You would clutch at straws to defend a bank and prove a customer wrong. This is nothing new. The reason I sometimes state the customer should take responsibility is because they should..and then CORRECT..I then I explain what the bank did as well since if I respond here..it is usually to point this out. And apparently the BANK agrees since they are changing policy..so perhaps your argument is whit the BANK and not me personally..I am merely stating the FACTS.
And speaking of FACT..and to answer your question..you stated...
"Why is it that more and more posters(not just myself) have to come
here and correct your "facts". As we have here the WaMu NEVER did this
"fact". Well I think you should take a look at the following report
from 2007(well before Chase came into the picture) that specifically
mentions WaMu posting transactions from highest to lowest.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/banks/washington-mutual/washington-mutual-is-a-ripoff-cfacg.htm
So who is lying here the person in 2007, which by the way there were
several other reports but this one specifically said the posting
order. Or the person in 2009 and you who says that they never did this
before? Because unless you want to think that they did this, stopped
posting this way between 2007 and 2009, and then when Chase took over
started it again you can't have it both ways."
I don't think anyone is "lying". According to the link you left..the poster states...
I have been banking with washington mutual
for several years. Over the past year, my local branch closed and I noticed that they had suddenly started playing with the order of my transactions.
This makes no sense. What does the local branch closing have to do with the bank "suddenly" start playing with the order of transactions? Perhaps another bank took over? All conjecture..WAMU customers know they do not re-sequence transactions..so anyone stating they do is probably not lying..but confused.
This same poster also says something about them listing the transactrions "by the minute"...so I think it would have been very obvious if the bank was actually doing any manipulations.
Regardless Robert...we have both seen the same complaint here enough..it is FACT the once CHASE took over and started re-sequencing transactions..that complaints increased. This is indisputable fact so hang it up. You need to do research and not depend on a few posts that are in error to your defense against customers lodging a legitimate complaint here. Or trying again with much failure to discredit me for simply stating FACT.
My issue is not against you Robert..so why the attacks against me from you? Do you really LOVE this bank that much?