Consumer stated in report...
"I HAVE A CHECKING ACCOUNT AT TD BANK. I RECEIVED 3
CONSECUTIVE CHARGES FOR OVERDRAWING MY ACCOUNT. WHEN I SAW MY ACCOUNT,
I DID NOT HAVE A NEGATIVE BALANCE. THE CUSTOMER SERVICE AGENT THAT I
SPOKE WITH SAID THAT SHE COULD NOT HELP ME BECAUSE I WAS NOT AT MY
REGULAR BRANCH. I CALLED MY ORIGINAL BRANCH AND THEY WOULD NOT PUT ME
THROUGH TO THE BANK MANAGER. I WAS DIVERTED TO CSR AND TOLD THAT
BECAUSE I QUALIFY TO USE MY ACCOUNT INTO THE NEGATIVE, I HAVE TO ENCUR
THESE CHARGES. I SAID THAT I WAS NEVER ADVISED ABOUT THIS POLICY AND
THEY SAID THAT DID NOT MATTER."
Edgeman replied...
"Are you saying that the
terms and condition for your account at this bank do not indicate that
you will be charged an overdraft fee if you overdraft your checking" account?
My reply...Perhaps I should not have to speak for this customer...but what I think he is saying is that he could not see that his account had a negative balance..nor that he was aware he was enrolled in courtesy overdraft protection..which is the reason the account was allowed to be continually used when the balance was below zero.
Consumer stated in report..."WHEN
I LOOKED AT MY ACCOUNT, IT WAS NOT NEGATIVE. TD BANK DID NOT UPDATE MY
ACCOUNT FOR A COUPLE OF DAYS AND THEN UPDATED IT WITH THE CHARGES TO GO
INTO THE NEGATIVE."
Edgeman replied...
This strongly suggests that you are using online banking, phone banking or checking balances at the ATM
machine. If that is the case, you should stop doing this. These systems
were never intended to be used as a substitute for keeping an actual
check register and they aren't accurate enough for that purpose.
My reply...I agree with this statement...I just wonder if the bank informed him of this as well when signing up for online services...what are the odds the bank told him not to rely on the statement?
Consumer stated in report..."I
JUST WANT THE $105.00 BECAUSE THIS IS MY GROCERY MONEY AND I WAS NOT
INFORMED OF THIS POLICY. WHY WOULD A BANK EVER ALLOW SOMEONE TO
OVERDRAW THEIR ACCOUNT?" Edgeman replied...Seriously?
Checking accounts
require work and they are not for everybody. The account holder is
ultimately responsible for the deposits, withdrawals and transactions
that they authorize. It appears that you want somebody to save you from
yourself and cut off your debit card if you spend too much. A prepaid debit card is probably a better product for you if you do not wish to manage your checking account.
My reply...Perhaps a checking account does require some "work"....but how much work would it take for the bank to simply decline a transaction if the funds are unavailable? As a matter of fact.. perhaps this consumer is unaware that his bank will allow him to opt out of courtesy overdraft protection. I can understand from the banks point of view (greed, coruption, manipulation, lack of ethics etc) why the bank would not inform this customer that there are actually choices on how best to "protect" his account and money...but perhaps a visit to the bank and the simple request to opt out of courtesy overdraft protection can help prevent this from happening again.
Sure, it is everyone's responsibility to monitor their account balance...but when the bank ENCOURAGES using online banking..and the bank ENCOURAGES use of the debit card for everyday purchases...perhaps it could be in the realm of possibility that the bank can ENCOURAGE all possible ways to help their customers avoid overdrafting and knock off some of the Tom Foolery and shenanigans.