This reviewer, Matthew (AKA "Victim23324695andcounting", "John D", "bobdole27", ...etc) from crestline, CA 92325, has taken full advantage of the internet to abuse various review / feedback websites, including this one to attack the company mentioned.
Here, I present the truth with supporting evidence to demonstrate how the company handled this case.
The following is the purchase record (screen capture) on Amazon.
This buyer's Amazon Order Details
The buyer purchased on 6/9/2010, we shipped the same day, but the item was returned by USPS on 6/20/2010 as shown below:
Picture of the Returned Package
We immediately notified the buyer with the following email sent 6/20/2010:
Email Notification to Buyer
Because this is an address issue, according to Amazon policy, Seller is NOT allowed to RE-SHIP the package to another address provided by the buyer; therefore, according to our published policy, we first notified the buyer, and went ahead to issue the refund on the same day 6/20/2010.
Please note, we refunded the entire purchase price of the item PLUS $2 shipping credit, just kept $2.99 to cover our shipping cost per company published policy. We still lose money, because we had to pay Amazon none-refundable closing fees.
This buyer never checked the emails we sent, he first contacted us on 7/10/2010 to request us to re-ship the item to him. We explained to him and also sent him the picture of the package to let him know that, in such case, reship to the same address doesn't solve the problem, and we can't ship to other address either, and the case was closed already, as refund was already issued.
We replied to every email (mostly attacks and humiliation) from this buyer and explained the situation, but this buyer ignored our messages, threatened and gave us negative feedback. Totally refused to acknowledge the evidence that we did notify him and already refunded him.
Log of Emails sent to This Buyer
Buyer Request to Re-ship
Amazon Shipping Policy
This buyer refused to listen. He filed A-Z claim against on us, left negative feedback, blamed us "choosing the cheapest shipping, and pocketed his money" in very nasty ways possible as demonstrated by his massive attacked on us on Amazon and other websites.Amazon granted the buyer's claim, it is Amazon refunded him the other $2.99, out of Amazon's own pocket. Us, the seller didn't do any thing wrong in such case, as we followed Amazon policies, as demonstrated by the following email from Amazon.
Amazon Confirmed Seller is Not Responsible
This is common sense. On Amazon, buyer pays Amazon, then Amazon send the order to seller for fulfillment. Seller does what Amazon requests. If Amazon provided a wrong address, then Amazon is responsible for it, NOT THE SELLER. But this buyer continued his
harassment by sending us the Amazon reimbursement letter, claimed victory and used it as evidence to continue his attack on us, as demonstrated here as well.
We also forwarded the Amazon decision to him at the same time to "educate" him that, it was Amazon paying him, not us. But this buyer continued to manufactured the facts and posted biased "one sided evidence" to validate / justify his outrageous attacks to
intentionally mislead the public.
Some buyer reported to us in Oct 2010 about his attacks, we again requested him to reconsider, hopefully after a few months, the buyer could become logical, we clearly failed.
We reported his feedback abuse to Amazon, and Amazon removed his negative feedback as demonstrated by the following link. (See bottom of the page).
Buyer Feedback Removed by Amazon
This buyer collected our company info and posted everywhere in his malicious attacks; in comparison, to protect this buyer, we have kept his last name, street address, phone number and email address private.
Anybody with common sense and decency, should come to easy conclusion.
Any website hosting his attacks should carefully review this abuse, and make it right.
(People may question why we didn't just issue the $2.99 back to this difficult buyer to get him off our back, well, this buyer moved so quickly, and ignored our messages completely, filed A-Z claim against us on 7/12/2010, before we realized what kind of person we were dealing with.)