Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #973259

Complaint Review: Nu-Century Inc - Oldsmar Florida

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: TS&P Properties LLC — Lanham Maryland United States of America
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Nu-Century Inc 297 Scarlett Blvd Oldsmar, Florida United States of America

Nu-Century Inc NCI NU-Century Inc refused to give a refund. When they was aware I would not pass GSA Schedule requirements. Oldsmar, Florida

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

This documents my dissatisfaction with service by Nu-Century Inc  dba NCI. The process to obtain GSA Schedule approval started November 2010 with Nu-Century. 

March 2012, Nu-Century Inc. submitted TS& P Properties LLC / dba DMV Transportation LLC proposal to GSA. After numerous requests for updates, I conducted an inquiry in August 2012 and within a week; I was in contact with GSA Staff.  GSA Staff advised me the proposal was rejected and Nu-Century Inc was advised on June 8, 2012 of the rejection by email to Kevin Chace. 

August 2010, I advised Nu-Century In (Laurie Butler) I was in possession of the rejection letter and technical review, and miraculously they now had the same documents after I requested a refund.

The technical review and rejection note obsolete, missing documents and expired Dun & Bradstreet Open Rating submitted.  Nu-Century Inc is supposedly the expert in obtain GSA Schedule Proposal approval. The reject proves otherwise, that Nu-Century Inc is incompetent, and I am requesting a refund of $3,500.

In addition, the contract signed on November 18, 2010 paragraph 2 clearly states a refund will be granted if Nu Cen-Tury Inc has not processed and submitted the application to GSA within 60-90 days from receipt of contract.  This process has gone on for almost two years.

I submitted a Better Business Bureau complaint. The following is the response to NCI.  In response to Nu-Century Inc, I reference the contract signed on November 18, 2010 paragraph 2 clearly states a refund will be granted if Nu-Century Inc has not processed and submitted the application to GSA within 60-90 days from receipt of contract.  This process has gone on for almost two years.

The proposal was rejected for old forms and expired Dun & Bradstreet Open Rating submitted.  This shows Nu-Century's lack of expertise and incompetence.  Nu-Century Inc should determine companies' compliance with GSA Proposal Standards before taking any monies.

In addition, the proposal was submitted to GSA, March 2012.  GSA issued a response June 2012.  Nu-Century Inc due to there incompetence did not acknowledge the response,  until I requested a refund and under my own ingenuity found out the proposal was rejected with the supporting documentation (Rejection Letter and Technical Review).  Nu-Century Inc never provided me with the rejection letter or technical review. 

I continue to request a full and/ or partial refund.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/24/2012 06:49 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/nu-century-inc/oldsmar-florida-34677/nu-century-inc-nci-nu-century-inc-refused-to-give-a-refund-when-they-was-aware-i-would-no-973259. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now