Notwithstanding the obvious irony of furthering a discussion you do not wish to further, or your pig headed refusal to stare the facts I have presented in the face, the following applies:
1. Unlike you I don't have to hide my identity because I don't live in the shadows like a corporate stooge. As for the website rules: do you realise they exist to protect complainants from recriminations by insidious corporates and not the other way around? Or do you simply follow rules when they suit your purposes?
As I have already explained, UAE was just above the UK - (not literally of course). By the way, well done on pointing out my lack of attention to detail, and then proceeding to spell UAE as "UAR" - a classic lack of irony,
and geography, which hill-billy's like you are well known for.
There is no UAR dummy.
2. Why would you assume that everyone is a corporate Steve Ballmer wannabe like you? Is that how you see the world, as one homogeneous long grey line of anaesthetised, soul-less grey men with sweaty arm pits, exchanging business cards and ranting about their boring IT companies until every vagina in the room has healed over? I couldn't give a toss about your 35 years experience
working at PC world replacing broken video cards, or whatever the fk you do.
3. The topic is
Fields Group, Fields Data Recovery scams, Rapid Data Recovery scams, fraud, rip off. Mentioning, as Fields have done that I am a "competitor of Fields" doing this for "your own gain", makes you even more suspect, since these are identical to
the words Fields use to attack me. You and your "friends" (if you have any) simply refuse to face up to the suffering and chaos they have inflicted on thousands of people, with their sharp sales tactics and incompetent "data recovery" methods. Therefore you concoct these fantasies about rival companies employing me to speak out against their methods (I was scammed, the same as the original poster).
4.
Everything I say is on topic; do you even know what the topic is? It is not "how wonderful Fields Data Recovery are". Actually, if your preference is for the latter, Fields have plenty of
shill review websites with fake testimonials (actually not many, now that I had most of them removed) for you to post on.
5. Do I sound like I'm joking you obtuse corporate Muppet? I couldn't care less what
you consider to be "reasonable". The evidence for Fields misdeeds are well known, and what I showed you was but a sample, yet your reasoning abilities seem conveniently absent when confronted with the hard evidence?
6. You need to answer the same questions you pose to me; what is YOUR interest in hyping up Fields, you could have easily added a testimonial to their swathes of
fake reviews, but you instead chose to come here. Why would you be so committed to defending a company you claim to send hard drives to, and what's it to you if there are some complaints against them? You have gone out of your way to defend Fields. I would understand if you worked for them, but
you are not even the original poster, you are not even a case updater.
7. It occurs to me that you may not wish the public to know that your company (if you have one) sends their hard drives to Fields?
8. When
you describe your childhood in intimate detail, can't you see the tragic, Freudian irony of of a description which more aptly applies to the classic nerdy, sex starved, blotchy, overweight, unnecessarily ugly, computer geek, who lives alone, owns more computer games than a teenage Asian kid, and masturbates so much that he needs bi-focal lenses made by the same company which built the Hubble telescope?
9. You "are who you say you are" -
but you have not said who you are! I still say that subtle clues give you away as a Fields stooge.
You don't have the brass balls to post your name here, and if you did, the public would know that you send drives to Fields to be "recovered".
10. Perhaps you need stronger bi-focals, or new eyeballs. I showed you two links, one from a
consumer expose on Fields Data Recovery shown on German TV, and another showing the
571 official (who knows how many unknown) complaints made against Fields Group, to Trading Standard in Wales (that's where they are based, as you are probably aware). Fields Data Recovery, Rapid Data Recovery, Data Phoenix, are apparently "trading names" and have never recorded a single tax dollar/pound in their annual accounts. What would you say of a company listed on the BBB, if it had 571 recorded complaints?
You now have constructive knowledge of Fields' disreputable business practices, regardless of your impaired vision, and by not taking the FACTS about this company seriously, I suggest you are protecting your own interests slightly more than those of your clients.