DLW

 I want to give you a quick update on the civil case involving Thuy-Duyen Thi Huynh. I also want to bring it to your attention that it appears her attorney, Early M. Hawkins, is trying to prevent any further cooperation with the IRS and is trying to intimidate witnesses into silence.

DLW

Yesterday a memo went out describing how Early Hawkins is REFUSING to COMPLY with two Court Orders issused on August 14th, 2013. That Early Hawkins is showing blatant disrespect to the Judge and the Court is not shocking in light of his past refusal to obey the law. What was shocking was that he tried to file a motion despite his refusals to comply. Because Early Hawkins suffers the problem of being Early Hawkins, he screwed up on the motion and the Court rejected it. We will have to wait for him to refile before we can assess just how meritless it will be. In the meantime, Hawkins continues on with his malicious prosecution of his victim. Hawkins' moral compass is so out of whack. Hawkins will never be confused with someone that deserves to be treated with respect.

A trial attorney with almost 20 years experience in litigation heard about Early Hawkins' mendacious conduct and offered the following words. He hits the nail on the head. It is also his opinion that Early Hawkins is suborning perjury.

"I did some thinking last night about Mr. Hawkins ill-conceived stunt in filing a motion for protective order in the midst of ignoring TWO court orders.  Never in a million years would I file a motion while defying a court order, much less two of them. It is unethical and shows very poor form.   I informally polled a half dozen trial lawyers on my floor this morning and to a man they agreed what he did was beyond stupid.  Not only will he have pissed the Judge off by defying his orders, he has done his own client a huge disservice by insuring that whatever little credibility his client had with the Court is now irreparably destroyed. Nothing Hawkins or his client can say will have much credibility.  For this reason alone I doubt he can call himself a trial lawyer because no trial lawyer I know would dare to treat a Judge with the blatant disrespect Mr. Hawkins has shown  this judge. I would not be surprised if the Judge does slaps a separate sanction on him for trying to file the motion.

If it is his client that is refusing to comply with the court’s order then he has an ethical duty to drop her as a client. Otherwise he is participating with her in defying multiple court orders and open to sanction. I would not want to be the lawyer explaining to a Judge a pathetic reason for non-compliance. If he had time to work on the protective order he certainly had time to work on complying with the Judge's order!

Because of who she is and what she has done, I do not feel sorry for her that she has ineffective counsel. She has the crappy lawyer she deserves.

I went back and checked the court registry of actions and her attorney has done nothing on her behalf. He is providing inadequate representation and he owes it to his client to explain to her in writing why he is failing to represent her. In my view, he has exposure to a malpractice suit.

The defendant's attorney filed the Motion to Compel on 06/20/13. The hearing was set for 07/31/13. During that time Hawkins had an affirmative duty to file a response in opposition. He failed to do so! Why did he do that to his client? What kind of trial lawyer allows opposing counsel run all over their client like that?

The defendant's attorney filed the Motion to Compel Further Bill of Particulars on 07/15/13. The hearing was set for 08/14/13. Again Hawkins had an affirmative duty to his client to file a response in opposition. Again Hawkins failed to protect his client. Hawkins has acquiesced to everything the defendant’s attorney has filed. Hawkins is a wimp.

I don’t feel sorry for Thuy because she is a horrible person, but she made a huge mistake hiring Mr. Hawkins to be her lawyer. He made a huge mistake taking her as a client. They deserve each other!

What baffles me is why is Mr. Hawkins not trying to settle this? Does he think the defendant is not going to come after him for pursuing a frivolous case against him? At least if he tries to settle, Hawkins can try to take some of the “malicious” out of the malicious prosecution. Pride cometh before the fall…"

Early…Early…Early…

You got some explaining to do son.. According to the Court registrar, you and your client are under two court orders.  Doesn’t look like you have filed any notice with the Court that you have complied with EITHER of them. Is that a smart move?

Then today I see that you tried to file a Motion for a Protective Order that was rejected (is there anything in life you don’t screw up?)

Let me get this straight….rather than comply with two reasonable Court orders (which is a really good idea unless you like additional sanctions), you file a for a protective order?

Why? People file for those when they want to hide something. What are you trying to hide? Is it by chance you want to hide from the IRS any evidence that your client is a TAX EVADER???  You do realize that your actions in light of your statement to the Judge look, in the words of Chris Rock, “suspicious as f***!”?

I wish it hadn’t been rejected on account of your screwing it up, because then I could download it and send it over to the IRS Criminal Investigator and let them know you and your client clearly have something to hide. Your actions fit my narrative that you will go to great lengths to obstruct justice.

This is what I need you to do Early: 1) Put down the bottle. 2) Focus 3) Get help from a 2^nd year law student that knows what they are doing 4) Resubmit your silly motion.

Then I can download it and send it over to the IRS and draw attention and speculation on what you are trying to hide.  Oh and I can post on RipOff Report additional commentary about how you are trying to conceal a crime. (Please don't try to tread on my 1st Amendment)

You do know just how bad it looks that you tried to file for a protective order AFTER you  have failed to comply with a Court order? IT LOOKS REALLY BAD! I know your understanding of the law is sparse, but a protective order won't stop the IRS for putting your client where she definitely belongs.

You are not too good at tactics and strategy and s*** are you? What did you want to be when you were a kid? Whatever it was, you should go try your hand at that.

YOU ARE INVITED TO WATCH EARLY HAWKINS PUT A TAX EVADER/PERJURER ON THE STAND!!!

On December 2, 2013, you are invited to watch attorney Early Marlow Hawkins assist in implicating his client, Thuy-Duyen Thi Huynh aka “Thuy Li” in the federal crime of tax evasion.

At a hearing on August, 14^th, 2013, Early Hawkins told the Judge he did not want to turn over evidence that he is required to turn over by law because it could implicate Thuy Li in a federal crime. So what does the brilliant Early Hawkins propose to do instead? Put her on the stand. Under oath. Where everything she says, can and will be used against her in a criminal proceeding.

See, what I really think is happening here is that Early Hawkins has every intention of assisting the Internal Revenue Service of nailing his client for tax evasion and sending her to prison where she belongs. Why else would Early Hawkins do something as stupid as putting a perjurer/tax evader on the stand and not only risking his law license, but opening himself up to a malpractice lawsuit?

Consider this your invite to watch Early Hawkins be monumentally stupid. And incompetent.

It is never easy when you are stuck in the Virgin Islands with a well paying "client". 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Thuy-Li-Thuy-Duyen-thi-Huynh/Orange-California/Thuy-Li-Thuy-Duyen-thi-Huynh-Thuy-Li-Thuy-Huynh-Perjury-Lying-Under-Oath-Divorc-1072251

Thuy Li's perjury has been repeatedly brought to the attention of attorney Early Marlow Hawkins (SB#1198127), it remains to be seen if Early Hawkins is going to obey the law and put a stop to his client's blatant perjury. Or if he is going to allow his client to continue committing a serioius crime. This report will be regularly updated with reports on what Early Hawkins decides to do.

Incorrect link posted for the fan page. 

I would volunteer to discuss this all with her during her conjugal visit time.

LOL I knew this girl. She used to work with my ex girlfriend at a sports bar in Tustin. She was fired after the owner, a woman named Kim, found out she was going into the bathroom and taking pictures of her s**tch and selling the pictures to customers for $100-200 “tips”. Kim hit the roof when she found out and called all the girls in and said she would fire anyone that was doing what Thuy did.

Last time I heard about her she was working here and there as a high priced call girl. I was told she tried to get into Playboy so she could justify charging her clients more money for her time.

On June 3rd, 2013, a RipOff Report was created accurately detailing Thuy's long running scheme to evade state and federal income taxes. The wording of the report was an abridged version that was sent to criminal investigators with the IRS and the FTB (CA's state tax authority). Of course, this was met with a feeble attempt by Early Hawkins to silence and intimidate the witnesses. Why a licensed attorney would be dumb enough to try to intimidate witnesses to a criminal investigation is something only Early Hawkins can explain.

This post is serving notice that a second RipOff Report is being created to go into detail Thuy's repeated and blatant perjury. Every single attorney (and prosecutor and Bar investigator) that has examined the evidence is in agreement that she has committed perjury. People have a right to know how willing she is to break the law. Basically, the letter that is being sent to the Orange County District Attorney's office will be posted. It remains to be seen if Early Hawkins is going to make another effort to silence witnesses to a crime committed by his client. 

Along with the description there will be posted hundreds of screen shots from her various social networking profiles that contradict her written and oral testimony that she has given under the penalty of perjury. It may be overkill to post the entire inventory of screen shots, but this will allow the readers to form their own opinion. 

Her legal counsel is aware of her perjury. If either one of them is not, then they are clearly not competent to practice law. They have failed to put a stop to their client flouting the law as they are required to do. This failure amounts to suborning perjury. It would be appropriate for this new RipOff Report to go into the detail how they have both failed in their duties. The legal community has a right to know these people condone perjury.

Attached are screen shots of an online tax fraud referral submitted to the California Franchise Tax Board. A hard copy was mailed as well. The same information was provided to the IRS in March, 2013.

In respond to this report being published Thuy Li has changed her screen name on Facebook. It is no longer ModelThuyLi and has been changed to OCBikiniGirl.