"There is legislation going into effect next year that will put a cap on what these greedy monsters can charge..so they are raising rates like there is no tomorrow while they still can..."
Really? Kindly post the law that was passed in Congress and signed
by the President that is going to limit the amount of INTEREST that the
credit card companies
and banks can charge. I already KNOW that you can't because no such
legislation has been passed. Also, there is no VIABLE pending
legislation that will do this because such a federal "standard" for
credit interest would be unconstitutional. Kindly post the passed
legislation that is going to CAP any interest rates, late fees, etc.
You are correct. Thanks for pointing it out..it is not actually a cap..it got voted out I know..but you must agree the changes in 2010 are causing the banks to panic and raise fees...for example this excerpt copied from a business news article...
President Barack Obama is expected Friday to sign stricter credit card regulations, but don't expect immediate protection.
Most of the rules won't take effect until February 2010. Meanwhile,
credit card companies may continue to tack on new fees and increase
interest rates while they can.
Credit card companies also warn that, under the law Congress
passed this week, they'll have to search for additional ways to earn
money. Even cardholders who pay off their balances on time could see
higher charges on a variety of services.
The legislation that I have read does NOT CAP any of these things,
rather, the legislation sets standards such as time required for change
notification and changed rate implementation as well as "triggers" for
such fees. The legislation mainly deals with NOTIFICATION and date of
implementation-NOT the actual AMOUNT of the interest rates and fees.
"and we are noticing this happen to customers that have never had a
late payment..ever. Way to help the country during a recession..there
is nothing else to say really."
I agree that based on media reported complaints this would APPEAR to
be the case but I doubt that it actually is or is as widespread as
would appear on such websites as this. I have posted in the past that
this is not happening to everyone, in fact it's hasn't happened to me
or anyone I know. I have had the SAME VISA card since 1995 and my
interest rate has been PRIME plus 7.99 (not the best rate available but
it has been CONSISTENT) for the last 13 years (it changed from fixed
8.99 to variable prime plus 7.99 in 1996.) My LIMIT has INCREASED over
the same time (never been lowered)- last year they upped my limit by
$2000. During this period I became UNEMPLOYED, returned to school full time (graduated with 2 degrees)
and am currently self-employed. So, I tend to believe that anyone who
has had a significant interest rate increase or credit limit reduction
or a closed account very likely has "other issues" that may have
triggered such actions.Of course they are going to go after the ones with "issues" first. When they run out of those..who do you think is next? And has far as "issues"...it seems judging at least by some of the reports here I have read...did not necessarily warrant rate increases so extreme or cancellations. Robert, we don't need to argue our differences in opinion...if you state a fact that proves me wrong or misstating anything..I will conceded..but something as evident as what is going on now..that did not go on before to this degree..is merely reporting the obvious.
Clearly, these interest rate increases and lowered credit limits
are NOT being applied on a scale that certain media report-the actions
are occuring with a small percentage of consumer credit accounts.
This statement rings familiar of what we had to read in defense regarding overdrafting and re-sequencing policies. And yet.....even with a so called "small percentage" of banking customers that incurred overdraft fees...policy changes are being made.
I can not tell you how to feel..but I can tell you this. Even if ONE customer is hurt by an unfair policy..it should be treated as if 50 billion people were hurt. Just like if you murdered 50,000 people..you could not get off with less time because you only murdered a small percentage of the population..extreme example yes..but it's proving a point. In my opinion..every person has a right to complain...and request changes if they believe they were done wrong..and not crawl under a rock and hide because it only happened to a "small percentage".
Because if ANY company is allowed to continue hurting others without it being exposed and can profit from it...then it can only get worse before it gets better, and before you know it..a "small percentage" gets larger and larger..am I wrong?
You don't even have to answer that. Time and evidence will for you.