Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #701254

Complaint Review: (((NAME(S) REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / CYBERSTALKING / CYBERBULLYING / REVENGE POST))) - (((REDACTED))) California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Dpty Gupta — Anaheim California United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • (((NAME(S) REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / CYBERSTALKING / CYBERBULLYING / REVENGE POST))) (((REDACTED))) (((REDACTED))), California United States of America

(((NAME(S) REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / CYBERSTALKING / CYBERBULLYING / REVENGE POST))) | RIPOFF REPORT POST-PUBLICATION CONTENT REVIEW: EDITORIAL REDACTIONS |  Loan Fraud, Student Loan Fraud, Grand Theft Fullerton, California

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

EDITOR’S COMMENT:  Ripoff Report strongly believes in the First Amendment, especially when consumers are truthfully warning other consumers about potential frauds, scams, rip-offs or the like by shady individuals or businesses.  Ripoff Report is by consumers, for consumers…and we want to keep it that way!  Unfortunately this Report was posted and, upon additional information, appears to have been primarily for the purpose of bullying or harassment.  In many instances Ripoff Report will reach out to the author of the Report to obtain further information.  In other instances, enough information is provided to Ripoff Report to warrant redactions without reaching out to the author.  Ripoff Report is working to combat tactics that are perceived to be cyberharassment, cyberstalking, cyberbullying and/or what is generally considered a “revenge post” as we do not condone such behavior. 

The Report was brought to our attention and, upon review of compiled information (which will be done on a case by case basis without any obligation as resources allow), and at Ripoff Report’s sole discretion, information that did not conform to current policies and/or the identifying information relating to the individual(s) and/or business(es) named in this “Report” and any subsequent comments thereto have been editorially redacted as indicated by the following “(((REDACTED)))” or (((REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / REVENGE POST)))”.

CONSUMERS:  Be kind.  Keep it honest.  Keep it fair.  Stick to the facts.  Do your research.  Keep the dirty laundry in the laundry hamper…not on Ripoff Report.

PLEASED TO SEE SUCH EFFORTS?  YOU CAN HELP RIPOFF REPORT COMBAT THOSE WHO ABUSE THE SYSTEM:  Ripoff Report, as resources allow, is working towards combatting Cyberharassment, Cyberstalking, Cyberbullying and/or other problems such as what is generically called “revenge posts” that can be riddled with nasty personal allegations that can be serious.   Ripoff Report would love to be able to timely address each and every review request we receive, however, this takes resources.  If you think this is a worth-while endeavor, we encourage you to make a donation so that we can expand the resources that we can devote to this project.  You can make a non-tax deductible donation by clicking on the PayPal icon at the bottom of the page located at the following URL:  http://www.ripoffreport.com/ConsumersSayThankYou/Donate.aspxThe more resources we have, the more resources we can devote to this project and other forward thinking and positive initiatives like it.

Thank you!

~ Ripoff Report Staff

NOW TO THE EDITORIALLY REDACTED REPORT:

Proposed Indictment Statement
 
Facts, Allegations, Summary
 
 
 
Parties of Interest
 
(((REDACTED)))
 
 
FACTS
 
1.      On or about June 2010, (((REDACTED)))solicited for funds from an unnamed victim, first in the amount of $10,000 in violation of securities laws purporting to be a securities dealer at which time (((REDACTED)))promised to use monies to trade in on behalf of someone in exchange for gain on proceeds in direct violation of Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. Evidence of (((REDACTED)))communication will be attached to an indictment as Exhibits.
 
2.      On or about October 2010 (((REDACTED)))illegally financed a property that (((REDACTED)))did not rightfully own and burdened said property with $160,000 in debt, said proceeds were used for securities trading purposes again in violation of securities laws. (((REDACTED)))contacted the rightful owner, in writing with multiple communications, assuring that (((REDACTED)))would invest the money and secure gains for the owner. (((REDACTED)))secured financing with (((REDACTED))), a private investor, and (((REDACTED)))was already informed of the pending action and will be enjoined into all causes of action as applicable. Evidence of (((REDACTED)))communications and applications will be attached to an indictment as Exhibits.
 
3.      On or about September 2007 (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))fraudulently obtained a student loan in the amount of $40,000.00 insured by the federal government’s GSE Sallie Mae. (((REDACTED)))filed false documents to obtain the loan and (((REDACTED)))guaranteed the loan to assure its approval. Both (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))knew that (((REDACTED)))had no intention of attending classes and (((REDACTED)))in fact doctored documents to falsely evidence attendance. (((REDACTED))) knew of the fraud as (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))have resided in the same household precedent to and concurrent while perpetrating the fraud. (((REDACTED)))used the funds for securities trading and lost the entire amount of $40,000.00. This is an irrefutable violation under Title 18, specifically Section 1001 in which the defendants were engaged in a scheme to defraud the US Department of Education of federal student loan funds. Additional counts are Sections 371, Conspiracy to Defraud the United States and Section 1344, Bank Fraud. Federal guidelines for each count are 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.
 
4.      On or about November 2007 (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))fraudulently obtained a student loan in the amount of $32,000.00 insured by the federal government’s GSE Sallie Mae. (((REDACTED)))filed false documents to obtain the loan and (((REDACTED)))guaranteed the loan to assure its approval. Both (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))knew that (((REDACTED)))had no intention of attending classes and (((REDACTED)))in fact doctored documents to falsely evidence attendance. (((REDACTED)))knew of the fraud as (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))have resided in the same household precedent to and concurrent while perpetrating the fraud. (((REDACTED)))used the funds for securities trading and lost the entire amount of $32,000.00. This is an irrefutable violation under Title 18, specifically Section 1001 in which the defendants were engaged in a scheme to defraud the US Department of Education of federal student loan funds. Additional counts are Sections 371, Conspiracy to Defraud the United States and Section 1344, Bank Fraud. Federal guidelines for each count are 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.
 
5.      On or about November 2007 (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))fraudulently obtained a student loan in the amount of $11,000.00 insured by the federal government’s GSE Sallie Mae. (((REDACTED)))filed false documents to obtain the loan and (((REDACTED)))guaranteed the loan to assure its approval. Both (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))knew that (((REDACTED)))had no intention of attending classes and (((REDACTED)))in fact doctored documents to falsely evidence attendance. (((REDACTED)))knew of the fraud as (((REDACTED)))and (((REDACTED)))have resided in the same household precedent to and concurrent while perpetrating the fraud. (((REDACTED))) used the funds for securities trading and lost all of the $11,000.00. This is an irrefutable violation under Title 18, specifically Section 1001 in which the defendants were engaged in a scheme to defraud the US Department of Education of federal student loan funds. Additional counts are Sections 371, Conspiracy to Defraud the United States and Section 1344, Bank Fraud. Federal guidelines for each count are 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.
 
 
ALLEGATIONS
 
 
(((REDACTED)))perpetrated items 1 and 2 and created the Masterson account with (((REDACTED))), and therefore (((REDACTED)))is enjoined into ALL causes of action. (((REDACTED)))then deposited funds into the account for securities trading purposes. (((REDACTED))) and (((REDACTED)))co-conspired and perpetrated items 3, 4 and 5.  The evidence is extensive, but not exhaustive. Original Exhibits and details are purposely withheld to preserve the integrity of the evidence.
 
 
SUMMARY & WARRANT INFORMATION
 
 
If (((REDACTED))) or (((REDACTED))), together or separately fail to make amends, which is the ONLY solution, then a copy of this set of allegations including an already-prepared complaint filed a civil attorney, with a complete explanation will be altogether forwarded to the following parties, in this order:
 
1.      (((REDACTED)))
2.      (((REDACTED)))
3.     (((REDACTED)))
4.      Sallie Mae, Fraud Cooperative, 4501 North Superior Drive, Muncie, IN 47303
5.      Frances T. Grunder and Daniel A. Olivas, Supervising & Deputy Attorneys General, California Attorney Generals Office, 300 S. Sprint Street, Suite 1702, Los Angeles, CA 90013, 213-897-6027, 213-897-4951 fax
6.      Steve Cooley, District Attorney’s Office, Stanley P. Williams, Head District Attorney, Leslie A. Hank, Deputy District Attorney, 201 N. Figueroa, Suite 1200, Los Angeles, CA 90012, 213-580-3273
7.      Fullerton Police Department, 237 W Commonwealth Ave, Fullerton, CA 92832 – for service of process and warrant enforcement


(((REDACTED)))

DOB:
(((REDACTED)))
Sex:
Male

Race:
White
Height:
6' 01"

Weight:
180
Hair:
Brown

Eye:
Brown
 
Warrant File Number: (((REDACTED)))

Type of Warrant:
Bench Warrant

Court of Issue:
Central Justice Center

Court Warrant Number:
(((REDACTED)))

Court Appearance Condition:
Mandatory

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/01/2011 11:29 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/names-redacted-due-to-perceived-harassment-cyberstalking-cyberbullying-revenge-post/redacted-california-redacted/names-redacted-due-to-perceived-harassment-cyberstalking-cyberbullying-revenge-701254. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now