This post is about a true scam artist named Mary T. Prantil, who
decided to come up on the Internet one day going on three years ago to obtain
spell casting and other on-line services in which she had no intention in paying
for at any time.
This is about a person that not only stole from legitimate businesses
but slandered them over the entire Internet under numerous fictitious names in a
effort to ruin their businesses after she was through using and scamming them.
This report is on a true criminal who hides behind religion and the
Constitution Of the United States while proclaiming herself to be a patriot,
comedian, and spiritual woman who believes in God, while accusing everyone of
doing the very things that she is carrying out in the shadows against the
innocent privately.
This report is about a scam artist that doesn't appear to have any set
ethical standards, values or morals whom is to cowardly to even make her
outlandish and fictitious charges against others under her true name for fear of
legal retribution.
She's a cowardly, shallow, ignorant individual who is conflicting by
nature that thinks she can play with the lives of people wherever she meets
them.
Her conflicts and arguments are full of lies, inconsistencies and
contradictions steaming from her delusional mind set who's further been fired
from about every job she has ever worked.
This person is a attention seeker, self-mutilator, compulsive,
obsessive, habitual liar that can't get along with anyone privately or in the
work place. This can be proven with her long track record found in public
records, background search and employment history.
Mary T. Prantil is currently attempting to group and slam several
independent magic sites and other private persons who have absolutely nothing to
do with each other because these same sites and persons are exposing her for her
fraudulent activity against them at various times.
So, when going over the gripe sites please recognize that any negative
statements or post made against us are more then likely coming from this out of
control moron of Mary T.Prantil who thinks she's making some sort of case
against us without ever producing one shred of evidence to support her numerous
fictitious claims. Who fails repeatedly in proving our charges against her as
being false.
Let's review one of Miss Prantil's web sites, more specifically her
site of ( "SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT" ) found at (((Redacted)))to further establish her personal CREDIBILITY and REPUTATION since these
issues seems to be of great importance to her currently.
Let's also recognize her statement of not believing anything that is
posted on Rip Off Report as she repetitively stated over and over on her site in
question. Miss Prantil states, and I quote ( "Mary Prantil CORRECTS THE RECORD
and tells the true story about Ripoff Report.com! Mary Prantil Defends the truth
- DO NOT BELIEVE RIP-OFF REPORT.com" ), Again a quote from Prantil, (
"Hello...This is Mary Prantil. Credibility is everything !! Protect your
Internet Reputation!! ").
Well, well, for a person that goes around bashing legitimate
businesses, and further the good personal names of other private individuals
both on and off the Internet, she sure likes to fall back on this little song
and dance of truth and protecting your reputation, doesn't she ?
Especially when it's Prantil herself that is, and has engaged in this
sort of attacks against others with hostile gossip, slanderous and lieing
activity against others on the Internet over the last three years as can be
proven on the site of Rip Off Reports and numerous other forum sites.
Prantil states, and I quote: ("I have been the victim of Identity Theft
as a result of a 3 year Internet Hoax on Rip-off Report.com, . After I randomly
bought a Psychic Reading On-line.") One little Psychic Reading, she
says?
Who might this Psychic be that she's talking about on her site that is
propagating this "hoax" against her ? I wonder if she, meaning Prantil could be
more specific regarding this statement found on her site so that the Psychic in
question could either substantiate or deny her statement and charges coming from
Prantil.
Perhaps she can provide tangible, detailed legitimate hard copy proof
that proves that she has been ripped off or that she doesn't have ANY criminal
records over the last eight years either in California or New York, or hasn't
been engaged in any court action or other legal activity brought against her by
others over the last eight years in either the state of New York or in
California contrary to what public records indicate in both California and New
York.
Again, perhaps she can prove that she doesn't abuse or sell drugs from
her apartment in tangible legitimate hard copy record, or report from the
District Attorney's Office. Maybe she can post this information for all of us up
here in a effort to clear her name.
Here's a post from a brave young man who is also tired of Miss
Prantil's games, whom moreover validates the claims that she is a Wh_ore, drug
abuser and dope pusher. Now, you have to give this man credit where credit is
due as he has even posted his picture on this site under his report.
Please lets see what this person has to say about Prantil and her
postings on ROR, also we would like to give a BIG THANK YOU to this upstanding
individual for stepping forward and telling us what he knows of his personal
interactions with Miss Mary T. Prantil. Please read the following paragraphs on
the site of : (((redacted)))
(((((((((" Blood Love and Lust Spells, I came here to speak about Mary,
Who Mary Prantil really is. I used to live next door to her Mary T. Prantil lies
telling the public she is a MALE from Houston Texas but let me tell you who Mary
T. Prantil REALLY is. Mary T. Prantil is a strung out drug addict and a sex
addict who goes crazy when she does not have a man between her legs having sex
with her twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. Mary T. Prantil is a FAT
SLOPPY WHORE who weighs about 200 pounds who pops pills and drinks like a fish
all day and all night- how do I know? I used to party with her. She DOES keep
illegal drugs hidden in her apartment and even sells them at her drug parties
passing out free drugs to guys she wants to get into bed with her.
She is cheap, A SL_T and I consider Mary Prantil the typical New York
crack head/wh_re/prostitute and feel she would be happy if she were in porn
instead of working in corporate America like she says all the time. At least she
could have sex whenever she wanted it. Which is about every five minutes. She
habitually uses crack cocaine, marijuana, LSD, crank, speed, angel dust, she
drinks and drives and is a ROAD RAGE MANIAC who places herself and others in
danger constantly with her evil and malicious behavior. I cannot tell you how
many times she has been in trouble with the cops. Her parties usually go into
sex parties because Mary is always looking for a man and uses her parties as an
excuse to get a man into her bed.
If she has a man to give her sex, she latches on to him like a black
widow spider thirsty to drink his blood and feed on him day and night with her
sex addictions until he is sucked dry. Then she is finished with him and throws
another party to get herself another man. ( or MEN I have known her to have
SEVERAL all at one time) when some of my friends and I went to one of Mary
Prantil's parties as soon as we were all like passed out she got into our
wallets and took all of our money.
Two of my friends sued the crap out of her after that. Mary Prantil
has a one track mind which is SUCK and FU_K some guy and take all the drugs she
can get her hands on. If she cant, she goes BONKERS! Which is why she is all
over these forums. I know her ex boyfriend and the last time I talked to him he
told me he was always trying to get away from her because all she wanted was sex
and drugs. That is all she cared about. Something else about her is that she is
in trouble for illegal drug possession, drug dealing, check forgery, check
kiting, fraud, disturbing the public peace, tax evasion, and a few other things
too many to name. Fact is the woman really is a criminal in every
respect.
The best thing to do is not even talk to her. She doesn't really have
any friends because she is too fake and too crazy to be real to anyone which is
why she hides and cannot show her real name. I have an IP tracer and have traced
all the reports here and on rip off which show her apartment address for all the
mean posts she keeps making on several people and business owners too. Go away,
Miss SLUT Mary. Everyone knows that you are not worth a sh_t
and neither was
your late dad. Why don't you do something nice for yourself and move to another
country? YOU ARE BUSTED EVERYONE KNOWS IT" ))))
Ok, great, now let's move back to the topics at hand. I quote Prantil
in saying : ("The Psychic Scam Artist posted all these falsehoods on Ripoff
Report.com in retaliation because I could not be scammed for thousands of
dollars for love spells and more Psychic Readings.
I did not buy a spell or put a spell on my lover or any person/lover I
know. I am not into spell casting.") THIS IS A SET OF LIES BY PRANTIL AS IT
HAS BEEN PROVEN AS FACT THAT SHE DID CONTRACT SPELL WORK AND MULTIPLE READINGS
FROM SEVERAL MAGICK SITES AND READERS."
Ok, fair enough to Miss Prantil and we will take your statements at face
value for now, however, can Prantil explain to us how and why four separate
spell casters that she claims NOT to know possess legitimate hard copy records
of having casted spells for her through their companies?
That moreover possess ALL legitimate proof of payment of her spell
castings, proof of payment or partial payment or no payment for psychic
reading/s and spell castings, Prantil's business voice messages and emails back
and fourth between these companies and herself throughout the course of her
cases, and over the last three years; not leaving out other legitimate and
tangible evidence that links her directly to them as a client ?
Quote from Miss Prantil : ( "I paid for my Psychic Reading, I did not rip
off anyone as the Gypsy Scam Psychic falsely posts about me, Mary Prantil on
Ripoff Report.com. I got ripped off by the Gypsy Scam Psychic.
I asked for my money back instead of getting my refund the Scam Psychic
began posting falsehoods about me on Ripoff Report.com. DO NOT BELIEVE POSTS
on Rip-off Report.com about me, Mary Prantil. Rip-off Report.com is not a
legitimate site and only writes propaganda for dishonest merchants.")
DIDN'T RIP OFF ANYONE ? ???, I THINK THE INFORMATION BELOW WILL SPEAK
OTHERWISE and for itself. What about Mr. Cahill's and Celeste reports against
Prantil that the Viewer can read down further in this report, I think there's a
matter of $ 2,100.00 owed by Prantil that she's telling Cahill that she can't,
and won't pay him for the services he rendered. If there's any question about
this then give Mr. Cahill a call at 1-727-787-0988 or write him at archer926@yahoo.com, his site is www.magicangelspells.com.
I guess everyone is entitled to their own opinions concerning ROR, However
it is also a matter of record concerning Ed Magedson and his site of ROR in that
Prantil has written several testimonials into him personally via email, and then
thanked him publicly on the site of ROR on her posts.
Perhaps Ed would like to post Mary Prantil's testimonials so everyone can
read over them. I believe there's a conflict of statement here on Miss
Prantil's part as she is PRAISING Ed Magedson on ROR one minute and then
seemingly bashing him on all over the place on her own little dumpy web site
when her scamming fiasco turned against and backfired on her. This can be seen
on the following link of www.correcttherecord.com/main_profile/view/53.
Also, you can see where Prantil is thanking Ed on ROR while calling us,
meaning Jan Windglows and James Morgan "GYPSY SCUM" in her posts. We also have
this specific language coming from Prantil in emails, recorded messages and
other mediums such as messengers along with 66 pages of our phone records.
There are four different sites out here in whom Prantil has contracted for
spell work and readings, who further have her posted ror statements probatum in
numerous email communications and recorded messages not to mention online
account information showing her scam activity through Pay Pal. Here are the
links Prantil posted on ROR under countless fictitious names thanking Ed
Magedson, and calling us "Gypsy Scum": http://www.ripoffreport.com/fortune-tellers/mary-prantil/mary-prantil-mary-praintil-jam-939g7.htm.
I wonder who Mary T. Prantil is specifically accusing in the way of
attempting to steal $5000.00, then $7,500 and eventually $ 50,000 from her ? No
one shows any record of these amounts in question regarding the sites that did
perform work for her, perhaps Mary T. Prantil would like to humor us all by
yielding the actual legitimate hard copy record of this actually transpiring, or
allegedly occurring between her and a spell caster or reader in question. Maybe
Prantil can scan her evidence of this and post it on all the forum sites so
everyone can see it instead of running off at the mouth with her half baked
accusations without actually providing any type of legitimate documented hard
copy PROOF.
Maybe she would like to name these alleged offenders on her own personal
web site. If the informational is factual then she has nothing to worry about
legally; however if not, then she's got plenty to worry about in the way of
unending legal repercussions against her for slander. Other posts that can be
linked to Mary Prantil on ROR are as follows : (((Redacted))).
Observe the language and phrasing of her sentences and the content of the
statements themselves and you'll see this is the same person talking this junk.
In Prantil's ROR reports, and aside from all her rantings and ravings
against Jan, myself and others, SHE CAN'T PROVE ANYTHING to anyone other then
the fact that she's being a STUPID half witted attention seeking moron with
criminal tendencies, who apparently learned her ignorant criminal behavior from
her unethical attorney father Frank G. Prantil.
It's all so irrelevant, when she talks to everyone about her dirty criminal
father and how much property he acquired as a result of ripping people off
throughout his career, her statements have no bearing regarding this case or
what she has personally carried out against others.
It doesn't matter how many names she chooses to SHAME by posting the names
of her mother, father, sister, uncle or dad's ex business partners. WERE NOT
IMPRESSED OR AFRAID, Miss Prantil. It doesn't matter how many outlandish things
she chooses to say about others without a trace of proof, or all the little
names she calls others. All her mud slinging is hitting her right back in her
UGLY face.
What matters is the proof you present to which we have posted below and the
proof Prantil fails to produce. This is real proof and can be verified through
legitimate hard copy records that moreover hasn't been changed in any way.
Prantil's emails haven't been altered either no more then her nasty voice
messages she left on countless occasions.
It really doesn't matter when Mary Prantil tells us about her alleged
"college degree" or how she ran to the bed side of her dieing father, or how she
was late in getting there because she was tied up doing other more important
things like smoking crack or getting herself into some other trouble elsewhere,
in our opinion.
What matters, is what she has carried out against others over the last
three years and the proof that many people have of her unlawful activities,
these are the relative facts. So, I guess Miss Prantil can just stop attempting
to obtain sympathy from others off the net by singing this little sad story/song
and dance of hers.
She can stop acting all patriotic with her little 911 poem and the "god
bless America" thing because no one is buying into it. WHAT A HYPOCRITE.
Prantil is the biggest abuser of the United States Constitution that I've ever
seen.
Mary T. Prantil abuses the first amendment covering free speech and the
privacy of others. She uses law enforcement along with other agencies to harass
others by fling false police reports against them.
Prantil abuses the Internet by posting junk on anyone who has offended her
to which includes everyone under the whistle blowers act giving her anonymity.
This is a worthless piece of flesh that sits up all night just to prank and
harass others because they wouldn't let her rip them off.
What about all the businesses she's ripped off because she torments them
until she gets something for free? She sounds just like her worthless daddy in
all her conning and greedy ways.
What's patriotic about attempting to harm business in a shit_y economy for
no good reason other then her own scamming greed? Please Prantil, don't talk to
us about the constitution, truth and protecting your so called "good name" as
your name is anything but good and your motives are evil, wicked, and abusive in
every way.
Your rampage against others for no good reason is over and you are the one
WHO HAS BEEN EXPOSED for who and what you are, A TWO BIT PIECE OF CRIMINAL
GUTTER TRASH.
If anything you are a ENEMY of this country and everything it stands for
as you abuse any law that you can use for your own self-gain. Like I said, your
comedy thing SUCKS and should be illegal.
Is it any wonder why they threw you out of the comedy club? Couldn't cut
it, huh? I guess your not as funny as you thought. Why don't you go perform
your act over in the middle east some place to see if you can raise a few laughs
there ?
I'm sure they would find something to do with you quickly as their justice
system isn't as bogged down as ours.
Now, I like this one. Quoting Prantil : (" So I went to the police for
help. It was here I learned of the Communication Decency Act of 1996 that
protects web-owners like Ed Magedson. Truly, we are at the mercy of web-owner
like Ed Magedson that allow a false forum. ")
Hey Prantil DUMMY....... This law is to protect web site owners from scum
buckets like you who violate the site policies in the way of posting false
statements about others on a forum site like ROR. Why should a site owner take
the heat for some lieing piece of human trash like Mary T. Prantil ?
Why should a site like ROR be closed down just because some low life like
prantil wants to abuse it like she abuses everything else in her life? YES,
PRANTIL, THIS PROTECTS SITE OWNERS FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU who don't have enough
good sense to be civil in a civilized society. Ed isn't going to vouch for you
and post your lying statements as truth on his site, you DUMB A_S.
Miss Prantil didn't mind too much when this site was posting all her trash
up here in the beginning of the Cahill conflict under her fictitious name of
"HONEST PERSON" when she had allies. What's wrong Prantil ? Don't you like
all the good people on the Internet being warned about you ?
SCAMS LIKE TO STAY HIDDEN IN THE SHADOWS SO THEY CAN GO FROM PERSON TO
PERSON or business to business, however when light is shed on the scam artist
like Prantil, then others become aware and STOP THE SCAM CRIMINAL IN HER TRACKS
before she can scam again.
Maybe this is why scam criminal Prantil has been trying so hard to cover
our posts with her endless postings of smut and endless lies. Maybe Prantil
doesn't want others to be turned on to her Fu_ked up scamming games.
Prantil likes to accuse ROR and Ed Magedson of spreading propaganda about
her, but there again, IT'S PRANTIL THAT'S TALKING TRASH ABOUT OTHERS and not Ed
Magedson. Isn't it true that ROR has a no spamming policy now that prevents a
person like prantil from filing 8 to 10 rebuttals all saying the same garbage
?
Isn't it true that every time a person makes a post that they have to
check a box declaring that their statements are true ? I guess this is why
Prantil's posts aren't so numerous on this site in particular. Congratulations,
Ed for a job well done.
Quote from Prantil: ("The Scam Artist Psychic posted these falsehood on
over 7 different web sites about 3 yrs ago:a couple of porn sites, dating sites
and Ripoff Report.com. So I went to the police for help. It was here I learned
of the Communication Decency Act of 1996 that protects web-owners like Ed
Magedson.
Truly, we are at the mercy of web-owner like Ed Magedson that allow a false
forum. So at the instruction of the FBI - I sent all web-owners proof of my
Clean Criminal Record to show that I was telling the truth. The good news is
that All 7 web owners respected the seriousness of my request to remove the
false postings and instantly took off the false postings - except Ed Magedson.
To this day Ed Magedson refuses all my request to please remove my name,
address, and all falsehoods about me, Mary Prantil. So for over 3 years Ed
Magedson hosts propaganda about me, Mary Prantil on his site Ripoff Report.com."
)
Fact: the F.B.I doesn't involve themselves in low level matters such as
postings on the Internet.
Fact : they WILL NOT send anyone a record of anything unless another
federal agency requests it such as the Department Of Justice.
This is yet ANOTHER LIE on Mary Prantil's part and over all deception
against the public. Perhaps she could scan us all a copy of this report and post
it on her web site or up here on ROR.
IT'S FUNNY THAT PRANTIL COMES UP WITH THE NUMBER SEVEN AS THIS WAS THE
NUMBER OF FAKE WEB SITES SHE MADE AGAINST ANOTHER INNOCENT PERSON in order to
discredit him and attempt to ruin his business.
It was yet another friend of the victim person that went to these web sites
created by Mary Prantil who had this information removed by speaking to the web
owners. LIAR, LIAR, LIAR---- Prantil distorting the facts again. Of course
this can be proven as well with hard legitimate factual proof as well.
You know, I'd love to post a lot of other stuff up here in this report
regarding Prantil, but that's for another day. All I can say is you'd better win
your court cases Prantil, or your going down BAD, both in the courts and on the
net. Keep running and telling lies, you Fuc_ing criminal, because your time is
getting short.
QUOTE:( "I, Mary Prantil, am the Victim of Identity Theft and what I see
as an Internet Hoax on Rip-off Report.com. All Rip-off Reports.com posts are
false posted by a Psychic claiming that I am a Rip off Scam artist and into
spell casting. THE TRUTH: I have a clean Criminal Record. I did not Rip-off
anyone. I was ripped off by this Psychic. ") .
Well, Prantil, and firstly, there are a lot of people on and off the net
who you've ripped off or harassed; however let's stay with the issues at hand.
YOU DID RIP OFF MR. CAHILL of "Magic Angel Spells" as he can prove with hard
copy evidence, you did attempt to scam us which we can prove and have proven to
the police, you did rip off some psychic readers which they proved through
records being Pay Pal.
You, Mary Prantil have harassed others endlessly both on the net and off
that is a matter for the courts presently regarding your actions.
NO ONE IS STEALING YOUR IDENTITY, NOR ARE THEY HARASSING YOU
UNNECESSARILY; however we aren't going to take your crap and we will show
everyone exactly who, and what you are being a SCAM ARTIST CRIMINAL.
FACT: No one ripped you off, but you rip others off. FACT: You HAVE
CRIMINAL RECORDS AND OTHER LEGAL ACTIONS PENDING AGAINST YOU currently in the
state of New York. ( Don't lie to everyone, Bi_ch. )
FACT : YOU MARY PRANTIL ARE THE HACKER, STALKER, HABITUAL LIAR and SCAM
ARTIST here and not us and we can prove this with the little virus, Trojan you
just sent us that didn't work.
Yes, we found you attempting to get into our computers and trying to
acquire credit card information, trying to acquire the private information of
Michael Jenkins etc, CRIMINAL HYPOCRITE. We all hope they put you away soon,
Mary Prantil Internet Terrorist.
You should be humiliated, Prantil, and yes, we do live in funny times,
however this is no joke and your a SCAM ARTIST CRIMINAL, a true Internet
terrorist. Please don't talk to us about slander or defamation on the net and
how others can say whatever the want against others as you are the QUEEN of
slander and defamation.
It's only a matter of time before your karma comes full circle for you,
MONKEY GIRL. Ok, everyone, please read the information below, and if you have
any questions or would like the proof of our statements then just contacts us
and we will turn it over to you so you won't be scammed by this idiot Mary
T.Prantil.
Mary T. Prantil Caught Slamming & Scamming
Let us begin by viewing Miss Prantil's sites that go on in explaining how
she has never and at any time ever had a spell cast in her and that some gypsy
scum reader, as she likes to call us, or clairvoyant had tried to rip her off
for $ 5000. When I personally read over her sites it's really hard for me to
stomach this boloney for more then five minutes as I know the real truth about
this person. After reading some of her so-called "STELLAR REVIEWS", fake resume
and questionable character references on these questionable sites please come
back to this report.
Now that your back and laughing really hard to the point of tears, I'd like
you to read the following statements below from another spell caster being Mr.
Cahill of magic angel spells whom actually performed work for prantil at one
time in the recent past. The same Spell Casting site in whom Miss Prantil
attempted to have curses cast on Jan and myself for allegedly ripping her off
according to Mr. Cahill.
Please see where Miss Prantil became very angry with Mr. Cahill for not
assisting her in cursing us, Again, according to Mr. Cahill, then see where Miss
Prantil contacted my Ex-wife, Miss Schaub after Mr. Cahill apparently dropped
Prantil for charging back on him a couple of times for services he rendered to
Miss Prantil. Again read the statements Celeste Schaub is making concerning her
encounter with Prantil in the way that Prantil is asking her to throw curses on
not only us in this instance but Mr. Cahill as well for dropping her case.
Look up the information below if you like as it's all factual and can be
confirmed by Mr. Cahill himself or Pay Pal. I believe Mr. Cahill would welcome
your questions at this point regarding this matter as he's tired of Prantil's
games along with my Ex, or being pulled up in the games of Miss Prantil
regarding ror and prantil other statements on air found on many other gripe
sites.
In other words, Prantil is saying one thing to folks and doing another
thing in private, stating something completely opposite to factual information
and truth on the net and carrying out slanderous and harassing deeds in private.
Miss Prantil's constant or repeated claims that she was ripped off from various
spell sites from behind her numerous fictitious names on ror is in all actually
the exact opposite of what had occurred with prantil in real life and this is
proven in this post and in other verifiable documentation.
It was Miss Prantil that was carrying out the con games, or rip offs
against these magick sites and not the sites ripping her off, WOW, isn't this a
eye opener ? Her pages on her site should be: Mary T. Prantil The Stellar Rip
Off Artist lol. So, what I'd like to ask Prantil would be : You say that you
were never ripped off on your sites and that you alone prevented this, correct ?
yet state the opposite thing by saying that you were in all your belligerent
postings and direct telephone calls and nasty emails to not just one, but all of
us. We all have all the emails and voice recordings over a three or four year
span of time pertaining to these nasty communications. We also have Prantil's
statements that not only did she trust us, but was extremely happy with her
services from ALL OF US.
Prantil, how can you state otherwise on your sites by saying that you never
had, or engaged in any type of black magic spell castings against anyone, how do
you explain these hard copy records below ? not to mention the current ones we
hold on you ?. Wow, there seems to be a little discrepancy in your statements,
wouldn't you agree ?. In short your telling people one thing on your sites but
we can prove otherwise and thus showing that your a liar. So, which is it Miss
Prantil ? did you get ripped off ? or did you escape the clutches of some nasty
Psychic as you go on about on your sites ?. We have recording of Miss Prantil
calling us gypsy scum that correlate with her postings on Rip Off Reports not to
mention her calling us scams and con artist.
Are you lying Prantil ? or did you have spell work performed in your behalf
? What about Your claim of Identity theft ?, who would want your identity ? I
wouldn't. What is your basis for the claim of identity theft ? would that be you
actually signing contracts and making deals for black magic spells to dominate
someone else's mind to your own needs ? Well, we have your records and can prove
all your dealings with us. You rail on Rip Off Reports while stating that any
one can say whatever they want, and that Ed Magedson is a criminal, Well you
should know Prantil as you've been up there posting enough smut on innocent
people.
Don't bother answering any of these questions above Miss Prantil, as it is
hugely apparent to everyone at this point in what your really doing up here not
to mention what you've carried out to innocent businesses along the way in the
past and recent past. You attempted to rip off one site and was successful in
ripping off another magic site along with a another unrelated Tarot Reader that
I know of so far, and this is setting the record straight by confirming it with
proof. Everyone can see how you've jumped from one site or business to another
while trying to get them to cast negative spells on another including death
spells, love spells and sexual spells.
We can see all your begging and threats to slander us along with you
actually carrying these threats out with your obvious postings on ror and other
sites, We can see how poorly you lie. We can see quite clearly in how you've
played these sites against one and the other in the past. It's now quite evident
that your nothing but a really nasty, two bit scam artist who is pis_ed off
because you've been EXPOSED for your scams that everyone moreover sees you for
what you are and knows what you've doing little miss self-proclaimed NY stand up
comic from corporate America Whanna BEEE.
You know, we all have pages and pages of phone records and harassing phone
voice messages connecting you to us through your threats, we have canceled
checks from you not leaving out charge backs in various pay pal accounts and
attempted charge backs. We have you on tape threatening to turn in every one of
us to this state of federal agencies with false allegations, charges or police
reports. You know we do prantil, Don't you ?. It seems to me that you were
telling us at one point in your postings how much Mr. Cahill had helped you
along with the communications we've shown to everyone where your making this
same positive statement about Jan and myself. So why are you posting smut on us
now ? Why are you trying to connect us to each other in your post when you know
were separate rival sites, and or competitors ? sounds like some more slamming
and scamming going on here on your end, HUH Mary ?.
Miss Prantil yells the loudest about being scammed, yet she is the biggest
scam artist in the world and on the net, Miss Prantil talks about FRAUD yet it's
on record regarding her attempted and actual credit card fraud through Pay Pal
to my understanding. Miss Prantil brags about how she can acquire services or
items, only to use them and return these items back to the store on a regular
basis.
Moreover how she obtains services from on-line business only to harass and
threaten this same business in question until they refund her money back just to
get rid of her. What does this make Mary T. Prantil ? Let me answer this for you
: She is a petty two bit CRIMINAL, Thief, scam artist of the worst kind and a
habitual lire to boot. Please read the Cahill and Schaub information below,
Again, call them and inquire about this posted information and I believe that
they will address your questions in a forthright and honest way.
=======================================================
CATCHING A LIRE & THEIF IN THE ACT Called Mary
SO I, MARY PRANTIL, AM TELLING MY STORY TO CORRECT THE RECORD!
(((Redacted)))
My
Story: About 3 years ago (Oct 2006) my Father died of cancer and to deal with
it, I foolishly went to a Psychic for a Psychic Reading who wanted to also scam
me for thousands of dollars by encouraging me to buy Psychic Love Spells. It was
this Scam Artist Psychic that retaliated when they realized I could not be
scammed for thousands of dollars. So for over 3 years now, the Scam Artist
Psychic posted all the false claims about me on Rip-off Report.com. I originally
went to the Psychic because I was very devastated by my Dad's untimely death.
It's not a crime to go to a Psychic or even buy a Psychic Reading. I did not
Rip-off anyone. I asked the Psychic for my money back when I realized my
mistake. So the Scam Artist and "so called Psychic" retaliated by posting all of
these false claims on Ripoff Report.com for over 3 years without my permission.
Clearly, the Scam Psychic has no life or real business with legitimate clients
to continue for 3 years to post more false claims with no contact from me.
3 years ago, I asked the Scam Artist Psychic for a refund for a pathetic
Psychic Reading where I was not satisfied and made it clear I felt I was ripped
off. And I stated to the scam Psychic that I did not want to purchase any future
Psychic Readings or any spells whatsoever. I wanted my money back for the
Psychic Reading. It's not a crime to get a Psychic Reading. The only thing I was
guilty of was being foolish to ever contact this Psychic. I believe in God and I
now realize it was wrong to go to this Psychic. I learned my lesson to rely on
my faith and not get Psychic Readings from Scam Artist on-line who prey on
vulnerable innocent people. But again - getting a Psychic Reading is not a
crime. In retrospect, I was really missing my Dad. I made a mistake to ever
purchase a Psychic Reading on-line but it is not a crime. Over 3 years ago, I
asked Ed Magedson to remove the false information about me from Ripoff
Report.com and he refuses. I even scanned and sent him my Clean Criminal Record.
Therefore, Ed Magedson is the real Criminal and Ripoff King not to be taken
seriously.
Mary T. Prantil's BOGUS Web Sites:
( PRANTIL'S COVER UP STORY... BAD MOUTHING ED MAGEDSON OF ROR )
(((Redacted)))
Mike Cahill & Celeste Schaub Tells All, How To Catch A Theif Named
Marry T. Prantil
----- Original Message -----
From: service@paypal.com
To: archer926@msn.com
Sent: Thursday, May
01, 2008 11:15 AM
Subject: PayPal: Initial Inquiry: Case ID -
PP-467-553-217
Dear stanley cahill,
We recently received a complaint regarding merchandise that was
never
received or received significantly not as described. The details of
this
transaction are as follows:
Buyer's Name: Mary Prantil
Buyer's Email: prant99@aol.com
Buyer's Transaction ID:
6E967396TD6877542
Transaction Date: Sep 6, 2007
Transaction Amount: -$1, 500.00
USD
Your Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542
Case Number:
PP-467-553-217
Seller's Transaction ID: 77E56376XD890860G
Your Transaction ID: 6E967396TD6877542
Buyer's Transaction ID:
77E56376XD890860G
We are contacting you to let you know that we will not be continuing
this
investigation because this complaint was filed 45 or more days after
the
original transaction date. However, we reserve the right for the next
180
days to begin an investigation if we later determine that this
complaint
should be examined.
We are committed to providing our community a safe environment in which
to
transact. As stated in the PayPal User Agreement, we reserve the right
to
close or limit an account in response to excessive complaints
received
about failure to ship merchandise, non-delivery of services,
merchandise
not as described, or problems with merchandise shipped.
You do not need to contact PayPal at this time, however, we encourage
you
to work directly with the buyer to amicably resolve this matter.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
PayPal Protection Services Department
Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and
you
will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal
account
and click the Help link located in the top right corner of any page.
If
your inquiry is regarding a claim, log in to your PayPal account and go
to
the Resolution Center.
----------------------------------------------------------------
PayPal Email ID PP822
==============================================
----- Original Message -----
From: service@paypal.com
To: archer926@msn.com
Sent: Friday, January
25, 2008 5:39 PM
Subject: Notification of chargeback reversal: Case ID
#PP-396-648-789 - PM001
Dear stanley cahill,
We recently notified you that one of your buyers filed a chargeback
stating
unauthorized use of a credit card.
It is PayPal's standard practice to dispute unwarranted chargebacks.
Using
the information you provided, we are in the process of disputing
this
chargeback with the buyer's card issuer.
Because the card issuer has reversed this charge, PayPal is
temporarily
holding an amount equal to the disputed funds until this matter
is
resolved. If the card issuer decides the case in your favor, the funds
will
be available in your PayPal account.
The credit card company has charged PayPal a settlement fee for
this
chargeback. In accordance with the terms of the PayPal User Agreement,
we
have debited your PayPal account to cover this fee.
-----------------------------------
Transaction
Details
-----------------------------------
Buyer's Name:Mary Prantil
Buyer's Email:prant99@aol.com
Transaction
Date:Oct 12, 2007
Your Transaction ID: 9ET7904456341182W
Buyer's
Transaction ID: 3617020566305634D
Transaction Amount:-$900.00 USDCase
#:PP-396-648-789
-----------------------------------
What to Do
Next
-----------------------------------
To learn more about how to respond to this chargeback, visit the
Resolution
Center and click "Resolution Center tutorials".
If you have additional information you’d like to upload or fax to us,
please provide it as soon as possible. Just log in to your PayPal account,
go to the Resolution Center, and click the “Details” link next to
this
case. For faster processing, choose “Upload files.”
We understand that you may not have been expecting this charge back. If
this
charge back has made your Pay Pal account balance negative, please
reimburse
us by adding funds to your account or by sending a check to the
following
address:
Pay Pal
Attn: Accounting Department
P.O. Box 45950
Omaha, NE
68145-0950
United States
-----------------------------------
Due
Dates
-----------------------------------
Please submit your response in the next 72 hours. The charge back
dispute
process is subject to strict timelines. If you are unable to respond
within
72 hours, we may be limited in the ways that we can dispute
this
charge back. After we receive and review any additional information, we
can
determine if we can take any further action. While we need to you
respond
quickly, a final decision about this charge back may take up to 75
days.
- If your Pay Pal account balance has become negative, please reimburse
us
within 60 days of the date of this email.
-----------------------------------
Other
Details
-----------------------------------
This transaction was reversed for the following reasons(s):
- We did not receive signed proof of delivery.
For further assistance, please log in to your Pay Pal account and click
the
Help link located in the top right corner of any page, or email
our
Charge back Department at the email address below. Be sure to include
your
case ID number in the subject of the email.
Sincerely,
Pay Pal
Charge back Department
Email: chargeback-appeal1@paypal.com
Fax:
402-537-5755
CB:PP-396-648-789:R4:USD900.00:01032008:9ET7904456341182W
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pay Pal Email ID
PP800
===================================================================
6-15-08
Jim, I'm sending this in to clear my name with you. I'm sending
this as proff that I no longer have Mary as a client and that she took back
several of the payments made to me through pay pal and that I'm not involved in
any kind of plott conspiracy with Mary or anyone against you and jan - I hope
this will put an end to you thinking I'm part of any kind of attacks on you - we
have had a few disagreements over the years but until now we have always worked
them out and you know that attacking you on the internet is not my style - as
always I remain here willing to discuss any of this with you at any time -
sincerely mike
brief summary
Mary prant came to me in sept of 2007 and stated that you
and jan cheated her and she begged me to take her case and help her - M agreed
to pay me $3200.00 + $ 100.00 for pay pal fees and cost totaling $3300.00 and I
was to cast repetitive type love and disruption prayers on her B.F. hani in
sept, oct, nov and dec of 2008 and weekly updated prayers were also cast every
week for M case - the e mail below from mary was her promising to repay the two
charge backs and the amount due if I would continue her case - then a short
while later she again tried charging back the 1st $ 1500.00 made in sept 2007
through pay pal and also on the $300.00 she paid on march 5 2008 through pay pal
which was so I'd do more work for her etc - it's been several times she promises
top pay me if I'd work on her case again after she cheated me by filing charge
backs with pay pal - and I took her back several times based on her saying she
was sorry and that she promised to pay the full balance due plus all charges
added by pay pal and I did more work on her case and then a few weeks later
she'd get mad and try more charge backs all over again and she stopped payment
on a check she sent me omn 4-10-08 - this was the last straw and I have had no
contact with her since - I tried my best to help her but she continued filing
charge backs against me and stopped payment on that check too - also in sept
2007 when she first came to me I refused to do the curses that she wanted me to
do on you and jan as you know that is not the way I work and I told her we may
not be getting alone now but we were friends for many years - and I explained
that you were within your rights to drop her as she was so obsessive and clearly
abused you and jan and your services - I'm always here to discuss this with you
at any time and I hope you and jan can see that I'm not involved in any
conspiracy with anyone against you - sincerely mike
$2000.00 BALANCE DUE AS OF MARCH 17 2008
THEN SINCE MARCH 17 2008 M FILED MORE CHARGE BACKS & STOPPED PAYMENT ON
A CHECK TO ME
$ 1500.00 CHARGE BACK ON 1ST PAYMENT MADE APROX SEPT 10
2007
$ 300.00 CHARGE BACK 3-5-2008 PAYMENT
$ 200.00 CHECK 4-10-2008 M
STOPPED PAYMENT
----- Original Message -----
From: Stanley Cahill
To:
Prant99@aol.com
Sent: Monday, March 17,
2008 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: Payment Plan - What is owed?
mary I just finished building more dolls for your prayers to be
continued - you can write another handwritten letter of request and request
exactly what you want - and send it when you can send a payment toward the
balance due I need to buy suppliers materials and offering to make up the
alchemy's to continue casting these prayers for you - without these implements
they are not very effective - I will expect and honest effort that you are
making payments to me on a regular bases - also my pay pal account is frozen -
all payments must be made by cashiers check or money order - I'm always here for
you mary - sincerely mike
our original
$3200.00 u.s.d was our original agreement in sept
2007
$ 100.00 u.s.d was added to help cover the fee pay pal charges and you
agreed to that after the first payment
========
$3300.00 u.s.d
-
$1500.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal around sept 10 2007
========
$
1800.00 u.s.d. balance due
- $ 900.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal on aprox
oct 10 -15 2007
========
$ 900.00 u.s.d balance due this was originally
promised to be paid by nov 10th 2007
$ 450.00 u.s.d. paid through pay pal on
aprox noc 10-15 2007
=======
$ 450.00 u.s.d. bal due on or before dec 10
2007
+ $900.00 u.s.d the oct 2007 payment wascharged back by you through pay
pal aprox in nov of 2007
+ $450.00 u.s.d. the nov 2007 payment charged back
aprox late dec 2007 or early jan 2007
========
$1800.00 u.s.d balance past
due
$ 500.00 u.s.d job payer done when you lost your job
========
$2300.00 u.s.d
- $ 300.00 u.s.d paid by you to pay pal aprox
2 weeks ago 3-5-08
========
$ 2000.00 u.s.d balance past due
also you agreed to pay the fee pay pal charged for the charge backs - there
not that much 80 - 90 bucks
they charged 29-30 bucks on the 450 - I'm
blocked from even viewing that account
in reality other than the $300.00 you
just payed to pay pal considering the charge backs I haven't gotten anything
from you since the first payment - yes I got the other two payments but pay pal
is demanding their money and they have put a report against my credit because I
actually owe them that money being you did the charge backs and the $300.00 did
not come to me it went toward the amount I owe them plus the fees they added
if you have any questions you can call this evening as I'm doing a ritual
most of today and I won't be able to talk
thanks mike
Mike,
I do not wish to cheat you but I also concerned about the case. I want a
reuniting and disruprion on all other people that interfere...for Hani to move
back in and make a commitment to me leading to marriage...honestly where is the
case ???
I need to make monthly payments to you.
You got $300 last week.
So $1800.
What is owed?
Mary
====================================================
----- Original Message -----
From: Celeste Schaub
To: Mike
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:41 PM
Subject: hello
HI Mike,
Just want to take a few minutes to go over what we talked about the
other day, in reference to M P, your past client. I remember when you were
working with her, and on the phone day and night for hours trying to calm her
down, as I witnessed this more than once when I was down at your place doing
spells together and even blooded on her spell while you were doing it along with
my clients spells.
In November of 2007 she emailed me when she was involved with you
still, and had Pay Pal take back the money she had sent you for these same
spells (prayers) work I already described above. I am not sure of the amount but
believe it was around $1, 800.00 for several different spells. Because the two
of you were involved in the charge back she was doing with Pay Pal, she was
asking me to do spell work for her. I declined doing anything for her for
various reasons; one being she was already your client and I don't work with
clients who are already engaged with another spell caster; two she wanted me to
do spell work against Jim and Janhett (curses), as well as to get her boyfriend
back. I got one more email from her the next day saying she really needed this
work done, almost begging me to take her on as a new client. I again wrote her
back, she wanted me to call her, and stated the same to her again and forwarded
you the emails she sent me, along with my responses. The next thing I knew she
was sending me emails she was sending to Jim and Janhett, that had been cc'd to
you and me, implying you and I were involved in some sort of conspiracy "to get
Jim and Janhett". This never was as you know and I had to finally block her
emails, but I was informed from a client of mine at the time that she was
suppose to have told Jim that she flew down to meet you and I...how
preposterous, I never even talked to this woman, or saw her before in my life,
too much drama for me. I told her Jim and I were having enough problems trying
to work out our divorce with everyone else interfering and I wasn't getting
involved in any of this bs. But yes she definitely did contract you for spell
work, and I was there for at least two of the spells myself. I told her, her
problems with Jim and Janhett were hers to work out and not to involve me. I
told her you were in my opinion, which I still feel today, the best person to
work with her for spell work as you were always completely dedicated to your
clients and do things as Divinity dictates. You always answer the telephone and
emails no matter when they come in. Your honesty and integrity is of the highest
qualifications I know. Hope this further clarifies our discussion the other
night. Take care,
Your friend and fellow magician,
Celeste
Mary Prantil Scamming Yet Another Magick Site She Claims Not To Know.
Set the record straight, huh ?. Well I will set the record straight for you
in this post ok ?. Ok Viewers, lets look at what Mary T. Prantil attempted to do
to us on top of what she's done to these other sites in question. Please see the
articles below outlining Prantil's negative scam plot that went horrible wrong
with Miss Windglows Pay Pal account, You will further see the pattern unfolding
in the Prantil scam routine.
Here's where Mary Ripped Off Another Spell Caster By Charging Back On Them
After The Worked Was Performed. More Fraud On Mary's Part. Who's The Real Fraud
Here I ask you?. MARY PRANTIL WOULD BE THE ANSWER. SHE SAYS THAT SHE PAYS FOR
HER WORK BUT APPARENTLY DOESN'T ACCORDING TO THIS SPELL CASTER BELOW. MAKES YOU
WONDER ABOUT THE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT MARY PROFESSES AS TRUTH HUH ?.
Matilda the Psychic writes to Jan : "I've forwarded you two e-mails in
regard to Mary Prantil. Yes, I did read for her, also she spent over 3 1/2 hours
on the phone to me. During said time she cried, cursed and begged me to do a
spell for her. I said that I don't usually do spells for people that I do not
know.Also I told her that usually people charge 1, 000.00 for the type of spell
that she wanted, as that is High Magic, not something simple.
Also the first card I got for her situation was the Heirophant, follwed by
the four of wands. I asked Mary if H _ _ _ _ was married, she said "No, not my
H".
Well she begged me ( begged Matilda the psychic NOT Jan ) so many times,
interrupted my other business, called at all hours. she cried so much to me. I
finally gave in and said I'd do the spell. Then she bargined with me to do it
for 800.00. Later she said that she had soooo many bills and could I do it for
$500.00.
I did it .It worked immediately, as her e-mail proves. Then she found out
that H---- is a drug addict and that he is married and has several other
girlfriends. I told her it was a moral choice, she admitted that in the past she
"was no angel" with Jan's service when I ask her what happened. She charged me
back on her credit card with Paypal and tryed to claim that the "merchandise"
was not the quality that she expected. Spell work is NOT merchandise because it
is SPIRITUAL in nature and therefore not tangible.
I said I would reverse the spell if she didn't pay me, I told her that she
should get professional therapy and I even arranged free drug counseling for her
boy friend; all of which she refused. I sent her a photo of part of the spell
and a paper tailsman as proof that I performed the service." ( Direct email
quote from Psychic Matilda to Jan )
HERE'S WHERE MARY REPORTED JIM MORGAN TO PAY PAL FOR FRAUD. MY QUESTION
FOR MARY IS (HOW CAN YOU STEAL SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXISTS?). THESE INVOICES
WERE NEVER PAID BY MARY PRANTIL TO START WITH LOL. The invoice was initially
sent to Prantil ( numerous times because her credit card would not go through
for the charge ) and the invoice was never paid by Prantil. She sent a signed
personal check through regular first class mail for her spell services, then
once her castings were completed and she messed up her relationship with her now
ex, she then tried to go into Pay Pal and put money on the open invoice to which
Jan promptly cancelled the invoice before Prantil had a chance. Everything was
explained to Prantil and she clearly understood that there would be no refunds
because once a spell is cast it is a done deal.
Mary Prantil tried to mess up Jan's Pay Pal account by attempting to pay
her own invoice after her personal check that was written to Jan cleared so that
she could force Jan to give her a refund anyway despite what she had already
been told and had agreed to regarding payment, the casting, no refunds, etc.
until Jan found out what she was doing and informed pay pal as to Prantil's
fraudulent activities. Prantil was going to pay off on her own invoice.
Again, Jan caught on to what Prantil was getting ready to do which was to
rip Jan off, so Jan cancelled the invoice from Prantil. Prantil then became so
angry she reported Jim Morgan to Pay Pal and it was not even Mr. Morgan's Pay
Pal account. What Prantil did at the point that she realized that she could not
charge back on the open invoice that Prantil never paid but was getting ready to
put funds on so she COULD charge back and force a refund anyway, Prantil then in
anger wrote a complaint to Pay Pal and placed a claim of Fraud against Jim
Morgan on this account, again which was not even his.
Again, Jim Morgan doesn't even own the company nor does he have anything to
do with the administrative functions of this company such as receiving monies
for anything especially spell work. Of course Pay Pal laughed at this little
Prantil Con Game and Denied Prantil's fraudulent claims against us. Mary also
was confused in the way that she was trying to report Jim Morgan to pay pal for
running and or owning a company to which he has no connections to other then
helping out with the counseling part of the operation to which he doesn't get
paid for.
See how miss-informed Mary Is. Basically what Mary was trying to do was get
her work performed for free by paying Jan with checks and then attempting to get
her money back for these cashed checks through pay pal. Notice where this email
originated from below and who it was sent to under the original message heading.
To those of you that know how to check IP Addresses this should clear up any
doubts that this is her actual communication to pay pal. So Much for Mary
Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax Evasion on our part.
PayPay,
I wish to report James Morgan for internet Fraud. There is a $1200 invoice
currently on my PayPal account form this site Love lust and Blood spells.
I will forward emails to Payapal saying he is going to refund me. I will
also call directly to file my complaint to prevent others form getting conned by
him.
Thanks,
Mary Prantil
HERE'S WHERE MARY TRIED TO RIP JAN OFF BUT FAILED. MARY IS A RIP OFF
SCAM WHO LIKES TO COMMIT FRAUD. MARY LIKES TO ACCUSE OTHERS OF THIS TO THROW
SUSPICION FROM HERSELF. So Much for Mary Prantil's claims of fraud & Tax
Evasion on our part. Mary Prantil in her ignorance thought that just because Jan
had sent her an invoice that she had NOT paid, that she still had money on THAT
open invoice, LOL. ( isn't that like thinking you still have money in the bank
as long as you still have checks, LOL????) ** NOTE** if ANYONE would like to see
the original invoice record that was cancelled by Jan, then write and we will
forward it to you to show that we are telling the entire truth about Mary's
little Pay Pal temper tantrum.
Forwarded Message:
Subj: STOP BOTHERING US
Date: 6/19/2007 8:36:31
P.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: Prant99
Mary,
your pay pal invoices were never processed-- And this is my business- James
is retired. How dare you say anything about him in a derrogatory manner after he
went out of his way to help you. It is only because of the grace of Divinity and
casting your spell that you have been getting along with H____ as well as you
have been especially after you messed up your case and sent him nasty e-mails,
etc.
We just sent you an e-mail and I strongly suggest you back off. I am
getting ready to forward all of your e-mails to the FBI as I write this. You
have, for one thing ( just one of many) already violated Federal Internet
Law.
In addition, I will report you to our cell phone company immediately for
harassing phone calls and telephone stalking.
In closing here are copies of the Pay Pal invoices you NEVER paid. You sent
cash, and two personal checks. Here is a copy of your e-mail stating that:
6/14/2007 2:12:54 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time
From: Prant99
Reply To:
To: Passionspells, Wizardmorgan2
I sent you 1. cash, and a 2. Citibank check and a 3. Bank of America
check.
Dear Mary,
This is Jan writing, dear. Could you please verify your method of
payment with me when you initially came in for your spell work?
I am going through all of my client records doing verification, etc. for my
records.
Thank you dear, I really appreciate it.
Sincerely,
Jan
Here is a copy and paste of the pay pal invoices that you never paid. I
will write pay pal and forward them all of your abusive e-mails so that they
will be aware of the nonsense you have caused us. You have no credence in that
matter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount:
$1, 250.54 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May 6, 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Spells Invoice
Invoice
Janhett T. Windglows
passionspells@aol.com
Qty Item ID
Description Unit Price Amount
1 050607 30 Day Spells Package For Mary 1,
200.00 1, 200.00 T
Subtotal: 1, 200.00
Shipping: 46.80 T
T =
0.299%tax applied to item Tax: 3.74
Currency is in U.S. Dollars (USD) Total:
$1, 250.54 USD
Request Sent
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount:
$500.00 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May
8, 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Revised Invoice
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
Here is the first 500 will send the next one right after this one
thanks dear
Request Sent
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount:
$500.00 USD
Status:
Pending
Date Requested:
May
8, 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
2nd one
In closing, I will now forward your e- mails to the F.B.I. for harassment,
abuse, and stalking. Also your spell work is now being reversed. You should have
listened to us and things would not have turned out this way for you. Perhaps
you will learn a lesson from all of this, however if you do not, that is no
longer our problem.
-----------------------Jan
HERE'S ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW MARY CONDUCTED HERSELF THROUGHOUT HER ENTIRE
SPELL PROCESS LOL. AND SHE WONDERS WHY NO ONE LIKES HER AND OR LAUGHS AT HER
LOL.
Subj: Jim - Sex spell on Hani - Disruption Spell on Tony
Date: 7/3/2007
1:37:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To: Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells
Jim, (and Jan)
H - - - actually said he is NOT sexually attracted to me last night...H- -
- - is prob mad at me too bcs I made out and kissed 2 of his friends this is one
of the reason I think he is upset and fri I was a raging drunk lunatic...Fri - I
was upset about the email and I started drinking around 7pm and saw H - - - - by
11pm totally wasted...then his Egyptian friends are making fun of me or so H - -
- - says...it may not be true the gossip but H - - - is acting discusted with
me...saying all will be OK if I just accept that...he confessed about T - - - -
and the email.
T - - - - is the negative influence...For the last 2-3 weeks H- - - - has
been around T - - - again now look...Please talk with Jan about these 2
spells.
Let me know.
Mary
HERE IS WHERE JAN REPORTED MARY FOR EMAIL ABUSE TO THE AOL AND YAHOO WEB
MASTERS AND HAD HER BLOCKED AS A RESULT OF THEIR FINDINGS. MORE FRAUD AND
HARASSMENT TO US CARRIED OUT BY MARY PRANTIL.
Subj: ABUSE
Date: 8/21/2007 4:13:33 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Passionspells
To: tosreports@aol.com
I wish to report an abusive e-mail sender. I have numerous copies of her
e-mails. We have blocked her from our e-mail addresses, however she continues to
send us more mail under different e-mail addresses.
Her name is Mary Prantil, and she has sent to us via the following e-mail
addresses:
I have all of her contact information, home address and telephone number. I
really do need this abuse from her to stop.
in which she has also been blocked from.
Sincerely,
Jan Windglows
THIS IS MARY BEGGING JAN TO TAKE HER CASE BACK AFTER SHE TOTALLY MESSED
THINGS UP WITH HER GUY. AT THIS POINT WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO ANYTHING FOR MARY AND
FURTHER REJECTED ANYMORE FUNDS FROM HER. WE HAD OFFERED TO REFUND HER $1, 200.00
AND MOREOVER TO EAT THE COST OF HER SPELL WORK JUST TO GET RID OF HER HOWEVER
SHE DECLINED THE REFUND AS YOU CAN SEE IN HER STATEMENT BELOW.
Subj: Sorry I want U on my case...$250 more 2 send T. F last phase...
Date: 6/15/2007 3:56:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: Prant99
To:
Wizardmorgan2
CC: Passionspells
Jim, I am sorry for any character defect in me that has got again
"reared it's ugly head". I respect you and Jan and I truly want your help. Yes.
I am needy, Yes I need to let go and let Divinity. Please do not give up on
me..no time is lost if we just get thru this 24 hr bump of mine. Help me please
!!
I believe in you and your expertise and your morals as a caster are so pure
and high.
I do not want you to send me back any money.
I want to send you the $250 discussed to complete the disruption spell with
T. F. I also want you to please make H. so uncomfortable without me, , , that he
can't stop thinking about me and what a great friend I am and lover. To be so
sexually frusterated without me...who ever he fucks or has a one night stand or
bi-sexual 3-way with H. will think of me..how lucky he was to have my
love...that he f- - - - - - it up between us not me...that he can't rest until
he gets me back - even if it means leaving T.F and the office.
Are you still willing to help me?
I truly want your help - I am done today at 1pm I will call you then I can
send the $250 today.
Mary
the needy brat...but lovable and willing to let go...
THIS IS WHERE I CONFERRED WITH JAN AND WE BOTH DECIDED AT THE TIME TO
FULLY TERMINATE MARY'S CASE AFTER GIVING HER SEVERAL CHANCES TO STRAIGHTEN UP
AND FOLLOW THE RULES. THIS IS THE LETTER WE SENT HER AFTER GOING THROUGH TWO
MONTHS OF HELL WITH Miss Chaos .
Mary,
OUR RESPONSE BACK TO MARY PRANTIL
Due to you ongoing harassing to Kim, Matilda and myself, I have decided
counseling with Matilda is not in anyone's best interest. I have instructed
Matilda not to have any further communications with you. After I send this
e-mail, I will also instruct Kim not to have any further contact with you
either.
Your spell work with James and myself has been finished, and Kim is
finishing your spell work that you hired her for. I paid for your counseling
with Kim. Since I paid for your counseling, which I did not have to do, for some
reason you think that Kim's spell work included your counseling, which it did
NOT. I PAID FOR YOUR COUNSELING. The 400 that you paid Kim was FOR SPELL
WORK-----NOT FOR COUNSELING. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS??????
I am officially ending all contact with you right after I send this e-mail.
I do not want you for a client from this point on. You have exhausted all of
your resources of obtaining any further help with any of us, because of your
RUDE DEMANDING rebellious controlling attitude, and constantly continuing to
break the rules of the spell criteria.
HOW DARE YOU SAY ANYTHING TO ME ABOUT MY HONESTY AND INTEGRITY.
JUST SO YOU KNOW AND UNDERSTAND YOUR SPELL WORK HAS BEEN DONE SO WE DID
YOUR WORK THAT YOU PAID US FOR. We did even more than that----numerous boosters,
and re casts also.
WE DO NOT WANT YOU FOR A CLIENT EVER AGAIN.
CONCERNING ANY FURTHER POSSIBLE COUNSELING, I DO NOT HAVE ONE SINGLE
COUNSELOR THAT IS WILLING TO WORK WITH YOU. YOU ARE OBNOXIOUS, DEMANDING, AND
RUDE-----THIS IS WHY ALL OF THIS HAS COME TO THIS POINT.
GOOD BYE MARY. YOU ARE BY FAR THE WORST CLIENT I HAVE EVER HAD IN ALL MY
YEARS OF SPELL CASTING.
MARY T. PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL RECORDS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Criminal Check for all Mary T Prantil in the state of CA
Record 1 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary T Prantil
CA
SOURCE: CA
OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: M598531 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE:
03/23/1990 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 2 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa Prantil
CA
SOURCE:
CA
OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T105836 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE:
11/13/1992 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 3 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa Prantil
CA
SOURCE:
CA
OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T108343 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE:
01/04/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 4 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa Prantil
CA
SOURCE:
CA
OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T110326 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE:
02/02/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 5 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa Prantil
CA
SOURCE:
CA
OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: T120948 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE:
08/09/1993 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
Record 6 of 6
IDENTIFICATION
Mary Theresa Prantil
CA
SOURCE:
CA
OFFENSE DETAILS
CASE NUMBER: M695524 - Confirm Case at the Courthouse
COUNTY CHARGED: San Diego DISTRICT: SAN DIEGO MUNICIPAL
OFFENSE DATE:
02/01/1995 OFFENSE COUNTY: San Diego
MATTER DISBARRMENT FRANK G. PRANTIL
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. D-787
110 S. Ct. 493, 493 U.S. 972, 107 L. Ed. 2d 497, 58 U.S.L.W. 3351,
1989.SCT.45677 (((Redacted)))
November 27, 1989
IN THE MATTER OF DISBARRMENT OF FRANK G. PRANTIL
For earlier order herein, see Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Marshall,
Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy
It having been reported to the Court that Frank G. Prantil, of Fair Oaks,
California, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of
California and this Court by order of May 15, 1989, having suspended the said
Frank G. Prantil from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued;
It is ordered that the said Frank G. Prantil be disbarred from the practice
of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
Disposition
Disbarrment entered.
19891127
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.
(((Redacted)))
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered by VersusLaw, Inc.
Home | Advertise | About | Feedback | Terms |
Privacy Policy | FAQ
All contents © Copyright 2008 - 2009 VersusLaw, Inc.
Bellevue, WA, USA. All rights reserved
****************************************************************************************************
On
trial before the bar court in San Francisco, FRANK PRANTIL [#35155], 67, of
Sacramento is charged with multiple counts of failing to perform legal services
competently. Prantil was disbarred in 1989, reinstated in 1994 and charged with
misconduct in 2002. The trial on the new charges was ongoing at press time and
although the bar had not formally asked for his disbarment, it is a possible
penalty.
The 1989 disbarment was the result of convictions for forgery and being an
accessory to possess cocaine.
**********************************************************************************************************
In a case two miles across town at the State Bar offices on Howard Street
-- and at the other end of the world of privilege -- 67-year-old defense
attorney Frank Prantil is facing a task he's already performed numerous times --
defending himself against accusations that he's acted unethically as an
attorney. In 1979, Prantil was suspended from practicing law after he was
accused of improperly representing a client. While on probation, Prantil was
alleged to have participated in a check-fraud scheme. He was convicted of
forgery and disbarred, according to the California Supreme Court opinion
confirming Prantil's disbarment.
Prantil later took advantage of California rules that allow disbarred
attorneys to ask for reinstatement after five years. Prantil successfully argued
that he had rehabilitated himself, and resumed practice in 1994.
Prantil is now facing State Bar disciplinary charges, which could
potentially get him disbarred again, alleging that he failed to competently
defend a client, then improperly charged the client for his services.
Prantil's case, along with three cases decided earlier this year in which
California attorneys were disbarred for a second time, has added steam to a
nine-year-old bureaucratic proposal to give judges the option of disbarring the
worst attorneys for life.
In California, there now exists no legal concept of permanent disbarment. A
State Bar committee on Nov. 15 will consider the possibility of changing that,
if only slightly. Rather than making all disbarments permanent, it would extend
from five to seven years the amount of time disbarred attorneys would have to
wait before requesting to be reinstated, and would give judges the option of
forever banishing the worst of California's worst attorneys.
The fact that it's taken nine years for such a mild proposal to reach this
preliminary step hints at a lack of seriousness the California legal
establishment lobby applies to abuses by its own members.
***********************************************************************************************************
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank G. PRANTIL,
Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit
June 25, 1985
764 F.2d 548
Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., argued, Peter K. Nunez, U.S.
Atty., Charles F. Gorder, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on the brief, San Diego, Cal.,
for plaintiff-appellee.
Eugene G. Iredale, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
AMENDED OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of
California.
Before FERGUSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, * District
Judge.
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
1
The defendant, a criminal defense attorney, appeals his conviction on
eight out of eleven counts alleged in an indictment for the offenses of perjury,
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623; false statements, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001; and being accessory
after the fact, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. All of the defendant's convictions are
predicated on actions he took while representing a criminal defendant, Betty
Powell, in a separate criminal prosecution. After a seven-day trial the jury
found the defendant not guilty on two counts of harboring a fugitive and
perjury. The district court had previously dismissed the misprision of a felony
count before the trial began. On appeal, the defendant raises a host of issues
which, for the most part, we need not address. Three of the defendant's
challenges, however, require reversal of the defendant's convictions for the
reasons explained herein.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2
The defendant was retained by Ronald Powell to represent his wife,
Betty Lou Powell, and her son in a federal criminal prosecution on various
drug-related charges.1 Mr. Powell had been a previous client of the defendant in
unrelated criminal proceedings. After Mrs. Powell and her son were arrested at
the Powell residence on April 23, 1982 in connection with the narcotics charges,
Mr. Powell, who was also named in the felony arrest warrant, remained a fugitive
until his apprehension on August 10, 1982. On the day of his wife's arrest, Mr.
Powell telephoned the defendant, Frank Prantil, and retained his services for
the criminal proceedings against his immediate family. Throughout Mr. Powell's
fugitive status, the defendant periodically telephoned Mr. Powell and met him on
at least two occasions.
3
During their first meeting after the incarceration of Mrs. Powell,
Mr. Powell presented the defendant with a partial payment of the retainer
agreement and directed the defendant to the whereabouts of other sources of cash
in various bank accounts and at the Powell residence. Mrs. Powell, unable to
make a $750, 000 bond, remained incarcerated until the completion of her
criminal trial. She gave the defendant the power of attorney to collect the
funds from the various bank accounts. The defendant also retrieved a substantial
sum of money from a floor safe at the Powell residence that had been overlooked
at the time of the Powell family arrest. Although questions over the capacity in
which Mr. Prantil retained custody of these monies (as attorney fees or in
bailment for Mrs. Powell) occupied a substantial portion of the defendant's
trial, we need not parse the evidence on this subject here. Pursuant to the
retainer agreement negotiated by Mr. Powell, the defendant represented Mrs.
Powell for the duration of her criminal trial. The case was prosecuted by
Assistant United States Attorney Charles Gorder.
4
Mr. Prantil succeeded in obtaining an acquittal on all but four of
the fifteen criminal counts leveled against his client Mrs. Powell. During the
course of his representation of Mrs. Powell, the defendant also sent his
sister-in-law, Malvina Schmidt, to meet the fugitive Ronald Powell for reasons
not relevant here. Within the same time frame, the defendant, on several
occasions, acted as the conduit for negotiations between the fugitive Ronald
Powell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Gorder for Mr. Powell's surrender. During the
period when Mr. Powell was a fugitive, the defendant was summoned before a grand
jury and questioned by Mr. Gorder concerning his contacts and relationship with
Mr. Powell. Three of the defendant's five perjury convictions rest on responses
he made to Mr. Gorder's grand jury examination. The remaining two perjury
charges and the two false statement counts stem from the events surrounding the
defendant's efforts to obtain Mrs. Powell's release on bond pending the appeal
from her criminal conviction. For purposes of this appeal, however, we need only
discuss the evidence presented on one perjury count.
5
One of the defendant's perjury convictions rests on grand jury
testimony the defendant gave under questioning by Mr. Gorder regarding a trip to
Omaha, Nebraska. In his testimony the defendant stated that he was picked up by
a blonde woman at his hotel in Omaha, Nebraska who took him to meet Mr. Powell
and then transported the defendant to the airport. The defendant further
testified that he did not know the identity of this woman. At trial the
government contended that the defendant committed perjury when he denied knowing
the name of this woman.
6
Under the government's theory, the defendant falsely denied knowing
the identity of this blonde woman in order to protect the woman from the grand
jury's investigation. The government unsuccessfully sought to prove that the
blonde woman who met the defendant at his hotel was Malvina Schmidt, the
defendant's sister-in-law. The evidence at trial revealed that although the
defendant had been met and transported to a different airport by a blonde woman
on a different occasion, no one picked up the defendant at his Omaha hotel. The
evidence did demonstrate that the defendant eventually met his sister-in-law at
a restaurant in the Omaha area. Accordingly, on appeal the government has
shifted its perjury allegation by recasting the defendant's denial of knowledge
about the name of the blonde woman who met him at his hotel into a denial of
"knowing who was with [Mr.] Powell in the Omaha area." In response, the
defendant claims his conviction should be reversed because the identity of the
woman whom he incorrectly recalled to have met at his Omaha hotel is immaterial
to any matters then before the grand jury and thus not perjurious.
II. ISSUES ON APPEAL
7
The defendant has raised several challenges to his convictions on
appeal. We reach only three of his challenges. The defendant's first allegation
of error involves the refusal of the trial court to grant a pretrial motion to
have the prosecutor, Mr. Gorder, recused from the case so that the defendant
could call Mr. Gorder as a witness. The defendant also claims that the
prosecutor exceeded the bounds of proper argument during closing argument and
the defendant was thereby prejudiced. The final contention of error challenges
the materiality of the defendant's allegedly perjurious statements regarding the
blonde woman at the Omaha airport.
8
The defendant has also raised a claim of insufficiency of the
evidence as to counts seven and eight of the indictment which charged the
defendant with violations of the false statement statute, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001.
In essence, the government presented evidence that the defendant attempted to
secure the release of his client Betty Powell through the submission of an
appeal bond form that the defendant knew was not authorized by the named bond
company. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution we
find the evidence presented sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to
find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v.
Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
Nonetheless, for the reasons discussed in the balance of the opinion, we reverse
the defendant's convictions on these and the other counts of the
indictment.
A. The Propriety of a Prosecuting Witness
9
The prosecutor in this case, Assistant United States Attorney Charles
Gorder, was also the prosecutor in the previous trial of Betty Powell. Mr.
Gorder not only opposed the defendant in that trial but also conducted the
examination of the defendant in both the grand jury and bond proceedings that
are the subject of defendant's perjury convictions in this case. Mr. Gorder was
also involved in the discussions with the bond agency as to the adequacy of Mrs.
Powell's bond collateral which gave rise to the defendant's false statement
convictions. Finally, on several occasions Mr. Gorder negotiated directly with
the defendant for the surrender of Ronald Powell, the fugitive whom the
defendant was accused of harboring and giving aid. Thus, although he never took
the stand, Mr. Gorder was a witness to, and indeed a participant in, some aspect
of all of the events alleged in the indictment.
10
The defendant was charged and convicted of being an accessory after
the fact to Mr. Powell's criminal offenses in that the defendant did "receive,
relieve, comfort and assist Ronald Lee Powell in order to hinder and prevent his
apprehension, trial and punishment, " in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3. During
trial the principal defense asserted by the defendant to this count, and the
harboring a fugitive charge, revolved around the defendant's efforts to
successfully negotiate Mr. Powell's surrender with Mr. Gorder. Rather than
harboring or assisting Mr. Powell, the defendant contended he was actively
conducting the ongoing negotiations for Mr. Powell's timely surrender through
direct communications with both Mr. Gorder and Mr. Powell. Obviously, this
defense hinges substantially on the availability of evidence detailing the
defendant's role in these surrender negotiations.
11
Both before and during the trial defense counsel unsuccessfully
moved the court to recuse the prosecutor to enable the defense to call him as a
witness. After final argument the defendant moved for a mistrial because the
prosecutor's remarks "reaffirm[ed] Mr. Gorder's role as a witness in the case
without cross-examination, because they appeared to be, in the way that they
were framed, assertions of personal knowledge based on his dealings with Mr.
Prantil." At every juncture, the prosecutor refused either to recuse himself or
to testify. The trial court declined to disturb the prosecutor's decision and
denied, without comment, all of the defendant's motions on this matter.
12
The prosecutor defended his decision, and the trial court concurred,
on the grounds that his testimony was unnecessary and cumulative to the
defendant's case. We recognize that a defendant has an obligation to exhaust
other available sources of evidence before a court should sustain a defendant's
efforts to call a participating prosecutor as a witness. United States v. West,
680 F.2d 652, 654 (9th Cir.1982). Nonetheless, the defendant's obligation to
resort to alternative means of adducing factual testimony is not absolute. Both
the quality and quantity of the alternate sources of evidence are proper
subjects for comparison with that sought directly from the participating
prosecutor. For example, in this case the prosecutor contends that his testimony
on the defendant's efforts to arrange for the surrender of the fugitive Ron
Powell was unnecessary and cumulative.
Why file a report here? Ripoff Report is a permanent record! Other complaint sites copy our content then remove reports for money.