Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher Attorney Jeanne V. Barron (P37138) Michigan Law Statue MCL 445.252 (e) of the Michigan Regulation of Practices Act 70 (1981) Farmington Hills, Michigan

 The individual who posted 06/04/2012 herself has a history, a rather embarrasing one.

Believe it or not, the Shiawassee Condominium Association (Southfield, MI) through its attorney, Jeanne Barron denied that it breached any of its duties and further denies that it was negligent but states it was guided by, and strictly observed all of its legal duties and obligations imposed by operation of law, the condominium bylaws and otherwise, in that all of the actions of its agents, servants, and/or employees were careful, proper, prudent and lawful. . . . it took proper action to administer and enforce its master deeds and bylaws but a request for snow maintenance was requested 12/17/2007. The request was refused 12/24/2007 “these items are co-owner responsibility the association will take no action on them clear snow. Additional wording, None [snow] available at this time”. How about that “None [snow] available at this time”. The Shiawassee Condominium Association on 12/24/2007 “in writing” refused to honor its legal obligation stated in the condominium documents, Article V, Section 5 and the Michigan law statue MCL 559.153. (Shiawassee) on 12/24/2007 refused to honor its fiduciary responsibility that it [defendant] accepts in its Spring 2005 newsletter. While defendant (Shiawassee Condominium Association) is not surer of safety, it has a duty to exercise DUE CARE, Roberts v Stevens Enterprise, Inc. (1999) WL 334455020. Defendant (Shiawassee) on 12/24/2007 “in writing” refused to exercise DUE CARE. The Shiawassee Condo Association (Southfield, MI) though its attorney Jeffrey Vollmer of Wegner and Associates, P.C. (St. Clair Shores, MI) foreclosed on a unit without authorization from mortgagee, Chase Bank and named itself the mortgagee not Chase Bank. The Shiawassee Condo Association did not own the debt , was not the mortgagee and had no right to foreclose. She gave her credibility no worth – Jeanne Barron.

Wait! Wait! The best is yet to come. Barron, in her introduction 01/07/2010 Summary Disposition, page 2 , Case No. GC 09 1653 in the Michigan 46th District Court says (plaintiff) was not unfamiliar to defendant”. Truthfully, Defendant and Barron were not unfamiliar to plaintiff; all played part in a previous litigation, Case No. 2005-067809-NZ (Michigan Oakland County Circuit Court) of which plaintiff Ms. “X” prevailed. The two Piech and Blanding “willingly” committed a crime. Plainiff Ms. ‘X” sued them and prevailed. She, Barron knew this. She was their representative attorney. She perhaps did not know the Shiawassee Condominium Assocition Board of Director members but certainly knew Robert (Bob) Piech and Thomas Blanding She knew them from Case No. 2005-067809-NZ. She was familiar with them and of course, plaintiff Ms. “X”. Chase Bank was first lien holder and owned the debt.

The January 07, 2010 Summary Disposition, page 2 according to Jeanne Barron says “ plaintiff Ms. “X” alleges that, on September 18, 2008, she slipped and fell on accumulated ice on a sidewalk in the condominium complex. (See Plaintiff’s Complaint, paragraphs 17 and 18)” The summary disposition stated inaccurate information. Plaintiff, Ms. “X” did not slip and fall on accumulated ice on the sidewalk in the condominium complex on September 18, 2008; this is not stated in the complaint, paragraph 17 and 18, Case No. GC 09 1653. How about that!!! She did that, Attorney Jeanne Barron, a Shiawassee Condominium Association agent. She was not careful or prudent. A Michigan practicing lawyer – thirty years – Inept, Incompetent and Obtuse. She may be an active attorney in good standing with the Michigan State Bar Association but still inept, incompetent and obtuse, still fat and looks like a man.

What the writer stated referencing that condo association and their lawyers is not a whackjob just Real and Reality.  Although rather embarrassiing, readers should absorb everything said. 

The individual who filed this complaint has a lengthy history of filing bogus lawsuits and has made it her personal agenda to trash a completely professional, talented and experienced lawyer. She was so angered by Ms. Barron's success in a case filed against the Plaintiff (the author of the complaint), that she has proceeded to try to bash her name. Do not listen to this whackjob, Ms. Barron is a kind, compassionate attorney with almost 30 years of practicing law and she does not deserve this woman's malicious agenda.