• Report: #386730

Complaint Review: La Superior Court Commissioner Gretchen Taylor

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Friday, October 31, 2008
  • Last Posting: Friday, October 31, 2008
  • Reported By:woodland hills California
La Superior Court Commissioner Gretchen Taylor
111 N. Hill Street Los Angeles California 90012 U.S.A.

La Superior Court Commissioner Gretchen Taylor Dept 82 corrupt or severely ignorant, perhaps buyable Los Angeles California


1Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner

Respond to this Report

  • Respond to this report!
    What's this?
  • Also a victim?
    What's this?
  • Repair Your Reputation
    ...the right way!
    Corporate Advocacy Program
atrributing a $3100.00 per month income for a multi millionaire living in million dollar home and driving over 600k worth of cars. Denying all legal avenues to require the individual to produce income documentation and ignoring the lifestyle of the individual claiming to make $3100.00 per month. oh did I mention the yacht?

Valgal
woodland hills, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/31/2008 1:06:45 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/federal-government/la-superior-court-co/la-superior-court-commissioner-d2j38.htm.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on La Superior Court

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Suggestion

If he is cheating you

AUTHOR: Nancy - Steilacoom (U.S.A.)

IF he is cheating you, he is probably also cheagting the IRS. Why not contact the IRS and let them know. Then maybe IF you can get the IRS involved, you might have proof of his income etc and the court would have to take that into account.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.