• Report: #515584

Complaint Review: J Paul Ottis - Jay Ottis

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Tuesday, October 27, 2009
  • Last Posting: Thursday, January 14, 2010
  • Reported By: Victim Defense — Manhattan New York USA
J Paul Ottis - Jay Ottis
163 North Avenue Omah Nebraska United States of America

J Paul Ottis - Jay Ottis Jay Ottis - Paul Ottis – Joseph Paul Ottis – J Paul Ottis – Joe Ottis Dishonets Bloggers Beware – The Courts are Waiting for You – The Truth Will Come Out – You Will Pay ! Omah, Nebraska

*UPDATE by author: LAYTON your a jerk


4Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner

Respond to this Report

  • Respond to this report!
    What's this?
  • Also a victim?
    What's this?
  • Repair Your Reputation
    ...the right way!
    Corporate Advocacy Program

So many names and nicknames for Joseph Paul Ottis, J Paul Ottis and Paul Ottis have been slandered for nine years that it pathetic.  So many lies by three suspect team mate bloggers using anonymous names.  Every blog has been addressed with Rebuttals from Paul’s friends and investigators including a career FBI (retired) investigator.  

In 2006 Paul was prosecuted partially based on the lies that were posted on this site.  The postings were in the complaint documents.   Mr. Ottis settled the case out of court.   The week after he settled the case he became a witness against the State.  The State was investigated by the House of Representatives for unconstitutional judicial conduct.  The director that came against Paul resigned facing false prosecution and abuse of power.

On October 18, 2007 Paul filed a federal suit case: 4:2007cv03251 to force Google and the Internet site to provide his lawyers with the names and contact information on the people assaulting his character.  

Stop and consider the facts.   Paul filed a petition in federal court to force the bloggers to come to court and face the judge.  Unfortunately the case could not be supported by laws  protecting people from being assaulted on the Internet. 

Remember Elizabeth Thrasher age 40, she posted pictures and lies about a 17 year old girl on the Internet that drove the teenager to kill herself.   Thrasher committed a horrific crime, but Thrasher could not be prosecuted because of the same reason.  There are no laws on the books against pathetic bloggers that stalk people causing them harm or even the loss of life.   New laws are finally starting to emerge and a good number of suits are popping up on the web, like a $15 suit against Goggle and Goggle being ordered to identify the blogger of a victim, August 2009. 

There are a lot of good people that have been damaged personally, financially that are looking forward to meeting their cyber terrorist in court.

Paul’s product line is bigger and better today than eight years ago.  He has complete records on file of every person that has ever provided finances to any of his projects.   A “Con, Scam Artist, or Crook” would keep up to date files on all of their past business associates.  Give me a break.  

The only Scam Artists in this issue are the liars that have sabotaged Paul and his family for years.   They are guilty of stalking, threatening, defamation of character and terrorists acts.  New laws are finally being passed that will force them to face a judge!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/27/2009 11:09:44 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/festivals-event-services/j-paul-ottis-jay-ott/j-paul-ottis-jay-ottis-jay-o-eed2d.htm.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on J Paul Ottis

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
4Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Comment

Jay Ottis, Globie's World convicted of Credit Card fraud and theft ??

AUTHOR: Stop Jay Ottis - Layton (USA)

 

This is an excerpt from the Utah Divisions of Securities..... Notice J Ottis has been convicted of multiple accounts according to this....

I know he stole thousands of dollars from myself and others around me....He is very good at this scam. He even has a web site, lots of characters, costumes and toys to support his scam.

Don't be taken by him.

OH... By the Way Jay...... You are Hilarious.... using all of these fake names to make it look like you have friends and supporters.....

JAY ... YOU MY FRIEND SHOULD GET OUT OF THE SCAM BUISNESS AND BECOME A COMEDIAN.......

 

May 31, 2007. An Order to Show Cause was issued against Joseph Paul (Jay) Ottis and his company Globie International, LLC. Ottis is accused of taking over $110,000 from an investor, promising to use the money to fund a television program centered around "Globie" characters that would teach children about global warming. Ottis promised a 10-20% return plus 2% of the company’s profits. He said he was negotiating with Disney and Nickelodeon and that there was no risk. He did not disclose his prior convictions for theft and credit card fraud. Docket No. SD-07-0039.

 

 


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Update By Author

TO LAYTON UTAH

AUTHOR: Victim Defense - Manhattan (USA)

You will have your day in court.   Save the BS for the Federal Judge.  Utah was a disgrace in justice.   New York Times reported your state in 2009 as the 14th most corrupt state in America.  The charges againt Mr. Ottis were highly exaggerated and the person who led the team resigned under threats of termination for false prosecution and abuse of power.   If you are such a decent human being you would have paid the $21,500.00 HOT check off that you wrote to Mr. Ottis's attorney. Mr. Ottis paid it for you so you would not be prosecuted.   Oh, you must have forgot. 

Alan for Ottis, NE 


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Update By Author

To LATON

AUTHOR: Victim Defense - Manhattan (USA)

Mr. Layton?   If this is Chris you could post your crime of paying a $21,500.00 personal check to Mr. Ottis' attorney that bounced "NSF'.   This was a Felony, Chris.

Mr. Ottis paid the check to stop prosecution actions against you.  The cashiers check that he paid the attorney is still on file.   Mr. Ottis developed an entire line of products for you and your fathers church based on contracts from you.   

He was left empty handed and lost thousnads of dollars and months of time.   Did you sign contracts? They are on file!   Did you follow up with performance?  NO.   Did Ottis prosecute you?  NO.

Before you throw rocks take a look at yourself.

Defense for Ottis


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Update By Author

LAYTON your a jerk

AUTHOR: Victim Defense - Manhattan (USA)

I am one of many investors who have been with Ottis since 1998 and there are over a lot of us.  

Idiots like you have no brains.   You screwed up your own opportunity if you lost money and the relation with Ottis. I am aware of the Utah court deal and I am aware of the BS promises from a Layton Church.  I also know the attorney in Nebraska that you stiffed for $21K with your hot check.   Ottis paid it for you to keep you out of jail "jerk".    I have seen the check you wrote an the cashiers check that he bought to pay your hot check and keep you out of jail.  You should be thankful, but, your character is far below the norm of decent people.

He is a strong person that has kept his dream alive under stress that most men would fold under.  People like you are a waste to humanity.  So go stick you head under a rock. 

Brandon, Lincoln, Nebraska.  


Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.