Greetings, 11/12/09
On behalf of New Image Technology, I would like the opportunity to respond to these false allegations. I feel it is vital that we respond in a professional manner so that anyone reading this inaccurate statement can hear our side of the story.
Sadly, many of the claims and statements written about us are slanderous and inaccurate and what we feel is an attempt to extort money to compensate for their business deficiencies. During their 3+ year tenure with us, Kidmusic.com was provided with many accommodations to their monthly minimum fee based on there request since they claimed they could no longer afford the payments. Per contract, the monthly minimum fee we charged at that time was $450 per month. We reduced this fee down to $250 per month out of professional courtesy so that we can help establish a relationship with this client and help to build there business.
As per our written contract, we also ask for a $2,000 deposit up front. We take out the fist month payment and last month payment due to us out of the deposit per our contract. Any balance left in the deposit is refunded back to the client at the end when our services are no longer required. When our services were no longer required, Brian Klecker, who is the sole owner of Kidmusic.com made an attempt with inaccurate reports to increase the dollar amount to be returned to him at the end of his contract with us.
We then provided him with a full itemized list of the deductions that verified the amount to be returned. Due to insufficient funds on his part he found it to be unacceptable and made many legal attempts to counter the amount owed back to him. He was unsuccessful in his attempt since he could not provide accurate/credible information to refute the itemization.
There are a few other notations I would like to make in regards to these accusations as well as how we conduct business at New Image Technology. We have been in business for close to 15 years now and work with many start up companies as well as fortune 500 companies. We do not withhold deposits at the end of the contract unless there are outstanding invoices owed to us. This is a standard business practice for companies who take initial deposits. Many deposits have been returned at the end of their contract.
A monthly minimum fee is put in place so that we may cover any expenses for having agents available to answer calls when needed. Based on our pricing structure, we are able to offer our clients a better rate based on having a monthly minimum fee. Brian Klecker was advised of this at the commencement of his contract. It was his decision to start mid month and he agreed to a pro-rate since he expected a very high volume of calls.
In regards to the toll free 800 numbers, we offer our clients the choice of keeping there own number and routing the calls over to us, or we can supply our clients with a toll free number which they are able to keep at the end of our contract. Some clients chose to keep their toll free number and others who do not have one will ask that we appoint one for them. We can accommodate either request.
To complete this rebuttal, I would like to point out that any document we asked to be signed was a standard closure form based on the recommendation of our attorney so that the matter is considered closed and no further action will be taken. If Mr. Klecker was honest and had no intention of further action after he received the remainder of his deposit balance from us then he would have no issue signing the document. Again, this was recommended by our attorney. Sadly, we see this as a matter of a client that is not producing the sales he wants and is attempting to extort money. We are very disappointed by the actions he chose to take.
Ralph Porco
Director, Client Services