• Report: #456103

Complaint Review: Suntrust Bank,

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Thursday, May 28, 2009
  • Last Posting: Wednesday, June 17, 2009
  • Reported By:Savannah Georgia
Suntrust Bank,
Johnson Square Branch Savannah Georgia 31401 U.S.A.

Suntrust Bank, Manipulating Payment of Transactions Savannah Georgia


1Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner

Respond to this Report

  • Respond to this report!
    What's this?
  • Also a victim?
    What's this?
  • Repair Your Reputation
    ...the right way!
    Corporate Advocacy Program
I have had a checking account at Suntrust for over 20 years. In March 2009, I noticed that they began manipulating the order of checks presented which caused an NSF on one item (which should have been covered because funds were sufficient to pay it). This caused a domino effect and multiple NSF Fees charged against my account. TWO DIFFERENT EMPLOYEES (one in Orlando and one in Savannah) admitted to me that Suntrust does have a policy of placing larger items first AS A SERVICE TO ITS CUSTOMERS because larger items are usually car payments, vehicles, etc. I closed my account due to these practices and found a local bank who advised they do not use this practice.

Cindy
Savannah, Georgia
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 5/28/2009 9:25:49 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/bbb-better-business-bureau/suntrust-bank/suntrust-bank-manipulating-pa-6pdb3.htm.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Suntrust Bank

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Comment

Manipulating transactions to create NSF charges

AUTHOR: Gail - Morriston (U.S.A.)

I live in Ocala Florida and have experienced the same treatment with Suntrust Bank. They claim that they pay the largest transaction first, even if the lessor transactions have already been processed and there is a final amount was available. they say they pay the largest amount because that they are usually mortgage or car payments, etc. I ask them why I don't have a choice. I told them that I thought it was illegal change what has already been processed and creating negative amounts in order to add NSF charges. They said it was policy, and that was that. I made a mistake and processed a check 1 day to early, after I had already processed my original transactions. At midnight the check was deposited to cover the last check, but by then, they had already manipulated the previous checks. I will be changing banks.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.