Well almost 3 years later Motor Works gets our name back!
in 2008 our product Cermax was taken from us one of our vendors, Now we have a court order giving us back what has always been our's . It cost a ton of money to prove we are the legal owner of Cermatechnology.com, Cermax brand, and we are the original product makers of all cerma branded products. Now you can purchase the real original Ceramic engine treatment without having to worry if it is the real stuff as reported in the data within any website.
Cermatechnology is back where it belongs, with the real owners. Selling the real patent pending formulation of Cermax, Cerma.
Cerma Technology, Inc. IN THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE
DIVISION
NO. C 08-03608 JW
JUDGMENT AND
PERMANENT INJUNCTION Motor W orks, LLC
Pl ai nti ff,
v.
Safer Technologies,
Inc., et al., Defendants.
This action was tried on the
facts without a jury, a jury having been waived by both parties.
The Court stated its findings of facts
and conclusi ons of law on the record
after the close of the
evidence, pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 52(a), and invited the parties to subm it
briefing with respect to any other m atters.
On June 8, 2010, the Court m ade
and filed its
Supplem ental
Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law.
Based upon its findings, judgm ent
is
entered as f ollows:
The Court declares that
Plaintiff Motor W orks, LLC a Nevada
corporation is the owner of
the CERMA fam ily of tradem arks, incl uding CERMA, CERMA LUBRICATION, CERMAX,
CERMA ENGINE LUBE, CERMA LUBE, CERMA
ADVANCED LUBRICATION
TECHNOLOGY, CERMA ORGANIC (hereinafter re ferred to as “the CERMA fam ily of
tradem arks”).
Defendants Safer
Technologies, Inc., Cerm a Technology, Inc., George Ackerson and
their
respective officers, agents, servants, em ployees, and attorneys and all those
persons in active concert
or participation with them :
Case5:08-cv-03608-JW Document109 Filed06/08/10 Page2 of 4
(1) A re
perm anently enjoined and restrained
from using any of the CERMA
fam ily of tradem arks or any confusingly sim ilar
tradem ark, trade nam e
com ponent or otherwise, to m arket, advertise or identify Defendants’
products
in
the United States;
(2) Shall cease use of any and all m aterials developed in connection with the
advertising,
prom otion and m arketing of Plaintiff’s products including but not
lim ited to custom er testim onials,
photographs, text, test and perform ance
data,
including
but not lim ited to: (a) the website “cerm atechnology.com ,” (b)
any
telephone
num ber including the pneum onic CERMA (or any variation
thereof ) in the United States;
(3) Shall cease m aking any representations concerning the content or quality of
the
products of Plaintiff and its licensees in the United States;
(4) W ithin
10 days of the date of this Judgm ent,
shall deliver to Plaintiff or declare under
oath
that they have destroyed all products, literature, advertising and other m aterial
bearing CERMA fam ily
of tradem arks or any confusingly sim ilar tradem arks the
infringing
designation;
(5) W ithin
10 days of the date of this Judgm ent,
shall deliver to Plaintiff and lodge a
copy
with the Court a notarized assignm ent
to Plaintiff of: (a) any and all state
or
federal
registrations or application for registration of the CERMA fam ily of
tradem arks issued to Defendants or pending from them ;
(b) docum ents necessary to
transfer
ownership and control or the website “cerm atechnology.com ” and any other
websites
delivered by Plaintiff or its representatives to any Defendant; (c) docum ents
necessary
to transfer ownership and control to Plaintiffs all telephone num bers with
the
pneum onic “CERMA” or any variation
thereof held or controlled by Defendants;
(6) W ithin
10 days of the date of this Judgm ent,
shall deliver to Plaintiff at Plaintiff’s
principal
place of business or such other location as Plaintiff shall designate all
2
Case5:08-cv-03608-JW Document109 Filed06/08/10 Page3 of 4
equipm ent, including but not lim ited to bottling m achines provided by Plaintif f to
Defendants;
(7) W ithin
10 days of this Judgm ent shall
provide to Plaintiff and lodge a copy with the
Court
an accounting of any and all profits of Defendants from sales of products using
the
CERMA fam ily of tradem arks.
Because no relief was
requested with respect to the corporate nam e,
nothing in this Order
shall be construed to require that
Defendants cease doing business under the corporate nam e “Cerm a
Technology, Inc.” Furtherm ore,
nothing in this Judgm ent shall be
construed to prevent Defendants
from purchasing
and selling products from BYK-Chem ie Gm bH
or any of its distributors in the
United States.
Defendants shall take
nothing by way of their counterclaim .
Based on the Court’s finding
that the following Defendants are not liable for the actions of
Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., and
Cerm a T echnology, Inc., judgm ent
is entered in favor of
Defendants Mary Stranahan, Nicholas
Streit, and Edward Halbach against Plaintiff Motor W orks,
LLC.
Plaintiff shall take nothing from these
nam ed Defendants. As between each of them and
Plaintiff, each party shall bear his or
her own costs, respectively.
Plaintiff has not sought
attorneys fees as a sanction pursuant to the Court’s March 10, 2010
Order.
Otherwise, each side shall bear their own attorney fees. Plaintiff shall recover its costs of
suit.
The Clerk shall close this f ile.
Dated: June 8, 2010
3
JAMES W A RE
United States
District Judge