I count 4 repos from Chrysler in your report. By now I'd have thought you'd have this figured out.
"The 2008 sebring my daughter drives she was morally responsible for the payment. she was late 15 times past 30 days. I was late twice and they were paid the month my car was repossessed. "
As you were the principle on both of these cars, that adds up to a generally poor record of repayment in your name. Though your daughter was morally responsible, you were financially responsible for making sure the payments were made.
"Please Examine Chrysler Financial lending practices. These vehicles were in my name making me contractually responsible for more than $1500. 00 a month out of a $2167.00 a month pension. "
That's just a cop out. You're saying that you willingly agreed to lease these vehicles, but now it's Chryslers fault because they should have known you couldn't afford it? Chrysler is not your mother nor your accountant. It is not their job to figure out if you can afford something. Apparently, the payments were being made for a couple of years, so how did that happen?
In all, I doubt that you would have had a different experience with GMAC or any other lender. The problem is one of financial management, not predatory lending. Your post indicates a general lack of attention where your obligations are concerned. Lenders, especially these days, are not kind to those who appear to take these obligations lightly.