The caption of the case was removed. The document was produced to force the other party to consent to the release of every kind of writing MySpace and Facebook have. If 'consent' was not provided, Tracy threatened to go to court for an order, and demand her attorney fees.
Even under that theory, Cynthia Tracy still made unethical remarks by alleging she will go to court to get an order. As seen below, federal law prohibits release of protected content. Although the below relates to email, the bottom line is it all relates to protected 'content'. With this in mind the Law Office of Cynthia Tracy in Houston simply extorts people with the threat of paying her legal fees under the pretense she can get an order which she can't.
http://legal.web.aol.com/aol/aolpol/civilsubpoena.htmlA subpoena or court order issued to AOL will not suffice to release e-mail content. See, In re Subpoena Duces Tecum to AOL ,LLC , 550 F. Supp. 2d 606 (E.D.Va. 2008) (A civil discovery subpoena is not an exception to the provisions of the Privacy Act that would allow an internet service provider to disclose an account holder's e-mail. The exception for production pursuant to court order does not apply to civil discovery matters.); Flagg v. City of Detroit , 2008 WL 3895470 (E.D. Mich. 2008) (“[The Stored Communications Act] lacks any language that explicitly authorizes a service provider to divulge the contents of a communication pursuant to subpoena or court order.”); Barnes v. CUS Nashville, LLC , 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 52263 (M.D. Tenn. 2010).