Responses for Susan...I am not putting words into anyone else's mouth..these are my opinions based on your replies...
"Really, does the bank follow you around with a gun and force you to
use your debit card?"
Of course not. But is anyone forcing the bank to automatically enroll every single customer into courtesy overdraft protection? Or to re-sequence the order and times of our transactions (which coincidentally Chase will no longer be doing in the near future).
You are missing the point of this report. It is a complaint against the outrageous fees the bank is charging. Sure, if you never use your debit card you would never overdraft...and if you never drove a car you would never get a ticket either. This customer has a right to use a debit card and have a checking account. And they also have a right to know their rights..one of them being they did not need to be enrolled in overdraft protection.
Now speaking of which..near the end of the report the poster states..."They told me I could get overdraft protection, I'll pass- and after
reading other people's stories in regards to that, I know it doesn't
really do you any good to have it."
That statement is correct when dealing with a debit card that is used for everyday small purchases such as was done on this road trip. But it seems by this report that apparently the poster did have overdraft protection. So there appears to be additional confusion.
The purpose of so called "courtesy" overdraft protection..as well as the way the banks re-sequence and re-orders the times of our transactions, were intended to protect large CHECK transactions..such as a mortgage payment. But since this is dealing with many small transactions..the re-sequencing and OD protection do nothing but line the banks pockets with these outrageous, insane, unconscionable fees..since ALL the transactions are being covered regardless..Not just the large ones. And this is why I place some blame on the bank when this happens. The bank is not so innocent here..they are clearly and blatantly taking advantage of a mistake and/or misunderstanding here, as is quite often the case.
" FYI there is no such thing as getting a monthly
charge for not using your debit card."
I never heard of that either..but perhaps there is a bank that does?..if so maybe we can find more info if someone will post it.
"You also claim stores double
bill you, waitress bill double on tips and the pizza delivery guy
charged you $22 instead of $20. Really? it is everyone elses fault
that you spend more than you have? "
I think it is obvious these are simply examples of how overdrafts can occur regardless of how well one keeps track of the account. It has happened to me as well on a few occasions. Now, since I am opted out of overdraft protection..these types of circumstances will no longer cause any fees..as if anyone else tries to spend more then I have, or I make an error and inadvertently attempt to use the card when the funds are depleted, the transaction is declined and my account is safe..from a mistake, or fraudulent activity AND most importantly... from the bank.
"I never have cash in my pocket so I use my debit card for every
purchase. Yesterday I went to the store for milk. It was on sale for
$1.99 a gallon and I used my debit card to pay for it. The difference
is, we had money in the account to cover that debit."Congratulations..you are now officially better then the rest of us in your own mind. But you do not know what the future holds. One day you may find out unless you think you are impervious to ever making a mistake or being subjected to a merchant error or unauthorized hold. Or perhaps you have so much money in your checking account you do not have to worry?
It is a fact that this customer was careless with the account..that is a given and the customer does not deny it. But at the same time...it is outrageous that the bank let the card usage go on and on after the account was drained..I mean why not notify the customer in case it was stolen or a mistake?..or even better...like the good ol' days simply decline the card if the funds are not available. Perhaps the bank thought this customer honestly intended to pay hundreds of dollars for a coffee and gas station sandwich? Or perhaps the bank believed it was extending a "courtesy" by assuming a hamburger purchase was a mortgage payment?
Now before I subjected to any vicious and personal attacks for simply seeing the side of this customer..and exposing the banks part in this..note that I am not advocating irresponsibility. However 50 million customers have been effected by these heinous fees, according to the FDIC report the banks will take in around 40 Billion dollars in these types of fees for 2009 alone. So this is not an isolated incidence..and not the result of any intent of stealing from the bank..or any illegal activity. It is in my honest opinion the result of a mistake..and the bank taking advantage of the very American citizens who bailed them out with taxpayer dollars during an economic crisis.
Now I hope no one has the gall to debate that, but I won't be too surprised if someone does.