS THIS, AND I GUESS THAT, AND AND APPARENTLY, SEEMINGLY THIS AND SEEMINGLY THAT,HAVE YOU PAID UP ALL YOUR TAXES IN THE 3 YEAR PERIOD OF TIME, NOT ACCORDING TO SOME POSTER UP HERE, I GUESS THAT'S ANOTHER QUESTION .

SEEMS TO ME YOU GOT NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE TO SAY APPART FROM, I GUESS THIS, SEEMINGLY THAT, ASSUMING THIS, WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH YOU, GEEZER YOU TAKING DOPE I GUESS. ITS ALL YOU EVER SAY.

WHAT WITH THE RUBBISH ABOUT HIM BEING ON AIR FOR IN ONE POSTING 5 YEARS, THEN 3 YEARS, THEN 3-4 YEARS AND NOT PAYING HIS TAXES FOR 5 YEARS THEN 3 YEARS THEN 3-4 YEARS, YOU'RE A REAL PRINCE CHARMING, RIDICULE IS NOTHING TO BE PROUD OFF. ANOTHER QUESTION DO YOU OWN A MOTOR HOME. I AM WAITING FOR YOUR ANSWER

NONE AKA JAMES NONE OTHER EUROPE sounds like the Hypocrite and a LIAR to me. Maybe (( NONE )) would like to explain why they are replacing Cahill's name with mine in a negative posting that was written by one of Cahill's past clients ?.

This same person, NONE OTHER AKA JAMES, says that I'm deceiving the public by not coming up with my physical address in another post, to which is Cra_ ,however as you can read below, they are telling others. Such things as: ((( my life status is of no business of anyone's))).

Is this person not willing to yield their own home address, work place, contact information ?????. It looks like the X marks the spot likes her privacy more then she respects the privacy of others, not to mention liking to create a new name ever week to slam others with. Moreover, SHE is still trying to lie her way out of her own negative deeds against others by attempting to deceive the public on ROR with her new postings.

This poster is trying to pass herself off as someone new this week to moreover continue slamming on a innocent site and persons. As they said: IT DON'T SOUND LIKE THEY GOT TO MUCH INTELLIGENCE to me LOL, does it ? especially when it's clear what they are attempting to do here, and or what their intent is concerning their post.

This poster wants everyone to respect her privacy but doesn't care to respect the privacy of others. WHY IS THIS ?. One has to ask themselves this, if a person is low enough to copy and paste another persons name into a totally unrelated post, then how honest or trust worthy can they be ?.

If a person like this poster NONE OTHER can't even tell the truth as to their true location, then how credible are they. Lastly, lets look at the poster motives such as, are they trying to impede my questions concerning the licensing of what I consider to be a fake site in magic angel spells ?.

Are they trying to cover up a site that has all ready been exposed. This poster is wanting everyone else's private information but not open in giving out her own out. Again, she likes to pressure others for their information but gets some what hostile when the same questions are posed back to her by others.

What about her honesty ?, why would she have to post under so many fictitious names like Dion, Amy, James, None and numerious other names ?, is this to avoid standing behind what she says, or the charges she brings against another ?. Perhaps to avoid legal measures being taken against her by the very same people she is throwing her accusations at.

Does this sound like someone from a fake site attempting to throw suspicion from themselves by accusing others of unrelated matters ?. This poster is posing under several names on ROR that likes to hurl around such words as Deluded,Hypocrite, Liar, scam etc but I think they are the deluded, lying,Hypocrite and scamming ones.

Perpetually calling into question the honesty of others, however this poster shouldn't throw stones when living in a glass house because they are anything but honest as can be seen through their on-line actions in the below post. This person NONE OTHER FROM EUROPE is from the SCAM CAHILL CAMP, LOL .

/psychic-fortune-tellers/Lovespells-magicspel/lovespells-magicspells-bloodlo-9ACEM.htm
Submitted: 3/8/2009 10:23:50 PM
Modified: 3/8/2009 10:48:22 PM
John
Charlotte Ama, Other
Macau

PHONEY CON MAN BLACK MAGIC BALONEY
I was looking for scam magick websites to stay away from and ran into these posts about someone who scammed me. i used magick angel spells over two years ago for a curse breaker and love spell and did everything mike cahil told me to do and i got NOTHING for the $$$$ 2,600.00 $$$$$ i spent with him, he didn't answer my calls or letters i sent to him through the mail and when i did get him on the phone by blocking my number all he told me was i did everything WRONG and tried to charge me again, and i thought boy did i get scammed good by this +(&)'?X% so called master of bloney. i looked

if any one doubts what im saying, feel free to go to the real authorities and make your quiry and then there will be no doubt of what is what, but don't be taken in by this bs artist who thinks he can say and do what he likes, after all his the one started it all, and for over 2 years now been allowed to get away with all his bs, so instead of believing me check it out for your selves

This site of http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/introduction.html belongs to my now Ex-wife who is going around under various names such as NONE OTHER FROM EUROPE, HARRY, DION and AMY just to name a few while pretending to be someone off the net yielding their comments as a consumer or other wise, this same person has stated under these same false names that they don't cast spells for the public nor do they perform tarot readings.

As you can see this is another out right lie on their part just like all the other lies they have told throughout the last two years regarding others when bashing their sites. No wonder people are leary of some spell casters when they go around like this trying to defame other sites for the sole reason of driving business back to their own web sites, trying to cover up their own mis-deeds.

The sad thing about it is that this silly woman knows nothing about magical art and all you have to do is to ask her a few simple questions to discern this about her, the same goes for her boy friend at www.magicangelspells.com. All these two people can do is in coming up here to spread their Cr_p about others while promoting their two scam sites,

I double dare anyone to research a little about magical practice then to call these two idiots to see if they can give you some good solid magical answers to your questions, they can't. Hell, they can't even give you their real names up here because their COWARDS and Frauds. I've tried to get them to come up here to debate with me but they won't, they know that I will show everyone what a bunch of scam artist they really are.

I DARE ANYONE to go check out their credentials and magical knowledge to see what their about, I really don't like sending anyone to these sites, however it is important that people see what scam sites really look like before they fall prey to them. True,

I don't like these people because I know them both personally and see what their up to and this is why I've exposed them over and over again on this site to the public. They claim to be magically knowledgable but their not, they claim to be ethical, but their not, they say they want to help the world, but if you knew what I know about them you would s_it.

The only way to solve this problem is to check them out then come back here to tell everyone else what you've found out about these two imposters, don't be easy on them either and ask them some real magical questions that you've researched off the net.

Find out what kind of magical art they actually perform as it's un-clear and concerning what kinds of angelic Entities they are using along with the times of their castings, specifically ask them what kinds of alchemies they use, then check them out to see if their giving you factual information.

Ask them if you can speak to some of their recent Clients who are happy with their past spell results and what their confirmed spell success rates really are. Hell, these are simple questions and they should have no trouble in answering them for you,

or in letting you speak directly with their past Clients who have had successful cases with them over all. Be sure to get everything they say in a email so you can have some proof of your interaction with them and how they have addressed your questions.

Perhaps they can send you a spell chart or a wax doll effigy before you move forward with any spell work with them should you decide to do so, ask then to speak a little Latin or Hebrew for you over the phone, maybe they can sent you a sample of all the ancient alphabets they use when writing up their spells along with the invoking,

if their on the up and up they should have no problem in doing this for you as after all they are asking for a lot of money for their spell castings, right ? I mean, they do proclaim to use all this stuff in their spell creations, right ? hey, what about the blood offerings they say they give Divinity in return for a spell to be granted, perhaps they would be so kind as to send you some pictures of this.

You see, I am so TIRED of these fakes getting up on the air ways telling everyone how good they are while hiding behind all their fake little names, I'm soooo TIRED of these SCAM ARTIST taking pot shots at legitimate sites under these fictitious names with the only intent of covering up their own criminal behavior and to solicit monies from the unsuspecting in need.

I've been practicing the magical art for close to thirty years and I know it to work or I wouldn't have stayed in it so long, I really don't give a shit who believes in magick or not as this is something that I believe in and that works for others and myself and that's all that counts.

I'm not here to make you believe in anything as this just isn't my task, moreover this is something that others will, or will not believe depending on their dealings with magical art or life experiences. However it is my job to protect the public from mis-information from scams like these two sites above, it would be completely irresponsible on my part to knowingly let two sites that I know to be scams go on to rip off the public without saying anything.

Again, I'm telling you that I DON'T LIKE THESE PEOPLE or their sites because of what I know of them magically and personally, so there's no ulterior motive here other then the mentioned above and the warning you the reader of these sites and people. THEY ARE NOT WHAT THEY SEEM, THEY ARE COMING OFF AS SOMETHING THEIR NOT.

I've dedicated my entire life to the occult sciences in the way of both studying and practicing them and I am very tired of copy cats, wanna bes and cheap imitations trying to come off to the public as something their not, disgracing the entire profession because people are having a hard time in distinguishing what is real and what isn't pertaining to the magick web sites they see on the internet. Copying and pasting bandits is all they are at best that rely on the publics ignorance to make their living.

For those of you that don't believe in magick or magic then this is fine in my opinion but I do hope you get the chance in your lives to experience this wondrous thing first hand at some point in your lives, to those that do believe in magick then please be carful as their are some really deceptive sites out their who are only interested in your money and nothing else.

Their are some really good sites as well however you will have to discern to which is real or not unfortunately, there are also a few copy cat sites out there like the ones mentioned above who like to ride off the backs of others hard work so beware. In other words they can talk the talk but can't walk the walk when it comes down to it because the are IMPOSTERS after all.

If you don't believe me in this instance, all you have to do is to read my ROR reports regarding KNOWING YOUR CASTER then read over these two sites to see this same material posted on their sites, especially the Cahill site.

THEY CAN'T EVEN WRITE THEIR OWN MATERIAL AND HAVE TO COPY MY TEXT OFF ROR LOL. Be safe and may Divinity bless all of you. Jim Morgan

well you may disagree all you want your case is full of holes and you are trying to convince the world that these two people are fake which is not true and given the evidence which proves this, you may have had Mike taken for copy-write issue but it categorically states in ror that you had given Mike permission which you yourself had admitted to and also the ex wife stated this too, you are the one using what you like out situations so people will turn against them. Now what would i leave out of design

You have plenty of agenda people, proven fact they not fake spell casters and if you want to check out the validity of the story, ring and get facts verbally from Florida tax and license office, Don't bother reading the reports tainted with malice and holes.

Don't know what you talking about i don't have any pictures, text etc, etc, i am not Mike nor the ex wife and as for apologizing what for i am helping the public to see that all you say is not true.

Your right everyone does get the picture you have an other motives apart from protecting the public, and its to ruin this these two people's reputation and businesses. Hostile you say! not at all pointing out facts protecting the public from being drawn into your fight where you want the public to believe these two are fake and so on telling them you don't.or have ulterior motives. lol lol lol

You always seem to doubt that anyone is who they say they are, maybe your clients are not who they say they are either any excuse will do to blame others and take attention from yourself.

No! your the one throwing suspicion away from you, trying to get the public to believe your links, how is it suspicious to ask the public to check out the validity of your story why would these officials want to refer the public back to your links that you've chosen for your on end, these office have computers in front of them. lol

That a big assumption that just because they have material its automatically yours, and if they have which who's to say if there not a valid reason for after all who would want your stuff after all that goes on, and that the ex is venting bull shit, or it could be the material used is theirs and the ex is telling everyone how difficult her life has been, i think people will have to go to these sites and read it themselves. There plenty on their sites to do with magic,

Your asking for apologies from some one who not even here, and you are more then welcome to stay as long as you like, these two are not here, seems they getting on with their life, why aren't you! lol lol

Why on earth would Mike Cahill use your stuff after the copy-write infringement.

There,s nothing to say sites can't have similar materials after all they knew each other ages ago and probably think alike.

More questions for the Cahill camp......What are Elementals and how do they work in conjunction to the six ancient planets, for instance, where would would you place the earthly elementals such as fire, water, earth, wind etc. in association to the planets; and what metals would be used such as copper, brass, tin, bronze and so fourth ?

What are the names to these elementals when invoking them in a rite and what point on the pentagram would you invoke each one from and on what day ? Come on, this is a easy one that any Master Wizard or High Priestess of Wicca would know. What are the secondary names for the Watch Towers and what element of herb, stone and metal belongs to them specifically ?

What are the differences between the planetary and Angelic signs, sigils and signatures and to what purpose do they serve, where did they come from and what are the alchemical symbols and properties to each one and what planets do they go with ? Can you tell us what planets do when they enter into retrograde and what cycle spell casting should be performed under for certain tasks; how does this effect spell work overall ?

What is a curse spell and how does it work; could you be specific concerning your wording of this advanced prayer and how it would react in a person's life that happened to be the un-happy reciepient of it? Cahill states on his site and in his key words that he alone can break curses and death curses....so he should have no trouble in explaining how he does this and what a curse spell is in actuality.

What names are used in any spell action to invoke movement in the Universe concerning the assumed spell operations you allegedly cast? Would this be various names of Gods and Goddesses or God as we know Him in Christianity, or would you invoke both benevolent and malevolent spirits at your descretion?

Where does the name "Jehovah Tetragrammaton" come from, and what does it mean? How is this name relative to what you do ? Are there other names that you use to invoke movement as well ? What part of the world can we find this name being used frequently or more specifically, by what faith systemn What are the cultural differences that can be found in those nations that use names such as "Ala", "Jehovah", "God", "Krishna" etc. ?

Mr. Cahill, can you give us details on the numerous differences found existing between the faith systems of Islam, Judaism, Christianity and how other world faith systems view what they consider to be main stream religious systems ? What is it to be a Hindu and what part of the world would you find this faith system, what kind of a belief system is this ? Is it a "one God" system, or do they have many Gods and Goddesses?

Who will they tend to call in times of need ? Here's a good one - who was the first Angel and in what time period can this Angel be found; what culture and society created this first Angel known to the world and can you tell us his name? After all, your site specializes in "Angel Magic", Mr. Cahill, correct? So, it would stand to reason that you would have done your research to know at least who the first Angel ever created was in a society that pre-dates Christianity by thousands of years, correct?

When the Ex speaks about the Goddess "Lilith" or "Lit", is she referring to Adam's first wife, or the first bride of Satan? What about "Mephistophilis", isn't he the equivalent of the Christian "Devil" ? How do you justify using the two of them in a given rite under Catholic mandate ? Do you consider them to be a God, Goddess, Demon or common Spirit;

and aren't they a negative or strictly a malevolent force by any standard that stand against anything orderly or positive ? Wouldn't they be opposed to God's laws; and aren't they mentioned in the Bible as something to stay away from, and what do their names actually mean ?

I think these names are loosely translated as : "He that hates the light" or "The Destroyer"; "Mephistophilis" of the order of "Incubus", correct ? And Lilith belongs to the order of "Succubine" who basically hates men and sucks the life or spirit out of men in particular, correct ? Banished to a island by God in the old testament to breed with sea monsters, right ? What does this have to do with POSITIVE spell casting? Can you tell us why these Angelic forms would need to be invoked anywhere unless it was for spiteful reasons, hateful behavior or simple revenge ?

So, the Ex is using the Christian names of Angels on her site and states that she "won't perform black magic death spells", however these two forms or Deity according to the church are nothing but intrinsically evil, and or are Enemies to the human race; so then, how do you relegate differently between what the Church says and your view concerning these two Spirits ?

Can you associate the alchemical union between the Divinity posted on your sites to the mixtures of precious stone, herb and root metals, how many compound names do they have, how many inflatable names do they have ? My personal favorite question is, what exactly is Divinity and how will they manifest in our lives ? Can you give us a break down of this so that we all can understand your particular "faith system" a little better ?

Exactly where and when did we as humanity start associating the God and Goddess aspects with the planets as we know them and how did these ancient societies come to their various faith systems? What happened to most of the faith systems found in the ancient world and which of them can still be found going strong today?

I also see where one of you state that your "well versed" in the art of the dread book, or faith system of the Necronomicon, and that you "can reverse any death spell, and or black magic spell that might be harmful to one"; how is this done and can you give us a idea of the creation myth in this particular magical discipline ?

Who are the key players and how old is this certain discipline? Can you tell us what the name means and what language it's derived from, since you are an "expert" in this field of endeavor Mr. Cahill? Can you tell us how old this system is and who was instrumental in gathering the text that make up what we know today as Necromancy magic?

Can you tell us how many fictional literary works have been written about it and who practiced it for the most part from --- to --- round about. Who was Jonas Faustus and John Dee and what contribution did they give to the magical community? Still yet can you give us a little background on Aleister Crowley and some of the other great masters you've allegedly studied under?

What is the Golden Dawn and how does this discipline fit into your faith system? Again, I've noticed that Cahill has studied under the great Magical Masters, could you tell us who they might be and what specific area you have mastered in under them?

I see Aleister Crowley mentioned periodically through out your pages as well; who is he and what did he have to do with the Golden Dawn? Can you name some others that were instrumental in the creation of the Golden Dawn, and where this system was originally drawn from ?

The Ex also speaks about the "TREE OF LIFE", what is this exactly and what is it for other then a tool in listing angelic orders ? Where does the tree of life concept originally come from and how is one to use it in a ritual or ceremony ? If not used in a rite, then how would one use it other wise?

What does your "Spiritual Cleansing Prayer" do for a potential or current Client and how does it exactly work in detail? What does it have to do with a person's spell work and would you be willing to post it for the benefit of all at no charge to the Client or potential Client?

Can you please explain what "Karmic Pay Back" is, and how one could avoid this when engaging in spell work ? What are the principles of the Universe concerning this topic? Isn't "Karmic Pay Back" automatic when spell work is performed, after all, your attempting to change things around in a person's life and therefore altering or causing a "ripple effect" in essence in the lives of all concerned, correct?

Perhaps you can give us an example pertaining to "good" and "bad" Karma or the differences between black magic and white magick; what could be considered a "justified spell" verses a "unlawful magic ritual" or spell?

What are the three key ingredients that a Caster must have before they can cast a successful spell action for anyone, what must be done before they enter into any rite? Come to think of it, what does the Caster have to do before creating any spell not to mention performing it ?

Again, this has nothing to do with the past and is only geared to determine where your'e at magically; to establish if your'e real spell casters or not. I don't think you are real spell casters at this point, however my mind can be changed with the answering of a few simple questions that any person in the magical community would know or be able to look up on the net; Cahill says he's all ready learned it all so he should have absolutely no problem in addressing any of these questions for us, right ?

Now, this page is geared to get to the bottom of the dispute regarding these two self proclaimed "spell casters" and my charges against them in the way of them coming off to the public as something they're not such as Cahill proclaiming to be a "Master Wizard" and the Ex being a "High Priestess".

If these two people don't address these questions for me on ROR then perhaps they will have the grace to address them for anyone who may come to them for spell work. You see, I'm tired of name droppers and people riding on my coat tails that come off to the public as something they are not such as these two sites in my opinion.

Perhaps Jim Morgan would mind his own business and get on with his life instead of trying to interfere with other people's and making assumptions that his the only one capable of mastering the magical art, trying to belittle people with his ohhh soooo many questions that according to him only he has answers to, knowing full well these two aren't here,anyone wanting to know can go directly to Mike himself and the ex and not let Jim Keep using stupid questions to try and make out Cahill doesn't have a clue, or even that the only way he would be credible is if he had learn from Jim himself, after not knowing how or when Cahill has done magically in nearly five years of not being in contact he makes sum big assumptions and trying to treat the public like they were born yesterday. whether Jim likes it or not, Cahill and the ex are spell casters, how they've learn or the level of their spell casting is not down to Jim to make assumptions about, this guy does not even know what they doing in nearly five years so how the hell can he come up here and try to discredit these people with out knowing what they doing now. oh please, the public can find out for themselves, there are various methods of spell casting if i read right, no one method is the only way to cast spells.

Why should Cahill and the ex only be a good spell caster if they learned with Jim learning spells, how on earth would Jim know if he knows these answers or not, is Jim the only one capable of teaching magic, as with any thing in life anyone can learn anything if they put their minds to it, Jim has had no contact coming to five years, what a joke, lol lol lol

What Jim is trying to do her is to discredit these two and make them out to be something they not and its not working because its been proven that they not fakes and the license and tax issues can be resolved by the public seeking the true answers from the Florida offices, if people criticizing its because we don't believe all that has been said about these two and proven here on ror that Jim tells tales and accuses others of acting on behalf of others which isn't true, its because i hate for the public used in his argument against these two.

Cahill does not seem to be here and if he did come up here and tell the truth about Jim, he would still try to belittle him as this is his style and since Cahill is gotten on with his life, if he feels he doesn't need to why should he, let Jim sort it out privately instead of trying to bring attention to himself and trying to make out his right in all that he says. Its down to the public to find out the truth not down to the public to believe this rubbish. Jim should stop trying to bring attention to himself by trying to make out that Mike and the ex don't know anything about magic by asking these question, let the public ask the question, Jim is the one trying to make himself out to be the big man.

Whatever is written on their sites is their business if they want to vent about old issues then its their choice, its their site and no one has the right to tell them how to run their business, if they want to use similar words its their concern, no one has a monopoly on how words are used. And if they got something written in the same or similar way when there no other way to word it then its their concern.Its their business what they write or how they want they're site to be.

Who in their right mind would copy another and let it go as their work when they had a infringement order put on them especially when it was agreed they could use the material, first never given the permission bt Jim then 4 month then 2-3 months then after 4 years and after falling out Mike stole the material lol lol lol

The fact of the matter is Jim is trying to come off as protecting the public when that not true, the public have the answers and where to go to verify the truth should they want to, when all his doing is trying soooooooooooooo damned hard a vilify these two, and make out they don't know anything about magic, if the public want answers they can ask themselves. They won't answer because they are not here on ror the only one is here is Jim and his staying here for attention, trying to vye for business.

Jim has not spoken to them in nearly five years how the hell would he know what kind of people they are and if he says his known them in the past that would be nearly five years ago, so please don't preach to the public on how bad these people might be he has had no contact with them for nearly five years, who's to say if Jim used to practice what he preached even to his clients. Jim is sooooo determined to use this against them.

Jim wants to maintain that Cahill is a fake site, Jim is lying to the public, trying to put doubt in their minds, Mike and the ex are genuine spell caster as proven on ror, Jim is trying to play games with regards to the level of skill, the ability to do spell casting is not an issue at all. Perhaps if they were on ror they would answer but they don't seem to be and if they did Jim would probably still try to vilify them.

Its not up to Jim, to decided their spell casting ability since the last time he had contact with them would a good 3-5 years ago, plus the reason his doing this is because its the only card he can play right now till he finds another, how the hell! would Jim know what they get up to know or what their skills are, answers he wouldn't his just making assumption!, why to discredit them, why for personal issues. If the public truly want the truth then go to the Florida tax and license issue and ask the spell casters the relevant questions.And since they don't appear to be here on ror they won't be answering any of his question and for that i hope the public goes directly to the source to ask question rather then listen to this vindictive man's moaning of more then 3 years now. Jim is a sad vindicitive so call man coming up to 50 years and still crying about other people's ability rather then mind his own business.

They're not unanswerable to Jim in any way shape or form especially here on ror they don't seem to be here, so how can they answer, if clients want these information it would be up to them to ask and not for Jim to play the big martyr, who's sole purpose is to discredit them and ruin their reputation, keep asking all your questions all you like and if anyone really wants the answers ask, and im sure these the public can find out. Jim is just trying to vilify these two people for his own end.His trying to come off like they don't know annything. Keep it up you'll be here forever, they won't give into your demands, you don't have a say on how they run their sites or don't, they are real spell caster get over it.

How did James Morgan learn magic.

Celeste Schaub states, and I quote: (“He has accused me of copy right infringements, and I never or would never intentionally post anyone's points of view”... ) end of quote. And I quote Schaub again: (“Jim Morgan attempted to discredit me on my old site, saying the same things about my stealing copy rited material” ) end of quote.

Please see my Web Spawner Page of http://www.webspawner.com/users/spiritus/ and read the text. Notice the copyright notice by Web Spawner in Jan and my names at the very bottom of the page, then go to Schaub's page of : http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/pleaseread.html and read the same text word for word within exception to the changes I've recently made to the text. Also notice that Schaub has taken off the copyright notice at the bottom of that page when copying and pasting this text to her site; she didn't post the link back to the web Spawner site.

I wonder why she failed to do this ? Perhaps she didn't want you to see that this page was copyrighted. Another point that I'd like to make is that Celeste A. Schaub DOES NOT have my written or verbal permission to use this text up on her site FOR ANY REASON, and that she is currently violating the copyright laws regarding this, and thus, this is in fact one count of copyright infringement in itself. This web Spawner page was copyrighted in 2005 and 2009 by myself.

Also, she claims that she never took credit for anyone else's work as seen in her statement above, however I beg to differ here as well. Please view this page belonging to Schaub at http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/mytributetotheangels.html then reference it to the Wilkipedia's page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_angelic_hierarchy and see the same text word for word. I don't see any links on this particular page leading back to the source or Schaub giving credit to the original author of this text in question, do you ? All I see is Celeste Schaub's statement at the bottom of this page stating, and I quote: “By High Priestess Celeste Ann Schaub”.

View Celeste's now hidden web page entitled “ The Seventh Heaven” at :http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/thelevelsofheaven.html And then View Circle Of Light's Copyrighted Page of: http://www.circle-of-light.com/Angels/angels-info.html. Ok then, my page constitutes copyright infringement as she is using my web Spawner material without my expressed permission either written or verbal. Regarding the other site copied and pasted on her site, perhaps she has notarized document of release and usage of their material that she would like to show us, again, why is she not sighting their link or source of information AS I DID WHEN POSTING BOOKS on the old dragon site for suggested reading ?

On the same page in question being http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/pleaseread.html on the Schaub site theirs also been some other statements made on my Ex.'s part such as, and I quote ( “I would be fair to assume that this person is the same one who had the low life audacity to go to this web site, get names and addresses of many family members from the obituary I posted on this site as a tribute to my wonderful, but deceased mother, and sent them 49 page "books" on "How to slam his ex wife"), end of quote. The letter in question WAS NOT A BOOK ON HOW TO SLAM YOUR EX and address information can be obtained in several different ways other then off a tribute page to her mother, and the only one sympathy peddling here is obviously Schaub. There was a email provided to anyone that had any questions concerning the letter however as I understand it, no questions were asked concerning it as it was very clear in yielding both sides of the story..

Celeste states, and I quote “(I never said this was my writing, it was just great info I passed on to my readers”) end of quote, is this a fact ? If this is so then, again why didn't she site the source, author and link back to the site ? Celeste states, and I quote (“Jim Morgan attempted to discredit me on my old site, saying the same things about my stealing copy rited material”) end of quote. I would imagine that Schaub is speaking in regards to my spell pictures and site text that she was made to take down by myself after she saw her mentioned good friend MIKE CAHILL served with a cease and desist order from my Attorney for the copyright infringement of eight pages taken off Dragon Spells and placed on his MSN sites, not leaving out his current site of www.magicangelspells.com . A law suit was pending against him until this text was removed.

Interesting note; Schaub started yielding bad legal advice to Cahill in this time to which all most caused him to be imprisoned and sued at the same time. Of course when it came down to it Cahill backed down and so did Schaub.

Concerning any NASTY LETTER by Jan, big deal as we have a Shit load of Schaub's nasty and harassing emails and letters before we placed Schaub under the civil restraining order that again Schaub says is bogus lol. You know, if I had to make a guess here, I would say that Miss Schaub is the one that is bitter here and not moving on with her life instead of me. The woman simply doesn't want to play by the rules and continues to copy and paste the material of others onto her web site, most certainly in the hopes that she can fool someone into thinking that she and Cahill have actual knowledge of these things and know what their talking about. Now, NASTY little comments are seen on her business web site regarding Jan and my good names, HOW UNETHICAL and low life is this ?

Just because this wanna be spell caster can't get her own way she now threatens to post other private information on me in particular, however I wouldn't credit her future statements as anything other then plan old hurtful lies and deceptions. Who's acting like the kid here ? "GROW UP", you say ? DAMN, you had better look in the mirror Celeste if you ask me.

Celeste Schaub states, and I quote: (“He has accused me of copy right infringements, and I never or would never intentionally post anyone's points of view”... ) end of quote. And I quote Schaub again: (“Jim Morgan attempted to discredit me on my old site, saying the same things about my stealing copy rited material” ) end of quote.

Please see my Web Spawner Page of http://www.webspawner.com/users/spiritus/ and read the text. Notice the copyright notice by Web Spawner in Jan and my names at the very bottom of the page, then go to Schaub's page of : http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/pleaseread.html and read the same text word for word within exception to the changes I've recently made to the text. Also notice that Schaub has taken off the copyright notice at the bottom of that page when copying and pasting this text to her site; she didn't post the link back to the web Spawner site.

I wonder why she failed to do this ? Perhaps she didn't want you to see that this page was copyrighted. Another point that I'd like to make is that Celeste A. Schaub DOES NOT have my written or verbal permission to use this text up on her site FOR ANY REASON, and that she is currently violating the copyright laws regarding this, and thus, this is in fact one count of copyright infringement in itself. This web Spawner page was copyrighted in 2005 and 2009 by myself.

Also, she claims that she never took credit for anyone else's work as seen in her statement above, however I beg to differ here as well. Please view this page belonging to Schaub at http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/mytributetotheangels.html then reference it to the Wilkipedia's page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_angelic_hierarchy and see the same text word for word. I don't see any links on this particular page leading back to the source or Schaub giving credit to the original author of this text in question, do you ? All I see is Celeste Schaub's statement at the bottom of this page stating, and I quote: “By High Priestess Celeste Ann Schaub”.

View Celeste's now hidden web page entitled “ The Seventh Heaven” at :http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/thelevelsofheaven.html And then View Circle Of Light's Copyrighted Page of: http://www.circle-of-light.com/Angels/angels-info.html. Ok then, my page constitutes copyright infringement as she is using my web Spawner material without my expressed permission either written or verbal. Regarding the other site copied and pasted on her site, perhaps she has notarized document of release and usage of their material that she would like to show us, again, why is she not sighting their link or source of information AS I DID WHEN POSTING BOOKS on the old dragon site for suggested reading ?

On the same page in question being http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/pleaseread.html on the Schaub site theirs also been some other statements made on my Ex.'s part such as, and I quote ( “I would be fair to assume that this person is the same one who had the low life audacity to go to this web site, get names and addresses of many family members from the obituary I posted on this site as a tribute to my wonderful, but deceased mother, and sent them 49 page "books" on "How to slam his ex wife"), end of quote. The letter in question WAS NOT A BOOK ON HOW TO SLAM YOUR EX and address information can be obtained in several different ways other then off a tribute page to her mother, and the only one sympathy peddling here is obviously Schaub. There was a email provided to anyone that had any questions concerning the letter however as I understand it, no questions were asked concerning it as it was very clear in yielding both sides of the story..

Celeste states, and I quote “(I never said this was my writing, it was just great info I passed on to my readers”) end of quote, is this a fact ? If this is so then, again why didn't she site the source, author and link back to the site ? Celeste states, and I quote (“Jim Morgan attempted to discredit me on my old site, saying the same things about my stealing copy rited material”) end of quote. I would imagine that Schaub is speaking in regards to my spell pictures and site text that she was made to take down by myself after she saw her mentioned good friend MIKE CAHILL served with a cease and desist order from my Attorney for the copyright infringement of eight pages taken off Dragon Spells and placed on his MSN sites, not leaving out his current site of www.magicangelspells.com . A law suit was pending against him until this text was removed.

Interesting note; Schaub started yielding bad legal advice to Cahill in this time to which all most caused him to be imprisoned and sued at the same time. Of course when it came down to it Cahill backed down and so did Schaub.

Concerning any NASTY LETTER by Jan, big deal as we have a Shit load of Schaub's nasty and harassing emails and letters before we placed Schaub under the civil restraining order that again Schaub says is bogus lol. You know, if I had to make a guess here, I would say that Miss Schaub is the one that is bitter here and not moving on with her life instead of me. The woman simply doesn't want to play by the rules and continues to copy and paste the material of others onto her web site, most certainly in the hopes that she can fool someone into thinking that she and Cahill have actual knowledge of these things and know what their talking about. Now, NASTY little comments are seen on her business web site regarding Jan and my good names, HOW UNETHICAL and low life is this ?

Just because this wanna be spell caster can't get her own way she now threatens to post other private information on me in particular, however I wouldn't credit her future statements as anything other then plan old hurtful lies and deceptions. Who's acting like the kid here ? "GROW UP", you say ? DAMN, you had better look in the mirror Celeste if you ask me.

THIS POST IS IN RESPONSE TO THE SCHAUB COPY CAT PAGE AND SITE

Schaub camp, If anyone is distorted here it's you with your delusional and irrational mind set. For your information, I am free and entitled to tell my side of the story to whomever I like despite the order; the letter wasn't addressed to you nor was it asking anyone to yield any sort of a message from myself to you. Besides, I don't need a order to deal with your a_s as I can do it just fine by myself without the assistance of anyone else.

If anything you are subject to mail tampering and stealing mail just like the good old days. I have the right to tell the truth to anyone I like in a effort to counteract all the lies you've told others about me. What's the matter don't you like anyone challenging your one sided stories full of twisting and deception ? Wait; don't answer that because I am so tired of hearing your mouth.

THE LETTER WAS TRUTHFUL AND GAVE A HONEST ACCOUNT IN HOW THINGS ACTUALLY TRANSPIRED, BACKED UP WITH PROOF AND OTHER EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNTS ALONG WITH COURT RECORDS. The letter was a fair rendering of both sides, to people I once knew and further who you corrupted with your lies AND TURNED AGAINST ME until they read the letter of course. Your a sympathy and influence peddler if you ask me that is always trying to cover up your negative deeds.

Your a COWARD because you attack people with all you have, especially when the person or persons in question aren't there to defend themselves against your deceptions and lies. Your a thief because you take advantage of those who loved and trusted you enough to blindly sign away their home to you, YOUR THE DISGRACE TO THE HUMAN RACE. The letter was anything but a book on how to "slam your ex-wife", YOU DULLARD. The letter in question also had a email on it to my recollection, that anyone could write to me to receive proof back of the statements being made in it. If anyone is "possessed" here it is you with the spirits of IGNORANCE and FOOLISHNESS, so DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GO BUY YOURSELF A EXORCISM. It's also my right to call old friends for your damn information, only to hear that you've done your level best in smearing my good name, you HYPOCRITE.

POST the letter if you like so everyone can really see what a piece of deceptive s_it you really are, and don't altar it in any way by editing out information here and there. You are GUILTY OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT by taking material off my Web Spawner page to which you were forced to take down by your hosting server Network Solutions, simply because you didn't have my permission to use it, DUH, NOT TO MENTION USING IT TO FURTHER YOUR SITE NAME BY DROPPING MY NAME to the public.

My whole post and the posts of others against you and Cahill is in that your copy cat sites who steal the work of others off the net AND NOW WE'VE PROVED IT, just like you did with three other totally unrelated sites such as LLEWELLYN, CIRCLE OF LIGHT and WILKIPEDIA just to name a few. The Viewer can write to these companies to inquire about the "Schaub incident" if they like just to confirm my statements. Wow, were they trying to slam you as well or trying to delete your site as well by having you take their material off your site ? Am I to understand that everyone including your own server is out to get you ? IS THIS A CONSPIRACY AGAINST YOU ? Or are you just Fuc_king up as you normally do, AND HAVE DONE YOUR ENTIRE LIFE.

When Dragon Spells LLC was active, I did in fact have the works of other authors on the site, however the source was sited with links back to the sites and credit was given to the authors. Damn, is this so HARD for you to understand ? I didn't try to make people think that I wrote the books posted on my pages, now did I ? Your trying to make people believe this about me now, however it's just not true and can be proven on the "Way Back Machine" archives where a person can look up my pages.

Also, if you just wanted to give the public some interesting things to read and weren't meaning to mislead them in any way, then why DO YOU STILL HAVE A PAGE HIDDEN ON YOUR SITE that you were ordered by the author and your host server to remove from your site? Why did this company lodge a complaint against you while threatening legal action for your copyright infringement of their intellectual property ?

You know, you say that your not riding on my coat tails, but why are you seeking publicity through the use of our names on your web site and in making all your false allegations ? Incidentally, we're not done with you either as were very tired of your crack pot charges against us that you can't prove in any way, shape or form, you just might be hearing from our attorneys concerning your slanderous comments up on your site regarding us, you LUNATIC EX-WIFE. Plus the fact that you are now marketing your slander under you true name up on a site registered to you and thus this can now be easily traced back to you by the courts concerning your slander and breach of the civil order.

Moving to the next issue, your statement pertaining to me stating that you don't know what your talking about magically, like you said on your site, EVERYONE HAS THEIR OWN OPINION, and this is my opinion of you, especially when you can't even address a few simple magical questions pertaining to magick, self or your site.

Like I stated in previous posts regarding the spawner page, Celeste Schaub was the site manager and edited the pages belonging to Dragon Spells LLC years ago; however past the administrative stuff she performed, she didn't perform spells with me other then being a gopher or being included in some photo shoots for the site from time to time. The real reason that Schaub left Dragon Spells, or resigned as its manager was for the sole reason that she didn't like Jan Windglows in the picture and decided to move out and leave everything for me to do at that point both administratively and spell wise, hoping that I would fail without her to do this for me.

Yes, she bailed on me and a old man that was depending on her to get his medicine for him just because she couldn't get her way, NOT because she felt that unethical activity was going on concerning Dragon. Her withdrawal came much later after I left the home and when she started plotting with her good buddies Cahill and Mary Prantil, MORE LIES ON SCHAUB'S PART.

Just for the record, this reading thing or the padding of readings is a old issue that I charged Cahill with in the beginning of this conflict regarding how he was using a reader to pad readings that in turn sent Clients to his site, and now we see the Schaub camp throwing this back at us. Cahill was also using this same reader along with the ex and Prantil to post negative comments about us. Take the time to read this as my ex is now trying to throw this back at us like she does with every charge given to her and Cahill that THEY are found guilty of; both now and in the past.

I really don't have any reason to smear anyone on this site, however I will set the record straight when charges are leveled against us, especially by a disgruntled ex-wife who doesn't have the scruples to keep junk like this off her site just because she wants to get even for herself and her copy cat boy friend Stanley Cahill. Also, as stated by me in a previous post, it was mentioned that Jan was one of the top readers on the net at one time but stopped when she started up her magick sites, largely in part to my objections as reading and casting spells seem to be a conflict of interest quit honestly, especially when the reader knows all the case facts. As far as Jan padding readings for me in the past, this is ABSOLUTELY absurd in every way and took place with the Cahill camp rather then with us. Again, Schaub is attempting to throw suspicion off her friend Cahill.

If Celeste Schaub is so magically knowledgeable then why does she have to drop my and Jan's names along with our link on her web site to get attention, I would think that a highly seasoned wanna B Enchantress or Priestess like Schaub wouldn't need to drop anyone's name and could go on her own merit, don't you think ? What exactly is her title any way and who gave it to her ? I didn't give her this title. One week she calls herself a High Enchantress and then the next week a High Priestess, WHICH IS IT; or do they both mean the same thing ?

No, I'm not the "Internet police" or "Guru", but neither are these other unrelated sites lodging complaints against Celeste Schaub and her web site, as far as Schaub breaking what she calls the "bogus restraining order". YES YOU ARE Schaub camp, by mentioning our names on your pathetic web site and communicating slanderous content and messages directed at us over the net, Schaub, you moron.

Why would Schaub's server being Network Solutions give her a ultimatum of either removing my material or getting her site suspended or deleted should she keep our text up on her site unless it was copyrighted text by another she was using ? Schaub states that none of what she's doing is for monetary gain but this is yet just another lie on her part like the many distortions of the truth she renders on a daily basis.

Why is her site named similarly to the old Dragon Spells? Why does she copy and paste it's old key words and phrases to her pages? Why does she still act like she's some part of Dragon Spells when she has no affiliation to it in any regard; and hasn't for going on four years? Why was she made to remove my text from her site during the divorce and why is she now seeking public attention from using my text while pointing out a page that she edited and I let ride years ago concerning one little statement regarding her assisting me generally, especially if she is not trying to ride on my name or coat tails?

As far as my copyrighted material goes, the divorce decree awarded all Dragon Spells copyright to me, PERIOD as thus Schaub has no rights to either use or post any of this material, including any text found on any other site I've created past this point. By the way, Dragon Spells has always been mine and my ex never had any right to the copyrights in the first place. She didn't help me in creating the site and did a poor job in assisting me in maintaining it when this was her job. Dragon Spells wasn't about spiritual things for my now ex as much as it was all about the money for her.

Also, for your information Schaub camp, you bunch of dill weeds, like with any other site, our personal names are in the copyrighted text not to mention being our personal property, WHAT DOES THIS MEAN ????? YOUR STILL IN VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT OR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT BY POSTING OUR NAMES AND LINKS ON YOUR SITE. DUH DUH DUH.

If the truth be known, these negative postings by Schaub and her Cronies are all about money and Clients by blasting another site and persons with untruths, NOT about serving Divinity, protecting or being a benefit to the public in any way. Defrauding and defaming is the business of Cahill and Schaub as far as I'm concerned. It's the same old story that's been going on for all most four years now with the exception of Prantil being here, however Prantil's charges are still being mimicked through Schaub as this is where all this trash came from in the first place. Trash from white trash like yourselves is what it is.

Ok,moving on, her statements about Jan are Bulls_it as well, Jan doesn't say anything about anyone's magical capabilities, however this is my opinion about Schaub being magically illiterate, knowing what I know of her personally, and her failure to address a few simple questions that any Client might ask of her when considering spell work. Schaub states that she is a High Priestess but DOESN'T HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE TO BACK THIS TITLE UP, why is this ?

I'd like a free copy of the cr_p your handing out behind Jan's back to people, Slob, you bunch of jerk off's. Always doing s_it behind everyone's backs just like the bunch of low lives you are, Cahill and Schaub camps. Oh, and I NEVER tried to engage Cahill into any Bulls_it like padded readings, BESIDES, HE WAS IN ENOUGH TROUBLE with sexually harassing and bad mouthing his clients at times through out his time with me. Tell us it's not true Cahill. This can be proven on ROR in the beginning of the copyright conflict between Cahill and myself.

I've never bashed anyone especially Cahill, DO YOU CALL DEMANDING THAT SOMEONE GET YOUR COPYRIGHTED TEXT OFF THEIR SITE BASHING ? Of course you do, Schaub, don't you also ? Especially when your engaging in this same sort of activity currently on the Internet. I was simply asking him to REMOVE MY COPYRIGHTED TEXT from his site.

However, and at the time, you were giving him BAD LEGAL ADVICE that in turn caused CAHILL to refuse to take it down, that in turn caused him to lose one of his sites and be strongly reprimanded and forced to take eight of my Copyrighted pages off of his site as well by his server on another. It all most caused him a law suit with a chance of imprisonment and huge fines, right ?

Celeste Schaub, then Celeste Morgan took her site down about a month after I requested that she take down my material as well, didn't ya Schaub ? Now she's back at it again, some people are just incapable of learning from their past mistakes. Oh, for your information, I AM A MASTER OF THE ARTS Cahill and Schaub camps and you are nothing but copy cat wannabe's.

Again, for your information, Jan Windglows is what she says she is, AN EXPERIENCED ENCHANTRESS OF THE ADVANCED MAGICAL ARTS unlike you Schaub who only pretend to be one. "Hey, YOU MIGHT KNOW ME ON T.V AS A HIGH PRIESTESS, but I'm really not a high priestess in real life says Schaub, while pushing a beautyrest mattress or other house wears HA HA HA".

Jan Windglows knew 100 times more then you ever knew right from the start, she retained everything I ever taught her and quickly drew up her own PROFESSIONAL spell charts, understands Universal principles and Angelic orders, makes her wax dolls correctly, she is a master spell writer and has spiritual gifts that I only wish I had. She's been with me for six years now but was already very highly skilled and had many years of magickal knowledge and expertise way before she ever studied under me, un-like you to which never really caught on to anything I tried to teach you.

And Jan does have rights to my copyrights as they are on her site with my FULL permission both written and verbally, so what's the problem little copy cat sites ????? Lastly, it's never about Schaub admitting to anything even when she has been caught red handed in the act of copyright infringement by posting my page and the pages of others not related to me on her site.

Damn, she even stated that she took the page of mine without permission on ROR under one of her fake little names and then said to the server that "she wasn't in admittance of guilt" LOL...... what an ass_ole. I do show courtesy to the public via addressing the questions the Schaub camp , however like always, she always has to throw the same charges made against her concerning things she has personally done back at others only to try to cover up her OWN wrong doings and nonsense, right Schaub? I simply get tired of addressing her same cra_ over and over again; due to the thickness of Schaub's skull and the minute size of her brain, somehow Schaub just doesn't "GET IT".

Ok, now that were all done addressing these same old issues the Cahill and Schaub camps keep bringing up, that keep showing them for the IDIOTS they really are in real life, let's move on. Alright now everyone, as you've seen by reading the previous posts on this page and others while observing all the cross links showing the Schaub copying and pasting of other sites to her own, plus the one

she actually took credit for writing as seen when you view this particular page, not to mention the one she has hidden that you can still view as we obtained the link before she tried to hide it. Be sure to read the previous posts. Now, didn't I just address a sh_t load of questions and accusations by Schaub, this is something else she states that I don't do such as addressing her statements even though she never addresses anyone else's questions, this is also something I've pointed out before concerning her in other posts.

Another thing, if anyone wants to know where I've obtained my magical experience and why I call myself a Master Of The Arts, then all you have to do is to read the Dragon Spells archives found by clicking the banner to Castle Dragon's Eye that is displayed on Blood Love And Lust Spells. Where is Schaubs or Cahill's magical history aside from their BOASTFUL CLAIMS on their sites of being in the arts for X amount of years ?

Now, may I present to you our latest proof concerning the Schaub web site and her copying and pasting text from yet other sites and then being warned by the company and host service to remove it immediately. Of course this is along with the transcripts of Jan and myself sighting her for the copyright infringement of our sites being the Spawner page and Blood Love Snd Lust Spells , GO BACK TO HER SITE PAGE OF ((( PLEASE READ ))) and then come back to this page and read the below information. THE FIRST COMPLAINT IS BY LLEWELLYN PUBLISHING'S and the second complaint is by us.

=======================================

On July 29, 2009, Network Solutions received yet another claim of copyright infringement by Sally Heuer acting on behalf of the claimed owner. Please find attached the emailed complaint.

The registrant (Ms. Schaub) of an affected site may make a counter notification pursuant to sections 512(g) (2) and (3) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. When we receive a counter notification, we may reinstate the material in question.

To file a counter notification with us, you must provide a written communication that sets forth the items specified this are claimed to be infringed. Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is not infringing the copyrights of others. Accordingly, if you are not sure whether certain material infringes the copyrights of others, we suggest that you first contact an attorney.

Once Network Solutions is in receipt of a properly filed Counter Notification we will promptly provide the person who filed the original notification with a copy of the counter notification and inform them that the material will be replaced or access to it restored in 10 business days. Please note that the material and website cease disabling access to it not less than 10 and not more than 14 business days following receipt of the counter notification. This does not apply, and the material should not be replaced, if the designated agent receives notification that legal action to seek a court order to restrain the subscriber from engaging in infringing activity to the material has been commenced.

If Network Solutions does not receive confirmation that the alleged infringing content has been removed today by the 5 p.m. July 30, 2009 your site will be deactivated. Filing a counter notification does not prevent the site from being deactivated if the alleged infringing material is still on the site. In order to keep the site active you must remove the alleged material and if you so wish file a counter notification. Network Solutions is merely the Registrar and the Hosting provider for the above referenced domain name, we are not in a position to make judgment, and again we will comply with the DMCA.

Respectfully,

John David, Paralegal
Network Solutions, LLC
Telephone: 703.668.5615
Facsimile: 703.668.5959
Email: dmca@networksolutions.com

===========================================

From: DMCA
Subject: RE: DN: www.fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com Registrar: Network Solutions; Host: Network Solutions- Attention To John David URGENT
To: "Celeste Schaub" , permissions@llewellyn.com, sallyh@llewellyn.com
Cc: Passionspells@aol.com
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 3:54 PM

Network Solutions, LLC is not in a position to determine rights to use images, photographs and other content that may appear on a website. However, Network Solutions is bound by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ( DMCA ), to take action when properly filed complaints have been made. The notice was sent July 21, 2009 along with the complaint by Janhett T. Windglows & James R. Morgan ll which listed the alleged infringing material. When the 48 hours expires and Network Solutions received no confirmation that the infringing material is removed the site will be taken down per DMCA and per our service agreement.

On July 29, 2009, Network Solutions received yet another claim of copyright infringement by Sally Heuer acting on behalf of the claimed owner. Please find attached the emailed complaint.

The registrant (Ms. Schaub) of an affected site may make a counter notification pursuant to sections 512(g) (2) and (3) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. When we receive a counter notification, we may reinstate the material in question.

To file a counter notification with us, you must provide a written communication that sets forth the items specified this are claimed to be infringed. Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is not infringing the copyrights of others. Accordingly, if you are not sure whether certain material infringes the copyrights of others, we suggest that you first contact an attorney.

From: Celeste Schaub [mailto:c_schaub@ymail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:52 PM
To: DMCA
Subject: RE: DN: www.fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com Registrar: Network Solutions; Host: Network Solutions- Attention To John David URGENT

Until proper facts are straightened out I will remove the one page alleged
copy rite infringements Mr. Morgan has alleged to you I have committed, THIS IS NOT AN ADMISSION OF GUILT, THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED AT A LATER DATE I ASSURE YOU...CELESTE SCHAUB
--- On Thu, 7/30/09, DMCA wrote:

==========================================

Now, what isn't Schaub and her scum bucket friends not understanding here ? Schaub was forced to take down the copyrighted material from both sites and even admits to taking down my stuff because her server forced her to, but continues to use our private names and links on her web site without our permission. Schaub's rogue site is still guilty of copyright infringement as far as were concerned . And what does this mean ((( THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED AT A LATER DATE I ASSURE YOU...CELESTE SCHAUB ))) is this some kind of threat of more bashing on the way from the Schaub camp ? Is she just angry because she's been caught yet again ?

It's a Copyright Infringement simply because our names are not only private property but are included in our Copyrighted material along with any links or domain names accosted with our sites. We AGAIN BOTH FORMALLY REQUEST AND PUBLICLY DEMAND THAT Celeste Schaub IMMEDIATELY REMOVE our names and anything else connected with us off of her site.

Oh, and Schaub camp, no one said that "they owned The Angels Of Divinity"; especially Jan, so where in the hell are you getting this from ? More than likely the same place where your getting the rest of your cr_p from, I would imagine. How can you even call on Angels knowing what you've done, aren't you afraid they might come down and smite you or something ? I dare you to swear in the name of Divinity that you haven't done anything you've been accused of, I DARE YOU.

I'm sure you will spew more garbage from your mouth but it doesn't matter as you have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt who and what kind of a person you are, hell, you can't even write your own post without copying something I've said in one of my previous post about you or Cahill. All the Schaub and Cahill web sites amount to in essence is a lot of copying and pasting on their pages off other sites with very little to no magical information written by themselves personally about anything, these sites are very dull to look at, they look just like what they are;

two ( AMATEUR ) sites that have no depth or any real meaning to either of them, who try so hard to look like something more then they are but fail miserably at best. These folks can't write their own text or produce their own spell pictures not to mention giving anyone a full and comprehensive run down or explanation of what is done for them magically should they dare ask.

These sites talk about high alchemy, astrology, botany and other magical disciplines of study but can't satisfactorily explain anything from what I've heard, the only thing high here is their attitudes and egos, not anything magical. Again, this site belonging to Schaub can't even satisfactorily explain her ideologies or theology to passer's by without stumbling around and flubbing up her words from between uncertain lips.

These two people in question always hope that the business of other sites are in decline probably because business sucks for them personally. The owner of this Schaub site seems to be a narrow minded little woman who enjoys making conflict so people will notice her even if it means stealing text and pictures from other sites or making slanderous comments about others. Cahill's site is just as dull and meaningless with about the same tone to it.

Schaub talks about folks judging her when caught in the act of stealing other peoples text and how she does everything in Divinity's name, but I think she comes off as more of a Liar and Hypocrite through her proven negative actions, than she has the nerve to call other people a false prophet etc. Damn, I believe she was called this in a post against her by myself some time ago.

These two sites are is a waste of space in my opinion who have been exposed over and over again, If I had to use some various words to describe these sites and the people that run them being Schaub and Cahill, I would venture to use such words as Nasty, Arrogant, Egotistical, Lying, Deceptive, Bigoted, self-righteous, Treacherous, Ignorant, jealous, petty, shallow, vicious, blaming, plotting, name dropping, attention seeking, self-serving and let's not forget self-absorbed and bitter because she Fuc_ked up her own life just to name a few things. In my opinion these traits found in them are the very traits that Divinity hates most in the human spirit and how can the sick heal the sick?

Of course if I had to use some terms to describe them, I would venture to use such terms as Un-inventive, Un-imaginative, Masters of plagiarism and copyright infringing, un-learned in magical art and so fourth, this is only my opinion you understand and may not be the shared opinion or view of some that either have or will speak to them in the future at some point. Schaub speaks of me as, and I quote ( a so-called Wizard or self-proclaimed Wizard ) but I would say that I would match magical knowledge against her and Cahill's dull wittedness any day of the week AND IN MY SLEEP.

You know, I don't think there's a real Wizard or Witch in the world who isn't looking at the Schaub posts under all her fake names while thinking what a liar and deceptive person she is. She should really be kind to herself and get a real job that she can actually perform or know something about AND QUIT STEALING THE WORK OF OTHERS and STOP gettting all pis_ed off and as a result writing a little messed up web page where you are bad mouthing us all over your poorly written "revised" page because YOU, Schaub who swore to the public that you NEVER copied and pasted ANYONE'S materials to your web site YET you got caught by Network Solutions and they forced you to take our Copyrighted text OFF your web site and if you did not, they would have deleted your web site entirely. That is NOT what a professional business savvy person would do, only a SORE loser who got caught in the act like you did, Schaub would behave in such a manner as you have. Oh, by the way BOO HOO HOO FOR YOU SORE LOSER SCHAUB ...... and thanks for putting our names and our web site link on the "revised page" of your web site, because it is driving new clients to us that will stay with us. We already have three people that are new clients that came to us from seeing our names on your site, LOL. Once people talk to Jan they stay with her because she knows how to take care of her clients....unlike "some" people that I know...... Ok Public, this is what you have on this fake site and self-proclaimed person who calls herself HIGH PRIESTESS, and thus take stock and draw your own conclusions. If you like, write into Network Solutions to confirm the emails above and what just transpired with the schaub site.

WARNING TO THE PUBLIC

AGAIN, these two sites owned and operated by Schaub and Cahill ARE NOT affiliated, connected or attached to Jan or myself in any way, shape or form. These sites do not follow our spell criteria and DO NOT HAVE ANY RIGHTS to post any material being pictured, textual or method of operation from our sites. We consider these sites as rogue sites or cheap imitations of what we have successfully accomplished magically and spiritually with any that come to us. We DO NOT take any responsibility for any promises or claims these rogue sites make nor do we condone any method or methods they may use in the process of whatever perceived action they may be using in the name of magical art. We Do Not recognize these sites as anything to do with magical art more so then just trouble makers on the net bashing and stealing Copyrighted intellectual property from other sites with nothing to offer except pure propaganda.

Here is the link to the hidden page that Celeste Ann Schaub is hiding from viewers on the net.

http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/revisedpage.html

Here is what Celeste wrote about us on that page....does what she wrote here below sound like something a "High Priestess" or an "Enchantress" would actually write and post on their own web page?

Celeste Ann Schaub : " Hi Everyone, it has come to my attention from several past and current clients, friends and family members, that a certain person who has been bashing my private and public life has been posting blogs on the infamous "Rip Off Reports" site on the Internet.

I would be fair to assume that this person is the same one who had the low life audacity to go to this web site, get names and addresses of many family members from the obituary I posted on this site as a tribute to my wonderful, but deceased mother, and sent them 49 page "books" on "How to slam his ex wife", while in his distorted mind thought they would feel sympathy for him and side with him for what ever reason. The post mark was from "Sandpoint, Idaho, USA"...guess that would be your address as you stated you lived there in past postings, Jim (James ) Morgan II. He never left a return address as I am sure he thought they may answer and tell him what they thought of his foolish and childish attempts to slur me to them. He even called several family members trying to convince them of how he "was wronged" by me...All they had to say is "What is the matter with that man, is he possessed? My response I would say is probably so...

He has accused me of copy right infringements, and I never or would never intentionally post anyone's points of view...what I did post is years of accumulated knowledge from books, etc. just to give the reader informed information about Magick, and the wonders of the angels and all of Divinity...many people want to know these things and when I read or hear of an interesting point of view or subject on anything to do with Divinity I let my readers know of this, as I often share the same views. I never said this was my writing, it was just great info I passed on to my readers...just like when Jim Morgan used to go to the net and books and post views on his old retired site of Dragon Spells LLC he started in 2001...Jim Morgan attempted to discredit me on my old site, saying the same things about my stealing copy rited material, and when I wrote the author (of which her name was posted) she said she saw nothing wrong with my posting her info on my site, and then gave me permission to keep it on the site.

There has also been postings he has continued to put on ROR for almost two whole years now, that I have no knowledge of Magick etc., yet I will copy and paste an actual page he has on the Internet, when we were still married, and still is on the net if you search, about my title and qualifications while working side by side with him on his site, this was posted in 2005. I ask you readers to review this then tell me, was he not telling the truth then about my qualifications, or is he not telling the truth now? Either way I am sure this very bitter, and unprofessional person I once called my husband, is not telling the truth either way you look at it.This is only yet another attempt to smear my name private and publicly, as well as that of my friend Mike Cahill and his site in his ongoing vendetta over a divorce that went seriously wrong, as far as he is concerned along with his fiance' Janhett T Windglows, as I have possession of her nasty mailed letters etc. as well. I think all readers would agree...come on Jim, get over it, you moved to get a new start on your life with Janhett, so please do so and MOVE ON...no one cares about you airing the dirty laundry you continue to carry around-you are not the GURU of the Internet, or Internet police, you and only you have tried your best to ruin the name of Magick on the net, by your child like behavior...true servants of Divinity do not act like you, I have not heard of any other site bashing another,as this is so unprofessional...if you are retired as you say, then go enjoy your life with Janhett, get married as she has proclaimed you both are to do, and forget your past...your past and your present and your future you create, no one else does...your choices, made freely, so please find something else to do with your free time and make your life productive. No one wants to hear your one sided views, most important, THEY DON'T EVEN CARE...and by the way,

I do blood my spells and have been for a long time now, a mutual friend showed me the proper and safe way to blood a prayer by inserting a needle in my vein, and I do so freely, that along with a sincere desire to help my clients and a great rapport with all of Divinity, dark and light, makes my spells strong and work...all done in Justice name...something you used to know about but must have forgotten through the years on your rise to fame and fortune, and no I am not breaking any bogus injunction you and her put on me on your little trip to California last year, you have posted my name and my business all over the net, stalked me through my private and business life, and I have all the copies you sent out to my family and witnesses that will testify if needed that you started this fiasco, so you broke your own injunction you put on me by doing exactly what you falsely accussed me of. Injunctions work both ways-I don't bother you-and it does not give you a free license to harrass me and bother me, I do not care what you do in your private and business world and wish you would would find internal peace ...my words of advice are...move on.

I have something I wish to share with my readers...I currently have been "ordered" by my website hoster, Net work Solutions, that Jim Morgan II (my ex) and Janhett T. Windglows, have filed Copy rite violations with me for posting the "Site 5" page my ex posted on the net, of which I stated previously that this was posted on my site just to show where he stated back in 2005 that I worked along side with him and did have "Magical" knowledge before I started my own site(s) and was NEVER intended for monetary gain. This was meant to contradict his accusations on ripoffreport.com that I had no prior knowledge and was only riding on his coat tails LOL...

First off, riding on his or any ones coat tails to make a profit or to make my site come up on the search engines by de-frauding the public is not my style...I am here for one reason and that is to educate the public about Divinity whether they purchase a spell from me or not. Janhett Taylor Windglows of www.bloodloveandlustspellshas HAS NO KNOWLEDGE OF MY MAGICAL SKILLS, OR THE COPY RITES THAT WAS ACQUIRED AS SHE WAS A Physic ON JIM'S SITE OF DRAGON SPELLS LLC AFTER THEY WERE PURCHASED IN 2003. SHE WAS NOT LICENSED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA AT THAT TIME IN 2005 AS A PHYSIC AND WAS WORKING WITH JIM TO LEAD PEOPLE TO HIS SITE THROUGH PHYSIC READINGS TILL SHE STARTED HER SITE IN 2006 AS A SPELL CASTER. I RESIGNED AS AN Administrative OFFICER WITH THE STATE OF FLORIDA, THROUGH THE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS, AS MANAGER AND REPORTING OFFICER FOR DRAGON SPELLS LLC THROUGH IRS, AS A SIGNER ON THE BUSINESS CHECKING ACCOUNT AND AS MANGER FOR FILING REPORTS WITH THE ACCOUNTANT JUST BECAUSE OF THE WAY THEY WERE Deceiving THE PUBLIC AND DEFRAUDING THE PUBLIC TO PURCHASE SPELLS (you can write the previous agencies and ask for the letter I sent to them, or me and I will send you a free copy). JANETT'S NAME WAS "NECTERES" ON JIM'S SITE IN MID 2005-2006. THEY WERE WANTING MY GOOD FRIEND AND SPELL CASTER MIKE CAHILL TO WORK WITH THEM AS WELL, AND WHEN HE REFUSED THEY HAVE BEEN BASHING HIM EVER SINCE. TRUTH IS JANHETT MOVED TO FLORIDA IN OCTOBER OF 2005, AND IN HER OWN WORDS AND IN FRONT OF MANY CREDIBLE Witnesses TO 'LEARN MAGICK FROM THE GREAT SELF PROCLAIMED WIZARD, MY THEN HUSBAND JIM MORGAN II. SO IN REALITY SHE HAD ONLY ABOUT A YEAR OF TRAINING BEFORE SHE GAINED ALL THIS ASTOUNDING KNOWLEDGE. WHY SHE FILED A COMPLAINT I HAVE NO IDEA, AS SHE HAD NO CLAIM TO THE COPY RITE EIGHT PAGES OF DRAGON SPELLS LLC, SHE DID THIS SIMPLY FOR SPITE. THIS IS IN NO WAY AN ADMITTANCE OF GUILT FOR ME REMOVING THIS "SITE 5" PAGE HE ALLEGES WAS COPY RITE, TRUTH IS COPY RITES WERE ON EIGHT PAGES OF DRAGON SPELL LLC IN 2003, THE POSTING I HAD WAS CLEARLY WRITTEN IN 2005. I SEE JIM WENT ON THE NET AND Accused ME OF "TAMPERING" WITH THIS PAGE I ADVISED THE PUBLIC TO GO AND Goggle THEIR SELF AND FIND...WHERE MY NAME AND HIS WAS MENTIONED IN 2005 THAT HE WROTE AND SIGNED, "SINCERELY JIM AND CELESTE", AND NOW HAS CHANGED/REPLACED MY NAME WITH JANHETTS...HOW CAN I CHANGE OR TAMPER HIS WEB SITE SUBMISSION, I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF HIS HOSTING COMPANY OR USER ID PASSWORD ETC...YOU CAN EDIT AN EMAIL, JUST ASK JIM AND JANHETT, THEY HAVE REPEATEDLY DID THIS TO TRY AND PROVE THEIR POINT...POINT IS YOU ARE BOTH A SHAME TO MAN KIND AND THE MAGICAL COMMUNITY...I AM SORRY TO HAVE TO POST THIS BUT GUESS WHAT THIS IS MY OPINION AND I BACK MINE UP WITH FACTS, NOT LIES AND DECEIT...AND JUST TO LET YOU KNOW....IT IS THOSE IN GLASS HOUSES SHOULDN'T THROW STONES, NOT ROCKS, BUT THEN AGAIN YOU TWO HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM WITH ACCURACY, YOU NEVER ANSWER ISSUES ADDRESSED YOU JUST CREATE NEW ONES...AND JANHETT, YOU DON'T OWN THE ANGELS OF DIVINITY, THEY WERE PUT HERE FOR EVERY ONE, SO DON'T FLATTER YOURSELF...THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED AGAIN, IT ISN'T OVER....FALSE PROPHETS ARE ALIVE AND DOING WELL..."

......tsk tsk tsk......."High Priestess?" "Enchantress?" Everyone knows that Celeste Ann Schaub is mad because she GOT CAUGHT in MANY bare faced lies. She said over and over again that she would NEVER copy ANYONE elses' material, didn't she? How many times over the many posts did she say that in the course of over two years?

In closing, since Celeste likes to quote scripture, we thought we would leave her with one in particular. We think it will REALLY hit home for her, lol after all her lies and talk about "false prophets", etc........YEAH she should look in the mirror and PREACH IT to HERSELF for a change. After all, a true servant of Divinity will admit that they have made a mistake, and then JUDGE THEMSELVES, right? .....oh but NOT Celeste, because she is too busy walking on water next to Jesus Christ Himself- right, Celeste? LOL. OOOOOPS looks to me like you are sinking now.....I would say that walking on water is no longer one of your better "psuedo" attributes, and never really was, now that the public knows the real truth about you.

"Beware of false prophets, ( such as Celeste Ann Schaub ) which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits.

Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." ( Matthew 7:15-20 KJV )

..............hmmmmmmmmmmm I bet that fire must be getting pretty HOT for ya by now, huh Celeste?

Jan Windglows – Seeks REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund by posting blatant lies on Ripoff Report.com:   DO NOT USE: JAN WINDGLOWS !!!!   NOT A psychic !!!   Will BREACH client confidentiality and post blatant lies on the Global Interet about clients that are unhappy and want a refund.

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   

 

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

BREACH

CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY, NOT Spellcasters or Psychics, Scam clients for money then dissappear – Complete Rip-off!!

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

JAN WINDGLOWS HAS BEEN RUNNING AROUND THIS RIPOFF REPORT.COM STATING THIS AND THAT UNDER FALSE NAMES AND PLACES WHILE NOT REALLY PRODUCING ANY SOLID EVIDENCE TO THESE CLAIMS MADE BY Jan Windglows...AGAINST unhappy clients that want a refund. NO VALIDITY AND OR SUBSTANCE AT ALL TO HER CLAIMS OTHER THEN HER VENTING ACCUSATIONS COMING AT US OUT OF NOWHERE.

 

WARNING:

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

Here's where Jan Windglows Ripped Off Another Spell Caster Sites By giving pyschic readings that customers wanted their money back...Who is the Real Fraud Here I ask you?. JAN WINDGLOWS WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT SHE Will refund the work...PAYS FOR HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT JAN WINDGLOWS PROFESSES Unhappy Customer: I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Jan Windglows. Yes, I did read for me.   The worst reading of my life TOTAL rip-off !!! During said time Jan   conned me and begged me to let her a a spell for me. Also I told her that I usually don’t ewven get psychic readings..Jan wanted $5,000.00 for the type of spell saying that it was High Magic , not something simple.

I didn’t want the spell and Jan Windglows said she would curse me and would reverse the spell if I didn't pay her $5000. I told her that she should get professional therapy. HERE'S WHERE JAN WINDGLOWS REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR JAN WINDGLOWSIS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER PAID BY JAN WINDGLOWS TO START WITH LOL. Jan Windglows tried to screw up my Credit with Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoices until as if uit were me then saying I asked for charge back....the unhappy customer found out what Jan Windglows was doing and reported it to PayPal fraudulent activities.

See how mis-informed Jan Windglows s. Basically what Jan Windglows as trying to do was get her work performed for free by paying Jan with checks and then attempting to get her money back for these cashed checks through pay pal. Notice where this email originated from below and who it was sent to under the original message heading. To those of you that know how to check IP Addresses this should clear up any doubts that this is her actual communication to pay pal. So Much for Jan Windglows's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part. -----Original Message----- From: unhappycustomer to:complaint-response@paypal.com Cc: wizardmorgan2@aol.com; passionspells@aol.com Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:12 pm Subject: Invoice From James Morgan PayPay, I wish to report Jan Windlgows for Fraud – she used my Credit Card without my permisssion and charged my Card $5000 There is a $1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Loe lust and Blood spells...which I did not approve.

Thanks, Unhappy Customer

'JAN WINDGLOWS

TRIED TO RIP JAN OFF PAY PAL A RIP OFF SCAM WHO LIKES TO COMMIT FRAUD. JAN WINDGLOWS LIKES TO ACCUSE OTHERS OF THIS TO THROW SUSPICION FROM HERSELF.

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   

 

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

BREACH

CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY, NOT Spellcasters or Psychics, Scam clients for money then dissappear – Complete Rip-off!!

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

DO NOT USE

–

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

or

passionspells@aol.com

or wizardmorgan2@aol.com .   PO Box # 712

Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James Morgan and Jan Windglows – BREACH Client Confidentiality , hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!!  Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!   

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

Gypsy SCUM

– James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of several spell casting sites on the Global Internet including

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

breach client confidentiality and are proven Internet Predators with no magical powers or wizardry.   These to Gypsy SCUM will commit DECEPTION FRAUD and IDENTITY THEFT and take clients for thousands and thousands of American hard earned dollars.  DO NOT USE or be RIPPED OFF by these SCUM idiots who stalk their clients and commit internet fraud by hacking into savings/checking accounts and posting personal information of clients on Global Internet. 

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

Scam Spell Casting Scheme Operation– James Morgan and Jan Windglows of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 NOT WIZARDS- NOT PSYCHICS-NOT SPELL CASTERS !!!

James/JIM Morgan and Jan Windglows have no magical powers and both are complete SCUM Rip-off Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off innocent CLIENTS...I know James/Jim Morgan AND Jan Windglows are complete Rip-off and Scam Artists whose only desire is to get as much money off their victims then NEVER answer their phone ever again...do not be taken by these CREEPS!!!

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

0D

DO NOT USE: FAKE Spell Casters James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.  

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

BEWARE - Complete Rip-off !! : 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE -

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 or

passionspells@aol.com

or

wizardmorgan2@aol.com – NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

 

 

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows unless you want your money stolen from you=2 0by these Gypsy Scum 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224, PO Box #712 Driggs , Idaho 83422 .

BREACH

CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY:

Do not send personal check or use Western Union or PayPal you will NEVER get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!   

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   ;

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows:

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

Business phone: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224

emails:

Jan Windglows:

passionspells@aol.com

Jim Morgan:

wizardmorgan2@aol.com

 

"Blood Love And Lust Spells"

Here are some of James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows sites to beware and not use:

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/lovespellcastings.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/deathspells.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/ultimatespells.html

s.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/magicdisruption.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/removeacurse.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastingpreviews.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/testamonials.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/orderaspell.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastinginfo.html

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE -

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 or

passionspells@aol.com

or

wizardmorgan2@aol.com – NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: BREACH Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Intern et !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

 

 

 

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

805-455-6548–

WARNING :

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

or

passionspells@aol.com

PO Box #712

Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-

Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

805-455-6548–

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows

Will Seek REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund by posting blatant lies on Rip-off Report.com:   DO NOT USE: JAN WINDGLOWS or her employee James or Jim Morgan !!!!   NOT Psychics !!!   NOT Spell Casters ! Will BREACH client confidentiality and post blatant lies on the Global Internet about clients that are unhappy and want a refund.

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   

 

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists/Internet Predators James Morgan and Jan Windglows of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

BREACH

CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY, NOT Spell casters or Psychics, Scam clients for money then disappear – Complete Rip-off!!

 

DO NOT USE

–

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

or

passionspells@aol.com

or wizardmorgan2@aol.com .   PO Box # 712

Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James Morgan and Jan Windglows – BREACH Client Confidentiality , hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!!  Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!   

 

 

 

WARNING:

Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

  SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

805-455-6548–

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   

 

JAN WINDGLOWS HAS BEEN RUNNING AROUND THIS RIPOFF REPORT.COM WEBSITE …STATING THIS AND THAT ABOUT X-Clients that asked for a refund…WHILE NOT REALLY PRODUCING ANY SOLID EVIDENCE TO THESE CLAIMS MADE BY Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan...AGAINST unhappy clients that want a refund. NO VALIDITY AND OR SUBSTANCE AT ALL TO OF THESE Slanderous CLAIMS OTHER THEN THESE CON-ARTISTS VENTING ACCUSATIONS COMING AT X-clients that are simple retaliation for exposing this  

Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   

 

Here's where Jan Windglows tried to Rip-off both PayPal and clients by giving saying she gave psychic reading and that customers also wanted a spell but they didn’t approve it and or Jan Windglows did not honor website offer of MONEY BACK GUARANTEE and clients never got their money back...Who is the real Fraud here I ask you? JAN WINDGLOWS OWNER OF

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

805-455-6548 IS THE ANSWER. Jan Winglows SAYS THAT SHE Will refund the work...BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS UnHappy Customer BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT JAN WINDGLOWS PROFESSES.

 

 

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows Seeks revenge post Blatant Lies about unsatisfied X-client that ask for a refund! DO NOT USE 805-455-6548.

COMPLAINT of Unhappy Customer: I've forwarded you two e-mails in regard to Jan Windglows. Yes, Jan did read for me.   The worst reading of my life TOTAL rip-off !!! During said time Jan conned me and begged me to let her a spell for me. Also I told her that I usually don’t even get psychic readings..Jan wanted $5,000.00 for the type of spell saying that it was High Magic , not something simple…I want a refund to my $150 psychic reading from Jan Windglows as it was the worst of my life….pls refund my PayPal account.   I didn’t want the spell and Jan Windglows said she would curse me and would reverse the spell if I didn't pay her $5000. I told her that she should get professional therapy. HERE'S WHERE JAN WINDGLOWS REPORTED CLIENTS TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION FOR JAN WINDGLOWSIS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT WASN”T APPROVED   DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER APPROVED To be paid. 0D Jan Windglows tried to screw up my Credit with Pay Pal account by attempting to pay her own invoices until as if it were me then saying I asked for charge back....the unhappy customer found out what Jan Windglows was doing and reported it to PayPal fraudulent activities.

-----Original Message----- From: unhappycustomer to:

complaint-response@paypal.com

Cc:

wizardmorgan2@aol.com ;

passionspells@aol.com

Sent: XXXXXXX Subject: Invoice20From James Morgan PayPay, I wish to report Jan Windlgows for Fraud – she used my Credit Card without my permisssion and charged my Card $5000 There is a $1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Blood Love and Lust and Blood Spells...which I did not approve.

 

I didn’t want the spell and Owner, Jan Windglows said she would curse me and would reverse the spell if I didn't pay her $5000. I told her that she should get professional therapy.

Thanks, Unhappy Customer of

JAN WINDGLOWS

SCAM Psychic-Jan Windglows: Owner of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

805-455-6548–

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!    Will Seeks REVENGE on unsatisfied customers who ask for a refund

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

DO NOT USE

–

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

or

passionspells@aol.com

or wizardmorgan2@aol.com .   PO Box # 712

Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James Morgan and Jan Windglows – BREACH Client Confidentiality , hack into clients personal computers to take your money out of checking accounts and credit cards; Stalk clients on Internet and post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet; Will NOT cast spells; and worse James Morgan and Jan Windglows are not spell casters or psychics; once they get your money they stop answering the phone!!!!  Do not use Western Union or PayPal you will never get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!   

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

Gypsy SCUM

– James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of several spell casting sites on the Global Internet including

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

breach client confidentiality and are proven Internet Predators with no magical powers or wizardry.   These to Gypsy SCUM will commit DECEPTION FRAUD and IDENTITY THEFT and take clients for thousan ds and thousands of American hard earned dollars.  DO NOT USE or be RIPPED OFF by these SCUM idiots who stalk their clients and commit internet fraud by hacking into savings/checking accounts and posting personal information of clients on Global Internet. 

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

Scam Spell Casting Scheme Operation– James Morgan and Jan Windglows of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 NOT WIZARDS- NOT PSYCHICS-NOT SPELL CASTERS !!!

James/JIM Morgan and Jan Windglows have no magical powers and both are complete SCUM Rip-off Artist Scamming thousands of dollars off inn ocent CLIENTS...I know James/Jim Morgan AND Jan Windglows are complete Rip-off and Scam Artists whose only desire is to get as much money off their victims then NEVER answer their phone ever again...do not be taken by these CREEPS!!!

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

DO NOT USE: FAKE Spell Casters James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows do not have magical powers and will only try to scam you for thousands of dollars.  

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Cast ing Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

BEWARE - Complete Rip-off !! : 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE -

w ww.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 or

passionspells@aol.com

or

wizardmorgan2@aol.com – NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: Breach Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Internet !!!  STAY AWA Y from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

 

 

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: James/Jim Morgan or Jan Windglows unless you want your money stolen from these Gypsy Scum 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224, PO Box #712 Driggs , Idaho 83422 .

BREACH

CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY:

Do not send personal check or use Western Union or PayPal you will NEVER get your money back from James Morgan and Jan Windglows. False Claims on website: NO MONEY BACK Guarantee!! Infact, Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows will retaliate and seek revenge on clients that ask for refund by posting slander, including changing and editing clients personal emails with false statements then posting on Global Internet. Truly, STAY AWAY FROM Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows WHO are sick socio-paths!!!   

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   ;

BEWARE and DO NOT USE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglo ws of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

or

passionspells@aol.com

or wizardmorgan2@aol.com .   PO Box # 712

Idaho , Driggs, 83422 . 805-455-

James/Jim Morgan and Jan W indglows:

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

Business phone: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224

emails:

Jan Windglows:

passionspells@aol.com

Jim Morgan:

wizardmorgan2@aol.com

0A

 

"Blood Love And Lust Spells"

Here are some of James/Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows sites to beware and not use:

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/lovespellcastings.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspell s.com/deathspells.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/ultimatespells.html

s.html

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/magicdisruption.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlusts pells.com/removeacurse.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastingpreviews.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/testamonials.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/orderaspell.html

 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/spellcastinginfo.html

 

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!  

 

BEWARE: 805-455-6548 or 208-639-2224 Con-artists James /Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows only want your money. DO NOT USE -

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 or

passionspells@aol.com

or

wizardmorgan2@aol.com – NOT SPELLCASTERS; NO MAGICAL POWERS: BREACH Client Confidentiality; post personal emails of clients; Internet Predators that hack into your personal checking accounts and steal your money; post blatant lies about clients on Global Intern et !!!  STAY AWAY from these Internet Con-Artist !!!! Complete Scam Spell Casting Rip-off Scheme!!

 

WARNING:

Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

  SCAM Psy chic-Jan Windglows: Owner of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com-

805-455-6548–

WARNING : Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   

 

Thank you Rip-off Report.com for exposing these Gypsy SCUM !!!

THIS IS A REAL POST ABOUT THE RIPOFF SPELL CASTING OPERATION –

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

– I WAS RIPPPED OFF BY Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows !!!!! 805-455-6548.

 

PSYCHIC SCAM EXPOSED: 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

805-455-6548 Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows: Owner and Employee James Morgan of 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

PO Box #712

Driggs , Idaho 83422

.

DO NOT USE JAN WINGLOWS OR JIM MORGAN – unless you want to be Ripped-off; Scammed for MONEY; then BREACH of CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY by posting clients full name with blatant lies about you on Rip-off Report.com !!!!

 

 

Contrary, to Jim Morgan’s lies on the recent post October 14, 2009 as DRAGON right here in this Rip-off Report.com Jim Morgan is falsely saying I am Mary T. Prantil…but I am NOT.   However,

mprantil@aol.com

was also ripped off by these SCAMS!! Because James Morgan posting Mary T. Prantil’s personal info on Rip-off Report.com I contacted her to find….

 

Mary T. Prantil does NOT have a Criminal Record; Mary T. Prantil was never thrown out of a car by any man; Mary T. Prantil reported this scam operation to the Sandy Point, Idaho District Attorney where Mr. Morgan filed bankruptcy. Jim Morgan is a sick person that is clearly a wife beater; I am a legitimate X-client of the Rip-off Spell Casting Scheme –

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

 

The Psychic Scam began with a Reading by Jan Windglows             1. Claims of negativity and bad luck             2. The need for Reiki or Spell work             3. The fraudulent activity and unauthorized use of my Credit Cards: and unauthorized payments to PayPal             4. Once Jan Windglows got my MONEY she disappeared             5. Hacking into my personal computer             6. Police and FBI intervention             7. Slanderous postings all over the Global Internet with my name; private home address and phone number             8. Claims that I ripped off other site             9. Pawning off to Other Scam Spell Casters, namely: Mike Cahill, Michael Jenkins, Kim Thrasher, Matilda Somerfield and Celeste Morgan             10. Jim Morgan stalking you thru your personal email accounts

ALL OF THESE CLAIMS HAPPENED TO MANY CLIENTS– DO NOT GET SCAMMED BY THIS SPELL CASTING OPERATION!!!!!!!

 

Who would be in the Spell Casting Business?   Answer: A Con-Artist!!!

Jim Morgan has blatantly lied, slandered and BREACHED CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY of many victims of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

! Namely, X-client, X-employees, fellow Psychics on the Global Net, PayPal, All Major Credit Card companies, and many, many innocent victims of their Spell Casting Scheme since 2006. This X- client Mary T. Prantil does not have a Criminal Record as she has been falsely slandered by Jim Morgan who is a self proclaimed Magical Advisor. Worse, Mary T. Prantil, like many more such as myself – WE ALL had a similar experience of being SCAMMED; so I am to say ANONYMOUSLY as Rip-off Report.com allows to expose the SCAM of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

here to say I had a similar experience:

SCAM EXPOSED: 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

805-455-6548 Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows: Owner and Employee James Morgan of 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

PO Box #712

Driggs , Idaho 83422

.

DO NOT USE JAN WINGLOWS OR JIM MORGAN – unless you want to be Ripped-off; Scammed for MONEY; then BREACH of CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY by posting clients full name with blatant lies about you on Rip-off Report.com !!!!

 

THIS IS A REAL POST ABOUT THE RIPOFF SPELL CASTING OPERATION –  

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com – I WAS RIPPPED OFF BY Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows !!!!!

Greetings to all on this Rip-off Report.com site and Thank you to Ed Magedson for revealing this Scam Spell Operation ! Jan Windlgows and James Morgan of http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/ operate a Rip-off Spell Casting Scheme on the Global Internet today. They will Scam you for MONEY then never answer their phone again…!!!  DO NOT USE!!! 

The Scam Spell Casting Operation starts with a Psychic Reading by Jan Windglows.

Within minutes of the Scam Psychic Reading Jan Windglows starts to say that you have negativity and need both Reiki and Spell work to remove the Bad Luck…Sound familiar?  Then Jan Windglows asks for your Credit Card to pay for the Psychic Reading and commits Fraud by falsely charging PayPal and your Credit Card Company for both a Psychic Reading and a Spell which you did not authorize for payment.  Worse, once this Scam Spell Caster get your money – they pawn you off to other Scam Spell Casters – then Jan Windglows and James Morgan do not answer their phone.

 

 

I am an X-client and victim of both Jan Windglows and her employee Lunatic James Morgan of the former Dragon Spells LLC and current

www.dragonspells.com

wizardmorgan2@aol.com .

 James Morgan blatantly lies to the IRS bcs he has HAS NOT been retired for years. Specifically, James Morgan continues to work with Janhett T. Windglows on her site of Blood Love And Lust Spells found at

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

in the capacity of a Magical Adviser.  Jan Windglows is the Owner of well established Rip-off Scheme

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

currently in operation on the Global Internet today..  These Internet Predators and Gypsy scum retaliate on X- clients that do not want to buy spells via the P psychic Reading Scam by BREACHING CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY and posting personal information of clients such as: personal emails; full names of clients; home address and private phone numbers of clients on Rip-off Report.com. Worse, name calling of clients such as Alcoholic, Drug Addict, False Criminal Record, Tax Liens, Bankruptcy…Shall I go on?  And it is all false info to hurt the Internet Reputation of the X-client and posted on Rip-off Report.com.

 

 

 

KARMA is real – even though Jan Windlgows and Jim Morgan hurt X-clients with their slanderous postings and abusive behavior…

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

has received bad press due to Jim Morgan’s slanderous statements of clients on the Global Internet.   Who would want to work with these guys for fear of being exposed and humiliated on the Global Internet with blatant lies such as remarks that clients have Criminal Records when indeed they do not?

  The

IRS

is investigating both of these deadbeats for Tax Evasion. James Morgan utilizes his Site

www.dragonspells.com

for new clients to scam thru

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

. Blood Love and Lust Spells take NEW clients of any kind period. James Morgan actively participates in the Blood Love and Lust Spells Company helping Jan Windglows out with her NRP Counseling program and Spell Casting which Jim Morgan does receive compensation for and in fact is NOT retired.

 

 

 

This brings me to my personal account and dealings with Jan Windglows and James Morgan.

They are both Perverse, Uncaring, Crude, Obnoxious, Bigoted, Narcissistic, passive and aggressive type of personalities and both are totally out of control in every respect and or regard of trained mindset or thought process.  Several X-clients and other persons such as other spell casters/employees that have been subjected to their unbridled fits of rage. Jan Windglows is highly obsessive, arrogant, and shallow person that tends to dominate an entire telephone conversation and does not give you a chance to get a word in edgewise. Even though I'm not a doctor of any kind and I don't profess to be, after seeing this behavior first hand, I personally consider I myself have been subjected to Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan’s wrathful ignorance on numerous occasions contacted the Driggs, Idaho police department on these Spell Casting Schemers!!! Jan Windglows is a habitual liar that does not retain facts well.  Miss Windglows is proven to be a Psychopath with a uncontrollable temper who fly's off of the handle when ever she again doesn't get her way on any level. Windglows is a pathological or habitual Liar that doesn't retain facts very well. Miss Windglows is again, In my opinion a PUSHY, Ignorant not to mention the Sorriest Excuse for a human being that I've ever had the misfortune of encountering. SCAMS Jan Windglows and James Morgan are very controlling, and dictate to you how you should live your life with total disrespect and no regard whatsoever for human boundaries. No matter how nice or kind you are to Jan Windglows she will betray you. Jan Windglows is someone that hardly anyone can stand to be around because she turns into an evil vindictive person. If Jan Windglows cannot dictate to you exactly how she feels her work should be done or the way people should respond to her she will post blatant lies about you on the Global Internet. DO NOT US E !!!

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

805-455-6548

 

 

 

 

Why am I taking the time in writing not to mention posting this?

For far to long Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan have hurt the General Public and NOT followed the rules of society.  These Spell Casting Scammers made the lives of those around them including their employees: Kim Thrasher, Mike Cahill, Matilda Somerfield, Celeste Morgan, and Michael Jenkins miserable. This is where we as their employees both Psychics and Spell Casters take a stand by not putting up with persons like this anymore.  These Internet Predators needs be put in jail at the very least the Spell Casting Operation of Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan has to end. These Scammers slide around back and fourth between sites while stabbing the very people that they engaged in business for spell work. It's hard to trust anyone when they don't care to follow the rules or moreover they blatantly commit BREACH of Confidentiality on this Rip-off Report.com. It's hard for the Client to receive valid spell casting20assistance when all they want to do is take your money then Pawn you off to other  Spell Casters. These Scammers are big pathetic mess. . These Evil Hypocrites are nothing more than bad liars, cheats and Con-Artists just to mention a few things that I've experienced. They have no problem in stirring up trouble not only professional people but private clients and people around in their personal life as well. These Con-Artists don’t care about anyone else and will readily hurt anyone while trying to fill their own perverse spiritual voids.  In my opinion these Scammers don’t possess the ability to listen or discern the most basic of Instructions not to mention the capability of following any sort of social criteria. Who would be in the Spell Casting business?  Answer: A Con-Artist.

As far as I'm concerned, Jan Windglows and James Morgan of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

are self-absorbed individuals that only care about themselves.

They have no respect or regard for God, Divinity, Angels or the very clients who just purchased services. These creeps also like to engage in making others feel bad about themselves via their domineering disposition and loud, crude remarks about one's physical appearance and lifestyle. If the fact be really known everyone would be interested to know that Jan Windglows and James Morgan are nothing more then Ageing Con-Artists with spiritual afflictions, compulsive tendencies and drug addictions judging from their hyper and overly emotional behavior. Furthermore it is clear form the multiple slanderous rebuttals posted on Rip-off Report since 2006 that these CREEPS find comfort in the fact that they can cause conflict for others. Perhaps they actually find meaning to their lives by creating havoc for their clients.  Furthermore, if they can in some way cause others to feel bad about themselves, then they can achieve a feeling of being more superior over those same others. Who knows what goes on in the mind of a con-artist like these scary compulsive Socio-Paths?

 

BEWARE: General Public- You have been warned about crazy Jan Windglows and her employee James Morgan and their proven Rip-off Spell Casting Scheme at

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

805-455-6548 PO Box #712

Driggs, Idaho 83422  email: passionspells@aol.com wizardmorgan2@aol.com

 

SCAM EXPOSED: 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

805-455-6548 Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows: Owner and Employee James Morgan of 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

PO Box #712

Driggs , Idaho 83422

.

DO NOT USE JAN WINGLOWS OR JIM MORGAN – unless you want to be Ripped-off; Scammed for MONEY; then BREACH of CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY by posting clients full name with blatant lies about you on Rip-off Report.com !!!!

 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

 

 

 

PSYCHIC SCAM EXPOSED: http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/ 805-455-6548 Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!! Jan Windglows: Owner and Employees James Morgan, Mike Cahill, Micheal Jenkins, Kim Thrasher, Matilda Somerfiled, Celeste morgan!   All unethical Con-Artist that will SCAM U 4 MONEY!!!

BEWARE: General Public- You have been warned about crazy Jan Windglows and her employee James Morgan and their proven Rip-off Spell Casting Scheme at

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

805-455-6548 PO Box #712 Driggs, Idaho 83422  email: passionspells@aol.com wizardmorgan2@aol.com archer926@aol.com

THIS IS A REAL POST ABOUT THE RIPOFF SPELL CASTING OPERATION –

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

– I WAS RIPPPED OFF BY Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows !!!!! 805-455-6548.

 

PSYCHIC SCAM EXPOSED: 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

805-455-6548 Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows: Owner and Employee James Morgan of 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

PO Box #712

Driggs , Idaho 83422

.

DO NOT USE JAN WINGLOWS OR JIM MORGAN – unless you want to be Ripped-off; Scammed for MONEY; then BREACH of CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY by posting clients full name with blatant lies about you on Rip-off Report.com !!!!

Contrary, to Jim Morgan’s lies on the recent post October 14, 2009 as DRAGON right here in this Rip-off Report.com Jim Morgan is falsely saying I am Mary T. Prantil…but I am NOT.  However,

mprantil@aol.com

was also ripped off by these SCAMS!! Because James Morgan posting Mary T. Prantil’s personal info on Rip-off Report.com I contacted her to find….

Mary T. Prantil does NOT have a Criminal Record; Mary T. Prantil was never thrown out of a car by any man; Mary T. Prantil reported this scam operation to the Sandy Point, Idaho District Attorney where Mr. Morgan filed bankruptcy. Jim Morgan is a sick person that is clearly a wife beater; I am a legitimate X-client of the Rip-off Spell Casting Scheme –

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

The Psychic Spell Casting Scam began with a Reading by Jan Windglows,Owner of the SCAM             1.

Claims of negativity and bad luck             2. The need for Reiki or Spell work             3. The fraudulent activity and unauthorized use of my Credit Cards: and unauthorized payments to PayPal             4. Once Jan Windglows got my MONEY she disappeared             5. Hacking into my personal computer             6. Police and FBI intervention             7. Slanderous postings all over the Global Internet with my name; private home address and phone number             8. Claims that I ripped off other site             9. Pawning off to Other Scam Spell Casters, namely: Mike Cahill, Michael Jenkins, Kim Thrasher, Matilda Somerfield and Celeste Morgan             10. Jim Morgan stalking you thru your personal email accounts

             

ALL OF THESE CLAIMS HAPPENED TO MANY CLIENTS– DO NOT GET SCAMMED BY THIS SPELL CASTING OPERATION!!!!!!!

 

Who would be in the Spell Casting Business?  Answer: A Con-Artist!!!

Jim Morgan has blatantly lied, slandered and BREACHED CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY of many victims of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

! Namely, X-client, X-employees, fellow Psychics on the Global Net, PayPal, All Major Credit Card companies, and many, many innocent victims of their Spell Casting Scheme since 2006. This X- client Mary T. Prantil does not have a Criminal Record as she has been falsely slandered by Jim Morgan who is a self proclaimed Magical Advisor. Worse, Mary T. Prantil, like many more such as myself – WE ALL had a similar experience of being SCAMMED; so I am to say ANONYMOUSLY as Rip-off Report.com allows to expose the SCAM of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

here to say I had a similar experience:

SCAM EXPOSED: 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

805-455-6548 Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!

  Jan Windglows: Owner and Employee James Morgan of 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

PO Box #712

Driggs , Idaho 83422

.

DO NOT USE JAN WINGLOWS OR JIM MORGAN – unless you want to be Ripped-off; Scammed for MONEY; then BREACH of CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY by posting clients full name with blatant lies about you on Rip-off Report.com !!!!

THIS IS A REAL POST ABOUT THE RIPOFF SPELL CASTING OPERATION –  

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

– I WAS RIPPPED OFF BY Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows !!!!!

Greetings to all on this Rip-off Report.com site and Thank you to Ed Magedson for revealing this Scam Spell Operation ! Jan Windglows and James Morgan of

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

operate a Rip-off Spell Casting Scheme on the Global Internet today. They will Scam you for MONEY then never answer their phone again…!!!  DO NOT USE!!! 

The Scam Spell Casting Operation starts with a Psychic Reading by Jan Windglows.

Within minutes of the Scam Psychic Reading Jan Windglows starts to say that you have negativity and need both Reiki and Spell work to remove the Bad Luck…Sound familiar?  Then Jan Windglows asks for your Credit Card to pay for the Psychic Reading and commits Fraud by falsely charging PayPal and your Credit Card Company for both a Psychic Reading and a Spell which you did not authorize for payment.  Worse, once this Scam Spell Caster get your money – they pawn you off to other Scam Spell Casters – then Jan Windglows and James Morgan do not answer their phone.

 

I am an X-client and victim of both Jan Windglows and her employee Lunatic James Morgan of the former Dragon Spells LLC and current

www.dragonspells.com

wizardmorgan2@aol.com

.

 James Morgan blatantly lies to the IRS bcs he has HAS NOT been retired for years. Specifically, James Morgan continues to work with Janhett T. Windglows on her site of Blood Love And Lust Spells found at

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

in the capacity of a Magical Adviser.  Jan Windglows is the Owner of well established Rip-off Scheme

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

currently in operation on the Global Internet today..  These Internet Predators and Gypsy scum retaliate on X- clients that do not want to buy spells via the P psychic Reading Scam by BREACHING CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY and posting personal information of clients such as: personal emails; full names of clients; home address and private phone numbers of clients on Rip-off Report.com. Worse, name calling of clients such as Alcoholic, Drug Addict, False Criminal Record, Tax Liens, Bankruptcy…Shall I go on?  And it is all false info to hurt the Internet Reputation of the X-client and posted on Rip-off Report.com.

KARMA is real – even though Jan Windlgows and Jim Morgan hurt X-clients with their slanderous postings and abusive behavior…

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

has received bad press due to Jim Morgan’s slanderous statements of clients on the Global Internet.   Who would want to work with these guys for fear of being exposed and humiliated on the Global Internet with blatant lies such as remarks that clients have Criminal Records when indeed they do not?

  The

IRS

is investigating both of these deadbeats for Tax Evasion. James Morgan utilizes his Site

www.dragonspells.com

for new clients to scam thru

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

. Blood Love and Lust Spells take NEW clients of any kind period. James Morgan actively participates in the Blood Love and Lust Spells Company helping Jan Windglows out with her NRP Counseling program and Spell Casting which Jim Morgan does receive compensation for and in fact is NOT retired.

This brings me to my personal account and dealings with Jan Windglows and James Morgan.

They are both Perverse, Uncaring, Crude, Obnoxious, Bigoted, Narcissistic, passive and aggressive type of personalities and both are totally out of control in every respect and or regard of trained mindset or thought process.  Several X-clients and other persons such as other spell casters/employees that have been subjected to their unbridled fits of rage. Jan Windglows is highly obsessive, arrogant, and shallow person that tends to dominate an entire telephone conversation and does not give you a chance to get a word in edgewise. Even though I'm not a doctor of any kind and I don't profess to be, after seeing this behavior first hand, I personally consider I myself have been subjected to Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan’s wrathful ignorance on numerous occasions contacted the Driggs, Idaho police department on these Spell Casting Schemers!!! Jan Windglows is a habitual liar that does not retain facts well.  Miss Windglows is proven to be a Psychopath with a uncontrollable temper who fly's off of the handle when ever she again doesn't get her way on any level. Windglows is a pathological or habitual Liar that doesn't retain facts very well. Miss Windglows is again, In my opinion a PUSHY, Ignorant not to mention the Sorriest Excuse for a human being that I've ever had the misfortune of encountering. SCAMS Jan Windglows and James Morgan are very controlling, and dictate to you how you should live your life with total disrespect and no regard whatsoever for human boundaries. No matter how nice or kind you are to Jan Windglows she will betray you. Jan Windglows is someone that hardly anyone can stand to be around because she turns into an evil vindictive person. If Jan Windglows cannot dictate to you exactly how she feels her work should be done or the way people should respond to her she will post blatant lies about you on the Global Internet. DO NOT US E !!!

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

805-455-6548

Why am I taking the time in writing not to mention posting this?

For far to long Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan have hurt the General Public and NOT followed the rules of society.  These Spell Casting Scammers made the lives of those around them including their employees: Kim Thrasher, Mike Cahill, Matilda Somerfield, Celeste Morgan, and Michael Jenkins miserable. This is where we as their employees both Psychics and Spell Casters take a stand by not putting up with persons like this anymore.  These Internet Predators needs be put in jail at the very least the Spell Casting Operation of Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan has to end. These Scammers slide around back and fourth between sites while stabbing the very people that they engaged in business for spell work. It's hard to trust anyone when they don't care to follow the rules or moreover they blatantly commit BREACH of Confidentiality on this Rip-off Report.com. It's hard for the Client to receive valid spell casting20assistance when all they want to do is take your money then Pawn you off to other  Spell Casters. These Scammers are big pathetic mess. . These Evil Hypocrites are nothing more than bad liars, cheats and Con-Artists just to mention a few things that I've experienced. They have no problem in stirring up trouble not only professional people but private clients and people around in their personal life as well. These Con-Artists don’t care about anyone else and will readily hurt anyone while trying to fill their own perverse spiritual voids.  In my opinion these Scammers don’t possess the ability to listen or discern the most basic of Instructions not to mention the capability of following any sort of social criteria. Who would be in the Spell Casting business?  Answer: A Con-Artist.

As far as I'm concerned, Jan Windglows and James Morgan of

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

are self-absorbed individuals that only care about themselves.

They have no respect or regard for God, Divinity, Angels or the very clients who just purchased services. These creeps also like to engage in making others feel bad about themselves via their domineering disposition and loud, crude remarks about one's physical appearance and lifestyle. If the fact be really known everyone would be interested to know that Jan Windglows and James Morgan are nothing more then Ageing Con-Artists with spiritual afflictions, compulsive tendencies and drug addictions judging from their hyper and overly emotional behavior. Furthermore it is clear form the multiple slanderous rebuttals posted on Rip-off Report since 2006 that these CREEPS find comfort in the fact that they can cause conflict for others. Perhaps they actually find meaning to their lives by creating havoc for their clients.  Furthermore, if they can in some way cause others to feel bad about themselves, then they can achieve a feeling of being more superior over those same others. Who knows what goes on in the mind of a con-artist like these scary compulsive Socio-Paths?

BEWARE: General Public- You have been warned about crazy Jan Windglows and her employee James Morgan and their proven Rip-off Spell Casting Scheme at

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

805-455-6548 PO Box #712 Driggs, Idaho 83422  email:

passionspells@aol.com

wizardmorgan2@aol.com

archer926@msn.com

PSYCHIC SPELL CASTING SCAM EXPOSED:

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

805-455-6548 Complete Spell Casting Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows: Owner and Employee James Morgan of 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

PO Box #712

Driggs , Idaho 83422

.

DO NOT USE JAN WINGLOWS OR JIM MORGAN – unless you want to be Ripped-off; Scammed for MONEY; then BREACH of CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY by posting clients full name with blatant lies about you on Rip-off Report.com !!!!

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

http://www.magicangelspells.com/

 

http://www.magicangelspells.com/

 

http://www.magicangelspells.com/

 

 

Check out these Negative Reviews about

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

:

http://love-spell-reviews.blogspot.com/2007/08/wwwpowerful-love-spellscom.html

Anonymous said... Has anyone used Jan Windglows from Blood love and lust spell . i believe she works with Jim Morgan. ...

love-spell-reviews.blogspot.com/.../wwwpowerful-love-spellscom.html -

Cached

-

Similar

Love Spell Reviews: www.powerful-love-spells.com

Anonymous said …I was scammed by 5

spell casters

who I am going to include on this blog as I was ... from Blood love and lust

spell . i bel ieve she with

Jim Morgan . ...

love- spell -

reviews.blogspot.com/.../wwwpowerful-love-

spell

scom.html -

Cached

-

Similar

 

   

WARNING:

5 Scammers employed and associates that Jan Windglows and James Morgan PAWN YOU OFF ONTO after they scam you for thousands of dollars they DO NOT ANSWER PHONE… Jan Windglows and James Morgan will pawn you off to other unethical Internet Predators and Scam Spell Casters: DO NOT USE:

 

1. Mike Cahill – 727-787-0988, 727-560-5704

archer926@msn.com

http://www.magicangelspells.com/

 

2. Micheal Jenkins –  727-216-9750,

admin@lovespells-magicspells.com

  http://www.lovespells-magicspells.com/angelic_seals.htm

 

3. Kim Thrasher -

km_thrasher@yahoo.com

http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/revisedpage.html

4.

Celeste Morgan AKA

Celeste Ann Schaub –

celeste_morgan@yahoo.com

,

c_schaub@ymail.com

http://fastestactingblackandwhitedragonmagickspellcastingservices.com/revisedpage.h

tml 5. Matilda Somerfield -

mgoddess562@yahoo.com

 

Thank you Ripoff Report.com for allowing the forun to expose this these Unethical Scammers Jim Morgan, Jan Windglows, Mike Cahill, Micheal Jenkins,Matilda Somerfield, Celeste Morgan DO NOT USE UNLESS YOU WANT TO BE RIPPED OFF THEN ALL THESE COMPUTER HACKERS WILL STEAL YOUR BANKING INFORMATION AND SCAM U FOR MONEY!!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

Jan Windglows;Jim Morgan;Stanley CaHILL are viscious evil scammer that steals your money; Proven Internet Hacking Operation - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com is not a legitimate spellcasting site:DO NOT USE!!

Jan Windglows is a viscious evil woman that steals your money; will download the Trojan Virus into your home computer then stalk u;DO NOT GET SCAMMED by this Internet Hacking Operation - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com is not a legitimate spellcasting site:DO NOT USE!! 

 

 

 

Beware:  www.Bloodloveandlustspells.com  is an Internet Hacking SCAM: to steal your personal info on-line; download trojan Virus into home computer and Jan Windglows; JimMorgan to stalk you thru your personal email accounts; then steal your Identity on-line scam and money from Credit Card Accounts;Paypal and your preosnl checking/savings accounts.

 

 

 

BEWARE:805-455-6548 www.Bloodloveandlustspells.com  is not a spell casting or psychic reading site but rather it is much sdangeropus than that...Jan Windglows owns www.Bloodloveandlustspells.com  which is a scam Internet Hacking Operation - Jan Windglows Criminal Records Idaho State Attorney to arrest FBI involved

 

Jan Windglows is a viscious evil woman that steals your money; DO NOT GET SCAMMED by this Internet Hacking Operation - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com is not a legitimate spellcasting site:DO NOT USE!!  Jan Windglows Owner:  Employees: Jim Morgan, Stanly Cahill, Mike Cahill, Kim Thrasher, Matilda Somerfield...ALL INTERNET PREDATORS - WHO WILL SELL YOUR PERSONAL INFO ON-LINE THEN STALK U !!!

 

PSYCHIC SCAM EXPOSED: 

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

805-455-6548 Internet Hackers download Trojan Virus into your email then stalk u on-line...scary scammer - NOT Psychics, Not spell caster: but real Internet Predators and Criminal Record: internet Crimes and Credit Card Debt!!!Scam Operation and Rip-off Scheme!!   Jan Windglows: Owner and Employee James Morgan

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

805-455-6548,

208-714-4348 PO Box #712

Driggs, Idaho 83422 .

DO NOT USE JAN WINGLOWS OR JIM MORGAN – unless you want to be Ripped-off; Scammed for MONEY; then BREACH of CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY by posting clients full name with blatant lies about you on Rip-off Report.com !!!!

 

Only a con-artist would be in the spell casting business...these people aren't even that smart..they are Internet Predators !!

 

I live in Houston , Texas –

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

robbed me of $7500 !!!  I was stalked by Jim Morgan and know that he lies blatantly about X-clients…do not use

http://www.bloodloveandlustspells.com/

 

 

 

Jan Windglows is a viscious evil woman that steals your money; DO NOT GET SCAMMED by this Internet Hacking Operation - www.bloodloveandlustspells.com is not a legitimate spellcasting site:DO NOT USE!!  Jan Windglows Owner:  Employees: Jim Morgan, Stanly Cahill, Mike Cahill,

 

Greetings  ROR  Viewers

 

Greetings Viewers, and welcome to Blood Love and
Lust Spells owned by Enchantress Jan Windglows. Often times, as One reads on
through Rip Off Reports they tend to encounter a lot of negative post made
against others by someone who is usually hiding behind a fictitious name much of
the time, perhaps their post are of a positive nature at times, but
mostly fictitious and negative in my experience a good deal of the
time. 

 

We ourselves have been targeted by one or two of
these negative and unscrupulous posters that have been doing their level best to
discredit our good names along with the very repeatable name of Blood Love And
Lust Spells and her sister sites, that again, all belong to Miss Windglows. 

 

Of course, theirs always going to be some idiot
out there who feels they've been ripped off even if they weren't such as was in
the case of "Crazy Mary"; as she all ready knows.

 

Prantil, and others like her moreover feel that
they can use ROR as a venting platform while routinely abusing even its policies
in every way, not to mention distorting the sites very purpose of reporting
legitimate violations via making false or harmful reports against innocent
people and business out of spite or revenge in certain instances.

 

In our case, we had, and still actively have, a
person that turned out to be a actual scam artist posting against us out of
spite, who likes to obtain services from ANY ON-LINE site only to turn around to
rip them off,  that likes to call her victims the "scam artists" and "wife
beaters" while posting other untrue or other false things that she would have no
way of knowing about them in the first place.

 

Prantil cannot  even actually  prove to the
smallest degree after she makes any type of charge.  If she is so right in her
charges, then why are we still here after three years of her earnest
nonsense would be my question LOL?   We're here and thriving because were one of
the better magick sites on the Internet.

 

This person attempted to steal services in our
case and was stopped by Miss Windglows, and that's why we have this
particular MORON Prantil slandering us on ROR  to date.

 

This is a person that has not only contacted us
numerous times, but other sites as well in her attempts to extract more services
or money out of us; in return she states that she will stop slandering us over
the open air ways, however we refused her offer several times along with other
sites as no one is willing to bend to her blackmail or extortion, period.

 

Speaking for ourselves personally, We do not bend,
We will not buckle, We will not give in to a small time or petty criminal and
Prantil's ploys.  

 

 This is so sad, as sites like ROR can be a useful
tool for the Consumer in separating good businesses, lawful businesses from scam
sites, especially regarding the Internet.  It just ruins the whole concept and
intent of a site like ROR when this type of abusive person turns a site like
this that is met to help the Consumer into a circus instead, there again, this
type of a person doesn't respect any kind of a business or its policies
including ror, moreover tries to capitalize on the loop holes found on ROR by
trying to harm others with fictitious slander.

 

A Individual such as this, or more specifically
Mary T. Prantil in our case, who is really a deceptive two bit little
criminal that pretends to have a legitimate complaint to report on ROR, but
really has no basis at all whatsoever in any way for her complaint in reality.

 

Mary T. Prantil attempted to steal services from
one site and actually went on to steal services from two or three other sites
after this, who now is playing the "victim" behind her numerous fictitious names
that further has been trying so hard to destroy the very businesses that tried
to help this NUT JOB in the beginning. 

 

It's all Tom Foolery if you ask me, and these
people thrive on sites like this because they can remain hidden to a larger
extent as we all know.  In short, it's easy to talk smut about anyone when your
hiding behind the first amendment enacting free speech, then behind the whistle
blowers act protecting your anonymity etc. 

 

Honest people with a case to prove will make their
real name and case facts known to the public and anything otherwise should just
be written off as smut.

 

Not standing behind what you say while hiding
behind others while speaking lies or slander against someone else is nothing but
petty and criminal in my opinion.

 

What makes it worse, is that these cowards are
taking advantage of, and abusing the very laws that were enacted, or placed in
our constitution to protect the innocent, free speech, freedom to operate a
business without being harassed, not to mention the freedom to practice
religious belief and so on without being persecuted for you beliefs etc.

 

The bottom line here is, that you can't believe
anything you see posted on a site like ROR for the sole reason that folks aren't
made to stand behind their charges made against others; I and others stand
behind our charges made against Prantil, however we don't have the same luxury
of Prantil facing off with us in a court of law because she's a coward, a
liar, and nothing she says is true. 

 

MARY T. PRANTIL  WON'T POST HER REAL NAME on ROR
because she knows what she's doing and HAS NO PROOF to back up her lunatic
allegations, simple truth, and fact.

 

 In short, and in the instance of Mary T. Prantil
is scamming the very site on the Internet being ROR that is openly opposed to
scamming of any kind LOL.  She's taking a site that in essence was
constructed to hinder or stop scamming by its very nature and thus using it
against its self by abusing and using its own policies against
it.

 

This person of Mary T. Prantil is in fact a scam
as can be proven over and over again via hard copy record reported by at least
four or five sites that I know of, plus the evidence you can view on this site
of ROR itself.

 

With sites like ROR that are available to abusive
psychologically disturbed people like Prantil, and in light of the very nature
of spell casting, is it any wonder that spell casters will draw highly ignorant
Whacko to them from time to time like Prantil ?

 

That should moreover have be placed in the nut
house some where before hand. Most folks are good people that just happen to be
caught up in a life crisis and not like this person at all, however, all it
takes is a scam artist like Prantil that is armed with anonymity to make a mess
on the air ways. 

 

 Most  if not ALL individuals receive their
desired spell results and then move on to enjoy their lives, but like I said
above, every once and a while the Caster will run into all kinds of people from
nut cases to scam artist like Mary T. Prantil.   It comes with the job so to
speak and One has to expect it at some point in time. 

 

Mary T. Prantil is exactly what Jesus taught
against along with every other Holy Teacher that Divinity has gifted to Humanity
with down through the eons of time, she is the very essence of 666 to which is
nothing more then the number that heaven uses to describe the fickle of mind and
unevolved spirit ( The Beast ).

 

666, is ground ZERO  in Human evolution so to
speak as the bible explains, and not even on the spiritual growth radar.  Mary
T. Prantil is the very essence of Sin according to Jesus Christ and other
spiritual teachers, She is the very thing that you want to avoid or become,
however if your wish is to spend a tormented eternity in ever lasting Hell then
she should be your role model.

 

In other words, Prantil is likened to a mouse that
runs around in a maze, or on a wheel who thinks she's  actually going somewhere
without ever gaining any ground,  too naive to recognize the fact as it is, or
the truth about her situation and standing in a perpetual state of denial for
all time. 

 

 

I was hoping that I could get out of having to
deal with a nut case like this in my time on the air, but I guess not, such is
life.  This person is so demented that she even post over those that are
actually ignorant enough show her sympathy on ROR,
LOL.

 

 I'm sure that Mary T. Prantil  will post all
around this report with her little copy and past slanders while thinking it will
do some good for her.  Trouble is, a person like this can only talk smut and
tell one lie after the next, and doesn't have the guts to even face her Accusers
ROR and has to hide behind numerous stupid sounding anonymous user names, it
really does expose her ignorant and cowardly demeanor, doesn't it ? 

 

Mary T. Prantil obviously is not confident of who
she is and that is precisely why she continues to hide on ROR under fake names
blaming others for her own mistakes and continues to post her lies and smut. 

 

We do not have any problem whatsoever telling
everyone who we are because we are in the green and we know who we are and what
we are all about.  Prantil on the other hand might as well be a snake or worm
who keeps hiding under a rock somewhere, LOL and does not have any courage
enough to even identify herself.  But that is okay because we and everyone else
who reads these posts knows who she is and what she has done, right?  I mean,
every time Prantil posts up here or anywhere, she is only harming herself
because quite frankly, no one believes her because she has not proven any of her
allegations YET.

 

Now that I've given you my opinion of ROR and the
cowardly scamming wimps who abuse it like Mary T. Prantil, please let me go on
to speak on something of a more positive nature. Despite what you've might have
read on the site of ROR while looking for real spell casters, please permit me
to direct you to the real deal being Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows and her
sites of :

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

,  

www.fast-acting-black-magick-love-spells.com

 and 

www.black-magick-spell-spell-casting-love-rituals.com

. 

 

 

Welcome
To Blood Love And Lust Spells

And
What This Site Is Really About

 

Firstly, let me just start off by saying that

Blood Love And Lust Spells is unlike any other site
that you've ever seen on the Internet as it specializes in the higher forms of
magical art, and proves it via the hand drafted spell pictures it provides on
the sites. We specialize in the most advanced forms of black and white magical
practice and moreover are also acknowledged by the entire magical community
as the leading authority in occult research and practice. 

 

 Enchantress Windglows and myself are both highly
skilled, or proficient in such occult disciplines as Enchain, Druidism,
Santeria, Wicca and other forms of elemental earth magicks just to name a few. 
We are highly skilled in the arts of doll crafting, ancient alphabets, spell
writing, star craft, planetary routing and other forms of alchemical invokings.

 

We routinely practice advanced alchemies in
correlating and incorporating precious stones, semi-precious stones, herbal
working or advanced botany, the blending of melted metals and other raw
compounds based plant and mineral materials.  We perform this in a effort to
coincide with each planetary influence at a given time and space for a directed
purpose be it for love, finances or justice. 

 

 Our spells are derived and created from numerous
sources and styles of magical art that are moreover incorporated into long held
and precise scientific principles and theories such as cause and effect and the
directed transferal of potential energy or planetary polarities to propagate
emergence of a given wish, or to instigate physical change in a persons
environment through the manipulation both negative and positive planetary
polarities.

 

Along with our observance of both the scientific
principles along with our solid theological ideology, we also understand the
value of astrology, astronomy and the use of the zodiac system within. Every
spell casting ritual is

 customarily crafted from start to finish regarding a
individual case, drawn up and cast according to the year, month, day of all
involved.

 

Further under the desired planetary rotation and
specific time that best suits a  given issue, problem or set of circumstances. 
And thus, this aligns everything involved to maximize the power or strength of
any given spell casting that more so intern ensures the fastest spell results
and full spell manifestation for the Client.

 

Our celestial star charts, planetary charts, or
star offering plates, are custom drafted on virgin parchment for each Client's
specific needs, wants or wishes, or situational needs. We stay with the Client
and walk them through every step of the spell process that ensures that a person
is staying within the confines of the spell criteria to which is nothing more
the exercising good prudence or following good old fashioned common sense and
advice. 

 

We primarily recognize that Divinity is a positive
Force Of Creation that is a benefit to not only its self but to the whole of
creation including Earth and those who dwell within.   We do not recognize that
a fall in Heaven had ever transpired and thus do not accept the concept of a war
in Heaven; how can your hand declare war on the rest of your body ? We recognize
that if a "Devil"

exists, then he
exists

within every one of us
through our bad choices or negative deeds in life.  We are the
"A

dversary",  "

The Accuser",

and our own worst enemies in
short.

 

If you would like a sample of our advanced, one of
a kind spell casting operations then simply click the links above, or copy and
paste these links into your browser and look for the spell preview pages once
your on the sites. 

 

I could go on and on here, but I won't because
this isn't the place for it.  B

esides this is why we have taken the time to build three
wonderful web sites that exhibit the work and address a good many questions or
concerns for you concerning the way the spells are drawn up, created and
performed.  Again, please read the sites to get a better feel of what
we'

re about.

 

Ok, lets talk about the services that are provided
by Blood Love And Lust Spells. 

Some sites you may have visited in the past may have offered
similar services, however I can assure you that these services weren't like
ours, or were not as in-depth as the services offered on this particular site. 

Why ?
B

ecause the services in question
are free with any paid spell casting, that is, within exception to the free
spell program in which is also offered on the site to those who qualify, of
course, these services won't apply in this instance, please read more on the
free spell program to see what's offered or required regarding this program.

 

On the other hand their exists

a lot of free information on the
sites that will in turn

get your
desired results without ever having a spell performed for you by us or anyone. 

Depending on the circumstance we
have been know to just provide services for some that can't afford spell work
that would normally be offered for paid spell castings. Were not all about the
money, however it really does depend on your circumstance that is pretty much
left up to our declaration.

 

 The paid spells include such free programs and
items as : Spiritual Counseling, Crisis Hot Line, Free Re-Cast if needed should
a case be manifesting slowly for some reason. Reiki Healings, free talismans and
amulets for health, finance or prosperity and protection, free money powders
and free Negativity Releasing Meditation or prayer designed for your success.

 

  Please permit me to clear up a few misconceptions
for the reader of this post should there be any,  as we wish for all to be well
informed so please pay attention to the following statements to ensure that
these services aren't misconstrued or misunderstood in any way, shape or form. 
WE ARE NOT Psychiatrists

or
Therapists 

 of any kind, so please
don't confuse this with the spiritual counseling service.

 

This service merely gives you a friend that guides
you throughout the spell process while yielding good, solid and positive advice
in responding to any given situation that a Client might find themselves in
regarding their situation.

 

Sometimes it's good to have a friend you can call
on at any time to get their opinion of what should be done with a given issue of
concern, this is a real plus especially when a person really doesn't have
another person that they can speak to regarding their sensitive situation.

 

We ARE NOT HERE to solve any pre-existing
psychological or substance abuse problems that a person might have upon
contacting us, and will not tolerate suicide threats or physical attempts of
suicide while on our watch.

 

We won't tolerate verbal abuse or the failure to
follow our good and sound advice especially when negative speech or action has
occurred on the Clients part that is further thwarting everything were trying to
accomplish positively in a persons situation through spell
work.

 

 We won't allow a person to do as they will while
throwing money at us for any reason. 

We moreover reserve the right to cancel, or terminate a case for any
reason, at any time due to a individual abusing our programs or repetitively
going against good advice that only causes their situation to grow worse as a
result. 

 

We are about assisting people in any way that we
can by giving good solid positive advice to them regarding any  situation that
will only benefit them at that time and throughout their lives. We are about
addressing a persons situation with the strongest forms of spell casting ever
known to humanity, we are about changing your life for the better and not adding
to your burden. In short, if you play by the rules and treat us with respect,
then we will return the favor to the point of giving you the shirts off our
backs.

 

We reserve the right to refuse any case, at any
time should we feel that the information given to us isn't factual via a
perspective Clients situational history sent into us, should we find
discrepancies later on in a situation, or information concerning the facts that
a Client has lead us to believe. We further reserve the right and option to take
whatever action that seems best to us at that time pertaining to that persons
particular case. 

 

In other words, we aren't driven by money or fame
and quite literally answer to a higher authority being Divinity. 
P

lease don't waste Divinity's time
or our time with this

untruth. 
Please don't abuse the spiritual counseling service for the sake of all
concerned as our process is solely geared for spell success,

 

Client success and the glory of your spirit, not
game playing. Please understand that our services, and the sub-services that
come with them are geared for the positive progression of a persons life, this
process allows a person to take control back over their life, or to become the
master of their own destiny, it's really a gift from Heaven that cost you very
little to nothing. 

 

Our spells and services are performed in the names
of Divinity and designed to give a given individual the tools they need to
better their communication skills with the Divine orders of the spiritual
realms, to better their working repore with Divinity, to understand why we are
here and what our part is in this life.  The sites are geared to assist others
in taking control back in their lives and sharing what they have learned with
others in the world, to make the world a better place in
short.  

 

The sites aren't about looking for excuses to drop
a case or to blame anyone for anything concerning their case, there not about
selling your soul to the Devil or performing anything negative to the Client in
any way, shape or form.  The sites are however about bringing people together
with each other and Divinity, their about learning new and positive ways in
dealing with old and negative problems.

 

T

o
peacefully co-existence with others if at all possible, their all about fairness
and justice according to Divinity's

and or God's laws.  Not about Satan, Not about dominating another, Not
about money or anything Evil. Not about selling your soul or making a deal with
the preverbal Devil.

 

We are Not Psychic Spell Casters, period. We are
highly experienced people with a combined magical experience of 59 years that
further offer a whole spectrum of services, some paid, and most free, These
sub-services are offered as a courtesy

to the Perspective Client, Current Client alike as we know most will need
a little help regarding their personal spell work.

 

I am considered a
"

Wizard"

or
"

Merlin",

as Miss Windglows is considered a
"

High Enchantress"

Of The Magical Arts. 
W

e have

dedicated our lives to the pursuit
of magical study and practice; and moreover,

we have the magical knowledge to
prove it.  We have worked very hard for to obtain our titles and status in the
magical community.

 

In closing, Miss Windglow's sites are the ONLY
sites

that offer these services
and customized spells in this way, that moreover teaches people how to develop
their own relationship with Divinity that not only empowers them in their
personal lives but also builds their spiritual fortitude over all.

 

This is the only site that we know of that
perpetually seeks to educate persons on the net in the ways of Universal
principle and magick, that again, empowers them in such a way that they will
never be subject in having a paid spell cast for them ever again should they
complete this process successfully.

 

Divinity will recognize its own and will grant a
wish before the wish is even spoken or thought once you have become a child of
Divinity.  Again, this is the only site that we know of to date that offers this
system of spiritual fulfillment and physical attainment ABSOLUTELY FREE and
without spell work by posting a step by step process of self help material on
the sites themselves. 

 

It doesn't matter to if your looking for a real
spell caster, just answers to life's questions or perhaps a good ideology that
ponders the mysteries of the Universe at times, I believe these sites will serve
you well.  Let us give you the power to succeed in your life, Allow us to share
the message of life and prosperity with you. Become the Masters of your own
destiny.  If you have any questions or concerns about ourselves, the sites,
spell castings or other free services we provide then please drop us a email at

passionspells@aol.com

or call us at: 208-714-4348.

 

Mary T.
Prantil Caught Slamming & Scamming  

 

 

Let us begin by viewing Miss Prantil's
sites that go on in explaining how she has never and at any time ever had a
spell cast in her and that some gypsy scum reader, as she likes to call us, or
clairvoyant had tried to rip her off for $ 5000. When I personally read over her
sites it's really hard for me to stomach this boloney for more then five minutes
as I know the real truth about this person.  After reading some of her so-called
"STELLAR REVIEWS", fake résumé and questionable character references on these
questionable sites please come back to this report.  

 

Now that your back and laughing really
hard to the point of tears,  I'd  like you to read the following statements
below from another spell caster being Mr. Cahill of magic angel spells whom
actually performed work for prantil at one time in the recent past. The
same Spell Casting site in whom Miss Prantil attempted to have curses cast on
Jan and myself  for allegedly ripping her off according to Mr.
Cahill.

 

Please see where Miss Prantil became
very angry with Mr. Cahill for not assisting her in cursing us, Again, according
to Mr.

Cahill, then see where Miss
Prantil contacted my Ex-wife, Miss Schaub after Mr. Cahill apparently dropped
Prantil for charging back on him a couple of times for services he rendered to
Miss Prantil. Again read the statements Celeste Schaub is making concerning her
encounter with Prantil in the way that Prantil is asking her to throw curses on
not only us in this instance but Mr. Cahill as well for dropping her case.

 

 

Look up the information below if you like as it's all factual and can be
confirmed by Mr. Cahill himself or Pay Pal.  I believe Mr. Cahill would welcome
your questions at this point regarding this matter as he's tired of Prantil's
games along with my Ex, or being pulled up in the games of Miss Prantil
regarding ror and prantil other statements on air found on many other gripe
sites.

 

 In other words, Prantil is saying one
thing to folks and doing another thing in private, stating something completely
opposite to factual information and truth on the net and carrying out slanderous
and harassing deeds in private.  Miss Prantil's constant or repeated claims that
she was ripped off from various spell sites from behind her numerous fictitious
names on ror is in all actually the exact opposite of what had occurred with
prantil in real life and this is proven in this post and in other verifiable
documentation.

 

It was Miss Prantil that was carrying
out the con games, or rip offs against these magick sites and not the sites
ripping her off, WOW, isn't this a eye opener ? Her pages on her site should be:
Mary T. Prantil The Stellar Rip Off Artist lol.  So, what I'd like to ask
Prantil would be :  You say that you were never ripped off on your sites and
that you alone prevented this, correct ? yet state the opposite thing by saying
that you were in all your belligerent postings and direct telephone calls and
nasty emails to not just one, but all of us.  We all have all the emails and
voice recordings over a three or four year span of time pertaining to these
nasty communications. We also have Prantil's statements that not only did she
trust us, but was extremely happy with her services from ALL OF US.

 

 Prantil,  how can you state otherwise
on your sites by saying that you never had, or engaged in any type of black
magic spell castings against anyone, how do you explain these hard copy records
below ? not to mention the current ones we hold on you ?.  Wow, there seems to
be a little discrepancy in your statements, wouldn't you agree ?. In short your
telling people one thing on your sites but we can prove otherwise and thus
showing that your a lire. So, which is it Miss Prantil ? did you get ripped off
? or did you escape the clutches of some nasty Psychic as you go on about on
your sites ?. We have recording of Miss Prantil calling us gypsy scum that
correlate with her postings on Rip Off Reports not to mention her calling us
scams and con artist.

 

 Are you lieing Prantil ? or did you
have spell work performed in your behalf ? What about Your claim of Identity
theft ?, who would want your identity ? I wouldn't.  What is your basis for the
claim of identity theft ? would that be you actually signing contracts and
making deals for black magic spells to dominate someone else's mind to your own
needs ? Well, we have your records and can prove all your dealings with us. You
rail on Rip Off Reports while stating that any one can say whatever they want,
and that Ed Magedson is a criminal, Well you should know Prantil as you've been
up there posting enough smut on innocent people.

 

Don't bother answering any of these
questions above Miss Prantil, as it is hugely apparent to everyone at this
point in what your really doing up here not to mention what you've carried out
to innocent businesses along the way in the past and recent past.  You attempted
to rip off one site and was successful in ripping off another magic site along
with a another unrelated Tarot Reader that I know of so far, and this is setting
the record straight by confirming it with proof.  Everyone can see how
you've jumped from one site or business to another while trying to get them to
cast negative spells on another including death spells, love spells and sexual
spells.

 

We can see all your begging and threats
to slander us along with you actually carrying these threats out with your
obvious postings on ror and other sites, We can see how poorly you lie. We can
see quite clearly in how you've played these sites against one and the other in
the past.  It's now quite evident that your nothing but a really nasty, two
bit scam artist who is pis_ed off because you've been EXPOSED for your scams
that everyone moreover sees you for what you are  and knows what you've doing 
little miss self-proclaimed NY stand up comic from corporate America Whanna
BEEE.

 

You know, we all have pages and pages
of phone records and harassing phone voice messages connecting you to us through
your threats, we have canceled checks from you not leaving out charge backs
in various pay pal accounts and attempted charge backs.  We have you on tape
threatening to turn in every one of us to this state of federal agencies with
false allegations, charges or police reports. You know we do prantil,Don't you
?.  It seems to me that you were telling us at one point in your postings how
much Mr. Cahill had helped you along with the communications we've shown to
everyone where your making this same positive statement about Jan and
myself.  So why are you posting smut on us now ? Why are you trying to connect
us to each other in your post when you know were separate rival sites, and or
competitors ? sounds like some more slamming and scamming going on here on your
end, HUH Mary ?. 

 

Miss Prantil yells the loudest about
being scammed, yet she is the biggest scam artist in the world and on the net,
Miss Prantil talks about FRAUD yet it's on record regarding her attempted and
actual credit card fraud through Pay Pal to my understanding.  Miss Prantil
brags about how she can acquire services or items,  only to use them and
return these items back to the store on a regular basis.

 

Moreover how she obtains services from
on-line business only to harass and threaten this same business in question
until they refund her money back just to get rid of her.  What does this make
Mary T. Prantil ? Let me answer this for you : She is a petty two bit CRIMINAL,
Thief, scam artist of the worst kind and a habitual lire to boot. Please read
the Cahill and Schaub information below, Again, call them and inquire about this
posted information and I believe that they will address your questions in a
forthright and honest way.

 

=======================================================

 

CATCHING A LIAR & THEIF IN THE ACT
Called Mary

 

SO I, MARY PRANTIL, AM TELLING MY STORY TO CORRECT THE
RECORD!

http://www.correcttherecord.com/index.php/main_profile/view/53

My Story: About 3 years ago (Oct 2006) my Father died of cancer
and to deal with it, I foolishly went to a Psychic for  a Psychic Reading who
wanted to also scam me for thousands of dollars by encouraging me to buy Psychic
Love Spells. It was this Scam Artist Psychic that retaliated when they realized
I could not be scammed for thousands of dollars. So for over 3 years now, the
Scam Artist Psychic posted all the false claims about me on Rip-off Report.com.
I originally went to the Psychic because I was very devastated by my Dad's
untimely death. It's not a crime to go to a Psychic or even buy a Psychic
Reading.  I did not Rip-off anyone.  I asked the Psychic for my money back when
I realized my mistake.  So the Scam Artist and "so called Psychic" retaliated by
posting all of these false claims on Ripoff Report.com for over 3 years without
my permission.  Clearly, the Scam Psychic has no life or real business with
legitimate clients to continue for 3 years to post more false claims with no
contact from me. 

 

 3 years ago, I asked the Scam Artist Psychic for a refund for a
pathetic Psychic Reading where I was not satisified and made it clear I felt I
was ripped off. And I stated to the scam Psychic that I did not want to purchase
any future Psychic Readings or any spells whatsoever. I wanted my money back for
the Psychic Reading. It's not a crime to get a Psychic Reading.  The only thing
I was guilty of was being foolish to ever contact this Psychic.  I believe in
God and I now realize it was wrong to go to this Psychic. I learned my lesson to
rely on my faith and not get Psychic Readings from Scam Artist on-line who prey
on vulnerable innocent people. But again - getting a Psychic Reading is not a
crime.  In retrospect, I was really missing my Dad. I made a mistake to ever
purchase a Psychic Reading on-line but it is not a crime.  Over 3 years ago, I
asked Ed Magedson to remove the false information about me from Ripoff
Report.com and he refuses.  I even scanned and sent him my Clean Criminal
Record. Therefore, Ed Magedson is the real Criminal and Ripoff King not to be
taken seriously.

 

 

Mary T. Prantil's  BOGUS Web Sites:   ( PRANTIL'S COVER UP STORY...
BAD MOUTHING  ED MAGEDSON OF ROR  ) http://www.correcttherecord.com/main_profile/view/53/85     (PRANTIL'S
EMPLOYER AND PREVIOUS EMPLOYERS ) http://www.linkedin-ech3.com/pub/mary-prantil/a/632/591     (
PRANTIL'S LIES TO COVER UP THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT WHO SHE IS ) http://maryprantil.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/mary-prantil-defends-truth-victim-of-ripoff-reportcom/   (
MARY PRANTIL'S BLOG PAGE ) http://www.blogger.com/profile/02680327863556078460     (REPUTATION
"FAULTLESS" http://maryprantil.blogspot.com/     (NEWSPAPER
AND CO WORKERS ON JIGSAW ) http://www.jigsaw.com/Mich_Pran_Davi_Prar/contact_information.xhtml http://www.jigsaw.com/scid7472092/mary_prantil.xhtml

 

 

Mike Cahill & Celeste Schaub
Tells All, How To Catch A Theif Named  Marry T.
Prantil

----- Original Message ----- From: service@paypal.com

To: archer926@msn.com

Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:15 AM Subject: PayPal: Initial Inquiry:
Case ID - PP-467-553-217

Dear stanley cahill,

We recently received a complaint regarding merchandise that was
never received or received significantly not as described. The details of
this transaction are as follows:

Buyer's Name: Mary Prantil Buyer's Email: prant99@aol.com Buyer's
Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542

Transaction Date: Sep 6, 2007 Transaction Amount: -$1,500.00 USD Your
Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542 Case Number: PP-467-553-217

Seller's Transaction ID: 77E56376XD890860G

Your Transaction ID:  6E967396TD6877542 Buyer's Transaction ID: 
77E56376XD890860G

We are contacting you to let you know that we will not be continuing
this investigation because this complaint was filed 45 or more days after
the original transaction date. However, we reserve the right for the next
180 days to begin an investigation if we later determine that this
complaint should be examined.

We are committed to providing our community a safe environment in which
to transact. As stated in the PayPal User Agreement, we reserve the right
to close or limit an account in response to excessive complaints
received about failure to ship merchandise, non-delivery of services,
merchandise not as described, or problems with merchandise shipped.

You do not need to contact PayPal at this time, however, we encourage
you to work directly with the buyer to amicably resolve this matter.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely, PayPal Protection Services Department

Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and
you will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal
account and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any page.
If your inquiry is regarding a claim, log in to your PayPal account and go
to the Resolution Center.

----------------------------------------------------------------

PayPal Email ID PP822

==============================================

----- Original Message ----- From: service@paypal.com

To: archer926@msn.com

Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:39 PM Subject: Notification of
chargeback reversal: Case ID #PP-396-648-789 - PM001

Dear stanley cahill,

We recently notified you that one of your buyers filed a chargeback
stating unauthorized use of a credit card.

It is PayPal's standard practice to dispute unwarranted chargebacks.
Using the information you provided, we are in the process of disputing
this chargeback with the buyer's card issuer.

Because the card issuer has reversed this charge, PayPal is
temporarily holding an amount equal to the disputed funds until this matter
is resolved. If the card issuer decides the case in your favor, the funds
will be available in your PayPal account.

The credit card company has charged PayPal a settlement fee for
this chargeback. In accordance with the terms of the PayPal User Agreement,
we have debited your PayPal account to cover this fee.

----------------------------------- Transaction
Details -----------------------------------

Buyer's Name:Mary Prantil Buyer's Email:prant99@aol.com Transaction
Date:Oct 12, 2007 Your Transaction ID: 9ET7904456341182W Buyer's
Transaction ID: 3617020566305634D Transaction Amount:-$900.00 USDCase
#:PP-396-648-789

----------------------------------- What to Do
Next -----------------------------------

To learn more about how to respond to this chargeback, visit the
Resolution Center and click "Resolution Center tutorials".

If you have additional information you’d like to upload or fax to
us, please provide it as soon as possible. Just log in to your PayPal
account, go to the Resolution Center, and click the “Details” link next to
this case. For faster processing, choose “Upload files.”

We understand that you may not have been expecting this chargeback. If
this chargeback has made your PayPal account balance negative, please
reimburse us by adding funds to your account or by sending a check to the
following address:

PayPal Attn: Accounting Department P.O. Box 45950 Omaha, NE
68145-0950 United States

----------------------------------- Due
Dates -----------------------------------

Please submit your response in the next 72 hours. The chargeback
dispute process is subject to strict timelines. If you are unable to respond
within 72 hours, we may be limited in the ways that we can dispute
this chargeback. After we receive and review any additional information, we
can determine if we can take any further action. While we need to you
respond quickly, a final decision about this chargeback may take up to 75
days. - If your PayPal account balance has become negative, please reimburse
us within 60 days of the date of this email.

----------------------------------- Other
Details -----------------------------------

This transaction was reversed for the following reasons(s):

- We did not receive signed proof of delivery.

For further assistance, please log in to your PayPal account and click
the Help link located in the top right corner of any page, or email
our Chargeback Department at the email address below. Be sure to include
your case ID number in the subject of the email.

Sincerely, PayPal Chargeback Department Email: chargeback-appeal1@paypal.com Fax:
402-537-5755 CB:PP-396-648-789:R4:USD900.00:01032008:9ET7904456341182W

----------------------------------------------------------------

PayPal Email ID
PP800 ===================================================================

6-15-08 Jim, I'm sending this in to clear my
name with you.  I'm sending this as proff that I no longer have Mary  as a
client and that she took back several of the payments made to me through pay pal
and that I'm not involved in any kind of plott conspiracy with Mary or anyone
against you and jan - I hope this will put an end to you thinking I'm part of
any kind of attacks on you - we have had a few disagreements over the years but
until now we have always worked them out and you know that attacking you on the
internet is not my style - as always I remain here willing to discuss any of
this with you at any time - sincerely mike   brief summary Mary
prant came to me in sept of 2007 and stated that you and jan cheated her and she
begged me to take her case and help her - M agreed to pay me $3200.00 + $ 100.00
for pay pal fees and cost totaling $3300.00 and I was to cast repetitive type
love and disruption prayers on her B.F. hani in sept, oct , nov and dec of 2008
and weekly updated prayers were also cast every week for M case - the e mail
below from mary was her promising to repay the two charge backs and the amount
due if I would continue her case - then a short while later she again tried
charging back the 1st $ 1500.00 made in sept 2007 through pay pal and also on
the $300.00 she paid on march 5 2008 through pay pal which was so I'd do more
work for her etc - it's been several times she promises top pay me if I'd work
on her case again after she cheated me by filing charge backs with pay pal - 
and I took her back several times based on her saying she was sorry and that she
promised to pay the full balance due plus all charges added by pay pal and I did
more work on her case and then a few  weeks later she'd get mad and try more
charge backs all over again and she stopped payment on a check she sent me omn
4-10-08 - this was the last straw and I have had no contact with her since - I
tried my best to help her but she continued filing charge backs against me and
stopped  payment on that check too  - also in sept 2007 when she first came to
me I refused to do the curses that she wanted me to do on you and jan as you
know that is not the way I work and I told her we may not be getting alone now
but we were friends for many years - and I explained that you were within your
rights to drop her as she was so obsessive and clearly abused you and jan and
your services - I'm always here to discuss this with you at any time and I hope
you and jan can see that I'm not involved in any conspiracy with anyone against
you - sincerely mike    $2000.00 BALANCE DUE AS OF MARCH 17 2008

  THEN SINCE MARCH 17 2008 M FILED MORE CHARGE BACKS & STOPPED
PAYMENT ON A CHECK TO ME $ 1500.00 CHARGE BACK ON 1ST PAYMENT MADE APROX
SEPT 10 2007 $   300.00 CHARGE  BACK 3-5-2008 PAYMENT $   200.00 CHECK
4-10-2008 M STOPPED PAYMENT ----- Original Message ----- From: Stanley
Cahill To: Prant99@aol.com

Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:25 AM Subject: Re: Payment Plan - What is
owed?

mary I just finished building more dolls for your prayers to be continued
- you can write another handwritten letter of request and request exactly what
you want - and send it when you can send a payment toward the balance due I need
to buy suppliers materials and offering to make up the alchemy's to continue
casting these prayers for you - without these implements they are not very
effective - I will expect and honest effort that you are making payments to me
on a regular bases - also my pay pal account is frozen - all payments must be
made by cashiers check or money order -  I'm always here for you mary -
sincerely mike   our original   $3200.00 u.s.d was our original
agreement in sept 2007   $  100.00 u.s.d was added to help cover the fee pay
pal charges and you agreed to that after the first payment   ========  
$3300.00 u.s.d - $1500.00 u.s.d.  paid through pay pal around sept 10 2007

  ========   $ 1800.00 u.s.d. balance due - $   900.00 u.s.d. paid
through pay pal on aprox oct 10 -15 2007   ========    $ 900.00  u.s.d
balance due this was originally promised to be paid by nov 10th 2007    $
450.00  u.s.d. paid through pay pal on aprox  noc  10-15  2007   
=======    $ 450.00 u.s.d. bal due on or before dec 10 2007 +  $900.00
u.s.d  the oct 2007 payment wascharged back by you through pay pal aprox in nov
of 2007 +  $450.00 u.s.d. the nov 2007 payment charged back aprox late dec
2007 or early jan 2007   ========   $1800.00 u.s.d  balance past due  
$  500.00 u.s.d  job payer done when you lost your job   ========   
$2300.00 u.s.d  - $  300.00 u.s.d paid by you to pay pal aprox 2 weeks ago
3-5-08   ========   $ 2000.00 u.s.d balance past due   also you
agreed to pay the fee pay pal charged for the charge backs - there not that much
80 - 90 bucks they charged 29-30 bucks on the 450 - I'm blocked from even
viewing that account in reality other than the $300.00 you just payed to pay
pal considering the charge backs I haven't gotten anything from you since the
first payment - yes I got the other two payments but pay pal is demanding their
money and they have put a report against my credit because I actually owe them
that money being you did the charge backs and the $300.00 did not come to me it
went toward the amount I owe them plus the fees they added   if you have
any questions you can call this evening as I'm doing a ritual most of today and
I won't be able to talk thanks mike     ----- Original Message -----

From: Prant99@aol.com

To: archer926@msn.com

Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:12 AM Subject: Payment Plan - What is
owed?

Mike,   I do not wish to cheat you but I also concerned about the
case.  I want a reuniting and disruprion on all other people that
interfere...for Hani to move back in and make a commitment to me leading to
marriage....honestly where is the case ???    I need to make monthly
payments to you.   You got $300 last week.   So $1800.   What
is owed?   Mary

====================================================

----- Original Message ----- From: Celeste Schaub To: Mike Sent:
Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:41 PM Subject: hello

HI Mike,

Just want to take a few minutes to go over what we talked about the other
day, in reference to M P, your past client.  I remember when you were working
with her, and on the phone day and night for hours trying to calm her down, as I
witnessed this more than once when I was down at your place doing spells
together and even blooded on her spell while you were doing it along with my
clients spells.

In November of 2007 she emailed me when she was involved with you still,
and had Pay Pal take back the money she had sent you for these same spells
(prayers) work I already described above. I am not sure of the amount but
believe it was around $1,800.00 for several different spells.  Because the two
of you were involved in the charge back she was doing with Pay Pal, she was
asking me to do spell work for her.  I declined doing anything for her for
various reasons; one being she was already your client and I don't work with
clients who are already engaged with another spell caster; two she wanted me to
do spell work against Jim and Janhett (curses), as well as to get her boyfriend
back.  I got one more email from her the next day saying she really needed this
work done, almost begging me to take her on as a new client.  I again wrote her
back, she wanted me to call her, and stated the same to her again and forwarded
you the emails she sent me, along with my responses.  The next thing I knew she
was sending me emails she was sending to Jim and Janhett, that had been cc'd to
you and me, implying you and I were involved in some sort of conspiracy "to get
Jim and Janhett".  This never was as you know and I had to finally block her
emails, but I was informed from a client of mine at the time that she was
suppose to have told Jim that she flew down to meet you and I...how
preposterous, I never even talked to this woman, or saw her before in my life,
too much drama for me.  I told her Jim and I were having enough problems trying
to work out our divorce with everyone else interfering and I wasn't getting
involved in any of this bs.  But yes she definitely did contract you for spell
work, and I was there for at least two of the spells myself.  I told her, her
problems with Jim and Janhett were hers to work out and not to involve me.  I
told her you were in my opinion, which I still feel today, the best person to
work with her for spell work as you were always completely dedicated to your
clients and do things as Divinity dictates. You always answer the telephone and
emails no matter when they come in. Your honesty and integrity is of the highest
qualifications I know.  Hope this further clarifies our discussion the other
night.  Take care,

Your friend and fellow magician,

Celeste

Mary Prantil Scamming Yet Another
Magick Site She Claims Not To Know.

Set the record straight, huh ?. Well I will set
the record straight for you in this post ok ? .  Ok Viewers, lets look at
what Mary T. Prantil attempted to do to us on top of what she's done to these
other sites in question.  Please see the articles below outlining Prantil's
negative scam plot that went horrible wrong with Miss Windglows Pay Pal
account,  You will further see the pattern unfolding in the Prantil scam
routine.

 

Here's where Mary Ripped Off Another Spell Caster By Charging
Back On Them After The Worked Was Performed. More Fraud On Mary's Part. Who's
The Real Fraud Here I ask you?. MARY PRANTIL WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT
SHE PAYS FOR HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER
BELOW. MAKES YOU WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT MARY PROFESSES AS TRUTH
HUH ?.

Matilda the Psychic writes to Jan :  "I've forwarded you two
e-mails in regard to Mary Prantil. Yes, I did read for her, also she spent over
3 1/2 hours on the phone to me. During said time she cried, cursed and begged me
to do a spell for her. I said that I don't usually do spells for people that I
do not know.Also I told her that usually people charge 1,000.00 for the type of
spell that she wanted, as that is High Magic , not something
simple.

Also the first card I got for her situation was the Heirophant,
follwed by the four of wands. I asked Mary if H _ _ _ _ was married , she said
"No, not my H".

Well she begged me ( begged Matilda the psychic NOT Jan ) so many
times, interrupted my other business, called at all hours. she cried so much to
me. I finally gave in and said I'd do the spell. Then she bargined with me to do
it for 800.00. Later she said that she had soooo many bills and could I do it
for $500.00.

I did it .It worked immediately, as her e-mail proves. Then she
found out that H---- is a drug addict and that he is married and has several
other girlfriends. I told her it was a moral choice, she admitted that in the
past she "was no angel" with Jan's service when I ask her what happened. She
charged me back on her credit card with Paypal and tryed to claim that the
"merchandise" was not the quality that she expected.  Spell work is NOT
merchandise because it is SPIRITUAL in nature and therefore not
tangible.

I said I would reverse the spell if she didn't pay me, I told her
that she should get professional therapy and I even arranged free drug
counseling for her boy friend; all of which she refused. I sent her a photo of
part of the spell and a paper tailsman as proof that I performed the service." 
( Direct email quote from Psychic Matilda to Jan )

HERE'S WHERE MARY REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD.
MY QUESTION FOR MARY IS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?).
THESE INVOICES WERE NEVER PAID BY MARY PRANTIL TO START WITH LOL.  The invoice
was initially sent to Prantil ( numerous times because her credit card would not
go through for the charge ) and the invoice was never paid by Prantil.  She sent
a signed personal check through regular first class mail for her spell services,
then once her castings were completed and she messed up her relationship with
her now ex, she then tried to go into Pay Pal and put money on the open invoice
to which Jan promptly cancelled the invoice before Prantil had a chance.  
Everything was explained to Prantil and she clearly understood that there would
be no refunds because once a spell is cast it is a done deal.

Mary Prantil tried to mess up Jan's Pay Pal account by attempting
to pay her own invoice after her personal check that was written to Jan cleared
so that she could force Jan to give her a refund anyway despite what she had
already been told and had agreed to regarding payment, the casting, no refunds,
etc. until Jan found out what she was doing and informed pay pal as to Prantil's
fraudulent activities. Prantil was going to pay off on her own
invoice.

 Again, Jan caught on to what Prantil was getting ready to do
which was to rip Jan off, so Jan cancelled the invoice from Prantil.  Prantil
then became so angry she reported Jim Morgan to Pay Pal and it was not even Mr.
Morgan's Pay Pal account.  What Prantil did at the point that she realized that
she could not charge back on the open invoice that Prantil never paid but was
getting ready to put funds on so she COULD charge back and force a refund
anyway, Prantil then in anger wrote a complaint to Pay Pal and placed a claim of
Fraud against Jim Morgan on this account, again which was not even his.  

Again, Jim Morgan doesn't even own the company nor does he have
anything to do with the administrative functions of this company such as
receiving monies for anything especially spell work. Of course Pay Pal laughed
at this little Prantil Con Game and Denied Prantil's fraudulent claims against
us. Mary also was confused in the way that she was trying to report Jim Morgan
to pay pal for running and or owning a company to which he has no connections to
other then helping out with the counseling part of the operation to which he
doesn't get paid for. 

See how miss-informed Mary Is. Basically what Mary was trying to
do was get her work performed for free by paying Jan with checks and then
attempting to get her money back for these cashed checks through pay pal. Notice
where this email originated from below and who it was sent to under the original
message heading. To those of you that know how to check IP Addresses this should
clear up any doubts that this is her actual communication to pay pal. So Much
for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.

-----Original Message----- From: m prantil To:

complaint-response@paypal.com

Cc:

wizardmorgan2@aol.com

;

passionspells@aol.com

Sent:
Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:12 pm Subject: Invoice From James
Morgan

PayPay,

I wish to report James Morgan for internet Fraud. There is a
$1200 invoice currently on my PayPal account form this site Love lust and Blood
spells.

I will forward emails to Payapal saying he is going to refund me.
I will also call directly to file my complaint to prevent others form getting
conned by him.

Thanks,

Mary Prantil

HERE'S WHERE MARY TRIED TO RIP JAN OFF BUT FAILED. MARY IS A
RIP OFF SCAM WHO LIKES TO COMMIT FRAUD. MARY LIKES TO ACCUSE OTHERS OF THIS TO
THROW SUSPICION FROM HERSELF. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud &
Tax Evasion on our part.  Mary Prantil in her ignorance thought that just
because Jan had sent her an invoice that she had NOT paid, that she still had
money on THAT open invoice, LOL.  ( isn't that like thinking you still have
money in the bank as long as you still have checks, LOL????)  ** NOTE** if
ANYONE would like to see the original invoice record that was cancelled by Jan,
then write and we will forward it to you to show that we are telling the entire
truth about Mary's little Pay Pal temper tantrum.

Forwarded Message: Subj: STOP BOTHERING US Date:
6/19/2007 8:36:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time From: Passionspells To:
Prant99

Mary,

your pay pal invoices were never processed-- And this is my
business- James is retired. How dare you say anything about him in a derrogatory
manner after he went out of his way to help you. It is only because of the grace
of Divinity and casting your spell that you have been getting along with H____
as well as you have been especially after you messed up your case and sent him
nasty e-mails, etc.

We just sent you an e-mail and I strongly suggest you back off. I
am getting ready to forward all of your e-mails to the FBI as I write this. You
have, for one thing ( just one of many) already violated Federal Internet
Law.

In addition, I will report you to our cell phone company
immediately for harassing phone calls and telephone stalking.

In closing here are copies of the Pay Pal invoices you NEVER
paid. You sent cash, and two personal checks. Here is a copy of your e-mail
stating that:

6/14/2007 2:12:54 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time From:
Prant99

Reply To: To: Passionspells, Wizardmorgan2

I sent you 1. cash, and a 2. Citibank check and a 3. Bank of
America check.

-----Original Message----- From:

Passionspells@aol.com

To:

Prant99@aol.com

Sent:
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 4:08 pm Subject: Verification Needed

Dear Mary,

This is Jan writing, dear. Could you please verify your
method of payment with me when you initially came in for your spell work?

I am going through all of my client records doing verification,
etc. for my records.

Thank you dear, I really appreciate it.

Sincerely, Jan

Here is a copy and paste of the pay pal invoices that you
never paid. I will write pay pal and forward them all of your abusive e-mails so
that they will be aware of the nonsense you have caused us. You have no credence
in that matter.

From: Janhett T. Windglows To: Mary Prantil
(

prant99@aol.com

)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount: $1,250.54 USD Status: Pending Date
Requested: May 6, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Spells Invoice Invoice Janhett T.
Windglows

passionspells@aol.com

Qty Item ID Description Unit Price Amount 1 050607 30 Day Spells Package
For Mary 1,200.00 1,200.00 T Subtotal: 1,200.00 Shipping: 46.80 T T
= 0.299%tax applied to item Tax: 3.74 Currency is in U.S. Dollars (USD)
Total: $1,250.54 USD

Request Sent

From: Janhett T. Windglows To: Mary Prantil
(

prant99@aol.com

)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount: $500.00 USD Status: Pending Date
Requested: May 8, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Revised Invoice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: Here is the first 500 will send the next one right
after this one thanks dear

Request Sent

From: Janhett T. Windglows To: Mary Prantil
(

prant99@aol.com

)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount: $500.00 USD Status: Pending Date
Requested: May 8, 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: 2nd one

In closing, I will now forward your e- mails to the F.B.I. for
harassment, abuse, and stalking. Also your spell work is now being reversed. You
should have listened to us and things would not have turned out this way for
you. Perhaps you will learn a lesson from all of this, however if you do not,
that is no longer our problem.

-----------------------Jan

HERE'S ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW MARY CONDUCTED HERSELF THROUGHOUT
HER ENTIRE SPELL PROCESS LOL. AND SHE WONDERS WHY NO ONE LIKES HER AND OR LAUGHS
AT HER LOL.

Subj: Jim - Sex spell on Hani - Disruption Spell on Tony

Date: 7/3/2007 1:37:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time From: Prant99 To:
Wizardmorgan2 CC: Passionspells

 

Jim, (and Jan)

H - - - actually said he is NOT sexually attracted to me last
night...H- - - - is prob mad at me too bcs I made out and kissed 2 of his
friends this is one of the reason I think he is upset and fri I was a raging
drunk lunatic...Fri - I was upset about the email and I started drinking around
7pm and saw H - - - - by 11pm totally wasted...then his Egyptian friends are
making fun of me or so H - - - - says...it may not be true the gossip but H - -
- is acting discusted with me...saying all will be OK if I just accept that...he
confessed about T - - - - and the email.

T - - - - is the negative influence...For the last 2-3 weeks H- -
- - has been around T - - - again now look...Please talk with Jan about these 2
spells.

Let me know.

Mary

HERE IS WHERE JAN REPORTED MARY FOR EMAIL ABUSE TO THE AOL AND
YAHOO WEB MASTERS AND HAD HER BLOCKED AS A RESULT OF THEIR FINDINGS. MORE FRAUD
AND HARASSMENT TO US CARRIED OUT BY MARY PRANTIL.

Subj: ABUSE Date: 8/21/2007 4:13:33 A.M. Pacific Standard
Time From: Passionspells To:

tosreports@aol.com

I wish to report an abusive e-mail sender. I have numerous copies
of her e-mails. We have blocked her from our e-mail addresses, however she
continues to send us more mail under different e-mail
addresses.

Her name is Mary Prantil, and she has sent to us via the
following e-mail addresses:

Prant99@aol.com

mary.prantil@email.com

I have all of her contact information, home address and telephone
number. I really do need this abuse from her to stop.

My other screen name is

wizardmorgan2@aol.com

in which she has also been blocked from.

Sincerely,

Jan Windglows

THIS IS MARY BEGGING JAN TO TAKE HER CASE BACK AFTER SHE TOTALLY
MESSED THINGS UP WITH HER GUY. AT THIS POINT WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING FOR
MARY AND FURTHER REJECTED ANYMORE FUNDS FROM HER. WE HAD OFFERED TO REFUND HER
$1,200.00 AND MOREOVER TO EAT THE COST OF HER SPELL WORK JUST TO GET RID OF HER
HOWEVER SHE DECLINED THE REFUND AS YOU CAN SEE IN HER STATEMENT BELOW.

Subj: Sorry I want U on my case...$250 more 2 send T. F last
phase... Date: 6/15/2007 3:56:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time From:
Prant99 To: Wizardmorgan2 CC: Passionspells

Jim, I am sorry for any character defect in me that has got
again "reared it's ugly head". I respect you and Jan and I truly want your help.
Yes. I am needy, Yes I need to let go and let Divinity. Please do not give up on
me..no time is lost if we just get thru this 24 hr bump of mine. Help me please
!!

I believe in you and your expertise and your morals as a caster
are so pure and high. I do not want you to send me back any
money.

I want to send you the $250 discussed to complete the disruption
spell with T. F. I also want you to please make H. so uncomfortable without
me,,,that he can't stop thinking about me and what a great friend I am and
lover. To be so sexually frusterated without me...who ever he fucks or has a one
night stand or bi-sexual 3-way with H. will think of me..how lucky he was to
have my love...that he f- - - - - - it up between us not me...that he can't rest
until he gets me back - even if it means leaving T.F and the
office.

Are you still willing to help me?

I truly want your help - I am done today at 1pm I will call you
then I can send the $250 today.

Mary the needy brat...but lovable and willing to let
go....

THIS IS WHERE I CONFERRED WITH JAN AND WE BOTH DECIDED AT THE
TIME TO FULLY TERMINATE MARY'S CASE AFTER GIVING HER SEVERAL CHANCES TO
STRAIGHTEN UP AND FOLLOW THE RULES. THIS IS THE LETTER WE SENT HER AFTER GOING
THROUGH TWO MONTHS OF HELL WITH Miss Chaos .

Mary,

OUR RESPONSE BACK TO MARY
PRANTIL

Due to you ongoing harassing to Kim, Matilda and myself, I
have decided counseling with Matilda is not in anyone's best interest. I have
instructed Matilda not to have any further communications with you. After I send
this e-mail, I will also instruct Kim not to have any further contact with you
either.

Your spell work with James and myself has been finished, and Kim
is finishing your spell work that you hired her for. I paid for your counseling
with Kim. Since I paid for your counseling, which I did not have to do, for some
reason you think that Kim's spell work included your counseling, which it did
NOT. I PAID FOR YOUR COUNSELING. The 400 that you paid Kim was FOR SPELL
WORK-----NOT FOR COUNSELING. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS??????

I am officially ending all contact with you right after I send
this e-mail. I do not want you for a client from this point on. You have
exhausted all of your resources of obtaining any further help with any of us,
because of your RUDE DEMANDING rebellious controlling attitude, and constantly
continuing to break the rules of the spell criteria.

HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING TO ME ABOUT MY HONESTY AND INTEGRITY.

JUST SO YOU KNOW AND UNDERSTAND YOUR SPELL WORK HAS BEEN DONE SO
WE DID YOUR WORK THAT YOU PAID US FOR. We did even more than that----numerous
boosters, and re casts also.

WE DO NOT WANT YOU FOR A CLIENT EVER AGAIN.

CONCERNING ANY FURTHER POSSIBLE COUNSELING, I DO NOT HAVE ONE
SINGLE COUNSELOR THAT IS WILLING TO WORK WITH YOU. YOU ARE OBNOXIOUS, DEMANDING,
AND RUDE-----THIS IS WHY ALL OF THIS HAS COME TO THIS POINT.

GOOD BYE MARY. YOU ARE BY FAR THE WORST CLIENT I HAVE EVER HAD IN
ALL MY YEARS OF SPELL CASTING.

 

MARY T. PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL RECORDS
IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Criminal Check for all Mary T Prantil in the state
of CA Record 1 of 6 IDENTIFICATION Mary T Prantil CA SOURCE:
CA   OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER: M598531 - Confirm Case at the
Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL

OFFENSE DATE: 03/23/1990 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego   Record 2 of 6

IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE: CA   OFFENSE
DETAILS CASE NUMBER: T105836 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY
CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 11/13/1992
OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego   Record 3 of 6 IDENTIFICATION Mary
Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE: CA   OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER:
T108343 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT:
SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 01/04/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego

  Record 4 of 6 IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa
Prantil CA SOURCE: CA   OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER: T110326 -
Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO
MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 02/02/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego   Record
5 of 6 IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE:
CA   OFFENSE DETAILS CASE NUMBER: T120948 - Confirm Case at the
Courthouse COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL

OFFENSE DATE: 08/09/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego   Record 6 of 6

IDENTIFICATION Mary Theresa Prantil CA SOURCE: CA   OFFENSE
DETAILS CASE NUMBER: M695524 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse COUNTY
CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL OFFENSE DATE: 02/01/1995
OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego

 

Ex-Employee speaks out: DO NOT GET SCAMMED by SCAM Jan Windglows. Unfortunately, I used to work for SCAM Jan Windglows in Bushnell, Florida. SCAM website www.bloodloveandlustspells.com PO Box #118 Bonners Ferry, Idaho PO BOx #712 Driggs, Idaho and last known mailing address 7961 Court Bushnell, Florida.  DO NOT CALL 208-714-4348 Jan Windglows ONLY WANTS YOUR MONEY!!!!

SCAM Jan Windglows Convicted Criminal for DECEPTION FRAUD - Scam Jan Windglows violated her SUMTER Bushnel Florida COUNTY JAIL Probation 90 Day Jail Sentence- Call Florida Dept of Corrections and find out PUBLIC records of many FELONY charges for Deception Fraud, Grand Larceny and Grand Larceny.

SCAM Jan Windglows taught me the trade of SACAMMING ppl for SPELLS and PSYCHIC Readings.

Jan on the LAM - Jail bird of SUMTER JAIL - Bushnell County Florida.  Violates Probation - Jan on the LAM

Jan on the LAM gives the worst Psychic Readings bcs she does not have a DIVINE GIFT - and charges MONEY which is EVIL and against Divity.

Jan on the LAM - never does the work only takes yoour MONEY!!!

 

SPELLS DO NOT WORK!!!

This post was written on Monday July 26th, 2010.

 

Hello to all who read this- this is Enchantress Jan Windglows- I do not live in Florida, LOL and have not for about seven years.

 

The person above posting against us is a deluded woman from New York facing a lot of criminal charges, named Mary Prantil. 

 

We expect her to be thrown in jail this October hopefully sooner.  She is a liar and blabber mouth, as everyone can see, and a garbage mouth as well.   Every time she emails or calls us, we simply send her threatening emails and phone calls to the attorney in New York currently prosecuting her.

 

Mary Prantil is our "pet psycho" so to speak. Hello, Mary !  My husband James and I are here in Bonners Ferry Idaho, anyone can call us- our phone number is 208-714-4348, just like it says on our web sites. 

 

Mary would LOVE to have our home residential address so she can make more trouble for us, but that will never happen.  This is precisely why business owners have post office boxes- to avoid psychotic people like Mary of course, LOL.

 

You see, Mary is MAD because when we did her spell work, the spells WORKED, her boyfriend wanted to marry her, and then Mary messed up and drove her boyfriend off, and she has been blaming all her messed up agenda on us ever since.

 

She also has some kind of psychotic thing going where she makes up outlandish stories about other people about the same things that are happening in HER life, lol.  The woman needs to be put away, committed, locked up for the rest of her life.  She is 46 years old and still all she can do is try to make trouble for innocent people.

 

My husband James spent countless hours on the phone helping this woman.  She did receive her spell results.  She messed up her life.  Oh, well !  I have no control over what this crazy woman did to her own life and we will not back down from her and will continue to help put her behind bars.

 

So in closing, Mary is a very unhappy person, constantly blaming her own self adversities on innocent other people.  And my husband and I are not the only ones- Mary Prantil has SEVERAL people in New York that have pressed charges on her and are waiting for her to be prosecuted.

 

For future reference, my husband and I will continue to run our very reputable and innocent highly successful business and continnue to defend ourselves, no matter WHAT Mary Prantil says.

 

We know who we are, and we know who Mary Prantil is.

 

Give me a call if any questions.  By the way, I see Mary had to actually write a long story of lies about me since she did a background check and could not find anything on MY record, lol.

 

Mary Prantil certainly has PLENTY of garbage racked up against her huh?  Just think here is a woman 46 years old that will never be a responsible adult or lead a positive productive life.  But that is her problem now, and she has Divinity to answer for, for all her misdeeds and her many lies and crimes.

 

The comical thing about all of this is, nobody CARES what Mary Prantil writes or says.  She is a liar and nobody or any of my cleints EVER ask me who Mary Prantil even IS.

 

All the stories that Prantil fabricates about us are garbage, as we have stated many times.  My husband and I are very successful honest people and we are not ruffled by anything Mary Prantil says because all she is doing at this point is taking up bandwidth that someone else who has something important to say could be using up here, lol.

 

Concerning my home address- Mary is the reason I will never disclose my residential address.  I do not need her crazy as_ showing up in my neighborhood, LOL.  Anyone reading these threads would feel the same.

 

Take care and be blessed everyone, call me and come visit my website I have nothing to hide, lol.  Come and see the new beautiful altar my husband James and I have built to bring glory to Divinity. 

 

In Divinity's Service,

Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows
www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
208-714-4348

This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his daughter Mary Theresa Prantil.  In past reports authored by Miss Prantil, she has stated that " I'm proud to have been the daughter of Frank G. Prantil" and that she again "comes from a "PRESTIGIOUS"  family based in the San Diego there in the state of California.

 

I can't speak for the character of the rest of her family as I don't personally know them however, I have no reason to believe them to be anything other then reasonable and law abiding people however, I can relay what I've read from credible sources such as transcripts from the Supreme Court, Colleges of Frank Prantil, Attorney Generals office, State Attorneys office legal sites etc pertaining to Frank G. Prantil.

 

Miss Prantil has stated that "My father got off lots of criminals" then latter went on to say: "My father got off lots of criminals and innocent people to", LOL. Well, I'm sure he did successfully defend some innocent people along the way but from the looks of it, he also was instrumental in successfully defending the trash of society such as Murders, Child Molesters, Check Forgers, Bank Robbers etc. Upon researching the records and past legal performance of Mr. Prantil, I was also informed that not only was he successful in defending the scum of humanity on several occasions but went on to be completely corrupted by the same criminals that he had been representing throughout his practice.

 

It was in my research sited below,  did I run across several charges launched against Frank G. Prantil via the Supreme and Superior court system there in California, such infractions as Perjury, Drug Poisson, Drug Abuse, Unlawfully removing $700,000 from a Clients safe as she sat in jail awaiting a murder trial and so fourth. Mr. Prantil also had interfered with the homicide trial by becoming personally involved with his Client of that same murder trial by attempting to cover for the accused so he could recover his fees. Prantil lied blatantly on several occasions and attempted to hold up the due process of law by filling one frivolous motion of delay right after another just like Mary in the current charges being lodged against her by the State of New York.

 

Frank Prantil was known as a greedy individual who would stop at nothing to accomplish his goals be they of a positive or unethical nature, JUST LIKE Mary T. Prantil his daughter, He was considered out spoken, brazened, and ruthless just like his daughter Mary T. Prantil Internet Terrorist Extraordinaire. So in essence and according to other legal professionals, Frank Prantil was nothing but a GREEDY UNETHICAL Attorney that happened to like the spotlight just like Mary. Another thing I'd like to add here. Did you know that Frank G. Prantil was in and out of rehab centers for his uncontrolled use of illegal narcotics ?, Did you know that he was imprisoned for 14 months for not only botching a homicide trial, but for being an Accomplice to check FORGERY in the commission of that crime.

 

As you can read in the research below, Mr. Prantil wasn't considered a professional on any level by the courts or his peers. Mr. Prantil was DISBARRED twice for drug, unethical activity, and leaving his Clients holding the bag simply because they ran out of money in the middle of their defense. Does any of this sound familiar ?, Does it sound like anything Miss Mary T. Prantil has done in the past ?, I would say that Little Mary is the preverbal apple that didn't fall very far from the tree, wouldn't you say ?  Well, Frank Prantil won't be bothering, SCAMMING, or ripping off his Clients any more because he's now deceased. Good Riddance I say.

 

Now, we have little Mary carrying on his legacy with all of her criminal activities such as you can view below after her fathers information. Please view the facts below coming from the Experts and those that had the misfortune of dealing with him first hand. Sounds like a real Gypsy Scum Ball to me. Read the history of this Idiot and be SHOCKED and then read about the exploits of his daughter little miss marry low life prantil, people like this should just be locked away forever and kept from wasting the courts time and resources.

 

 

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

March 31, 1989|ANTHONY PERRY

The California Supreme Court has quietly ended one of San Diego County's more clamorous legal careers.

The court this month upheld the disbarment of Frank George Prantil, a well-known attorney and aspiring politician before being convicted of perjury and forgery charges and spending 14 months in prison.

"At one time, he was considered one of the county's top defense attorneys," said attorney Eugene Iredale, who once represented Prantil. "Somehow his life just fell apart on him."

Now living outside Sacramento, the 51-year-old Prantil said he was "devastated" by the court's rejection of his plea that he was unfairly convicted. And he repeated his oft-made accusation that he was victimized because of his maverick ways.

"I'm a victim of the war on drugs," Prantil said. "The prosecutors and the courts can't stand it when someone insists that all defendants have rights."

In nearly two decades as a practicing attorney, the San Diego native was never far from the headlines. He won several high-publicity felony cases and big-money damage suits. He defended a San Diego councilman indicted in the Yellow Cab scandal.

Reporters loved his flamboyant rhetoric (he favored Shakespeare and the classics) and brash attire (he wore an American flag tie to court). His practice boomed. He moved from East County to a comfortable spread in La Jolla.

But there were also political defeats, angry public disputes, money problems and his final slide into Vacaville state prison. He concedes now that alcohol and marijuana played a role in his difficulties.

He lost races for Congress (1968), district attorney (1970) and El Cajon Municipal Court (1978). The County Bar Assn. branded him as unqualified. The State Bar in 1979 suspended him for six months for misusing a client's money.

He was convicted in 1983 of forgery and perjury in a case involving a bogus $53,000 check and, in 1986, of being an accessory to a cocaine conspiracy. Released from prison in 1987, Prantil says he will never return to San Diego County: "They rode me out on a rail."

He says that Deputy Dist. Atty. Bob Sullivan had a vendetta against him. Sullivan says that's bunk and notes that two juries convicted Prantil on a number of counts.

From his self-imposed exile, Prantil tries not to dwell on how far he has fallen. "I used to believe in ultimate justice," he said. "I don't anymore."

A Winning T-Shirt

 

T-shirts protesting the judge's decision will go on sale today in 14 San Diego County outlets of Pacific Eyes and T's, the Sorrento Valley-based T-shirt and sunglasses chain.

The new shirts show a Conner-like catamaran with a large screw through it, and a kiwi bird laughing at the sight. Price: $10.

Pacific Eyes and T's has long backed Conner against pirate-banker Michael Fay. During the September races it sold shirts saying "No Way Fay", and "Throw Another Kiwi on the Barbie."

A Well-Done Roast

In Pete Wilson's latter years as mayor of San Diego, it was said he had two goals: to learn to sing and to become governor.

He took lessons and can manfully handle a tune. The second goal eluded him, and he settled for the U. S. Senate. Now, he's trying to rectify that with his third try at the governorship, with his likely Democratic foe being Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.

Thursday night the Republican Wilson was among those roasting Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) at a benefit dinner in Oakland.

He joked that he wasn't surprised to find picketers carrying signs urging him to stay in the Senate. What did surprise him, he said, was that one of the signs was carried by Van de Kamp.

==========================================================================================

 

http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/843/843.F2d.314.86-6669.html

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=Frank+George+Prantil&circuit=

 

PUBLIC RECORDS http://public.resource.org/

843 F.2d 314

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-6669.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1987*.
Memorandum Jan. 4, 1988.
Order and Opinion March 31, 1988.

Frank G. Prantil, Fair Oaks, Cal., pro se.

M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before CHOY, FARRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank George Prantil, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.

I.

2

Prantil, formerly an attorney in California, was introduced to Daryl Bell by his client Melvin Goins. Prantil agreed to represent Bell on a criminal charge. A few weeks later a woman purporting to be Bell's mother asked Prantil to help her negotiate an escrow check from which Prantil would receive his fee. Prantil accompanied the woman to his bank where he informed the teller that the woman was his client's mother and that he wanted to deposit the check into his trust account. The woman signed the check, which was made payable to Joanna F. McKnight, and Prantil endorsed it to his trust account. Neither Prantil nor the woman indicated that the check might not be genuine.

3

Subsequently, the owner of an escrow agency discovered that three checks were missing from her office. One of the checks had been made out to Joanna F. McKnight and deposited in Prantil's account. The agent's signature had been forged on the check.

4

Prantil was charged with forgery in violation of Section 470 of the California Penal Code. At trial, Prantil argued he knew nothing of the forgery, and that he had deposited the check merely for collection purposes to see whether it was genuine.To establish that Prantil knew the escrow check was forged, the prosecution introduced evidence concerning four trust deeds which Prantil had prepared. Prantil had received information suggesting that the four deeds were forged and that Goins and Bell, were responsible for the forgeries.

5

Prantil was convicted of forgery and sentenced to two years in prison. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. People v. Prantil, 169 Cal.App.3d 592, 215 Cal.Rptr. 372 (1985). The California Supreme Court denied review and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Prantil v. California, 475 U.S. 1067, 106 S.Ct. 1381, 89 L.Ed.2d 606 (1986).1

6

Prantil filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court summarily denied the petition. This court granted Prantil's application for a certificate of probable cause.2

II.

7

Prantil contends that numerous trial court errors and a district court delay in deciding his habeas petition denied him due process.

8

This court reviews de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987). This court presumes the state court's findings of fact to be correct. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).

III.

9

Prantil contends he was denied due process because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he passed the forged escrow check "as true and genuine."3

10

This court determines whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

11

The evidence established that Prantil received information prior to the transaction which suggested that Goins and Bell were involved in a forgery scheme. He also knew that one of the possible victims of the scheme was Joanna McKnight, who was described to him as an elderly woman between the ages of 78 and 80. Yet, despite this knowledge, when Prantil deposited the escrow check into his trust account he did not inform the teller that the check might be a forgery or that the woman with him, who appeared to be approximately 40 to 45 years of age, might not be the person whose name appeared on the check. He merely endorsed the check and asked that it be deposited into his account.

12

Prantil's knowledge of the previous forgeries and the contradictory descriptions of McKnight could have led the jury to reasonably conclude that by failing to alert the bank, Prantil was attempting to pass the check "as true and genuine." See People v. Williams, 186 Cal.App.2d 420, 424, 8 Cal.Rptr. 871, 873 (1960) (tender of check purporting to be signed by specific person established "true and genuine" requirement). Thus, the district court did not err in the determining there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to find that the "true and genuine" requirement was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

IV.

13

Prantil contends that the trial court deprived him of due process by giving two erroneous jury instructions.

14

This court evaluates jury instructions "in the context of the overall charge to the jury as a component of the entire trial process." Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 838, 105 S.Ct. 137, 83 L.Ed.2d 77 (1984). To warrant habeas relief, the instruction cannot be merely "undesirable, erroneous, or even 'universally condemned,' " but must violate some due process right guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146, 94 S.Ct. 396, 400, 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). Moreover, the petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction "so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 1, 1987).

15

Prantil challenges the trial court's instruction regarding the elements of forgery. He contends that by omitting the "true and genuine" requirement, the trial court denied him his due process right to have the jury consider each element of the charged offense. See Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 87-88, 103 S.Ct. 969, 978, 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983) (instruction on presumption of intent reversible error because permitted jury to convict defendant without examining evidence concerning essential element of crime).

16

The trial court gave the following instructions on the elements of forgery:

17

Now, in order to prove the commission of such crime [forgery], each of the following elements must be proved, each of them. Here we go.

18

Number one, that a person passed or offered to pass a forged instrument. That is the first one.

19

Two that such person knew that the instrument was forged; and three, that such person passed or offered to pass such instrument with the specific intent to defraud another person or persons.

20

Although the instruction omitted the "true and genuine" requirement, we consider the instruction in conjunction with the other instructions. See Bashor, 730 F.2d at 1239. Prior to giving the challenged instruction the court told the jury:

21

Now, every person with the specific intent to defraud--now, remember that I told you 'specific intent.' That's it. That's specific intent--with the specific intent to defraud another, utters, publishes, passes or attempts to pass or make use--there's a lot of things here--or make use of, as true and genuine, any false, altered, forged or counterfeited instrument or document, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited, is guilty of the crime of forgery. (emphasis added)

22

Because the overall charge to the jury informed them of the true and genuine requirement, Prantil was not denied his due process right to have the jury consider every element of the crime.

23

Prantil also contends he was denied due process because the trial court gave an inapplicable and erroneous jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Prantil argues that the accomplice instruction removed an issue of intent from the jury's consideration and thus constituted reversible error under the reasoning of Johnson and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).

24

However, the prosecutor specifically denied that Prantil could be guilty as an aider and abettor instead of as a principal. An erroneous jury instruction does not merit habeas relief if the deficiencies pertain to matters that are not in dispute and the error did not so affect the entire trial as to deprive the defendant of due process.See Darnell, 823 F.2d at 302-03. The trial court gave proper instructions regarding the intent necessary to convict Prantil as a principal to the forgery. Because the prosecution did not present an accomplice theory, any deficiencies went to a matter that was not in dispute. The error did not mislead the jury on a disputed issue and thus did not so infect the trial as to deprive Prantil of due process. Id.

V.

25

Prantil contends that the trial court denied him due process by refusing to grant judicial use immunity to a potentially exonerating witness.

26

On his motion for a new trial, Prantil claimed that Goins could testify that Goins and Bell had set up Prantil, that Prantil was unaware that the check was stolen, and that Bell had lied to Prantil when he said there were criminal charges pending against him. Goins had been unavailable to testify at the trial because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. At the new trial hearing Goins invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify at the trial unless he received judicial use immunity because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. The court denied Prantil's motion to grant immunity to Goins.

27

Under California law, a court may only grant immunity on the prosecutor's request. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 1324. See In re Weber, 11 Cal.3d 703, 720, 523 P.2d 229, 240, 114 Cal.Rptr. 429, 440 (1974). However, the prosecution's failure to request immunity violated Prantil's due process rights if it deprived him of his right to a fair trial. See United States v. Garner, 663 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905, 102 S.Ct. 1750, 72 L.Ed.2d 161 (1982).

28

Here, Prantil's unsupported assertion is the only indication that Goins would have presented exculpatory testimony had he been granted immunity. The record contains overwhelming evidence that Prantil was not an unwitting accomplice in the crime, much of which would not be controverted by Goins' testimony even if that testimony is as Prantil contends it would be. For example, Prantil knew that the woman who deposited the check in his account did not match the description of the woman whose name appeared on the check. On these facts, we hold that Prantil was not deprived of a fair trial. If Prantil was denied a fair trial in this case, trial courts would be required to grant immunity simply on the basis of unsupported allegations by criminal defendants that immunity is required by due process.

29

Moreover, Prantil has made no showing that any misconduct on the part of the prosecutor caused Goins to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination. See United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 890-92 (9th Cir.1983).

VI.

30

Prantil contends he was denied due process because of a twenty-month delay between the date of the alleged crime and the date of the indictment.

31

A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is "tested by general proscriptions of due process."4 Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th Cir.1978). A pre-indictment delay does not justify habeas relief unless the defendant can show actual prejudice. Id. at 1382. To prove actual prejudice a defendant must give more than "mere assertions that ... witnesses' memories may have faded with the passage of time...." United States v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 822, 106 S.Ct. 74, 88 L.Ed.2d 60 (1985).

32

Prantil contends that he suffered actual prejudice because the bank teller could no longer remember the details of the escrow check transaction. However, the state court of appeals found that the delay did not affect the teller's memory. In addition, the court noted that Prantil was benefited by the teller's unresponsiveness to certain questions; therefore there was no prejudice.

33

Prantil also claims that a seven-month delay between the time he filed his habeas petition and the time the district court dismissed the action violated his right to due process.5

34

In Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1976), the Fifth Circuit held that a district court's procedure for handling habeas petitions which routinely resulted in delays of up to twenty months violated due process. However, in Satterlee v. Kritzman, 626 F.2d 682, 683 (9th Cir.1980), we held that a district court's clerical error which resulted in an eight-month delay between the dismissal of a prisoner's habeas petition and the time his files were forwarded to the court of appeals did not deprive the petitioner of any substantive rights. As in Satterlee, here there is no policy of discrimination and no showing that the delay was purposeful.

VII.

35

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Prantil's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

36

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

1

Because Prantil's direct appeal presented the same constitutional claims as his subsequent habeas petition, it is unnecessary for him to have filed for state habeas relief. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987)

2

Prantil was released from prison on April 20, 1987. However, because a felony conviction may cause a defendant to suffer adverse collateral consequences even after he has served his sentence, a defendant's release from custody prior to the completion of his federal habeas corpus proceedings will not render his petition moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-38, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). Prantil was in custody when he filed the petition in district court, so this court retains jurisdiction over the proceedings after he is released. Id

3

Under California law, a person is guilty of forgery if he passes or attempts to pass as true and genuine a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 470; People v. Hellman, 189 Cal.App.2d 777, 778-79, 11 Cal.Rptr. 433 (1961). The only element Prantil challenges as lacking sufficient evidence is the true and genuine requirement

4

Once a suspect is indicted, the more stringent requirements of the speedy trial right apply. Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1978)

5

Prantil first raised the issue in his brief to this court. Ordinarily, this court will not decide an issue which was not raised at the District Court. Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985). The court may decide an issue for the first time on appeal, however, where review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Id. Because a claim that a district court violated a party's due process rights questions the integrity of the federal judicial system, we review Prantil's claim despite his failure to raise it below

CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org

=========================================================================

MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=

 

 

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/ A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

 

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

 

=================================

 

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at the airport and who drove him back. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman at the airport could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman at the airport and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman at the Omaha airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

31

CONCLUSION

32

To conclude, we reverse defendant's perjury conviction on Count Six of the indictment because the allegedly perjurious statements lack materiality. We reverse and remand the defendant's remaining convictions on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to recuse the participating prosecutor as a material witness and on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct in the government's closing argument.

===========================================

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

==========================================

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/

A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

25

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

=========================================

(1984). Hence, we must decide whether the defendant's testimony was material.

29

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at his hotel and who drove him back to the Omaha Airport. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman who met him at his hotel and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel and drove him to the airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

===========================================

1

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ See United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), rev'd in part, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984). Betty Powell was convicted on four counts of a fifteen-count indictment which had alleged that she conspired with her husband and son to distribute cocaine. She was acquitted on all substantive conspiracy counts. Three of her four convictions, those alleging the use of a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, were subsequently reversed on appeal, United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), but then reinstated by the Supreme Court, United States v. Powell, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984)

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979)

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

===========================================================================

MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=

 

 

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/ A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

 

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

 

=================================

 

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at the airport and who drove him back. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman at the airport could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman at the airport and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman at the Omaha airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

31

CONCLUSION

32

To conclude, we reverse defendant's perjury conviction on Count Six of the indictment because the allegedly perjurious statements lack materiality. We reverse and remand the defendant's remaining convictions on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to recuse the participating prosecutor as a material witness and on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct in the government's closing argument.

===========================================

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

==========================================

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/

A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

25

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

=========================================

(1984). Hence, we must decide whether the defendant's testimony was material.

29

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at his hotel and who drove him back to the Omaha Airport. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman who met him at his hotel and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel and drove him to the airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

===========================================

1

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ See United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), rev'd in part, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984). Betty Powell was convicted on four counts of a fifteen-count indictment which had alleged that she conspired with her husband and son to distribute cocaine. She was acquitted on all substantive conspiracy counts. Three of her four convictions, those alleging the use of a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, were subsequently reversed on appeal, United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), but then reinstated by the Supreme Court, United States v. Powell, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984)

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979)

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T.

Mary Prantil's Book & Case # from NYC Department Of Corrections - Prantil Mary IS AVerified Criminal Convicted for Deception,FRAUD, Grand LARCENY, EXTORTION, ABUSE, HARRASSMENT OF INNOCENT BUSINESS OWNERS

 

HERE FIND MARY PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL BOOK AND CASE NUMBER LOOK UP ANYONE CAN PULL IT UP BY FOLLOWING THESE SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS:

The public may look up Mary Prantil's criminal records, on the NYC Department Of Corrections web site so you the public can see what a real piece of crap Mary Prantil really is.

Go to the following link which is the NYC jail inmate lookup: 

http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/

After the page has been pulled up, you will see the place where to enter Mary Prantil's Booking and Case Number, which is 3471001054- simply enter that number in the white box, as shown below.

As you will see, the NYC Department Of Corrections has all her criminal information and charges posted. As we have said numerous times in the past, we have proof of what we have been warning the public about this criminal Mary Prantil all along, so see for yourself- go to the link, enter her book and case number, the information is current and is all there for anyone because it is PUBLIC RECORD. The facts, simply put.

Enter
NYSID or Book & Case Number: ( enter 3471001054 )

You will then find, on the NYC Department of Corrections Inmate Lookup, Mary Prantil's criminal records, including her Felony Stalking charge.

May Mary Prantil rot in Hell, if the Devil will even let her in, LOL. Good riddance, freak Prantil :( LOL the joke is on U

LOOK PRANTIL TAX EVASION CHARGES AND REPORTS AGAINST YOU TAX WARRANTS REPORTED TO THE NEW YORK STATE AND FEDERAL TAX BOARDS YOU SHOULD LEARN YOUR LESSON AND LET INNOCENT PEOPLE ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN DAMN BUSINESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TAX HOME | e-Services Help | Privacy | Security | Disclaimer | Contact Us 

Office of Tax Enforcement - File an Information Referral to report suspected tax evasion and fraud 

Check to see if you meet our minimum browser requirements for this service. 

*Required fields 

Information Referral: 
This information referral concerns a(n)* Individual Business/Tax Preparer/Practioner 

Description of Information Referral* 
Please include a detailed description of the alleged violation activity. 
https://www.integrascan.com/search_results.php?type

County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched:

MARY PRANTIL QUEENS

Warrant ID# : E-029211902-W001-3

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant 

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. 

Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
June 10, 2008 QUEENS $106.21 June 20, 2008 


Warrant ID# : E-029159448-W001-7

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant 

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
February 14, 2008 QUEENS $4,072.14 February 14, 2008 


* Filed with Department of State on or prior to implementation of electronic filing system, January 8, 2004. Dates for filings made prior to January 8, 2004 must be derived from paper filings and should be obtained from the Department of Taxation and Finance.

Taxpayer Name(s) Selected: City specified in warrant address record of Taxpayer Searched: County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched: MARY PRANTIL, QUEENS

Subject Information: 

Please enter as much information as you can regarding the primary person allegedly involved in the complaint. 

First Name* Mary T. 
Last Name* Prantil
Street Address 32-85 33rd Street
Apt # C-2
City* Astoria
State* New York, 11106
Cell Phone Number: 9172246605
Also Known As: Mary Prantil, Mary T. Prantil, Mary Theresa Prantil 
Date of Birth January 27, 1965
Physical Description: Female, white, eyes green, hair blonde, 95 pounds
Any known partners, affiliates, etc.: 

WE EMAILED IT, AND MAILED A FED EX HARD COPY TOO, SO PRANTIL YOU NEED TO STOP POSTING LIES ABOUT US AND LEAVE US ALONE ONCE AND FOR ALL BECAUSE YOU HAVE LOST THIS BATTLE SO GET OVER YOURSELF !!!!!! EVERYONE KNOWS ALL ABOUT YOU, WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU HAVE DONE.

If you would prefer to mail this form, print it and mail it to: 
NYS Department of Taxation and Finance 
Report Suspected Tax Evasion/Fraud 
Information Referral Unit 
Income/Franchise Desk Audit 
Albany NY 12227-0166

SCAMMER Jan Windglows is in a PANIC bcs the Global Internet is posting multiple complaints about her DECEPTION FRAUD - Western Union Operation called -SCAM SITES  www.bloodloveandlustspells.com and www.dragonspells.com passionspells@aol.com wizardmorgan2@aol.com

SCAM Jan Windglows has no credibilty or Stability and changes PO BOX's as many times as Jan Windglows is arrested. Jan on the LAM from SUMTER Floria Jail!!!

It is TRUE - the worst Psychic Readings from SCAM Jan Windglows - Jan will try to get you to buy SPELLS after the Psychic Reading - DECEPTION FRAUD is the CRIME of offering money for a result! Everytime SCAM Jan Windglows offers to do a SPELL for MONEY Jan Windglows is committing DECEPTION FRAUD...report this SUMTER FLORIDA JAIL Fugitive to the POLICE

ASK Jan Windglows for her REAL ADDRESS before any Money is exchanged or GET OFF THE PHONE with SCAM Jan Windglows.

Only a SCAM list just a PO BOX.  Jan On the LAM from SUMTER FLORIDA JAIL!!

Scam Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows has over 3 address changes in less than 2 year.  Grifter and Con-Artist - SCAM Jan Windglows is a only interested in getting your MONEY!!!

PO BOX #118
Bonners Ferry, Idaho
208-714-4348

PO Box #712
Driggs, Idaho
208-639-2224

7961 Court
Bushnell, Florida
352793-2205

DO NOT USE - www.bllodloveandlustspells.com - www.dragonspells.com SCAMMERS Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan are VERIFIED CONVICTED CRIMINALS!!!

ASK SCAMMERS JAN WINDGLOWS AND JIM MORGAN FOR THEIR ADDRESS...WHEN THEY DO NOT PROVIDE IT DO NOT GIVE THESE SCAMMERS ANY MONEY!!!!

READ about SCAMMERS Jan Windglows and Jim Morgan - DO NOT GET SCAMMED - Do not use www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

(((Redacted)))

 

CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.

Hello to all who read this- this is Enchantress Jan Windglows, owner and successful entrepreneur of my  beautiful web site, www.bloodloveandlustspells.com

 

The person above posting against us on the Internet is a deluded woman from New York facing a lot of criminal charges, named Mary Prantil. 

 

We expect her to be thrown in jail this October hopefully sooner.  She is a liar and blabber mouth, as everyone can see, and a garbage mouth as well.  

 

Every time she emails or calls us, we simply send her threatening emails and phone calls to the attorney in New York currently prosecuting her.

 

Mary Prantil is our "pet psycho" so to speak- every successful business owner deals with these types of unsavory characters.  People like this freak Mary Prantil are actually twisted GROUPIES trying to ride off our famous coat tails because it is their only claim to fame since they cannot get a life of their own and keep messing up their own life by perpetually getting into trouble with the law, LOL. 

IT IS A TWISTED AND VERY SICK PSYCHOTIC ATTRACTION OF CRIMINALS AND UNSAVORY CHARACTERS WHO ARE UNHAPPY AND UNSUCCESSFUL AND CONTINUE TO GET IN TROUBLE AND DO NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO CREATE SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL- they are hateful, evil, vindictive, and hate honest people because they are unhappy and have an extremely troublesome existence and no one can help them.

 

My husband James and I are here in Bonners Ferry Idaho, anyone can call us- our phone number is 208-714-4348, just like it says on our web sites.  No one is on the lam here, lol just Mary and her CRIME RIDDEN CLAN.

 

Mary would LOVE to have our home residential address so she can make more trouble for us, but that will never happen.  This is precisely why business owners have post office boxes- to avoid psychotic people like Mary of course, LOL.

 

You see, Mary is MAD because when we did her spell work, the spells WORKED, her boyfriend wanted to marry her, and then Mary messed up and drove her boyfriend off, and she has been blaming all her messed up agenda on us ever since.

 

She also has some kind of psychotic thing going where she makes up outlandish stories about other people about the same things that are happening in HER life, lol.  The woman needs to be put away, committed, locked up for the rest of her life.  She is 46 years old and still all she can do is try to make trouble for innocent people.

 

My husband James spent countless hours on the phone helping this woman.  She did receive her spell results.  She messed up her life.  Oh, well !  I have no control over what this crazy woman did to her own life and we will not back down from her and will continue to help put her behind bars.

 

So in closing, Mary is a very unhappy person, constantly blaming her own self adversities on innocent other people.  And my husband and I are not the only ones- Mary Prantil has SEVERAL people in New York that have pressed charges on her and are waiting for her to be prosecuted.

 

For future reference, my husband and I will continue to run our very reputable and innocent highly successful business and continnue to defend ourselves, no matter WHAT Mary Prantil says.

 

We know who we are, and we know who Mary Prantil is.

 

Give me a call if any questions.  By the way, I see Mary had to actually write a long story of lies about me since she did a background check and could not find anything on MY record, lol.

 

Mary Prantil certainly has PLENTY of garbage racked up against her huh?  Just think here is a woman 46 years old that will never be a responsible adult or lead a positive productive life.  But that is her problem now, and she has Divinity to answer for, for all her misdeeds and her many lies and crimes.

 

The comical thing about all of this is, nobody CARES what Mary Prantil writes or says.  She is a liar and nobody or any of my cleints EVER ask me who Mary Prantil even IS.

 

All the stories that Prantil fabricates about us are garbage, as we have stated many times.  My husband and I are very successful honest people and we are not ruffled by anything Mary Prantil says because all she is doing at this point is taking up bandwidth that someone else who has something important to say could be using up here, lol.

 

Concerning my home address- Mary is the reason I will never disclose my residential address.  I do not need her crazy as_ showing up in my neighborhood, LOL.  Anyone reading these threads would feel the same.

 

Take care and be blessed everyone, call me and come visit my website I have nothing to hide, lol.  Come and see the new beautiful altar my husband James and I have built to bring glory to Divinity. 

 

In Divinity's Service,

Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows
www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
208-714-4348

 

This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his daughter Mary Theresa Prantil.  In past reports authored by Miss Prantil, she has stated that " I'm proud to have been the daughter of Frank G. Prantil" and that she again "comes from a "PRESTIGIOUS"  family based in the San Diego there in the state of California.

 

I can't speak for the character of the rest of her family as I don't personally know them however, I have no reason to believe them to be anything other then reasonable and law abiding people however, I can relay what I've read from credible sources such as transcripts from the Supreme Court, Colleges of Frank Prantil, Attorney Generals office, State Attorneys office legal sites etc pertaining to Frank G. Prantil.

 

Miss Prantil has stated that "My father got off lots of criminals" then latter went on to say: "My father got off lots of criminals and innocent people to", LOL. Well, I'm sure he did successfully defend some innocent people along the way but from the looks of it, he also was instrumental in successfully defending the trash of society such as Murders, Child Molesters, Check Forgers, Bank Robbers etc. Upon researching the records and past legal performance of Mr. Prantil, I was also informed that not only was he successful in defending the scum of humanity on several occasions but went on to be completely corrupted by the same criminals that he had been representing throughout his practice.

 

It was in my research sited below,  did I run across several charges launched against Frank G. Prantil via the Supreme and Superior court system there in California, such infractions as Perjury, Drug Poisson, Drug Abuse, Unlawfully removing $700,000 from a Clients safe as she sat in jail awaiting a murder trial and so fourth. Mr. Prantil also had interfered with the homicide trial by becoming personally involved with his Client of that same murder trial by attempting to cover for the accused so he could recover his fees. Prantil lied blatantly on several occasions and attempted to hold up the due process of law by filling one frivolous motion of delay right after another just like Mary in the current charges being lodged against her by the State of New York.

 

Frank Prantil was known as a greedy individual who would stop at nothing to accomplish his goals be they of a positive or unethical nature, JUST LIKE Mary T. Prantil his daughter, He was considered out spoken, brazened, and ruthless just like his daughter Mary T. Prantil Internet Terrorist Extraordinaire. So in essence and according to other legal professionals, Frank Prantil was nothing but a GREEDY UNETHICAL Attorney that happened to like the spotlight just like Mary. Another thing I'd like to add here. Did you know that Frank G. Prantil was in and out of rehab centers for his uncontrolled use of illegal narcotics ?, Did you know that he was imprisoned for 14 months for not only botching a homicide trial, but for being an Accomplice to check FORGERY in the commission of that crime.

 

As you can read in the research below, Mr. Prantil wasn't considered a professional on any level by the courts or his peers. Mr. Prantil was DISBARRED twice for drug, unethical activity, and leaving his Clients holding the bag simply because they ran out of money in the middle of their defense. Does any of this sound familiar ?, Does it sound like anything Miss Mary T. Prantil has done in the past ?, I would say that Little Mary is the preverbal apple that didn't fall very far from the tree, wouldn't you say ?  Well, Frank Prantil won't be bothering, SCAMMING, or ripping off his Clients any more because he's now deceased. Good Riddance I say.

 

Now, we have little Mary carrying on his legacy with all of her criminal activities such as you can view below after her fathers information. Please view the facts below coming from the Experts and those that had the misfortune of dealing with him first hand. Sounds like a real Gypsy Scum Ball to me. Read the history of this Idiot and be SHOCKED and then read about the exploits of his daughter little miss marry low life prantil, people like this should just be locked away forever and kept from wasting the courts time and resources.

 

 

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

March 31, 1989|ANTHONY PERRY

The California Supreme Court has quietly ended one of San Diego County's more clamorous legal careers.

The court this month upheld the disbarment of Frank George Prantil, a well-known attorney and aspiring politician before being convicted of perjury and forgery charges and spending 14 months in prison.

"At one time, he was considered one of the county's top defense attorneys," said attorney Eugene Iredale, who once represented Prantil. "Somehow his life just fell apart on him."

Now living outside Sacramento, the 51-year-old Prantil said he was "devastated" by the court's rejection of his plea that he was unfairly convicted. And he repeated his oft-made accusation that he was victimized because of his maverick ways.

"I'm a victim of the war on drugs," Prantil said. "The prosecutors and the courts can't stand it when someone insists that all defendants have rights."

In nearly two decades as a practicing attorney, the San Diego native was never far from the headlines. He won several high-publicity felony cases and big-money damage suits. He defended a San Diego councilman indicted in the Yellow Cab scandal.

Reporters loved his flamboyant rhetoric (he favored Shakespeare and the classics) and brash attire (he wore an American flag tie to court). His practice boomed. He moved from East County to a comfortable spread in La Jolla.

But there were also political defeats, angry public disputes, money problems and his final slide into Vacaville state prison. He concedes now that alcohol and marijuana played a role in his difficulties.

He lost races for Congress (1968), district attorney (1970) and El Cajon Municipal Court (1978). The County Bar Assn. branded him as unqualified. The State Bar in 1979 suspended him for six months for misusing a client's money.

He was convicted in 1983 of forgery and perjury in a case involving a bogus $53,000 check and, in 1986, of being an accessory to a cocaine conspiracy. Released from prison in 1987, Prantil says he will never return to San Diego County: "They rode me out on a rail."

He says that Deputy Dist. Atty. Bob Sullivan had a vendetta against him. Sullivan says that's bunk and notes that two juries convicted Prantil on a number of counts.

From his self-imposed exile, Prantil tries not to dwell on how far he has fallen. "I used to believe in ultimate justice," he said. "I don't anymore."

A Winning T-Shirt

 

T-shirts protesting the judge's decision will go on sale today in 14 San Diego County outlets of Pacific Eyes and T's, the Sorrento Valley-based T-shirt and sunglasses chain.

The new shirts show a Conner-like catamaran with a large screw through it, and a kiwi bird laughing at the sight. Price: $10.

Pacific Eyes and T's has long backed Conner against pirate-banker Michael Fay. During the September races it sold shirts saying "No Way Fay", and "Throw Another Kiwi on the Barbie."

A Well-Done Roast

In Pete Wilson's latter years as mayor of San Diego, it was said he had two goals: to learn to sing and to become governor.

He took lessons and can manfully handle a tune. The second goal eluded him, and he settled for the U. S. Senate. Now, he's trying to rectify that with his third try at the governorship, with his likely Democratic foe being Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.

Thursday night the Republican Wilson was among those roasting Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) at a benefit dinner in Oakland.

He joked that he wasn't surprised to find picketers carrying signs urging him to stay in the Senate. What did surprise him, he said, was that one of the signs was carried by Van de Kamp.

==========================================================================================

 

http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/843/843.F2d.314.86-6669.html

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=Frank+George+Prantil&circuit=

 

PUBLIC RECORDS http://public.resource.org/

843 F.2d 314

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-6669.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1987*.
Memorandum Jan. 4, 1988.
Order and Opinion March 31, 1988.

Frank G. Prantil, Fair Oaks, Cal., pro se.

M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before CHOY, FARRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank George Prantil, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.

I.

2

Prantil, formerly an attorney in California, was introduced to Daryl Bell by his client Melvin Goins. Prantil agreed to represent Bell on a criminal charge. A few weeks later a woman purporting to be Bell's mother asked Prantil to help her negotiate an escrow check from which Prantil would receive his fee. Prantil accompanied the woman to his bank where he informed the teller that the woman was his client's mother and that he wanted to deposit the check into his trust account. The woman signed the check, which was made payable to Joanna F. McKnight, and Prantil endorsed it to his trust account. Neither Prantil nor the woman indicated that the check might not be genuine.

3

Subsequently, the owner of an escrow agency discovered that three checks were missing from her office. One of the checks had been made out to Joanna F. McKnight and deposited in Prantil's account. The agent's signature had been forged on the check.

4

Prantil was charged with forgery in violation of Section 470 of the California Penal Code. At trial, Prantil argued he knew nothing of the forgery, and that he had deposited the check merely for collection purposes to see whether it was genuine.To establish that Prantil knew the escrow check was forged, the prosecution introduced evidence concerning four trust deeds which Prantil had prepared. Prantil had received information suggesting that the four deeds were forged and that Goins and Bell, were responsible for the forgeries.

5

Prantil was convicted of forgery and sentenced to two years in prison. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. People v. Prantil, 169 Cal.App.3d 592, 215 Cal.Rptr. 372 (1985). The California Supreme Court denied review and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Prantil v. California, 475 U.S. 1067, 106 S.Ct. 1381, 89 L.Ed.2d 606 (1986).1

6

Prantil filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court summarily denied the petition. This court granted Prantil's application for a certificate of probable cause.2

II.

7

Prantil contends that numerous trial court errors and a district court delay in deciding his habeas petition denied him due process.

8

This court reviews de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987). This court presumes the state court's findings of fact to be correct. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).

III.

9

Prantil contends he was denied due process because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he passed the forged escrow check "as true and genuine."3

10

This court determines whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

11

The evidence established that Prantil received information prior to the transaction which suggested that Goins and Bell were involved in a forgery scheme. He also knew that one of the possible victims of the scheme was Joanna McKnight, who was described to him as an elderly woman between the ages of 78 and 80. Yet, despite this knowledge, when Prantil deposited the escrow check into his trust account he did not inform the teller that the check might be a forgery or that the woman with him, who appeared to be approximately 40 to 45 years of age, might not be the person whose name appeared on the check. He merely endorsed the check and asked that it be deposited into his account.

12

Prantil's knowledge of the previous forgeries and the contradictory descriptions of McKnight could have led the jury to reasonably conclude that by failing to alert the bank, Prantil was attempting to pass the check "as true and genuine." See People v. Williams, 186 Cal.App.2d 420, 424, 8 Cal.Rptr. 871, 873 (1960) (tender of check purporting to be signed by specific person established "true and genuine" requirement). Thus, the district court did not err in the determining there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to find that the "true and genuine" requirement was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

IV.

13

Prantil contends that the trial court deprived him of due process by giving two erroneous jury instructions.

14

This court evaluates jury instructions "in the context of the overall charge to the jury as a component of the entire trial process." Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 838, 105 S.Ct. 137, 83 L.Ed.2d 77 (1984). To warrant habeas relief, the instruction cannot be merely "undesirable, erroneous, or even 'universally condemned,' " but must violate some due process right guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146, 94 S.Ct. 396, 400, 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). Moreover, the petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction "so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 1, 1987).

15

Prantil challenges the trial court's instruction regarding the elements of forgery. He contends that by omitting the "true and genuine" requirement, the trial court denied him his due process right to have the jury consider each element of the charged offense. See Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 87-88, 103 S.Ct. 969, 978, 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983) (instruction on presumption of intent reversible error because permitted jury to convict defendant without examining evidence concerning essential element of crime).

16

The trial court gave the following instructions on the elements of forgery:

17

Now, in order to prove the commission of such crime [forgery], each of the following elements must be proved, each of them. Here we go.

18

Number one, that a person passed or offered to pass a forged instrument. That is the first one.

19

Two that such person knew that the instrument was forged; and three, that such person passed or offered to pass such instrument with the specific intent to defraud another person or persons.

20

Although the instruction omitted the "true and genuine" requirement, we consider the instruction in conjunction with the other instructions. See Bashor, 730 F.2d at 1239. Prior to giving the challenged instruction the court told the jury:

21

Now, every person with the specific intent to defraud--now, remember that I told you 'specific intent.' That's it. That's specific intent--with the specific intent to defraud another, utters, publishes, passes or attempts to pass or make use--there's a lot of things here--or make use of, as true and genuine, any false, altered, forged or counterfeited instrument or document, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited, is guilty of the crime of forgery. (emphasis added)

22

Because the overall charge to the jury informed them of the true and genuine requirement, Prantil was not denied his due process right to have the jury consider every element of the crime.

23

Prantil also contends he was denied due process because the trial court gave an inapplicable and erroneous jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Prantil argues that the accomplice instruction removed an issue of intent from the jury's consideration and thus constituted reversible error under the reasoning of Johnson and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).

24

However, the prosecutor specifically denied that Prantil could be guilty as an aider and abettor instead of as a principal. An erroneous jury instruction does not merit habeas relief if the deficiencies pertain to matters that are not in dispute and the error did not so affect the entire trial as to deprive the defendant of due process.See Darnell, 823 F.2d at 302-03. The trial court gave proper instructions regarding the intent necessary to convict Prantil as a principal to the forgery. Because the prosecution did not present an accomplice theory, any deficiencies went to a matter that was not in dispute. The error did not mislead the jury on a disputed issue and thus did not so infect the trial as to deprive Prantil of due process. Id.

V.

25

Prantil contends that the trial court denied him due process by refusing to grant judicial use immunity to a potentially exonerating witness.

26

On his motion for a new trial, Prantil claimed that Goins could testify that Goins and Bell had set up Prantil, that Prantil was unaware that the check was stolen, and that Bell had lied to Prantil when he said there were criminal charges pending against him. Goins had been unavailable to testify at the trial because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. At the new trial hearing Goins invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify at the trial unless he received judicial use immunity because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. The court denied Prantil's motion to grant immunity to Goins.

27

Under California law, a court may only grant immunity on the prosecutor's request. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 1324. See In re Weber, 11 Cal.3d 703, 720, 523 P.2d 229, 240, 114 Cal.Rptr. 429, 440 (1974). However, the prosecution's failure to request immunity violated Prantil's due process rights if it deprived him of his right to a fair trial. See United States v. Garner, 663 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905, 102 S.Ct. 1750, 72 L.Ed.2d 161 (1982).

28

Here, Prantil's unsupported assertion is the only indication that Goins would have presented exculpatory testimony had he been granted immunity. The record contains overwhelming evidence that Prantil was not an unwitting accomplice in the crime, much of which would not be controverted by Goins' testimony even if that testimony is as Prantil contends it would be. For example, Prantil knew that the woman who deposited the check in his account did not match the description of the woman whose name appeared on the check. On these facts, we hold that Prantil was not deprived of a fair trial. If Prantil was denied a fair trial in this case, trial courts would be required to grant immunity simply on the basis of unsupported allegations by criminal defendants that immunity is required by due process.

29

Moreover, Prantil has made no showing that any misconduct on the part of the prosecutor caused Goins to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination. See United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 890-92 (9th Cir.1983).

VI.

30

Prantil contends he was denied due process because of a twenty-month delay between the date of the alleged crime and the date of the indictment.

31

A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is "tested by general proscriptions of due process."4 Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th Cir.1978). A pre-indictment delay does not justify habeas relief unless the defendant can show actual prejudice. Id. at 1382. To prove actual prejudice a defendant must give more than "mere assertions that ... witnesses' memories may have faded with the passage of time...." United States v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 822, 106 S.Ct. 74, 88 L.Ed.2d 60 (1985).

32

Prantil contends that he suffered actual prejudice because the bank teller could no longer remember the details of the escrow check transaction. However, the state court of appeals found that the delay did not affect the teller's memory. In addition, the court noted that Prantil was benefited by the teller's unresponsiveness to certain questions; therefore there was no prejudice.

33

Prantil also claims that a seven-month delay between the time he filed his habeas petition and the time the district court dismissed the action violated his right to due process.5

34

In Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1976), the Fifth Circuit held that a district court's procedure for handling habeas petitions which routinely resulted in delays of up to twenty months violated due process. However, in Satterlee v. Kritzman, 626 F.2d 682, 683 (9th Cir.1980), we held that a district court's clerical error which resulted in an eight-month delay between the dismissal of a prisoner's habeas petition and the time his files were forwarded to the court of appeals did not deprive the petitioner of any substantive rights. As in Satterlee, here there is no policy of discrimination and no showing that the delay was purposeful.

VII.

35

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Prantil's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

36

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

1

Because Prantil's direct appeal presented the same constitutional claims as his subsequent habeas petition, it is unnecessary for him to have filed for state habeas relief. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987)

2

Prantil was released from prison on April 20, 1987. However, because a felony conviction may cause a defendant to suffer adverse collateral consequences even after he has served his sentence, a defendant's release from custody prior to the completion of his federal habeas corpus proceedings will not render his petition moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-38, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). Prantil was in custody when he filed the petition in district court, so this court retains jurisdiction over the proceedings after he is released. Id

3

Under California law, a person is guilty of forgery if he passes or attempts to pass as true and genuine a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 470; People v. Hellman, 189 Cal.App.2d 777, 778-79, 11 Cal.Rptr. 433 (1961). The only element Prantil challenges as lacking sufficient evidence is the true and genuine requirement

4

Once a suspect is indicted, the more stringent requirements of the speedy trial right apply. Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1978)

5

Prantil first raised the issue in his brief to this court. Ordinarily, this court will not decide an issue which was not raised at the District Court. Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985). The court may decide an issue for the first time on appeal, however, where review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Id. Because a claim that a district court violated a party's due process rights questions the integrity of the federal judicial system, we review Prantil's claim despite his failure to raise it below

CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org

=========================================================================

MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=

 

 

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/ A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

 

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

 

=================================

 

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at the airport and who drove him back. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman at the airport could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman at the airport and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman at the Omaha airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

31

CONCLUSION

32

To conclude, we reverse defendant's perjury conviction on Count Six of the indictment because the allegedly perjurious statements lack materiality. We reverse and remand the defendant's remaining convictions on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to recuse the participating prosecutor as a material witness and on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct in the government's closing argument.

===========================================

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

==========================================

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/

A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

25

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

=========================================

(1984). Hence, we must decide whether the defendant's testimony was material.

29

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at his hotel and who drove him back to the Omaha Airport. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman who met him at his hotel and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel and drove him to the airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

===========================================

1

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ See United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), rev'd in part, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984). Betty Powell was convicted on four counts of a fifteen-count indictment which had alleged that she conspired with her husband and son to distribute cocaine. She was acquitted on all substantive conspiracy counts. Three of her four convictions, those alleging the use of a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, were subsequently reversed on appeal, United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), but then reinstated by the Supreme Court, United States v. Powell, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984)

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979)

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

===========================================================================

MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=

 

 

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/ A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

 

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

 

=================================

 

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at the airport and who drove him back. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman at the airport could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman at the airport and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman at the Omaha airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

31

CONCLUSION

32

To conclude, we reverse defendant's perjury conviction on Count Six of the indictment because the allegedly perjurious statements lack materiality. We reverse and remand the defendant's remaining convictions on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to recuse the participating prosecutor as a material witness and on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct in the government's closing argument.

===========================================

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

==========================================

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/

A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

25

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

=========================================

(1984). Hence, we must decide whether the defendant's testimony was material.

29

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at his hotel and who drove him back to the Omaha Airport. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman who met him at his hotel and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel and drove him to the airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

===========================================

1

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ See United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), rev'd in part, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984). Betty Powell was convicted on four counts of a fifteen-count indictment which had alleged that she conspired with her husband and son to distribute cocaine. She was acquitted on all substantive conspiracy counts. Three of her four convictions, those alleging the use of a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, were subsequently reversed on appeal, United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), but then reinstated by the Supreme Court, United States v. Powell, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984)

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979)

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T.

Mary Prantil's Book & Case # from NYC Department Of Corrections - Prantil Mary IS AVerified Criminal Convicted for Deception,FRAUD, Grand LARCENY, EXTORTION, ABUSE, HARRASSMENT OF INNOCENT BUSINESS OWNERS

 

HERE FIND MARY PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL BOOK AND CASE NUMBER LOOK UP ANYONE CAN PULL IT UP BY FOLLOWING THESE SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS:

The public may look up Mary Prantil's criminal records, on the NYC Department Of Corrections web site so you the public can see what a real piece of crap Mary Prantil really is.

Go to the following link which is the NYC jail inmate lookup: 

http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/

After the page has been pulled up, you will see the place where to enter Mary Prantil's Booking and Case Number, which is 3471001054- simply enter that number in the white box, as shown below.

As you will see, the NYC Department Of Corrections has all her criminal information and charges posted. As we have said numerous times in the past, we have proof of what we have been warning the public about this criminal Mary Prantil all along, so see for yourself- go to the link, enter her book and case number, the information is current and is all there for anyone because it is PUBLIC RECORD. The facts, simply put.

Enter
NYSID or Book & Case Number: ( enter 3471001054 )

You will then find, on the NYC Department of Corrections Inmate Lookup, Mary Prantil's criminal records, including her Felony Stalking charge.

May Mary Prantil rot in Hell, if the Devil will even let her in, LOL. Good riddance, freak Prantil :( LOL the joke is on U

LOOK PRANTIL TAX EVASION CHARGES AND REPORTS AGAINST YOU TAX WARRANTS REPORTED TO THE NEW YORK STATE AND FEDERAL TAX BOARDS YOU SHOULD LEARN YOUR LESSON AND LET INNOCENT PEOPLE ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN DAMN BUSINESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TAX HOME | e-Services Help | Privacy | Security | Disclaimer | Contact Us 

Office of Tax Enforcement - File an Information Referral to report suspected tax evasion and fraud 

Check to see if you meet our minimum browser requirements for this service. 

*Required fields 

Information Referral: 
This information referral concerns a(n)* Individual Business/Tax Preparer/Practioner 

Description of Information Referral* 
Please include a detailed description of the alleged violation activity. 
https://www.integrascan.com/search_results.php?type

County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched:

MARY PRANTIL QUEENS

Warrant ID# : E-029211902-W001-3

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant 

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. 

Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
June 10, 2008 QUEENS $106.21 June 20, 2008 


Warrant ID# : E-029159448-W001-7

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant 

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
February 14, 2008 QUEENS $4,072.14 February 14, 2008 


* Filed with Department of State on or prior to implementation of electronic filing system, January 8, 2004. Dates for filings made prior to January 8, 2004 must be derived from paper filings and should be obtained from the Department of Taxation and Finance.

Taxpayer Name(s) Selected: City specified in warrant address record of Taxpayer Searched: County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched: MARY PRANTIL, QUEENS

Subject Information: 

Please enter as much information as you can regarding the primary person allegedly involved in the complaint. 

First Name* Mary T. 
Last Name* Prantil
Street Address 32-85 33rd Street
Apt # C-2
City* Astoria
State* New York, 11106
Cell Phone Number: 9172246605
Also Known As: Mary Prantil, Mary T. Prantil, Mary Theresa Prantil 
Date of Birth January 27, 1965
Physical Description: Female, white, eyes green, hair blonde, 95 pounds
Any known partners, affiliates, etc.: 



If you would prefer to mail this form, print it and mail it to: 
NYS Department of Taxation and Finance 
Report Suspected Tax Evasion/Fraud 
Information Referral Unit 
Income/Franchise Desk Audit 
Albany NY 12227-0166

THANKS TO ED MAGEDSON FOR HELPING US EXPOSE THE CRIME RIDDEN PRANTIL CLAN.

SPELLS DON'T WORK!!!! Scam Jan Windglows Don't WORK!!  DO NOT USE www.bloodloveandlustspells.com or www.dragonspells.com 208-714-4348 - PO BOX #118, Bonners Ferry most recent PO BOX of Verified Criminal SCAM Jan Windglows.

Ex-Employee says: SCAM Jan Windglows is an Extortionist!! SCAM Jan Windglow post LIES like BLACKMAIL to get clients to pay $5000 for SPELLS and then to Cover her own life of CRIME.  YEARS of unsatisifed customers post TRUTH about SCAM Queen Jan Windglows.

Scammers Jan Windglows and employee Jim Morgan - are Verified CRIMINALs for DECEPTION FRAUD, Grand Larceny and Identity Theft...most recent Cyber Crimes Hackers, Predators and Verified CRIMES of Aggaravted Harassment on Ripff Report.com - BEWARE - SCAM Jan Windglows onlys wants your MONEY and will post Lies on the Global Internet like BLACKMAIL to get you to pay her MONEY for SPELLS!

Ex-Employee says: I used to work for SCAM Jan Windglows - SCAM Jan Windglows deal with you and the issues of my posts that concern you SCAM Jan Windglows.

1. Where is your REAL Address and Home Phone number?

PO Box #118
Bonner Ferry, Idaho
208-714-4348

Previously at
PO BOX #712
Driggs, Idaho
208-639-2224

7961 Court Street
Bushnell, Florida
352-793-2205
805-455-6548

2. DECEPTION FRAUD - a real Crime
Everytime SCAM Jan Windglows offers to do a SPELL for MONEY Scam Jan Windglows is committing the CRIME DEception Fraud - an d depending n how much money SCAM Jan Windglows takes off you - $1000 and above is GRAND LARCENY

3. SCAM Jan Windglows does wear WIGS - bxs SCAM Jan Windglows is a CRACK Head andis BALDING from her Crack Cocaine addiction.

4. SCAM Jan Windglows SUMTER Florida County - Fugitive -POST LIES - to cover life of CRIME - as part of Exrtortion - SCAM Jan Windglows is the real JAIL BIRD...I bailed SCAM Jan Windglows out of the SUMTER Florida Jail - and Jan on the LAM - I am not postingthis information bcs it is a CRIME to harass ppl with their Background- it is all true about Verified Criminal SCAM Jan Windglows of SCAM site www.bloodloveandlustspells.com = DO NOT BELIEVE anything that SCAM Jan Windglows posts - Jan on the LAM - Sumter Florida Jail - Bushnell, Florida.

SCAM Jan Windglows - ANSWER my questions about YOU _ start with DECEPTION FRAUD and your scam operation called www.bloodloveandlustspells.com -SCAM Jan Windglows post LIES like Blackmail and Extortion to cover her own life of CRIME.

 

Firstly, Jan has no Employes, NEVER HAS. Secondly, your nothing but a scammer trying to Decieve the public again, prantil.  Hey, are you STUPID prantil ? I think you are, especially if you believe that everyone is taking anything you say as the truth.

About the address issue you keep bringing up, HOW COME YOU HAVE SO MANY ADDRESSES Scammer, is it because you are always running from the police or people trying to sue you ? or are you afraid that someone you've been harassing is going to come looking for you ?  I bet it's all the above.

Again, prantil likes to run her mouth about PO Boxes and real addresses so let's look at a few addresses she has had over the past years as listed below.

MARY THERESA PRANTIL AKA: MARY T PRANTIL AKA: PRANTIL, MARY Year Of Birth: 1964 (46)

Address City State Zip 32-85 C2 33 ST ASTORIA NY 11106

3285 33RD ST C2 ASTORIA NY 11106 32-85 33 ST ASTORIA NY 11106 251 E 32ND ST 2C NEW YORK NY 10016

251 E 32ND ST 17F NEW YORK NY 10016 3285

33 WUSD 69 ASTORIA NY 11106

1352 PO BOX NEW YORK NY 10150

PO BOX 1352 NEW YORK NY 10150

 Voter Information Name : MARY T PRANTIL Residential Address :

32-85 33 STREET C2, ASTORIA, NY 11106

Previous address Locations & Criminal Records Of Mary T. Prantil 3285 33rd St, Astoria, NY 11106

Reported:12/01/2002 251 32nd St, New York, NY 10016 Reported:07/18/2001 3285 33 Wusd # 69, Astoria, NY 11106

Reported:06/01/2001 3044 1st Ave, San Diego, CA 92103 Reported:11/13/2000 1352 PO Box, New York, NY 10150

Reported:06/18/1997 3044 Juniper St # 2, San Diego, CA 92104

 Reported:10/01/1995 1154 22nd # 2, San Diego, CA 92102 Reported:12/01/1993 319 Gravilla St, La Jolla, CA 92037 Reported:08/01/1992

 

CRIMINAL RECORDS OF MARY T. PRANTIL : http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/ and punch in number 3471001054

MARY PRANTIL NYSID: 03088617J Age: 46 Sex: Female Race: White Height: 5 ft 3 inches Weight: 95 lbs Hair Color: Blonde Eye Color: Green Nativity: New York Booking Information Incarceration: 2010-06-14 Book & Case

 Number: 3471001054 Facility: Rose M. Singer Center Arrest Date: 2010-06-14 Arrest Number: COURT DIRECT Next Court Date: 2010-06-30 Projected Release Date: Actual Release Date: Discharge Reason: Bail & Bond: Remanded Charge Information Docket:

2010NY022485 Indictment: 00000 0000 Charges: 120.50 FE (STALKING 3RD DEGREE E Felony) 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) Docket: 2009NY002655 Indictment: 00000 0000 Charges: 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 205.30

MA (RESISTING ARREST A Misdemeanor) Docket: 2009NY046033 Indictment: 00000 0000 Charges: 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 215.50 MA (CRIMINAL CONTEMP- 2ND A

Misdemeanor) Ten Jails on Rikers Island List Part 2 Rose M. Singer Center Address: 19-19 Hazen St., East Elmhurst, N.Y. 11370 Rose M. Singer Center was opened in June 1988 as an 800-bed facility for female detainees and sentenced inmates.

http://www.correctionhistory.org/html/chronicl/nycdoc/html/jailst1a.html#RMSC

CRIMINAL RECORDS OF MARY T. PRANTIL : http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/ and punch in number 3471001054

 

MARY PRANTIL NYSID: 03088617J Age: 46 Sex: Female Race: White Height: 5 ft 3 inches Weight: 95 lbs Hair Color: Blonde Eye Color: Green Nativity: New York Booking Information Incarceration: 2010-06-14 Book & Case Number: 3471001054 Facility: Rose M. Singer Center Arrest Date: 2010-06-14 Arrest Number: COURT DIRECT Next Court Date: 2010-06-30 Projected Release Date: Actual Release Date: Discharge Reason: Bail & Bond: Remanded Charge Information Docket: 2010NY022485 Indictment: 00000 0000 Charges: 120.50 FE (STALKING 3RD DEGREE E Felony) 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) Docket: 2009NY002655 Indictment: 00000 0000 Charges: 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 205.30 MA (RESISTING ARREST A Misdemeanor) Docket: 2009NY046033 Indictment: 00000 0000 Charges: 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 240.30 MA (AGGRAVATED HARASSMENT A Misdemeanor) 215.50 MA (CRIMINAL CONTEMP- 2ND A Misdemeanor) Ten Jails on Rikers Island List Part 2 Rose M. Singer Center Address: 19-19 Hazen St., East Elmhurst, N.Y. 11370 Rose M. Singer Center was opened in June 1988 as an 800-bed facility for female detainees and sentenced inmates. http://www.correctionhistory.org/html/chronicl/nycdoc/html/jailst1a.html#RMSC

SCAMMER - Jan Windglows is mentally ill and suffers from the Mental Disease Bi-Polar.; Pathological LIAR and Borderline personality problems with cutting herself, and picking humiliating ways to make a living and dangerous men, like Warlock wanna be - Jim Morgan.

http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM - READ all complaints and post your most recent Ripoff on this shared FORUM!!

SCAM Jan Windglows can you pleasew answer why you continue to DECEPTION FRAUD on-line?

What is your real address?

PO Box #118, Bonners Ferry ? 208-714-4348

Or is it?

PO HBox #712 Driggs Idaho, 208-639-2224

Or ist? 7961 Court Bushnell, Florida?

SCAM Jan Windglows caught in LIES

Several X-employees come forward with complaints: Mike Cahill, Kim Thrasher, Matilda Sommerfiled, Celeste Morgan and her current employee, Jim Morgan.

SCAM Jan Windglows uses WIGS to disguise herself.  SCAM Jan Windglows uses WIGS to disguise herself.

http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM

http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM

 

SCAM Jan Windglows commits DECEPTION FRAUD everytime she offers to do a SPELL for MONEY!!!   Call Police givewhereabouts about this mentally ill scammer, Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows aka Mystical Jan 208 aka Enchantress...

READ all Ripoff Report.com on SCAM Jan Windglows - multiple compliants form X-employees, unsatisfied custoemrs - then ppl like me - who surf the WEB and found SCAM Jan Windglows committing DECEPTION FRAUD!!!

Hello to all who read this- this is Enchantress Jan Windglows, owner and successful entrepreneur of my beautiful website, www.bloodloveandlustspells.com   Business Phone Number: 208-714-4348.

My wonderful husband Master Wizard James and I reside in Bonners Ferry Idaho.  Cyberstalker violent criminal who has been caught by the name of Mary "psyhic hater Prantil""""" would LOVE to have our residential address BUT that will NEVER happen.  I am SURE I am going to give some freak stalker like her my home address, LOL.  GET REAL, Prantil.

Mary Prantil IS The INTERNET AND LAND CRIMINAL charged with CRIMINAL FELONY STALKING CHARGES THAT HAS posting against us on the Internet is a deluded woman from New York facing a lot of criminal charges, named Mary Prantil. 

 

We expect her to be thrown in jail this October hopefully sooner.  She is a liar and blabber mouth, as everyone can see, and a garbage mouth as well.   I have NOTHING to hide.  I run a fully legitimate business and have happy clients across the board.

 

Every time Mary Prantil posts up here she comes across as an IDIOT.  Talk about someone who's brain is FRIED.  My clients and other people that have been reading her posts comment about how STUPID and ridiculous she sounds, LOL.

 

  If she emails or calls us, we simply send her threatening emails and phone calls to the attorney in New York currently prosecuting her.  Mary will post and post up here but the fact is, everyone knows that she is a liar - she has not proved a single statement she has ever posted, makes up outlandish stories, cannot provide ANYTHING to actually PROVE what she is saying.  She just likes to tell lies.  Mabie it is the only way she knows how to entertain herself.

 

Every successful business owner deals with these types of unsavory characters, stalkers, etc.  People like this freak Mary Prantil are actually twisted GROUPIES trying to ride off our famous coat tails because it is their only claim to fame since they cannot get a life of their own and keep messing up their own life by perpetually getting into trouble with the law, LOL.  IT IS A TWISTED AND VERY SICK PSYCHOTIC ATTRACTION FOR CRIMINALS AND UNSAVORY CHARACTERS WHO ARE UNHAPPY AND UNSUCCESSFUL AND CONTINUE TO GET IN TROUBLE AND DO NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO CREATE SOMETHING BEAUTIFUL- they are hateful, evil, vindictive, and hate honest people because they are unhappy and have an extremely troublesome existence and no one can help them.

 

My husband James and I are here in Bonners Ferry Idaho, anyone can call us- our phone number is 208-714-4348, just like it says on our web sites.  No one is on the lam here, lol just Mary and her CRIME RIDDEN CLAN.

 

Mary would LOVE to have our home residential address so she can make more trouble for us, but that will never happen.  This is precisely why business owners have post office boxes- to avoid psychotic people like Mary of course, LOL.

 

You see, Mary is MAD because when we did her spell work, the spells WORKED, her boyfriend wanted to marry her, and then Mary messed up and drove her boyfriend off, and she has been blaming all her messed up agenda on us ever since.

 

She also has some kind of psychotic thing going where she makes up outlandish stories about other people about the same things that are happening in HER life, lol.  The woman needs to be put away, committed, locked up for the rest of her life.  She is 46 years old and still all she can do is try to make trouble for innocent people.

 

My husband James spent countless hours on the phone helping this woman.  She did receive her spell results.  She messed up her life.  Oh, well !  I have no control over what this crazy woman did to her own life and we will not back down from her and will continue to help put her behind bars.

 

So in closing, Mary is a very unhappy person, constantly blaming her own self adversities on innocent other people.  And my husband and I are not the only ones- Mary Prantil has SEVERAL people in New York that have pressed charges on her and are waiting for her to be prosecuted.

 

For future reference, my husband and I will continue to run our very reputable and innocent highly successful business and continnue to defend ourselves, no matter WHAT Mary Prantil says.

 

We know who we are, and we know who Mary Prantil is.

 

Give me a call if any questions.  By the way, I see Mary had to actually write a long story of lies about me since she did a background check and could not find anything on MY record, lol.

 

Mary Prantil certainly has PLENTY of garbage racked up against her huh?  Just think here is a woman 46 years old that will never be a responsible adult or lead a positive productive life.  But that is her problem now, and she has Divinity to answer for, for all her misdeeds and her many lies and crimes.

 

The comical thing about all of this is, nobody CARES what Mary Prantil writes or says.  She is a liar and nobody or any of my cleints EVER ask me who Mary Prantil even IS.

 

All the stories that Prantil fabricates about us are garbage, as we have stated many times.  My husband and I are very successful honest people and we are not ruffled by anything Mary Prantil says because all she is doing at this point is taking up bandwidth that someone else who has something important to say could be using up here, lol.

 

Concerning my home address- Mary is the reason I will never disclose my residential address.  I do not need her crazy as_ showing up in my neighborhood, LOL.  Anyone reading these threads would feel the same.  Any good businesss owner with common sense would never give out their actually residential address when they are being stalked and threatened by some psychotic moron.

Take care and be blessed everyone, call me and come visit my website I have nothing to hide, lol.  Come and see the new beautiful altar my husband James and I have built to bring glory to Divinity. 

In Divinity's Service,

Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows
www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
208-714-4348 

  

For full information concerning Mary Prantil and her CRIME RIDDEN family, see this link:   

  

http://www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net

 

GO BACK TO RIKERS ISLAND MARY.  AT THIS POINT YOU REALLY LOOK STUPID POSTING YOUR LITTLE LIES UP HERE.  EVERYONE KNOWS THAT ANYONE POSTING ON THESE FORUMS SHOULD ALSO PROVIDE PROOF FOR THEIR STATEMENTS, WHICH YOU HAVE NOT FOR OVER THREE YEARS.  YOU JUST BABBLE ON AND ON ABOUT NOTHING.

I invite anyone to call me at 208-714-4348 and I will give them the contact information for the New York prosecuting attorney that is currently working to put this FREAK Mary Prantil behind bars and out of society. 

I will also provide other information with contact telephone numbers of some key people involved in Mary Prantil's upcoming CRIMINAL court trial on October 15th. 2010.  You can speak to them personally and that alone proves that Mary Prantil is just a little WORM who should just crawl back into her wormhole, but instead, she had rather bring shame to herself and now her family.

We did do spell work for Mary but we did not go combing the Internet looking for her. She came to us and insisted on having us cast spells for her.  I feel sorry for ANY caster or psychic that has ever tried to help Mary Prantil because I know what an IDIOT, stalker, and psychotic FREAK she is.  So does the NYPD.

Mary has tried every lie she can make up about us on the Internet ----not working, PrantSIMPLETON.  The cat is out of the bag about you and no matter what you keep saying, you only are making an ass out of yourself at this point. 

HERE IS COURT INFORMATION ON MARY PRANTIL'S FATHER, HER UNCLE- SEE HOW MARY FOLLOWS HER CRIME RIDDEN CLAN AND FOLLOWS SUIT:

 

This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his daughter Mary Theresa Prantil.  In past reports authored by Miss Prantil, she has stated that " I'm proud to have been the daughter of Frank G. Prantil" and that she again "comes from a "PRESTIGIOUS"  family based in the San Diego there in the state of California.

 

I can't speak for the character of the rest of her family as I don't personally know them however, I have no reason to believe them to be anything other then reasonable and law abiding people however, I can relay what I've read from credible sources such as transcripts from the Supreme Court, Colleges of Frank Prantil, Attorney Generals office, State Attorneys office legal sites etc pertaining to Frank G. Prantil.

 

Miss Prantil has stated that "My father got off lots of criminals" then latter went on to say: "My father got off lots of criminals and innocent people to", LOL. Well, I'm sure he did successfully defend some innocent people along the way but from the looks of it, he also was instrumental in successfully defending the trash of society such as Murders, Child Molesters, Check Forgers, Bank Robbers etc. Upon researching the records and past legal performance of Mr. Prantil, I was also informed that not only was he successful in defending the scum of humanity on several occasions but went on to be completely corrupted by the same criminals that he had been representing throughout his practice.

 

It was in my research sited below,  did I run across several charges launched against Frank G. Prantil via the Supreme and Superior court system there in California, such infractions as Perjury, Drug Poisson, Drug Abuse, Unlawfully removing $700,000 from a Clients safe as she sat in jail awaiting a murder trial and so fourth. Mr. Prantil also had interfered with the homicide trial by becoming personally involved with his Client of that same murder trial by attempting to cover for the accused so he could recover his fees. Prantil lied blatantly on several occasions and attempted to hold up the due process of law by filling one frivolous motion of delay right after another just like Mary in the current charges being lodged against her by the State of New York.

 

Frank Prantil was known as a greedy individual who would stop at nothing to accomplish his goals be they of a positive or unethical nature, JUST LIKE Mary T. Prantil his daughter, He was considered out spoken, brazened, and ruthless just like his daughter Mary T. Prantil Internet Terrorist Extraordinaire. So in essence and according to other legal professionals, Frank Prantil was nothing but a GREEDY UNETHICAL Attorney that happened to like the spotlight just like Mary. Another thing I'd like to add here. Did you know that Frank G. Prantil was in and out of rehab centers for his uncontrolled use of illegal narcotics ?, Did you know that he was imprisoned for 14 months for not only botching a homicide trial, but for being an Accomplice to check FORGERY in the commission of that crime.

 

As you can read in the research below, Mr. Prantil wasn't considered a professional on any level by the courts or his peers. Mr. Prantil was DISBARRED twice for drug, unethical activity, and leaving his Clients holding the bag simply because they ran out of money in the middle of their defense. Does any of this sound familiar ?, Does it sound like anything Miss Mary T. Prantil has done in the past ?, I would say that Little Mary is the preverbal apple that didn't fall very far from the tree, wouldn't you say ?  Well, Frank Prantil won't be bothering, SCAMMING, or ripping off his Clients any more because he's now deceased. Good Riddance I say.

 

Now, we have little Mary carrying on his legacy with all of her criminal activities such as you can view below after her fathers information. Please view the facts below coming from the Experts and those that had the misfortune of dealing with him first hand. Sounds like a real Gypsy Scum Ball to me. Read the history of this Idiot and be SHOCKED and then read about the exploits of his daughter little miss marry low life prantil, people like this should just be locked away forever and kept from wasting the courts time and resources.

 

 

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

March 31, 1989|ANTHONY PERRY

The California Supreme Court has quietly ended one of San Diego County's more clamorous legal careers.

The court this month upheld the disbarment of Frank George Prantil, a well-known attorney and aspiring politician before being convicted of perjury and forgery charges and spending 14 months in prison.

"At one time, he was considered one of the county's top defense attorneys," said attorney Eugene Iredale, who once represented Prantil. "Somehow his life just fell apart on him."

Now living outside Sacramento, the 51-year-old Prantil said he was "devastated" by the court's rejection of his plea that he was unfairly convicted. And he repeated his oft-made accusation that he was victimized because of his maverick ways.

"I'm a victim of the war on drugs," Prantil said. "The prosecutors and the courts can't stand it when someone insists that all defendants have rights."

In nearly two decades as a practicing attorney, the San Diego native was never far from the headlines. He won several high-publicity felony cases and big-money damage suits. He defended a San Diego councilman indicted in the Yellow Cab scandal.

Reporters loved his flamboyant rhetoric (he favored Shakespeare and the classics) and brash attire (he wore an American flag tie to court). His practice boomed. He moved from East County to a comfortable spread in La Jolla.

But there were also political defeats, angry public disputes, money problems and his final slide into Vacaville state prison. He concedes now that alcohol and marijuana played a role in his difficulties.

He lost races for Congress (1968), district attorney (1970) and El Cajon Municipal Court (1978). The County Bar Assn. branded him as unqualified. The State Bar in 1979 suspended him for six months for misusing a client's money.

He was convicted in 1983 of forgery and perjury in a case involving a bogus $53,000 check and, in 1986, of being an accessory to a cocaine conspiracy. Released from prison in 1987, Prantil says he will never return to San Diego County: "They rode me out on a rail."

He says that Deputy Dist. Atty. Bob Sullivan had a vendetta against him. Sullivan says that's bunk and notes that two juries convicted Prantil on a number of counts.

From his self-imposed exile, Prantil tries not to dwell on how far he has fallen. "I used to believe in ultimate justice," he said. "I don't anymore."

A Winning T-Shirt

 

T-shirts protesting the judge's decision will go on sale today in 14 San Diego County outlets of Pacific Eyes and T's, the Sorrento Valley-based T-shirt and sunglasses chain.

The new shirts show a Conner-like catamaran with a large screw through it, and a kiwi bird laughing at the sight. Price: $10.

Pacific Eyes and T's has long backed Conner against pirate-banker Michael Fay. During the September races it sold shirts saying "No Way Fay", and "Throw Another Kiwi on the Barbie."

A Well-Done Roast

In Pete Wilson's latter years as mayor of San Diego, it was said he had two goals: to learn to sing and to become governor.

He took lessons and can manfully handle a tune. The second goal eluded him, and he settled for the U. S. Senate. Now, he's trying to rectify that with his third try at the governorship, with his likely Democratic foe being Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.

Thursday night the Republican Wilson was among those roasting Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) at a benefit dinner in Oakland.

He joked that he wasn't surprised to find picketers carrying signs urging him to stay in the Senate. What did surprise him, he said, was that one of the signs was carried by Van de Kamp.

==========================================================================================

 

http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/843/843.F2d.314.86-6669.html

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=Frank+George+Prantil&circuit=

 

PUBLIC RECORDS http://public.resource.org/

843 F.2d 314

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-6669.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1987*.
Memorandum Jan. 4, 1988.
Order and Opinion March 31, 1988.

Frank G. Prantil, Fair Oaks, Cal., pro se.

M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before CHOY, FARRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank George Prantil, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.

I.

2

Prantil, formerly an attorney in California, was introduced to Daryl Bell by his client Melvin Goins. Prantil agreed to represent Bell on a criminal charge. A few weeks later a woman purporting to be Bell's mother asked Prantil to help her negotiate an escrow check from which Prantil would receive his fee. Prantil accompanied the woman to his bank where he informed the teller that the woman was his client's mother and that he wanted to deposit the check into his trust account. The woman signed the check, which was made payable to Joanna F. McKnight, and Prantil endorsed it to his trust account. Neither Prantil nor the woman indicated that the check might not be genuine.

3

Subsequently, the owner of an escrow agency discovered that three checks were missing from her office. One of the checks had been made out to Joanna F. McKnight and deposited in Prantil's account. The agent's signature had been forged on the check.

4

Prantil was charged with forgery in violation of Section 470 of the California Penal Code. At trial, Prantil argued he knew nothing of the forgery, and that he had deposited the check merely for collection purposes to see whether it was genuine.To establish that Prantil knew the escrow check was forged, the prosecution introduced evidence concerning four trust deeds which Prantil had prepared. Prantil had received information suggesting that the four deeds were forged and that Goins and Bell, were responsible for the forgeries.

5

Prantil was convicted of forgery and sentenced to two years in prison. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. People v. Prantil, 169 Cal.App.3d 592, 215 Cal.Rptr. 372 (1985). The California Supreme Court denied review and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Prantil v. California, 475 U.S. 1067, 106 S.Ct. 1381, 89 L.Ed.2d 606 (1986).1

6

Prantil filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court summarily denied the petition. This court granted Prantil's application for a certificate of probable cause.2

II.

7

Prantil contends that numerous trial court errors and a district court delay in deciding his habeas petition denied him due process.

8

This court reviews de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987). This court presumes the state court's findings of fact to be correct. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).

III.

9

Prantil contends he was denied due process because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he passed the forged escrow check "as true and genuine."3

10

This court determines whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

11

The evidence established that Prantil received information prior to the transaction which suggested that Goins and Bell were involved in a forgery scheme. He also knew that one of the possible victims of the scheme was Joanna McKnight, who was described to him as an elderly woman between the ages of 78 and 80. Yet, despite this knowledge, when Prantil deposited the escrow check into his trust account he did not inform the teller that the check might be a forgery or that the woman with him, who appeared to be approximately 40 to 45 years of age, might not be the person whose name appeared on the check. He merely endorsed the check and asked that it be deposited into his account.

12

Prantil's knowledge of the previous forgeries and the contradictory descriptions of McKnight could have led the jury to reasonably conclude that by failing to alert the bank, Prantil was attempting to pass the check "as true and genuine." See People v. Williams, 186 Cal.App.2d 420, 424, 8 Cal.Rptr. 871, 873 (1960) (tender of check purporting to be signed by specific person established "true and genuine" requirement). Thus, the district court did not err in the determining there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to find that the "true and genuine" requirement was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

IV.

13

Prantil contends that the trial court deprived him of due process by giving two erroneous jury instructions.

14

This court evaluates jury instructions "in the context of the overall charge to the jury as a component of the entire trial process." Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 838, 105 S.Ct. 137, 83 L.Ed.2d 77 (1984). To warrant habeas relief, the instruction cannot be merely "undesirable, erroneous, or even 'universally condemned,' " but must violate some due process right guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146, 94 S.Ct. 396, 400, 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). Moreover, the petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction "so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 1, 1987).

15

Prantil challenges the trial court's instruction regarding the elements of forgery. He contends that by omitting the "true and genuine" requirement, the trial court denied him his due process right to have the jury consider each element of the charged offense. See Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 87-88, 103 S.Ct. 969, 978, 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983) (instruction on presumption of intent reversible error because permitted jury to convict defendant without examining evidence concerning essential element of crime).

16

The trial court gave the following instructions on the elements of forgery:

17

Now, in order to prove the commission of such crime [forgery], each of the following elements must be proved, each of them. Here we go.

18

Number one, that a person passed or offered to pass a forged instrument. That is the first one.

19

Two that such person knew that the instrument was forged; and three, that such person passed or offered to pass such instrument with the specific intent to defraud another person or persons.

20

Although the instruction omitted the "true and genuine" requirement, we consider the instruction in conjunction with the other instructions. See Bashor, 730 F.2d at 1239. Prior to giving the challenged instruction the court told the jury:

21

Now, every person with the specific intent to defraud--now, remember that I told you 'specific intent.' That's it. That's specific intent--with the specific intent to defraud another, utters, publishes, passes or attempts to pass or make use--there's a lot of things here--or make use of, as true and genuine, any false, altered, forged or counterfeited instrument or document, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited, is guilty of the crime of forgery. (emphasis added)

22

Because the overall charge to the jury informed them of the true and genuine requirement, Prantil was not denied his due process right to have the jury consider every element of the crime.

23

Prantil also contends he was denied due process because the trial court gave an inapplicable and erroneous jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Prantil argues that the accomplice instruction removed an issue of intent from the jury's consideration and thus constituted reversible error under the reasoning of Johnson and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).

24

However, the prosecutor specifically denied that Prantil could be guilty as an aider and abettor instead of as a principal. An erroneous jury instruction does not merit habeas relief if the deficiencies pertain to matters that are not in dispute and the error did not so affect the entire trial as to deprive the defendant of due process.See Darnell, 823 F.2d at 302-03. The trial court gave proper instructions regarding the intent necessary to convict Prantil as a principal to the forgery. Because the prosecution did not present an accomplice theory, any deficiencies went to a matter that was not in dispute. The error did not mislead the jury on a disputed issue and thus did not so infect the trial as to deprive Prantil of due process. Id.

V.

25

Prantil contends that the trial court denied him due process by refusing to grant judicial use immunity to a potentially exonerating witness.

26

On his motion for a new trial, Prantil claimed that Goins could testify that Goins and Bell had set up Prantil, that Prantil was unaware that the check was stolen, and that Bell had lied to Prantil when he said there were criminal charges pending against him. Goins had been unavailable to testify at the trial because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. At the new trial hearing Goins invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify at the trial unless he received judicial use immunity because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. The court denied Prantil's motion to grant immunity to Goins.

27

Under California law, a court may only grant immunity on the prosecutor's request. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 1324. See In re Weber, 11 Cal.3d 703, 720, 523 P.2d 229, 240, 114 Cal.Rptr. 429, 440 (1974). However, the prosecution's failure to request immunity violated Prantil's due process rights if it deprived him of his right to a fair trial. See United States v. Garner, 663 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905, 102 S.Ct. 1750, 72 L.Ed.2d 161 (1982).

28

Here, Prantil's unsupported assertion is the only indication that Goins would have presented exculpatory testimony had he been granted immunity. The record contains overwhelming evidence that Prantil was not an unwitting accomplice in the crime, much of which would not be controverted by Goins' testimony even if that testimony is as Prantil contends it would be. For example, Prantil knew that the woman who deposited the check in his account did not match the description of the woman whose name appeared on the check. On these facts, we hold that Prantil was not deprived of a fair trial. If Prantil was denied a fair trial in this case, trial courts would be required to grant immunity simply on the basis of unsupported allegations by criminal defendants that immunity is required by due process.

29

Moreover, Prantil has made no showing that any misconduct on the part of the prosecutor caused Goins to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination. See United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 890-92 (9th Cir.1983).

VI.

30

Prantil contends he was denied due process because of a twenty-month delay between the date of the alleged crime and the date of the indictment.

31

A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is "tested by general proscriptions of due process."4 Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th Cir.1978). A pre-indictment delay does not justify habeas relief unless the defendant can show actual prejudice. Id. at 1382. To prove actual prejudice a defendant must give more than "mere assertions that ... witnesses' memories may have faded with the passage of time...." United States v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 822, 106 S.Ct. 74, 88 L.Ed.2d 60 (1985).

32

Prantil contends that he suffered actual prejudice because the bank teller could no longer remember the details of the escrow check transaction. However, the state court of appeals found that the delay did not affect the teller's memory. In addition, the court noted that Prantil was benefited by the teller's unresponsiveness to certain questions; therefore there was no prejudice.

33

Prantil also claims that a seven-month delay between the time he filed his habeas petition and the time the district court dismissed the action violated his right to due process.5

34

In Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1976), the Fifth Circuit held that a district court's procedure for handling habeas petitions which routinely resulted in delays of up to twenty months violated due process. However, in Satterlee v. Kritzman, 626 F.2d 682, 683 (9th Cir.1980), we held that a district court's clerical error which resulted in an eight-month delay between the dismissal of a prisoner's habeas petition and the time his files were forwarded to the court of appeals did not deprive the petitioner of any substantive rights. As in Satterlee, here there is no policy of discrimination and no showing that the delay was purposeful.

VII.

35

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Prantil's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

36

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

1

Because Prantil's direct appeal presented the same constitutional claims as his subsequent habeas petition, it is unnecessary for him to have filed for state habeas relief. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987)

2

Prantil was released from prison on April 20, 1987. However, because a felony conviction may cause a defendant to suffer adverse collateral consequences even after he has served his sentence, a defendant's release from custody prior to the completion of his federal habeas corpus proceedings will not render his petition moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-38, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). Prantil was in custody when he filed the petition in district court, so this court retains jurisdiction over the proceedings after he is released. Id

3

Under California law, a person is guilty of forgery if he passes or attempts to pass as true and genuine a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 470; People v. Hellman, 189 Cal.App.2d 777, 778-79, 11 Cal.Rptr. 433 (1961). The only element Prantil challenges as lacking sufficient evidence is the true and genuine requirement

4

Once a suspect is indicted, the more stringent requirements of the speedy trial right apply. Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1978)

5

Prantil first raised the issue in his brief to this court. Ordinarily, this court will not decide an issue which was not raised at the District Court. Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985). The court may decide an issue for the first time on appeal, however, where review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Id. Because a claim that a district court violated a party's due process rights questions the integrity of the federal judicial system, we review Prantil's claim despite his failure to raise it below

CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org

=========================================================================

MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=

 

 

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/ A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

 

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

 

=================================

 

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at the airport and who drove him back. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman at the airport could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman at the airport and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman at the Omaha airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

31

CONCLUSION

32

To conclude, we reverse defendant's perjury conviction on Count Six of the indictment because the allegedly perjurious statements lack materiality. We reverse and remand the defendant's remaining convictions on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to recuse the participating prosecutor as a material witness and on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct in the government's closing argument.

===========================================

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

==========================================

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/

A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

25

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

=========================================

(1984). Hence, we must decide whether the defendant's testimony was material.

29

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at his hotel and who drove him back to the Omaha Airport. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman who met him at his hotel and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel and drove him to the airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

===========================================

 

1

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ See United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), rev'd in part, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984). Betty Powell was convicted on four counts of a fifteen-count indictment which had alleged that she conspired with her husband and son to distribute cocaine. She was acquitted on all substantive conspiracy counts. Three of her four convictions, those alleging the use of a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, were subsequently reversed on appeal, United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), but then reinstated by the Supreme Court, United States v. Powell, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984)

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979)

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

===========================================================================

MAIN SITE http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/search?q=+Prantil+&circuit=

 

 

 

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/756/759/162188/ A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

 

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

 

=================================

 

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at the airport and who drove him back. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman at the airport could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman at the airport and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman at the Omaha airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

31

CONCLUSION

32

To conclude, we reverse defendant's perjury conviction on Count Six of the indictment because the allegedly perjurious statements lack materiality. We reverse and remand the defendant's remaining convictions on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to recuse the participating prosecutor as a material witness and on the ground of prosecutorial misconduct in the government's closing argument.

===========================================

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T. 115 (emphasis added)

==========================================

Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S. Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of California.

Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,* District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/

A review of the prosecutor's remarks during the closing argument reveals that his statements, although derogatory and gratuitous by themselves, served to compound the prejudice to the defendant that flowed from Mr. Gorder's ambiguous role as both prosecutor and participant witness. The prosecutor's closing arguments illustrate the degree of actual prejudice that results when an advocate, through his direct participation in the events under litigation, can argue to the jury based on actual or perceived personal knowledge.⁵ The prosecutor launched a personalized attack on the defendant's motives. A recurrent theme of the prosecutor's summation was to portray the defendant as "greedy,"⁶ "corrupt," "dishonest," and "sleazy." The prosecutor cautioned the jury that the defendant did not meet the minimum standards of attorney behavior demanded by the "advocacy system of justice." As such, the prosecutor explained to the jury that "Mr. Prantil is the kind of person who gives lawyers a bad name to the general public and it's your duty as jurors to call him to account." The prosecutor charged the jury with the responsibility of ridding the ranks of the criminal defense bar of such a "crook" even though "it's true, thank God it's true, that criminal defense attorneys are not crooks as a general rule."

25

These comments came from an individual who was not only an experienced prosecutor but also, as the jury could not fail to appreciate, both a participant in many of the underlying events and Mr. Prantil's adversary throughout. As previously mentioned, Mr. Gorder had conducted the grand jury examination of the defendant that resulted in three of the defendant's perjury convictions. In his summation of the evidence on these counts, the prosecutor drew the jury's attention to the complete grand jury transcripts. Mr. Gorder informed the jury that these transcripts demonstrated that the defendant committed perjury "not just in the specific counts he's charged with, but in a number of other areas also." Once again, this is an assertion of personal knowledge of a testimonial rather than an argumentative character.

=========================================

(1984). Hence, we must decide whether the defendant's testimony was material.

29

Initially, we decline to accept the government's contention, raised for the first time on appeal, that the defendant committed perjury by denying knowing who was with Powell in the Omaha area. No question concerning the identity of the person with Mr. Powell in the Omaha area was asked or answered in the grand jury proceedings. Further, the prosecutor's depiction of Mr. Prantil's actual remarks as an attempt to conceal the activities of his sister-in-law from the grand jury is somewhat puzzling in light of the fact that Mr. Gorder had, pursuant to Ms. Schmidt's prior agreement to cooperate with the government, full knowledge of her activities in and around the Omaha area. The only grand jury testimony elicited from the defendant focused on who picked up the defendant at his hotel and who drove him back to the Omaha Airport. The defendant said that a woman, whose name he couldn't recall, did so. In our view, this assertion could not have influenced the grand jury's investigation. The defendant's inaccurate testimony about a nonexistent woman could not have launched any further successful grand jury investigation.

30

The government's entire perjury theory on this count of the indictment depends in equal measure on the false premise that there was a woman who met him at his hotel and that this woman was the defendant's sister-in-law, whose identity the defendant wishes to conceal. The defendant, however, could not possibly be testifying falsely so as to shield a nonexistent woman. Similarly, the defendant's inability to recall the name of this nonexistent woman, a testimonial assertion that is hard to peg as a literal falsehood, could not have influenced the grand jury's deliberations. Simply put, if there was no blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel and drove him to the airport, the defendant's inability to recall her name is immaterial. Accordingly, because the defendant's testimony was not material, we hold that the defendant's conviction on Count Six is reversed.

===========================================

 

1

http://cases.justia.com/us-court-of-appeals/F2/764/548/149993/ See United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), rev'd in part, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984). Betty Powell was convicted on four counts of a fifteen-count indictment which had alleged that she conspired with her husband and son to distribute cocaine. She was acquitted on all substantive conspiracy counts. Three of her four convictions, those alleging the use of a telephone to facilitate drug offenses, were subsequently reversed on appeal, United States v. Powell, 708 F.2d 455 (9th Cir.1983), but then reinstated by the Supreme Court, United States v. Powell, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 471, 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984)

(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 931, 99 S.Ct. 2864, 61 L.Ed.2d 300 (1979)

5

In winding up his closing argument, Mr. Gorder clarified his role in the case as follows:

Ladies and Gentlemen, our system of justice is an advocacy system of justice and there are adversaries. In this particular case the United States is an adversary, Frank Prantil is an adversor. I represent the United States and Mr. Iredale represents the defendant. That system depends upon a certain minimum standard of behavior, a system where the attorneys are honest with each other and with the court. Frank Prantil is not that kind of person. He was dishonest from day one until he walked off the stand on October 6th having said that everything was above the board. And it's your duty to call him to account for those actions, and I ask you to return verdicts of guilty on each count of the indictment.

R.T. 116.

6

In his closing argument, Mr. Gorder refers to the defendant's explanation, contained in a tape recording, that the monies he collected represented his attorney's fees in part. In response to the defendant's taped statement that "I have a right to earn my living too," the prosecutor explains to the jury, "He talks about he's just picking up his fees, again establishing his greed." R.T.

Mary Prantil's Book & Case # from NYC Department Of Corrections - Prantil Mary IS AVerified Criminal Convicted for Deception,FRAUD, Grand LARCENY, EXTORTION, ABUSE, HARRASSMENT OF INNOCENT BUSINESS OWNERS

 

HERE FIND MARY PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL BOOK AND CASE NUMBER LOOK UP ANYONE CAN PULL IT UP BY FOLLOWING THESE SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS:

The public may look up Mary Prantil's criminal records, on the NYC Department Of Corrections web site so you the public can see what a real piece of crap Mary Prantil really is.

Go to the following link which is the NYC jail inmate lookup: 

http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/

After the page has been pulled up, you will see the place where to enter Mary Prantil's Booking and Case Number, which is 3471001054- simply enter that number in the white box, as shown below.

As you will see, the NYC Department Of Corrections has all her criminal information and charges posted. As we have said numerous times in the past, we have proof of what we have been warning the public about this criminal Mary Prantil all along, so see for yourself- go to the link, enter her book and case number, the information is current and is all there for anyone because it is PUBLIC RECORD. The facts, simply put.

Enter
NYSID or Book & Case Number: ( enter 3471001054 )

You will then find, on the NYC Department of Corrections Inmate Lookup, Mary Prantil's criminal records, including her Felony Stalking charge.

May Mary Prantil rot in Hell, if the Devil will even let her in, LOL. Good riddance, freak Prantil :( LOL the joke is on U

LOOK PRANTIL TAX EVASION CHARGES AND REPORTS AGAINST YOU TAX WARRANTS REPORTED TO THE NEW YORK STATE AND FEDERAL TAX BOARDS YOU SHOULD LEARN YOUR LESSON AND LET INNOCENT PEOPLE ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN DAMN BUSINESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TAX HOME | e-Services Help | Privacy | Security | Disclaimer | Contact Us 

Office of Tax Enforcement - File an Information Referral to report suspected tax evasion and fraud 

Check to see if you meet our minimum browser requirements for this service. 

*Required fields 

Information Referral: 
This information referral concerns a(n)* Individual Business/Tax Preparer/Practioner 

Description of Information Referral* 
Please include a detailed description of the alleged violation activity. 
https://www.integrascan.com/search_results.php?type

County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched:

MARY PRANTIL QUEENS

Warrant ID# : E-029211902-W001-3

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant 

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. 

Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
June 10, 2008 QUEENS $106.21 June 20, 2008 


Warrant ID# : E-029159448-W001-7

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant 

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
February 14, 2008 QUEENS $4,072.14 February 14, 2008 


* Filed with Department of State on or prior to implementation of electronic filing system, January 8, 2004. Dates for filings made prior to January 8, 2004 must be derived from paper filings and should be obtained from the Department of Taxation and Finance.

Taxpayer Name(s) Selected: City specified in warrant address record of Taxpayer Searched: County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched: MARY PRANTIL, QUEENS

Subject Information: 

Please enter as much information as you can regarding the primary person allegedly involved in the complaint. 

First Name* Mary T. 
Last Name* Prantil
Street Address 32-85 33rd Street
Apt # C-2
City* Astoria
State* New York, 11106
Cell Phone Number: 9172246605
Also Known As: Mary Prantil, Mary T. Prantil, Mary Theresa Prantil 
Date of Birth January 27, 1965
Physical Description: Female, white, eyes green, hair blonde, 95 pounds
Any known partners, affiliates, etc.: 

If you would prefer to mail this form, print it and mail it to: 
NYS Department of Taxation and Finance 
Report Suspected Tax Evasion/Fraud 
Information Referral Unit 
Income/Franchise Desk Audit 
Albany NY 12227-0166

 

PUBLIC BEWARE ALL INTERNET AND LAND BASED BUSINESSES BEWARE AND STAY AWAY FROM CRIMINAL MARY  PRANTIL !  MARY PRANTIL IS DANGEROUS VIOLENT, AND IS CURRENTLY CHARGED WITH SEVERAL CRIMES INCLUDING FELONY STALKING !!!!

 

HERE IS MARY PRANTIL'S BOOK AND CASE NUMBER LOOK UP INFORMATION AND MUCH MORE VIA THIS WEB SITE AND THE INFORMATION HERE BELOW:

 

http://www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net

 

 

Mary Prantil's Book & Case # from NYC Department Of Corrections - Prantil Mary IS A Verified Criminal Convicted for Deception,FRAUD, Grand LARCENY, EXTORTION, ABUSE, HARRASSMENT OF INNOCENT BUSINESS OWNERS

Mary fabricates lies all over the internet insisting she is an ex employee, ex spouse, etc. accuses others of the crimes she is committing because she knows she is going to be prosecuted soon by the state of New York.

HERE FIND MARY PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL BOOK AND CASE NUMBER LOOK UP ANYONE CAN PULL IT UP BY FOLLOWING THESE SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS:

The public may look up Mary Prantil's criminal records, on the NYC Department Of Corrections web site so you the public can see what a real piece of crap Mary Prantil really is.

Go to the following link which is the NYC jail inmate lookup: 

http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/

After the page has been pulled up, you will see the place where to enter Mary Prantil's Booking and Case Number, which is 3471001054- simply enter that number in the white box, as shown below.

As you will see, the NYC Department Of Corrections has all her criminal information and charges posted. As we have said numerous times in the past, we have proof of what we have been warning the public about this criminal Mary Prantil all along, so see for yourself- go to the link, enter her book and case number, the information is current and is all there for anyone because it is PUBLIC RECORD. The facts, simply put.

Enter
NYSID or Book & Case Number: ( enter 3471001054 )

You will then find, on the NYC Department of Corrections Inmate Lookup, Mary Prantil's criminal records, including her Felony Stalking charge. 

 

Liar Mary Prantil is a criminal, a violent stalker, who is a text switcher, deluded person that FAILED in her own miserable life- who should be put away and never allowed to use a computer again.  

Mary Prantil has also been turned in and reported to the FBI and Department Of Justice for Digital Computer Fraud and Harassment with MALICIOUS INTENT TO SLANDER AND DEFAME an innocent business - now Mary Prantil can add ANOTHER FELONY CRIME TO HER LONG CRIMINAL RECORD.