SUBMITTED: Tuesday, March 27, 2007
POSTED: Wednesday, March 28, 2007
My name is Dan. I don't know if my name will sound familiar or not, but I remember speaking with someone from Arvada Colorado and your address looks very familiar. If my suspicions are correct, I was the sales representative who first spoke with you and gave you the details on the warranty you purchased. How ironic that I should have found this. Or maybe not. I worked for the sales vendor you refer to for close to two years and sold a lot of service contracts for them. The company is called National Auto Warranty Services or NAWS abbreviated and is based out of Wentzville, Missouri which is near Saint Louis. I just responded to another gentleman before you who also filed a complaint against NAWS on this website. It is only fitting and fair that I respond to yours as well, especially since I may be the one who sold the service contract to you in the first place.
Let me start by saying that I no longer work for NAWS and do not have any obligation to protect them or bend the truth in their defense. Let me also state that any opinions or views I may express about NAWS are mine and mine only. That being said it is probable that I will say something in this rebuttal that they may not agree with though I will endeavor to tell only the truth as I know it without revealing trade secrets or copyrighted material. I write this only to cover my own behind as NAWS is currently sueing me for breech of a Non-Compete clause and I'm not entirely sure if what I'm about to say will violate that or not. It is not my intention to do so and since I was never given a copy of the non-compete clause I don't see how I could be expected to know if I will or won't.
To my knowledge and belief NAWS is a direct marketing and call center company. They do not in and of themselve provide the warranty coverages they sell, but rather they sell the warranties and in return earn a commission from the warranty company on what is sold. That comission is then shared with the salesman who sold it. The rest is used to pay the bills, cover backouts and cancellations and to pay the rest of the employees. What's then left is pure profit. And let me tell you, there is a LOT of profit. As salesmen we used to love selling Warranty America to customers because the profit marigin was so high. I would sometimes favor it over more comprehensive, more expensive warranties simply because by doing so I would earn a higher commission. I do not believe I was alone among the salesmen in this practice. This is not to say that Warranty America is not a good company. Their service contract provides a very good coverage at a very affordable price. Even you yourself said that some things were covered, (the AC and the wiper motor I think you wrote) even though some weren't. If I am not mistaken, those two problems alone could easily total over $1500 once labor and parts are factored in, and all you had to pay was your $100 deductible. Saving you an estimated $1400.00. Even if I am way off on those prices you still saved alot of money on the repairs. And another thing in defense of Warranty America and all warranties in general. Whether the most comprehensive or the least, they all state in writing that repairs will not be covered until the part actually breaks. Just because it starts rough or shifts hard or makes a queer little noise every now and again is not evidence of mechanical breakdown or total part failure which is required by the warranty company. Is it proof of optimal vehicle performance? Probably not, but if an adjuster comes out and the mechanic cannot hold up a broken part and say "This here part is broken." then a repair cannot be authorized. Those are the rules and they are stated in the paperwork you recieve after you purchase the warranty. It is your job as a consumer to read that thoroughly once you get it and to complain then if you have a problem with it, not wait until after the car breaks and a claim is denied.
As to your claim that the salesman (in this case, probably me) misinformed you, I do not believe that for a moment. First off I would like you to ammend in your complaint the facts about who called who first in your scenario. I worked for NAWS. We did NOT cold call customers to sell them warranties. The only way you could have been contacted by us was with a letter from my former company which is formatted and marketed in such a way as to get you to call into us so we can begin the process of selling you a warranty. You HAD to have called us first. It's the only way we contacted customers. The fact that you misrepresented that leads me to belive that you are sugar coating other aspects of your story as well.
On the surface, every sales representative at NAWS is a trained warranty specialist, but the truth is that the only thing we are, or were, trained to do is to sell. We are trained from the first moment we walk through that door to control the conversation when you call and to get you to give us a credit card number with as little information given back to you as possible. Does that mean we lie? No it does not. It means we are salesmen. If you ask us direct questions we give you the truth, even when we find it unpleasant or feel that it weakens our chance for a sale. That is called ethics and commitment to honesty and that is something that every sales representative I knew at NAWS had. When you called us it was not our job to make sure you knew everything there was to know about warranties. Most sales representatives at NAWS don't even know everything there is to know about warranties so how could that be our job? It was our job to make sure you knew enough about them to know you needed one. Not telling you something you did not know and did not ask about is not misrepresentation and it is not lying either.
What I will grant you is that salesmen can be adept at telling you things in such a way as to make it easier for you to hear whatever you want to hear. And we hit the high points without dwelling on the low points. We stress what the warranty will do (and in your case what it did do) which is save you money when the car breaks down. We don't sit there and tell you about the things it won't cover. What kind of salesman in his right mind would do that?
"Hello sir, let me tell you about what our fine product doesn't do."
That's never gonna happen as long as there are salesmen with something to sell. Realtors don't sell you a house by talking about the old wiring, Car salesmen don't sell you a car by talking about how much value it's gonna lose as soon as you drive off the lot, Cigarette companies don't sell you cigarettes with pictures of cancerous lungs on the pack, and the fry clerk at McDonald's doesn't sell you a Big Mac by telling you how much fat and cholesterol it has. That's just the way the world works. It's the way it has always worked.
I remember my pitch from when I worked at NAWS and I would have never told you that "everything" was covered except for oil changes and routine maintenance unless it was. What I said probably was. "This warranty will cover all your major mechanical and electrical components. If anything mechanical on the vehicle breaks it will be covered and all you'll have to pay is your deductible. Obviously it won't cover oil changes or your routine maintenance but you're covered as far as the most common problems a vehicle can experience." Or something to that effect. And if you don't believe me and still think that I lied to you you'll be happy to know that NAWS records every conversation between it's sales reps and it's clients. It can be played back at any time to verify what was said.
If you truly believe you were lied to then file a case in court and get that tape subpoenaed, But if you're not confident enough to do that then you should be willing to admit that you yourself did not ask enough questions. And maybe you should be willing to admit that other people cannot be held accountable for beliefs you have which may not be true. We're born, we live and we die. And no matter what anyone tells you we have to do that alone ultimately. So take responsibility for yourself. I read your complaint and I see a man who bought a good product which did exactly what he'd been promised it would do, but who got upset and annoyed once he realized that he'd mistakenly thought he'd been promised more than that. And who felt ahsamed once he realized he did not ask enough questions before buying something. I understand shame. It burns with foul unpleasantness and it is easier to transfer that shame into anger at someone else than to bear it against ourselves.
But in the end I wish you all the best, Joe. With the greatest sincerity I wish it. And I am truly sorry that a product I may have sold to you did not satisfy you and that it did not cover your particular problem. I have heard from customers who are happy and it brought me feelings of self-worth but it is the ones who are unhapy that affect me the most. It is impossible not to feel a moral twinge at the thought that maybe I did a job of selling too well and sold you something you didn't really want after all.