He left this same nonsense on several reports. It seems to be some kind of attempt to discredit me..but it falls so very very short. First off it claims of hypocrisy yet he uses posts from different reports that are regarding separate instances and situations to prove I am a liar..but it FAILED.
Robert, you should actually read the reports before you try to use any to slander someone..it makes you look kind of foolish.
Then he starts ranting about how I can never be wrong or something to the effect, yet he leaves posts where I have admitted if i was wrong, or making a retraction. He also leaves reports where I agreed with him, yet he says I am wrong.
Then he leaves link to reports accusing me of fabricating my experience..where I have went to school and worked very hard to accomplish. I don't really care what anyone thinks or believes about me personally, but I have a right to make corrections and defend myself if called a liar.
He also puts words in my mouth so to speak...because he knows most people may believe him and not actually click the links to the reports he left. The only link he did not leave, is the one about the Walmart DVD non refund where there is debate regarding copyright law..and then uses a text book I wrote as an example, yet the post is about returning a DVD, honestly it is hard to keep track but apparently he put a lot of time into it..but where he missed..is the effort..he put no EFFORT into it, it is blatantly wrong information. Anyone who really cares, which I doubt anyone but Robert does..can read my followup responses and link to the evidence...
Okay here goes...
http://www.ripoffreport.com/fast-food-restaurants/mcdonalds/mcdonalds-general-complaint-i-52a25.htm
so I got a couple of bites before tossing the rest
again out the window. I hope it doesn't kill any wild animals that find
it, although they are probably smarter then me and will smell it and
walk away.
When called out for his illegal littering, on a
busy
road, The Great and Powerful Roz rationalized that he really didn’t
litter because…..wait for it….
Normally "food" would be considered
organic and not actually be littering...
Yup! There you have it! This
is why he’s the Great and Powerful Roz! Never wrong, always right, always has to have the last
word. The rest of us poor schleps have to live
within the laws of our society but not the Great and Powerful Roz!!!
Only in the Land of Roz, is littering not
littering, is
rambling with 30 page rebuttals and name calling considered “debating”
and having the last post means a “win.” LMAO!
The Wonderful Liar (AKA The Cowardly
Lyin’):
http://www.ripoffreport.com/fast-food-restaurants/mcdonalds/mcdonalds-in-vineland-nj-mcdo-a22ba.htm
but when I got it the burger was not at all like the
picture or as described and it was cold and tasted like old socks and
butt wrapped in a stale bun. I didn't want to complain because I figured
they would just spit on the burger so I threw it in the garbage.
In the garbage Roz? In your ROR (see above “wonderful
litterbug”) you stated you tossed it out the window. While
you were driving home on a busy street. According
to YOUR McDonalds ROR you didn’t even open your burgers until you were
driving home! In this rebuttal you give the
impression you were an “eat in” customer who tossed it in the garbage.
If this rebuttal by you is the truth (making your ROR a LIE) me thinks
you behaved more like the “Cowardly Lyin” LMAO!
There you have it folks. The
Wizard of Roz excels at everything, including LYING!
MY CURRENT
REPLY>>>
Robert is an
idiot. Take a look at the links. They are TWO SEPARATE REPORTS.
And, they are regarding TWO
SEPARATE INSTANCES. One reply he pasted was from someone else's
report back in August of 2009 which I commented on, when I lived in
Silverlake, and one was very recent and a report I personally lodged
regarding when I was driving home from work to where I currently live in
NORTH HOLLYWOOD. One is regarding a deluxe burger from the menu..one is
regarding .99 cent cheeseburgers.
I also did not state that I threw the
burger on a "busy street". I clearly stated I threw it on the 134
eastbound. It is not a local street. It was the side of the highway. I
could not take the smell. I also did admit it was disrespectful, however
being it was organic matter, it will not pollute the earth.
Now, tell us Robert..what does any of
this have to do with this report? So I admitted I tossed cheeseburger
out the window..that means I lost this debate regarding banking
policies?? You need serious psychiatric evaluation my friend.
STRIKE ONE...next
The
Wonderful Author:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/banks/wachovia-bank/wachovia-bank-excessive-overd-844c8.htm
I used to teach at a school and wrote a textbook. I
have written for a few publications and a home study course but I have
not chosen writing as a profession.
Gosh. You wrote a textbook and yet seemingly know
nothing about copyright law!
Seemingly? What does that mean? Can you
back up with any evidence what I know or do not know regarding
copyrighting a text book? First of all, I wrote the textbook for a
school that I was teaching at. They handled the copyrights through a
copyright attorney. I had my attorney look it over, and we came to an
agreement. I never claimed to be a copyright expert. Writing a textbook,
music, a screenplay etc has nothing to do with how much you know about
copyright law. And that is why they have copyright attorneys. The report
you are referring too, which has NOTHING to do with this debate about
bank policies, was a complaint lodged regarding a customer at Walmart
who was told they can not return an open DVD for a refund, and a debate
regrading if it was because it was prohibited by federal law. I agree
that this was store policy and not necessarily anything to do with a
federal law.
So we were in
agreement, I simply chose to investigate it, post evidence, and look at
all sides. YOU on the other hand.."claimed" to be an expert in copyright
law, based solely on your "claim" that you wrote some
software back in the 1980's.
If
anything..you seem to be the one who knows nothing. And how come you
did not leave a link to that report? Are you afraid to let everyone see
that we were in agreement, yet you are trying to somehow discredit me
using copyright law knowledge as an example?
I have a feeling you are holding some
kind of grudge against big retailers because you were denied a refund of
open software or a DVD. Well tough luck. These companies are not in
business of free rentals. You buy it..you open it..it is yours..period.
You don't like the policy, don't shop there. The policy is no "corporate
secret" or conspiracy. It is to prevent people from ripping them
off..imagine that????..a retailer in business to profit, and not give
free rentals..how absurd??
STRIKE
TWO next...
The
Wonderful Best Buy Associate (aka
Best Buy Defender):
http://www.ripoffreport.com/appliances/best-buy/best-buy-best-buy-warranty-fr-95382.htm
Because in my 6 years associated with BesyBuy..
nor do they want to rip anyone off with intent...I
feel they are very ethical and may be why they are surviving while
places like Circuit City bite the dust...
I guess during your 6 years, you were not aware of
the
legal troubles Best Buy has had with some States Attorney General;
illegally using software (copyright infringement by Geek Squad) and some
unsavory business practices (duplicate Best Buy website with
“alternative” pricing higher than what was on the “public” Best Buy
website.) When customers complained that the
in-store price was higher than advertised on the “public” website, the
associate would “go online” (actually an IN-HOUSE intranet site) to a
different website to show the customer that he or she was mistaken! Real ethical stuff!!!
Yes..I have been associated with this company for six
years...including being a district trainer..so i know how it works...
Really? Does this mean you
were
party to the copyright infringers? Did you train
Geek Squaders how to use software that Best Buy was using illegally? Did you help set-up the TWO websites that Best Buy
had, or just the “in house” one that associates showed customers with a
HIGHER item price than the “public” Best Buy website?
I have worked with BestBuys across the nation..and
there are different cultures in different locations regardless of SOP.
The
issues BestBuy had can be found at Wikipedia Bestbuy. As
far as the software issue, it was resolved and the software company
ended up in an agreement with BestBuy to use the software, that is how
it ended, nothing else is disclosed, no news here.
As far as the
duplicate website, I have nothing to do with that and I don't know why
that is being brought up in a debate about bank policy. This was
addressed back in 2007..
"In response, Best Buy spokesperson Sue
Busch indicated the in-store
kiosks were not intended for price-match purposes and rather a means to
navigate in-store availability. Since the initial investigation, a
banner was placed on the in-store site to make its customers more aware
of the difference."
And that is as much as I know, or
care about that. When I shop online..I do it at home and print it out.
If Best Buy was using any tactics with intent to decieve
customers, I certainly as a consumer advocate do not defend it. I only
know the policies as I was told when I did any work for them. Which was
"have the customer bring in a copy from bestbuy.com of the price, and we
will match it in the store". Doesn't seem like rocket science to me.
Why Robert is bringing this up
here, I have no idea..but I responded to a report in which a customer
brought in a sound system that was non-functioning. The system was still
under manufacturers warranty. The customer was denied because the
system had liquid inside of it, and signs of mold/corrosion etc on the
side and cord. So the customer was accusing Bestbuy of doing this with
intent.
I am sure this company has nothing to gain by further
damaging and already non functioning unit, that is COVERED under the
manufacturers warranty, just to rip them off. No company could survive
this way. How many other reports are there of Bestbuy or any large
retailer doing something like this to a piece of equipment that is
currently covered under the manufacturers warranty?
STRIKE THREE.... next..
The Wonderful New ROR Editor:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/doctors/black-hawk-plastic-s/black-hawk-plastic-surgery-dr-abe38.htm
You really have no reason to make this person feel
even worse, unless you are getting some kind of satisfaction from it? Or
does it just make you feel important or better as a person to belittle
victims?, Not very nice now, save that for the bank posts.
That’s our mighty Roz laying into someone who made a
rebuttal. Notice the Wizard of Hypocrisy? Of course, he doesn’t mention how HE treats ROR
posters when they complain about Best Buy! No…
not at all!
Click on the link and go to the report. Some woman was
swindled by a plastic surgeon. She wanted a certain procedure, the
doctor told her that was what she was getting, and then she found out
they were going to do the EXACT procedure she said she did not want, and
that the Doctor told her it was not going to be.
So what do these trolls do? Insult her for being vain.
The doctor charged her $20,000 for a procedure she did not want, and
was told she was not getting. When she tried to cancel after realizing
she was not getting the procedure as she was told she was, they would
not refund a penny. I felt that was wrong..forgive me Robert.
STRIKE FOUR....next...
The Wonderful Subway Hidden Tax
Finder (AKA that’s MY 49 cents!):
http://www.ripoffreport.com/fast-food-restaurants/subway/subway-is-a-5-dollar-foot-lon-9ab86.htm
I was duped. I though it was going to be
like Baywatch..but I traverse the streets dodging used condoms and drug
bags, homeless beggars abound..I think they charge a fee to enter the
7/11..and instead of fresh ocean air breezes..I get to inhale
pollution..feces, and urine smells. The pollution is so bad..
And so it goes! This was
heavy
intellectual stuff that the entire world (those of us who are not
blessed to live in the Land of Roz) had to know! As
it was, the Great and Powerful Roz actually posted a
retraction…er…well….sorta….
I would like to submit a "semi" retraction...
A “semi” retraction? Is that
anything like “oops” or “I was mistaken?” Naw,
couldn’t be! This is the Great and Powerful Roz!
I lodged a complaint
against Subway for non disclosure. It ended with Subway putting up a
sign, and me understanding some regulations regarding California food
to-go vs. eat in toasting and heating statutes.Anyone can click on the link and see my semi
retraction. I never claimed to be infallible from a mistake. Only the
bank defenders, the most arrogant bank defenders, believe they can never
make a mistake, and anyone who does is a criminal as they imply.
Here is the condemning "semi retraction" I stated,
from a report I posted back in October, 2009..."Today
I went into Subways again.and ordered the new buffalo chicken 5
dollar foot long..and said "yes" when asked if I would like it
toasted...
Total
came out to $5.49...$5.00 + .49 "sales" tax.
So mystery one
solved..they only tax once for both chicken heating tax..and toasting
tax combined.
I looked around at the signage in the store..and
did notice some of the signs state on the bottom.."plus applicable sales
tax".
Congratulations
Robert aka "Kojak and copyright attorney"..you solved the case of the
chicken/toast tax semi-retraction caper.
Robert...what does this have to do
with Best Buy?
STRIKE WHATEVER, I am
starting to lose track..next..
The
Wonderful Travel Agent (AKA
What’s a branded credit card?):
http://www.ripoffreport.com/credit-card-processing-ach-companies/u-s-bank-national-as/u-s-bank-national-association-4b2e2.htm
False advertising comes to mind, which is against the
law. If I were in your shoes I would start with a call or letter to the
FTC if the bank continues to refuse accountability.
Rozzy is correct about a possible “false
advertising”
issue. Except that any false advertising was made
by Aeromexico, not the bank that administers the card. We
all know what happens whenever the Wizard of Roz detects the word
“bank” in a report!
Okay, here we go again.
Robert aka Kojak the copyright attorney is bringing up a report that is
unrelated, and irrelevant. Anyone can click on the link Robert was kind
enough to leave. And they will clearly see, that the bank was
ADVERTISING on Aeromexico's website. Hence, the bank must honor what
they advertised, or face a false advertising charge. This was NOT an ad
placed by Aeromexico on the banks website..but an ad placed by the bank
on Aeromexico's website. If the bank will not honor their own ad, and
customers sign up with that bank or any offers implied, then the bank
must honor the offer. If the ad was fraudulent and the customer signs
up, surely at the time of sign up, the bank would have some
responsibility to tell the customer the ad is a fraud, if indeed it was.
And
again Robert I ask, what does this have to do with the report we are discussing here?
STRIKE..well heck..who is
counting anymore?
The Wonderful ROR Hijacker:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/banks/us-bank-us-bancorp/us-bank-us-bancorp-rip-off-f3dda.htm
Page after page of Rozzy wasting bandwidth. A funny read if you have a lot of free time on your
hands. A simple ROR turns into “The Wizard of Roz
Show” as Rozzy hijacks this posting to troll for fights; showing his
true colors (and they aren’t emerald green) once again. This
one is so long it would probably smoke your printer if you attempt to
print it! LMAO!
Why would anyone use a printer to read a report from
this site? That aside, if you were more alert, you would realize that
the link you posted..is THIS very report. Need I say more? And the cause
of the waste of bandwidth, is that people like you are debating logic,
and diverting the topic with personal attacks and slander against me. I
do not need to apologize for defending myself.
Sometimes it requires reasoning and
evidence to back up a point, which I use freely. No one is forced to
read it, and no one is required to respond, rebut or debate it.
Another
Strike...
If that wasn’t enough here’s another example of The
Great and Powerful Roz (AKA Chaseboy) hijacking a post! Troll,
troll, troll.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/banks/chase-wamu/chase-wamu-wamu-chase-bank-f225b.htm
What are you talking about
"hijacking" a post? That was called a DEBATE, and I held my ground.
Anyone can click on that link...and see the report...which was about a
$34.00 overdraft fee escalated to a $64.00 overdraft fee..for....get
ready for this...brace yourselves............the customer went over
by.......................TEN CENTS !
Once again...Robert..the
"Kojak" and copyright attorney of rip off report..solved the case!!!!
Yes..you did it. You discredited me and proved what a bad person I am.
Or..maybe you are a couple of cans short of a six pack? Let the readers
decide..if any have not been bored into a coma by now.
The Wonderful Auto-restorer and
PayPal/Ebay Defender:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/motorcycles/rebecca-sparks/rebecca-sparks-stephanie-wallo-e9de4.htm
Since this is ONE of my businesses, restoring older
cars and selling them via online auction nation and WORLD wide,
I wish ROR would go back to the OLD search format
which worked much better!
Why? What would the old search format do to conclude
you are a waste of time that the current format does not allow? I have
been restoring old cars as a hobby, and it turned into a lucrative
business. What does this have to do with the report here?
The Wonderful DC Engineering;
http://www.ripoffreport.com/utility-companies/txu-oncar-energy/txu-oncar-energy-txu-my-electr-84c86.htm
Although I no longer reside in NYS, and am no longer a
licensed electrician for home/industrial in NYS, I was a local 3 union
electrician, as was my uncle, and Grandfather. I now specialize in DC
engineering.
I guess this would be sorting out the red, black,
and
green wires in those restored autos!
Oh, I can tell by that reply that you
probably are an electrician, and an antiquated one at that. And yes, the
wiring in older automobiles is quite simple,,but not exactly sorting
red, black and green wires..there is a bit more to it then that. I don't
know any vehicles I have ever restored that only use 3 colors..that is
reserved for old school A/C electricians..which as I stated, I have been
one in the past. I was able to get into the union while I was in school
since close family members were in it. And the test was not very
difficult to pass.. it was essentially based on the same principles used
since Thomas Edison was experimenting with the phonograph.
But if you even try to
get into a debate with me about current automotive technology, I will
make you look like even a bigger fool then you are making yourself look
like. You do realize that late model vehicles, which I train others how
to integrate with, incorporate data bus systems, LAN systems, M.O.S.T.
systems, and fiber optics to name a few? Robert, it is basically being a
software engineer on top of everything else, it is not like twisting
wires together where all you had to figure out was which was
neutral...and use pliers and wire nuts. Robert..you are SO far out of
your league..that the light bulb from your league would take 100,000
light years to get here if you had a light bulb 100,000 years ago. Go
ahead, try me.
The Wonderful Radio Installer (AKA
Sirius Defender):
http://www.ripoffreport.com/satellite-companies/sirius-xm-radio/sirius-xm-radio-xm-radio-what-ca79d.htm
I am not actually a direct employee of Sirius XM..but I
work for a company that sells and installs a lot of them.
Gosh! Is there anything you don’t do or haven’t
done? Oh, I forget-The Great and Powerful Roz! This must be more of that “DC Engineering” thing! Let’s see, author, teacher, engineer, auto-restorer,
Best Buy Trainer. I’m overwhelmed-NOT. It’s getting harder to believe any of this crap! LMAO!
Yes Robert. It is ALL related. D/C based technology.
Guess what most vehicles use as a power source? I will tell you. A D/C
battery. Which applies to...the textbook I wrote, the articles I have
published, the degree I have, and what I have been teaching in schools,
and... for corporations that sell and install DC operated products. The
auto restoration was a hobby that turned itself into a side business. Is
that so unheard of? Does it make you envious that I can profit off
doing what I enjoy? And that I can freelance, and make my own hours, and
I am still young?
That must kill you. I won't rub it in your face too
hard. And, I have nothing I need to prove to you. And I will not expose
or divulge any personal further personal information about me on this
public forum since I don't need you sickos involved in my personal
life..but if there is anything you wish to debate regarding D/C
engineering or it's applications regarding current automotive
technologies, have at it, I am all to quite willing to do this.
But again, I must
ask..what doe this have to do with the report?
The Wonderful Electrical Engineer
(and Best Buy Defender):
http://www.ripoffreport.com/miscellaneous-electronics/best-buy/best-buy-warranty-lies-flint-d8fc7.htm
Number two, I am an electrical engineer, and white on
the circuit board is a sign of water damage, and green buildup can be
mold, or possibly corrosion build up, and this kind of damage is built
up over time.
Wow! From Best Buy associate
and trainer to electrical engineer! Whoooeeeh. BTW O Great and Powerful Roz, the Best Buy customer
stated that the stuff was on the OUTSIDE of the surround sound when Best
Buy gave the item back. No where did the
customer’s ROR state anything about “white on a circuit board.” It was white stuff on the OUTSIDE, as well as a water
mark, and green stuff on the power cord!!! But
hey, you were too busy defending Best Buy and blaming the customer to
even READ the ROR correctly.
The customer stated Best Buy noticed LIQUID on
the INSIDE, and white stuff on the side, and green stuff
on the power cord. What more do you need to be satisfied that this unit
has liquid in it? I don't care where the white stuff was. I stated white
on the circuit board indicates liquid..yes I did..so crucify me.
However, it is a TRUE statement that white residue on a circuit board
indicates liquid. Now you are correct, the report did not state there
was any white on the circuit board...IT WENT A STEP FURTHER
by stating there is actual LIQUID on the circuit board.
Feel any better now???
“This is not the way best buy became such a success.”
Of course not. Neither was
the
“double website caper” or the illegal use of diagnostic and utility
software! Yeah, Best Buy is a “stand up company.” Go do a search for some lawsuits against Best Buy and
read up on their past antics.
Since this was already discussed, go back
several hundred replies to see my response to this. Why does Robert
think this is relevant to this report? And I never stated Best Buy was a
"stand up company" in those terms so why do you put it in quotes? I
simply choose to look at all sides of an accusation before condemning.
Imagine that? Due process, reasoning and fairness??? I guess that is
something you have never had in your life..so you think no one else
should utilize it.
The Wonderful Ripoff Report Defender:
http://www.ripoffreport.com/banks/us-bank-us-bancorp/us-bank-us-bancorp-rip-off-f3dda.htm
they most likely will end up here, so it is important
that information is accurate and all sides of the argument are offered
so the site doesn't come off as a joke or biased, which due to this
redundant banter, it may to some.
Now you’re the self-appointed defender of ROR! The reality is that your redundant hypocrisy coupled
with your picking for fights POLUTES ROR! Anyone
reading your incessant novellas quickly realizes that your purpose is to
provoke conflict under the guise of attempting to debate.
There is no debating with you-you act as a child.
As someone else has told you, it’s OK if you wish to be a
hypocrite, just don’t do so and pretend to be one of the good
guys-you’re not. You troll for a fight and play victim when called out
on it.
Robert?...Are you senile? The link is
once again..to THE SAME report.
All
you have accomplished here, is to post links to THE same report where we
are already at, or reports that are unrelated to the topic here, and to
COMPLETELY divert the topic, and ruin any credibility it may of had.
And, to posts where I have debated and stood my ground. I don't know
what you wanted to accomplish..maybe to make the bank defenders proud?
Either way, I don't think anyone could care less.
It just makes you look desperate and like you have some kind of grudge against me, like apparently you do against Best Buy and Walmart because they don't allow you to have free rentals of DVD's and software.