For anyone who is reading this “report,” notice that it was written in November 2008, nearly a year ago.
Our appointment setters draw from a database of more than 8 million active records, as well as from phone directories throughout the country. They are clearly instructed to speak only with owners of real businesses, and not to make an appointment unless the owner specifically agrees to it. Every call is recorded, then confirmed, reviewed and approved by a quality assurance team. If it isn’t clear that the owner understands the appointment and is ready for it, the sales rep doesn’t get sent.
Appointment setters do NOT screen merchants to determine if they are ready to change processors, as Fisherrj claims. The merchant agrees to meet, but it’s up to the salesperson to show the value of our products and services. It sounds a bit like Fisherrj expected to simply walk in, get a signature and collect the commission.
Anytime I hear a comment about bad appointments, I always ask the same question: Why would we set bad appointments on purpose? We have more than 100,000 active accounts, and we certainly haven’t achieved that level of success by sending reps on bogus appointments. It makes no sense.
I’m not sure why Fisherrj ran into problems. It’s impossible to believe that “over one hundred appointments” were ALL bad leads. It’s also difficult to imagine any salesperson going on 100 appointments without making a sale. As the old saying goes: “Even a blind squirrel is bound to find an acorn eventually.”