- Report: #1077344
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: GLENCORD BUILDING CORPORATION< GISTIZIA AGRESSIVO< CONSTANCE CINCOTTA
GLENCORD BUILDING CORPORATION< GISTIZIA AGRESSIVO< CONSTANCE CINCOTTANew York, Select State/Province USA
GLENCORD BUILDING CORPORATION, GISTIZIA AGRESSIVO, CONSTANCE CINCOTTA THE LANDLORD, THE GLENCORDS INTENTIONAL TORT WITH CARBON MONOXIDE AND TOXIC GASES, CORRUPTION, FORGERIES, New York New York
*Author of original report: WHEN THE LAW IS IGNORED BY GLENCORD BUILDING CORP., HIS LAW FIRMS KAUFMAN & KAHN LLP , FIDEN & NORRIS LLP, ET ACCOMPLICES.
A businesses first
line of defense on
If your business
willing to make a
Click here now..
I RESUBMIT THE ORIGINAL REPORT IN LIGIBLE FORM !
2 Author of original report
GLENCORD BUILDING CORPORATION CRIMINAL ACTS, TORT.
AUTHOR: Antigona - ()
SUBMITTED: Saturday, August 17, 2013
POSTED: Saturday, August 17, 2013
GLENCORD BUILDING CORPORATION, JUSTIZIA AGRESSIVO, CONTANCE CINCOTTA ( ”The GLENCORDS”)
( The Landlord) SECRET WEAPON TO KILL PEOPLE WITH CARBON MONOXIDE (CO), AND TOXIC GASES!
” SHOULD THE CURRENCY OF OUR VALUE BE MONETARY ?”
I was fortunate to live from 1994 to 2009, in the most expensive area in the world , zip code 10021.
In 2009 I abandoned the apartment because the above the law Glencords refused four (4) Courts' Orders to fix the apartment for Carbon Monoxide (CO) and toxic gases. No law could and can so far touch them!
In this period I had three (3 ) owners. I had no any problems with the first two.
In 2004 the building was bought by the third owner Glencord Building Corp , Gistizia Agressivo, and Constance Cincotta “ The Glencords” “ the landlord”.
Starting with the new owner bizarre problems occurred in our building. Two rapes and many tenants' rights violations.
Personally, I stated to experience very bad symptoms ONLY IN APARMENT: Coughing, Nausea, High Blood Pressure, and Headache, vomiting.
In September 2006 the ambulance took me at Emergency Room (ER) for chest pain, High Blood Pressure, Dizziness.
In November 2006, I arrived again at ER and the doctors diagnosed me with “chronic intoxication with CO”, and sent in that night Fire Department for the building inspection.
In 2006, 2007, due the gas problems I was forced to eat out. The Glencords promised to pay me, and they did just 1% from my expenses.
In 2007, after a year ( not two months conform the law ), time when Glencords tried to poison me with CO and toxic gases, they sued me for unpaid rent L& T Index # 096115/07( I spend my money for rent by eating out due the Glencords's calculated negligence, tort, breach of contract).
The case was designated to an impeccable, vertical, and with 100% judicial integrity, Honorable Judge Michelle Schreiber.
Honorable Schreiber did not care if you are rich or poor, plaintiff or defendant, with blue or brawn eyes, beautiful or average. She looks straight at both parties and applies the law.
She wrote with her hand an order with 10 rules to be respected, and rule #6 with suborder a, b, c, d, e. At 6-e she wrote:
” Fix the stove as necessary”,
and asked me and the Glencords's lawyer attorney Robert L. Kahn from Kaufman & Kahn LLP to sign in front of her.
Later Honorable Judge Schreiber will give another two orders in my cases filed in HP Court as : HP case 633/09, and HP 305/09, where ordered to Glencords to fix the apartment, and took signature from attorney Kahn and me to respect the Orders. The Glencords and his attorney ignored all orders.
It was too much for above the law Glencords and his lawyer Robert Kahn.
For this, in March 17, 2008, they abandoned their case, and the case was close by the same judge for non-presentation.
In retaliation they intensified my poisoning with CO and toxic gases. In August 2008, the Glencords’ lawyer Mr. Robert Kahn, filed a Motion to vacate the Judge Schreiber’s Order.
I apologize because I cannot give you the name of another Honorable Judge also with integrity and high respect for American Justice, who on September 25, 2008, in only a few minutes denied Mr. Kahn’s motion to vacate , and said:
“ Counselor , you have something in your mind to wait 6 months to file the motion”.
The order disappear from my evidences and from the court also.
Yes, the Glencords had in mind to intensify the poison for me.
In this way on July 2008, I arrived again at ER poisoned with CO. The gas Company Con Edison found High Level of CO, and cut again the gas connection. I did not have any gas connection again from July 2008 until January 2009.
The Glencords kept me intentionally without gas connection to be free to poison me. Also they filed another L&T case.
In February 2009, 2 days before the court with Judge Kraus, I had in apartment a steam explosion. I was fortunate because I moved at hotel a day before due the toxic smell.
In June, 2009 a Building Expert paid by me, found totally unhealthy the apartment and with High Level of toxic gases. He recommend do not stay in apartment.
Looking with a special instrument for a possible hidden camera , I found in my stereo digital musical combine a very strange , fresh, white cream . The stores, and the Police could not identify it but definitely was not a lubricant. They directed me to lab.
I went at the EMSL Laboratory who make to disappear the cream and the parts trying to cover the Glencords’ criminal acts. At my request the EMSL give me a contra probe which I sent at a Long Island Laboratory who determinate a huge amount of toxic substances as:
- HEXANE (12, 255 ppb very toxic at 400 ppm),
- BUTANE (of 4,735 ppb.) ,
- CYCLOHEXASILOXANE 2,950 ppm.,
- plus many more over 100 with flags.
All this toxic substances are color , and smell less. The lab called me, and told me to quit the apartment immediately, and to underground everything because is very , very toxic substance.
Additionally, on September 5, 2008, the U.S Consumer Safety Product did an Epidemiologic Investigation, Task # 080903HCC1888, Investigator ID: 8966, who reported in around 100 pages, that the Glencord Building Corp., Giustizia Agressivo, and Constance Cincotta responsible for all problems my rent apartment.
The report was stolen for 5 times from my room by the Glencords' “good people”.
In November 2008, the Glencords filed another lawsuit against me for unpaid rent, and refused to pay me the expenses due his negligence to have a stove.
Judge Sabrina Kraus was the judge in last part in the case L&T 90925/2009.She refused to give me the right to defend myself, to support my evidences, and did not care about the truth.
In abuse of discretion Judge Sabrina Kraus :
- Ignored my robust evidence accepted by judge as “ Respondent Exhibits, over 130 pieces of evidences accepted in court " en gross, an block" was illegally ignored. Refused my constitutional right to support my case.
- Rewarded the Glencord Building Corp with $17, 000.
- Refused my legal right to reopen the case for new evidences.
- Refused my motion to subpoena Con Edison who falsified Subpoena Duces Tecum.
- the 4 Red Tags for violations with Carbon Monoxide and toxic gases violations issued by Con Edison ( in 2006, 2007, 2008).
- the DHPD's and HPO's inspectors report who found violations.
- over 14 Carbon Monoxide Detectors did not detect High Level of CO.
- In 19 months was changed 4 stoves ( 3 of them in warranty), and a meter, as a source of High Level of CO and toxic gases
- The HP Affidavit filed by attorney Mark Roedner in my favor supporting the presence of violation in my apartment.
- The Doctors and Emergency Room medical reports who directed me to stay in hotel until the situation will be fixed.
- The previous Judges' Orders who said the apartment must to be fix.
- My Constitutional Right for Jury Trial, Discovery and Deposition from Glencord Building Corp.,
- My legal Right to support my evidence for my defense.
- The facts that other persons from the same building who arrived in hospital and complained the same problems.
BUT ACCEPTED :
- The false affirmation under oath done by the Buidilg’s manager Mr. Nudo.
- The falsified Subpoena Duces Tecum and the deposition done by Con Edison.
AND IN ABUSE OF DISCRETION JUDGE KRAUS SAID:.
( from the Court’s Transcript) :
“..the record at trial contains no evidences that petitioner [the landlord] are guilty of any morally culpable conduct”
( Decision and order March 11, 2009, L&T 90925/08-Pg.3).
” All right. There ‘s no evidence that there’s been any intoxication by carbon monoxide.. No any carbon monoxide” ( Court Deposition , February 27, 2009, Pg. 67, L. 24, 25 and Pg. 68, L.1).
” So I’m not terrible concerned with the physical symptoms of her medical situation”-
( Court Deposition, Feb .27, 2009, Pg. 131, L. 14 to 16),
and rewarded the above the landlord GLENCORD:
“A money judgment is• hereby granted , along with cost and disbursements in the amount of $ 0.00 in favor of: GLENCORD BUILDING CORP AND GISTIZIA AGRESIVO, LLC AS, TENANTS- IN _COMMON, and against ......, DOE , JOHN for a total amount of $ 17966.20” – Decision and Judgment is rendered based upon a decision made after trial. Date 3/11/09, Sabrina Kraus- Judge, Civil /Housing Court “
IMMEDIATELY, THE ENTIRE FILE L& T 90925/2008 (THOUSANDS OF EVIDENCES) DISAPPEARED COMPLETELY FROM THE COURT.
I did complaints. Judge Sabrina Kraus signed in May 8, 2009, an “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO RECREATE THE FILE” where said :
” Upon the annexed affirmation of Robert L. Kahn, Esq., [ never served to me], dated May 7, 2009, the exhibits attached thereto, and upon all prior pleadings and proceedings had herein , Let the respondent [me] show cause at Part S, ….Let overnight courier service of a copy of this order and the papers which is granted upon respondent …..n [I was never served}…,, on before 11th day of May , 2009, be deemed good and sufficient service. Proof of service may be filed on their return date with the Clerk in the Part indicated above. Dated New York, New York , May 8, 2009, Hon. Sabrina Kraus”.
This ORDER WAS NEVER SERVED TO ME. Same with the attorney Affidavit in support of Recreate the file.
Only a few extras from my Exhibits accepted by Judge Kraus and ignored.
- On January 22, 2007, I complaint why the landlord tergiversates to fix the stove problem:
”….. I understand in 2-3 weeks the gas problem will be fix. Now, again I have cut the gas about a months, and I am waiting for somebody to take responsibility for this grave situation” ….”(Respondent Exhibit 29), EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
2.. January 30, 2007. ….I reminded to my landlord his promise to contact Con Edison:
” Also I am still waiting as you promised me -to contact Con Edison and fix the old problem with the gas….”(Respondent Exhibit 28). EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
- February 8, 2007. I reminded to my landlord to fix the stove problem “ …
“Therefore , today February 8, 2007, are 49 days , from when you forced me for the second time to eat anywhere. Already my health problems increased alarm ant ……I hope to take seriously this grave problem, and to fix in my benefit , and all tenants benefits”, EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
- March 12, 2007, I was waiting for the plumber to come, and again “ inexplicable at that time” the landlord postponed to fix the meter. I complained with the letter where I wrote:
” Please take seriously my problem with the gas connection in my rent apartment. Please fix with the Plumber Company what they have to do . It is unbeliever in what sad situation I am. Today March 12,2007, I lost my doctor’s appointment waiting for the plumber” …as Respondent Exhibit 059, EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
- April 5, 2007. I still remained to my landlord his obligation to fix the gas problem;
“On behalf of myself, ……, I am outlining the totally disappointment do not have almost 5 months gas in apartment” …( Respondent Exhibit 060) EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
6.. May 27, 2008. ….I complained to the landlord:
“ very strange and abnormal things happened in this apartment in last 4 years. For this I insist that PROMPT STEPS BE TAKEN to rectify those problems”,
( Respondent Exhibit 073). EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
7. August 14, 2008. I informed the landlord and the landlord’s lawyer Mr. Kahn, about the oncoming HPD inspector’s workshop in my rent apartment. Additionally, in the same day the stove’s factory company inspector Premier Plus came for inspection and to fix the stove:
“….Please take all steps necessary to assure the normal conditions for investigation” ( Respondent’s Exhibit J” and 082). EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
8. September 12, 2008. I remained to the landlord’s lawyer to force the landlord to fix the stove:
” Today September 12, 2008, will be 2 months ( 60 days plus to another 260 days in last 17 months) from when AGAIN I do not have a working stove. .Your client’s constant refusal to cooperate with Housing Department inspectors, and stove’s factory representative, tells a lot” . ….”(Respondent Exhibit 038). EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
9. December 16, 2008. I wrote to landlord’s attorney:
“I would like to know why you did not respect the Court Order[ gave by Judge Fardell Rushford] regarding the stove installation? “ . No answer. ….”(Respondent Exhibit 035). EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
10. From July 2008 until January 14, 2009, I DID NOT HAVE ANY APPOINTMENTS WITH CON EDISON. Judge Kraus did an legal err by giving credibility to the building’s manager false affirmation.
11. January 2, 2009 I wrote to the landlord’s attorney Mr. Kahn :
“Please advise your client ( my owner) to take all legal steps regarding the 4th stove installation in last 17 months….”. ( Respondent Exhibit 056). EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
12. January 13, 2009. I wrote to attorney Kahn:
“ ….I will appreciate if you will give me a copy letter where you informed me about “ the pretended Con Edison ‘s appointment” on December 30, 2008“. Evident never provided one because did not exist. ( Respondent Exhibit 054). EVIDENCE ACCEPTED and IGNORED BY JUDGE KRAUS.
And Judge Krause said I did not inform the landlord for gas problems.
• In the same time I opened in HP Court two cases regarding the warranty of habitability (HP 305/09 and HP 633/09). Two HP judges ordered on 4/7/09 and 4/16/09 that Glencords must to fix the toxic gases problems (same order with the L& T from 2/7/08 and 11/19/2008).
After, Judge Sabrina Kraus abandoned her case.
The case was taken by Judge Kaplan, who will give in abuse of discretion as legal fee for attorney Robert Kahn $ 37, 000. 00. A total of $ 55,716.20 .
My efforts to establish the truth was in vain.
In mean time cannot be find in the Court :
- The CD with the Court’s Deposition during Judge Sabrina Kraus, never produced to me
- " The Order signed by L& T Judge Schreiber on 2/7/07.
- " The Order signed by L& T Judge Schreiber on 2/7/08.
- ", and other orders does not exist in file anymore also.
I was staying in hotel from February 2009 until June 2009 when I abandoned the apartment. Four 4 judges were not impressed by the "currency value" and respected my Legal Rights. On July 16, 2009, the HP Judge David B. Cohen, will ignore his colleagues judges' s orders, and will deny my request for :
- Jury Trial Demanded - Discovery - Deposition and Judge Cohen will agree with judge's Kraus's order full of legal fundamental errors.
Judge Cohen ignored totally my Constitutional Rightss, and the HP Affirmation in my favor.
Due all this in June 2011 was found dead a tenant in the Glencords building.
He was 69 years old, and lived in the same rent apartment own by Glencords for 49 years. He complained as me the strange heat in walls, toxic gases, and wanted to be witness in my personal injury case with CO and toxic gases.
In the same months June 2011, I arrived for two times at ER very ill , and the blood showed High Level of CO and high risk at heart attack .
I was and I am abused, harassed by above the law Glencords and his clique ( my ex lawyers, some corrupted institutions et al.).
The case actually, was between Judge Sabrina Kraus and GLENCORD’s attorney Mr. Robert Kahn who refused to respect the law.
AT THE TRIAL THE GLERNCORD’S ATTORNEY MR. KAHN AND THE BUILDING’S MANAGER DID NOT BRING A PIECE OF EVIDENCE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT WAS NOT CO IN APARTMENT!
Later the same judge Sabrina Kraus will refuse me the legal right to reopen the case for new evidences .
Additionally, the Court refused to give me the CDs with audio Court Deposition because the reporter falsified the transcript.
Until now 2013 I do not have the CDs, and the court explained me they cannot find the audio deposition in Judge’s Kraus Court.
All this encouraged The Above The Law Glencord Building Corp., Gistizia Agressivo and Constance Cincotta To:
- • Continue to abuse me, to harass me, to poison me, to ruin my life and my heath.
- • Corrupt people, banks, insurances, hospitals who falsified the medical reports, hided the blood under bed, clerk, laboratories...
• Make to disappear files , Order, Legal documents from the court and my apartment •
IN 2009 DIED A WOMEN DUE TOXIC GASES USED BY GLENCORD TO POISON ME.
At that time I informed my lawyer Bompart& Bompart and State Farm Insurances. I did not know they were my adversary, and in the Glencord’s side.
REGARDING THE HEARING UNDER JUDGE KAPLAN IS A CONTINUATION OF INJUSTICE WHO TOOK JUDGE”S SABRINA KRAUS CASE.
In JUDGE KAPLAN COURT:
- The Court Reporter refused to transcript the Court Audio 4 minutes deposition on January 9, 2012. After 6 months when I started to prepare the Brief for my appeal I saw the mutilated transcript done by the abusive court’s reporter Vicky Valente, and missing that 4 minutes. I went in court and I requested corrections. The court contacted the reporter who refused to make correction but added that 4 minutes missing from the transcript.
- I went home and I did errata at deposition. When I tried to submit the errata in court, the Appellate Clerk , Room 118, refused to accept my errata, pretending that she did not have that 4 minutes of audio transcript intentionally omitted by the Court’s Reporter. I was sent to 3rd Floor, at Transcript Clerk to ask a copy for Appellate Clerk. Here the clerk could not find his original sent by Court’s Reporter where added that 4 minutes.
- Finally, I was asked to bring my copy from home to make a copy for court because the court does have the original anymore.. I was shocked but I did not know that my copy was already a falsified one.
- Also, the CDs with audio transcript and my signature on red on the labels were stolen.
- In the falsified one, the Judge Kaplan’s affirmations are not the same with the original one. For this reason the court asked me to bring my copy. The Court’s Deposition was gross falsified.
- I scanned the transcript after the reporter added the missing audio transcript , effectively Pg. 17, 18, 19, 20 from Court Dep. Before Judge Kaplan – January 9, 2012, and Pg. 18 is deleted from my computer. Also, I did a copy the CDs with the audio Court Deposition, and I found that were totally falsified. Impossible to listen.
This is the way to fight for justice by Glencord and his attorneys. They control my life, my oxygen, my heath, my computer, EVEERYTHING! NO LAW FOR THEM !
The Glencord's Attorney Mr. Robert Kahn filed a Notice of Motion for December 17, 20111 where he requested fee pretending conform " Judge Kraus Order".
I filed a Reply Affidavit in Opposition, reply who disappeared from the court. In December 17, 2011:
- Judge Kraus abandoned her case.
- The case was sent to Judge Sandres Room 523, who refused to take Judge’s Kraus case.
3. From there the case went back in the same day at Judge Kraus- Room 820.
4. Judge Kraus sent the case to Judge Kaplan Room 820.
- Judge Kaplan postponed the hearing for January 9, 2012 because I complained the missing of my Reply Affidavit in Opposition over 400 pages.
MS…..: Your Honor, I want to ask why the file disappear from court? I want to know?
THE COURT: So ask counsel. Do you know why the file disappear from court?
MR. KAHN: Judge, I have no idea why the file was missing…
(Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 35, L.3 to7).
ON JANUARY 9, 2012 I DEPOSED:
"THE COURT : So what are you asking for? MS………:
…………………I asking , first of all, he [ Glencord’s attorney] cannot ask to be paid for perjury—obstruction of – [justice]“. (Court Dep. Before Judge Kaplan – January 9, 2012- pg. 5, L. 24, 25 and Pg. 6, L. 1).
The Judge Kraus Order said “ A money judgment is• hereby granted , along with cost and disbursements in the amount of $ 0.00 in favor of: GLENCORD BUILDING CORP AND GISTIZIA AGRESIVO, LLC AS, TENANTS- IN _COMMON, and against ……[me]..”,
but the Glencord’s lawyer Mr. Robert L. Kahn, whiteout scruples falsified the truth and said:
“ MR. KAHN: …
Yes, Judge. In support of my motion, Your Honor , I attached Judges Kraus’s decision. In that decision, she awarded the petitioner—she awarded the petitioner 98 percent of petitioner’s claim [FALSE], directed a judgment for over $ 17, 000 in rent arrears”. (Court Dep. Before Judge Kaplan – January 9, 2012- Pg. 6, L.7 to 11).
I knew Judge Kraus never gave 98% as attorney fee. Judge Kaplan in court in January 9, 2012 stopped the trial to read my “ missing” and “found” Reply in Opposition and my Notice of Cross Motion.
When we came back , Judge Kaplan said that he cannot see where Judge Kraus give 98 % as fee and suggested a settlement .
THE COURT : …but what I am suggesting is, maybe withdrawing your appeal of Judge Kraus’s order and moving on” . (Court Dep. Before Judge Kaplan – January 9, 2012- Pg. 19, L. 13 to 15).
I refused, and the Judge Kaplan wrote in his decision that petitioner “ was awarded a judgment of 98% of his claims by virtue of J. Kraus’s 3/11/09 decision after trial”.
In February 8, 2012 in court when the judge asked me I answered:
“THE COURT : Ms. …., you want to say something? MS…… : Yes, I do want to say something. First , your Honor, I didn’t understand your decision from January 9th. You state here it’s a judgment was 98 percent signed by Judge Kraus. I was looking more at the decision by Judge Kraus and I cannot see. Could you—maybe the Petitioner can explain where the Judge Kraus say 98 percent for him, for the fees”. (Court Dep. Before Judge Kaplan – Feb. 8, 2012- Pg. 3, L. 20 to 25 and Pg. 4, L. 1 to 3).
At my request immediately the Glencord’s attorney said that actually is not Judge’s Kraus decision, it is an “ simple arithmetic” at attorney Kahn’s mercy, not a Court Order anymore.
MR. KAHN: ..Judge , what happened is is that the 98 percent is simple arithmetic. She awarded Ms. ...... about $ 300 in abatements and awarded us the balance of the arrears—
MS. …: I want to see
MR. KAHN: –of $ 17, 000. THE COURT : Okay. I’m not so interested in calculating that”. (Court Dep. Before Judge Kaplan – February 8, 2012- Pg. 4, L. 11 to 18).
Of course, Judge Kaplan, is not interested to listen the truth, because he will rewarded the Petitioner for attorney’s fee with 210% that means $ 37, 750 [ since judge Kraus gave zero(0), and not any 98%].
Additionally, attorney Kahn submitted a FALSE contract between me and Glencord, before the Glencord stole all contacts from my file.
Supplementary, before Judge Kaplan, The Appellate Term of The Supreme Court, First Department Division on January 18, 2012 dismissed attorney’s Kahn Notice of Motion to stop me to sue and for fees. And, with aplomb Glencord’s attorney said:
“MR. KAHN: …..Judge Kraus found that she, Respondent [me] was obstructive in allowing both Con Ed and Petitioner access to the apartment to inspect in and repair the condition.
MS……..: Objections, Your Honor”. (Court Dep. Before Judge Kaplan –1/ 9/ 2012- Pg. 6, L. 20 to 23).
His affirmation are false. If Judge Krause did not ignore my over 130 evidences marked by Court as Respondent ‘s Exhibits, Judge Kraus could not say:
“ RESPONDENT [ME] HAS BEEN OBSTRUCTIVE IN ALLOWING PETITIONER ACCESS TO INSPECT AND REPAIR ANY ALLEGED CONDITIONS IN THE SUBJECT PREMISES” -Judge Kraus Order Pg. 3.
Judge Kraus did legal errors, and encouraged the Glencord’s attorney Mr. Robert Kahn to have the nerve to falsify the truth under oath. HE BROUGH A FALSE CONTRACT. At that and this time I do not have any contract . All were stolen by Glencord.
Attorney Kahn broth in court the bills without giving me the right to exanimate them, to attack them.
Judge Kaplan gave me 10 minutes to exanimate attorneys fees over $ 50, 000. Supplementary, the court did not respect, the 6th Amendment from The American Constitution who said:
“ # 6- To Know the Evidence against you and Confront Your Accuser… …. and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation …”
Now my file is vandalized. Missing Court’s Orders with Judge Kaplan, missing my Reply Affidavit in Opposition, My Motion to reopen the case for new evidences, my Notice of Cross Motions, my motion. No any contract between me and Glencord. I went in court to see the file and I have to wait a few months. I asked in court a copy of Judge Kaplan decision done in 2012, and I was refused.
Effectively, I could not do my brief because the evidences was partially stolen.
TO CONTINUE WITH THE GLENCORD’S ABUSES!
Exemplificative, is that another Glencords’ lawyer Mr. Austin Jacobson, who is in Default Judgment in my personal injury case with Carbon Monoxide and toxic gases Index 18853/2009.
Mr. Jacobson had the nerve to falsify the truth under oath by saying that he submitted the answer in his Affirmation in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion Seeking Default Judgment, as Exhibit D, which is a gross false and fatal injustice.
The document did not content any Exhibit D, because he never respected the Court’s Order to answer. He is above the law as his client GLENCORD.
I was also speckles when I saw the Glencord’s lawyer Mr. Jacobson’s document “VERIFIED ANSWER AND NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON ORAL EXAMINATION” under a FICTIVE LAWSUIT in my name as “ AGRIPINA” v. Glencord – Filed in Kings Court under Index # 25016/2005.
I sent him an email on 11/29/12 and I asked:
” What is this ? Another forgery with law suit in my name?”, and he directed me “… As to the complaint, I suggest asking Bompart & Bompart [my ex lawyer]”.
My ex lawyer refused to give an explanation. And not randomly my 7 (seven ) lawyers cannot fight for my legal rights and rushed to do forgery with fictive lawsuits in my name.
They knew I must to pass away under so many poisoning with Carbon Monoxide and toxic gases under Glencord’s scenario. So until now I found 3 lawsuits filled with forgery by my ex lawyers who became my adversary in their greed for money as:
1. “ Agripina “ v. Glencord – Filed in Kings Court under Index # 25016/2005.
2. “ Agripina “ v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, docket No: 18134-05S .
3. “ Agripin a” v. Consolidate Edison Index 107975/2011.
- 4. PLUS a life insurances and assets in value $ half million issued by attorney Kahn, and pretending under oath me I served that evidences. In this situation all continue to harass me ,to torture me, to abuse me, because Glencord and his cliques consider to be above the law and under 1% privilege.
THE GLENCORDS AND HIS ACCOMPLICES CORRUPTED HOSPITAL WHO FALSIFIED THE MEDICAL REPORTS, STATE FARM INSURANCES, BANKS, PRIVATE DOCTORS, LABORATORIES , TO COVER THEIR CRIMINAL ACTS.
ALL BECAUSE FIRST JUDGE KRAUS WHO IGNORED ANOTHER JUDGES ORDERS , AND DID LEGAL FUNDAMENTAL ERRS TOGETHER WITH JUDGE COHEN AND KAPLAN.
Also, Judge Kraus, Judge Cohen and Judge Kaplan ignored my Constitutional Rights. Judge Sabrina Kraus, Kaplan and Judge Cohen " to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not "- Patrick Henry' s discourse " GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME THE DEATH" in front of George Washington, March 20, 1775.
Nobody wanted to take my case, and all legal aids, declined their help for such complicated case.
I appealed the Judge Sabrina Kraus Decision and Order, dated March 2009, in Appellate Term, Supreme Court, New York, and was denied. After, I appealed her order in APPELATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
In February 17, 2011 THE APPELATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, decided for my Motion No: M-6276P:
“ GLENCORD BUILDING CORP. V. “ AGRIPINA” ; MATTER TRANSFERRED TO THE APPELLATE TERM, SUPREME COURT, NEW YORK COUNTY, FOR HEARING AND DISPOSITION”.
I never received from Glencord’s attorney Robert Kahn, a Notice of Entry with the Order. I did not know about the correct content of this order until February 5, 2013, because what I received was a copy with only “ motion denied”.
In this contest, I filed a Motion to Reopen the case for new evidence in L&T court, and Judge Sabrina Kraus denied my legal right by saying in her Order dated September 22, 2011:
” MOTION IS DENIED. RESPONDENT HAS ALREADY APPEALED THIS COURT’S TRIAL DECISION AND LOST. NO FURTHER RELIEF IS WARRANTED”.
For sure Judge Kraus knew what THE APPELATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT ordered in the Court Order dated February 2011, the file to go back for hearing, and also knew that my appeal was not granted so was not any trial but did not care, and denied me the even the legal right to reopen the case for new evidences.
I filed a Motion for an Order to Subpoena Con Edison who falsified the truth in court and in Subpoena Duces Tecum and Judge Sabrina Kraus denied my motion . Judge Sabrina Kraus abandoned her case in November 2011.
Why Judge Kraus did not give me the legal right to reopen the case, since actually the initial case conform APPELATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT should be back “FOR HEARING AND DISPOSITION”.
Why was the order hidden away from me for two years The APPELATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT ? . Order for the Motion No: 6276 decided on February 17, 2011 was “ PUBLISHED by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law &431” and “ This Motion is uncorrected and is not subject to publication in the Official Reports”.
IT IS NOT PUBLISHED BECAUSE GLENCORDS HIDE THE TRUTH. ACTUALLY, ON FEBRUARY 15, 2013 MY MOTION NO: M-6276, FILED IN APPELATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT CANNOT BE FOUND IN COURT.
In my file disappeared long time ago.
- When will stop the above the law Glencord’s abuses?
- Why justice is nor respected in my case?
PEOPLE WITH POWER AND RESPECT FOR AMERICAN JUSTICE, please help me.
I did nothing wrong, and I know I have the right to refuse an injustice! Thank you.
I would like to know why an Inferior Court did not respect an order from Superior Court”?
• Why does an Inferior Court respect the order from a Superior Court? ( The Appellate Division, First Department Order dated February 17, 2011, signed by Honorable Justice David B Saxe, Honorable Justice Karla Moskowitz, Honorable Justice Rosalyn H. Richter, Honorable Justice Sallie Manzanet –Daniels and Honorable Justice Nelson S. Roman, never served me with Notice of Entry by above the law Glencord’s attorney’s Robert Kahn. I did not know about the real content of the order until February 5, 2013. The order was hidden. What I know was that the my motion to appeal was in Appellate Division, First Department was denied, but I did not know that The Justices decided the case should be ” transferred to Appellate Term , Supreme Court, New York county, for hearing and disposition” .
Later, Judge Kraus abandoned her case. Very courageous, the Glencord’s attorney Mr. Robert Kahn filed a Motion in Appellate Term of the Supreme Court , First Department where he requested “ costs and enjoining tenant –appellant from bringing further motions or appeals”. Also, he filed a similar motion in L&T Court for December 17, 2011, falsely pretending that Judge Krause gave 98% as attorney’s fees ( which is not true, and as I described before, after he changed the story by saying is a mathematical deduction).
IN JANUARY 6, 2012, HONORABLE JUSTICE RICHARD B. LOWE, III, P.J., HONORABLE JUSTICE MARTIN SCHOENFELD AND HONORABLE JUSTICE MARTIN SHULMAN DENIED GLENCORD’S ATTORNEY MOTION.
Because my Reply Affidavit could not be found in court, L&T case 90925/2008, the trial was postponed finally for February 8, 2012. In L& T Court on February 8, 2012 in Judge Kaplan Court I said:
“ THE COURT: …Maybe I misheard you, I though you said something was denied at Appellate Term?
MS. …. : Yes, he submitted a motion for fees, the similar motion in Supreme Appellate Division and the motion was denied. I put _ _ I have a copy with me, Your Honor. Here..
THE COURT: Okay.
MS. ……. : In the Judge Kraus Order, I –
THE COURT: Okay. I’m going forward with the hearing, okay. You’ll have another order you can appeal if you’re not satisfied with it”
MS….. : Your Honor, just a second because I believe it’s something wrong. I have Judge Sabrina Kraus’s signature.
THE COURT: Okay.
MS. …. : And she gave zero for fees”. ( Court’s Deposition February 8, 2012, Pg. 5, L. 2 to 17)
In conclusion: - Judge Sabrina Kraus gave on her order dated March 11, 2009 gave “ a money judgment is hereby granted, along with cost and disbursements in the amount of 0.00 in favor of Glencord Building Corp”.
She gave me less $ 1(one) by day for food. - Supreme Court Appellate Term denied the motions for fees, - and Judge Kaplan in abuse of his discretion gave $37,750.00 as attorney’s fees, and sent me to appeal the order. In the meantime my motions, court’s orders, replies affidavits disappear from file.
Actually, Attorney Kahn tried to stop my fight for Justice do not discover that he hide the Appellate Division Court Order for hearing and other courts orders, and forgery life insurances. What I knew now!
Since L&T Court did not respect the Superior Courts’ Orders, it easy to understand how the Inferior Court respected my Constitutional Rights and my right for defense. On January 9, 26 and February 8, 2012 was Trial for L&T Index 090925/2008, with Judge Kaplan who replaces Judge Sabrina Kraus who abandoned her case.
THE TRANSCRIBER VIKY VALENTE, INTENTIONALLY DID NOT TRANSCRIPT 4 MINUTES FROM THE COURT AUDIO DEPOSITION TRIAL ON JANUARY 9, 2012, AND MUTILATED THE TRANSCRIPT AT THE GLENCORDS’ ATTORNEY MERCY.
ONLY a few examples below: (Erratum is conforming the audio deposition in Judge Kaplan Court).
• MS. …..: This building manager who falsified the position, he say he receives thousand of faxes, it’s in the disposition and what I complain or presents of carbon monoxide.
MS. ….: This building manager who falsified the deposition (very audible), he said he received thousands of faxes, it’s in the deposition where(very audible) . I complained the presence (very audible) of carbon monoxide. (Court Deposition 1/9/2012- Pg. 8 L. 8 to 11).
MS. …..: Also ( inaudible- strong accent) falsify subpoena ducas tecum. Falsifies their position.
MS:…… Also Con Edison falsified (very audible) Subpoena Duces Tecum. Falsified the deposition (very audible). (Court Deposition 1/9/2012- Pg. 8, L 21 to 22).
- • MS. ……: Okay. He – - please the court, at his desire. He might (inaudible- strong accent) how is possible?
Ms…………..He [ the counselor] manipulated (very audible) the court, at his desire. He manipulated the deposition , he manipulated Con Edison( very audible) how is possible? (Court Deposition 1/9/2012- Pg. 12, L 16 to 18).
• MS….. : Never because is classifies it through justice, it’s unbelievable.
MS. …. : Never because they falsified the truth, they obstructed (very audible)the justice, it’s unbelievable. (Court Deposition 1/9/2012- Pg. 19, L 22 to 23).
• MS. ….: …For forgery? For obstruction of justice? It’s everything what they did. The building manager falsifies the truth. The -( inaudible –strong accent ) falsifies subpoena ducas tecum, It is of their position.
MS. ….: …For forgery? For obstruction of justice? It’s everything what they did. The building manager falsifies the truth. The Con Edison(very audible ) falsified Subpoena Duces Tecum, and the deposition( very audible). (Court Deposition 1/26/2012- Pg. 4, L 22-25).
- • MS. ….. : I don’t know the file disappear from court and I was not served. The Judge gave an order to ( inaudible –strong accent)file or must be served overnight. I wasn’t served. He submitted an affirmation and opposition. I was not served. I didn’t understand. I believed this case was between Judge Kraus and ( inaudible –strong accent) Kahn.
MS. …….. :I don’t know the file disappear from court and I was not served. The Judge gave an order to recreate (very audible) file and I (very audible) must be served overnight. I wasn’t served. He submitted an affirmation and opposition. I was not served. I didn’t understand. I believed this case was between Judge Kraus and attorney (very audible) Kahn. (Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 14, L. 12 to 18).
• MS. ……: Yes, Your Honor, and I ask permission to ask more , more questions. Mr. Kahn, this is a Judge’s decision regarding my – - your case. Could you tell me why you had (inaudible- strong accent) the case ?
MS. …..: Yes, Your Honor, and I ask permission to ask more , more questions. Mr. Kahn, this is a Judge’s decision regarding my – - your case. Could you tell me why you abandoned (very audible-)the case ? MR. KAHN: I am going to object Judge. It has nothing to do with the – - MS. …..: Why your objection?
(Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 26, L. 5 to 12).
• MS. ……: Yes, You Honor. He had a court order from this case from Judge to fix apartment, to fix the stoves, to fix – - to find the source of carbon monoxide , they refuse.
MS. ….: Yes, You Honor. He had a court order from this case from Judge to fix the apartment, to fix the stoves, to fix – - to find the source of carbon monoxide , and they refused( very audible).(Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 27, L. 19 to 25).
• MS. ……. : Why is the building inspector paid by me who found high level of carbon monoxide which was not in the correction. Your Honor I want to submit this as Exhibit, if you give me permission, because they can sue me for everything and this court , I have 130 exhibits accepted by Judge Kraus , I’m broke , I’m( inaudible- strong accent),, and she refuse me the possibility to support my exhibits, and still the building manager, he came with memos and he had permission to support his case.
MS……. : Why the building’s inspector paid by me found high level of carbon monoxide since was not any gas connection( very audible). Your Honor I want to submit this as Exhibit, if you give me permission, because they submit(very audible), everything and this court , I have 130 exhibits accepted by Judge Kraus , on block, on masses (very audible), and she refuse me the possibility to support my exhibits, instead (very audible), the building’s manager, he came with memoirs (very audible), and he had permission to support his case. (Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 28, L. 10 to 25).
• MR. KAHN: …with respect to Ms. …. ‘s two HP proceedings. Her allegations that there was a court order to making repairs is untrue and – -
MS. …..: Excuse me, Your Honor.
MS. ……: Objection, I have with me. It’s objection, Your Honor. Court order to repair.
MR. KAHN: …with respect to Ms. ….. ‘s two HP proceedings. Her allegations that there was a court order to making repairs is untrue and – -
MS. …..: Excuse me, Your Honor.
MS…….: Objection, I have with me. It’s objection, Your Honor. Was( very audible)Court’s orders to repair. (Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 17, L. 2 to 3).
- • MS. …..: It was in the HP Court decision that – - just a second – - after judge Kraus’s decision, to repair. Why it was not respected and why I have to leave in a toxic environment and to pay fees for lawyer. I want to know why the judge’s decisions were not respected ?
MR. KAHN: Judge, I’m going to object. (Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 30, L. 11to 16).
- • MS. …… :Why I have to pay expenses. Why I had four ( inaudible –strong accent) in nineteen months, three of them(inaudible – strong accent), so why – -
MS. ….. : Why I have to pay expert?. Why I had four stoves( very audible ) in nineteen months, three of them in guaranty(very audible), so why – -(Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 31, L. 9 to 12).
• MS. …… : You don’t know ( inaudible –strong accent).
MS. …… : Your Honor they kept me two years without a working stove(very audible).
(Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 31, L. 19 to 20).
- • MS……: I have objection. It’s not fair, I was intoxicated, I was hurt, I am with health problems, and I have to pay a lawyer fees because I didn’t have the chance and Judge Kraus was to support my evidence, to support and because they classified their position .
MS. …….: Your Honor( very audible)I have objection. It’s not fair, I was intoxicated, I was hurt, I am with health problems, and I have to pay a lawyer fees because I didn’t have the chance in Judge Kraus Court to support my evidence, to support and because they falsified the Deposition -( very audible)(Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 33, L. 11 to 16).
- • MS. ….: I – - you know , how my evidence , Judge Kraus, took like – - I’m broke , I’m broke and (inaudible – strong accent)and I did not have any chance to support. I didn’t have any chance to see the subpoena ducas tecum which was falsified by Con Edison, so their position falsified by Building Manager, which kind of Trier was that ?
MS…… : I – - you know , how my evidence , Judge Kraus, took like “ on block”, “on gross” (very audible )- – and the clerk put the stamp (very audible ), and I did not have any chance to support. I didn’t have any chance to see the Subpoena Duces Tecum (very audible )which was falsified by Con Edison, the deposition (very audible ) falsified by Building’s Manager, which kind of trial (very audible )was that ? (Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 34, L. 20 to 25).
- • MS. ……….: Okay, why is that my reply after the – - 130 pages disappear from court in December?
MS. ………..: Okay, why Sir ( very audible) my reply Affidavit around 400 ( very audible) pages disappear from court in December?
MR. KAHN: I have no idea. (Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 35, L. 14 to 16).
• MS…..I’ ’m very shocked because ( inaudible- strong accent), which is a reputable company, ( inaudible- strong accent) subpoena ducas tecum to cover the Glencord Building Corporation ( inaudible- strong accent), to send Fire Department to call in my name..
MS: ………. I’m very shocked because Con Edison (very audible), which is a reputable company, falsified (very audible) Subpoena Duces (very audible) Tecum to cover the Glencord Building Corporation illegal acts (very audible ), to send Fire Department to call in my name..(Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 42, L. 12 to 16).
- • MS. ….. :Five lawyers, I hired for my carbon monoxide with ( inaudible- strong accent) and no one can make or discover it, no one can take a position from this landlord.
MS. ……: Five lawyers, I hired for my carbon monoxide personal injury ( very audible, and no one can make a discovery , no one can take a deposition ( very audible) from this landlord. (Court Deposition 2/8/2012- Pg. 44, L 3 to 6).
- • MS. …: …For forgery? For obstruction of justice? It’s everything what they did. The building manager falsifies the truth. The -( inaudible –strong accent ) falsifies subpoena ducas tecum, It is of their position.
MS. ……….: …For forgery? For obstruction of justice? It’s everything what they did. The building manager falsifies the truth. The Con Edison(very audible ) falsified Subpoena Duces Tecum, and the deposition( very audible). (Court Deposition 1/26/2012- Pg. 4, L 22-25).
• Ms. …… : I want them to bring a piece of evidence, one piece of evidence to say it was not Carbon Monoxide. (Court Deposition 1/26/2012- Pg. 7, L. 8 to 10).
ATTORNEY ROBERT KAHN , HAD AND HAS HYPER NERVES TO IGNORE AND 2( TWO) HP COURT’S ORDERS DATED : 4/7/09 (INDEX 305/09) AND 4/16/09 ( HP INDEX 633/09 ) AND TO SAID:
: ”with respect to Ms. … ‘s two HP proceedings. Her allegations that there was a court order to making repairs is untrue”. For his recollection, actually the HP Judge requested his and my signature on the orders.
TOTAL 4 COURT’S ORDER TO FIX THE APARTMENT WAS IGNORED BY THIS ABOVE THE LAW GLENCORD AND HIS ATTORNEY MR. ROBERT KAHN.
ALSO, HE DID NOT KNOW WHY THE FILES DISAPPEAR FROM THE COURT, AND DID NOT BRING A PIECE OF EVIDENCE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT WAS NOT CARBON MONOXIDE, BUT WON THE CASE.
For this the CD with audio transcript in Judge Sabrina Kraus the Court never wanted to provide to me. Entire transcript is illegally falsified by transcriber.
The Appellate Division order to reopen the case for ” hearing and decision” is ignored. Personally, I filed a request on December 14, 2012 to have access at my file, and until April 8, 2013 I did not have. the Glencords did not bring one (1) piece of evidence to demonstrate was not carbon monoxide for defense because they did not have , and were sure I will pass away (died) with their secret weapon – Carbon Monoxide and toxic gases.
For this, as I mentioned before, my lawyers betrayed me, and filed lawsuits with forgery in my name. I take responsibility for every affirmation!.
MOST NEW : THE GLENCORDS’ ATTORNEY ROBERT KAHN DECLARED UNDER OATH WITH FORGERY IN FEBRUARY 2009, THAT I HAVE A LIFE INSURANCES AND ASSETS IN VALUE OF $ 1/2 MILLIONS.
The Appellate Term Orders are with no notice of entry, and considered do not disturb the Judge Kraus Order, and Ignored the Appellate Division Order ‘ for hearing”.
I want what happen to me , to Edie, Ms. F , and another tenants from Glencord’s building NEVER happen again.
Also, NEVER Bellevue Hospital, or another hospital to hid the patient’s blood under bed to cover Glencords’ criminal acts . This was happened to me on May 19, 2012, and New York State Department of Heath found guilty Bellevue Hospital and New York Presbyterian Hospital.
Also, FOEVER and NEVER QUEST DIAGNOSTIC will falsify the patients’ blood tests. Additionally, the Factory CO Detectors [ Kidde], never to try to cover Glencords’ criminal acts with their defective detectors.
I CAN NOT STOP MYSELF TO HOPE THAT PEOPLE WITH POWER IN THIS COUNTRY WILL STOP THESE ILLEGAL ACTS , AND WILL ASSESS DEEM AND APPROPRIATE PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO PUNISH THESE ABOVE THE LAW PEOPLE, INSTITUTIONS, AND TO SET AN EXAMPLE TO DETER OTHERS FROM SIMILAR CONDUCT.
I BEG YOU BE A VOICE AGAINST INJUSTICE!
Anticipate and infinite thank you. I am fighter since I am still alive.
SO FAR ONLY GOD PROTECTS ME!
Thank you for your time!
PS: If I could have more time, a good health and environment, I could write less, and with minimal mistakes. Hope you will not judge a “book from the cover” and my report for my inadvertence.
1 Author of original report
GLENCORD BUILDING CORP. CRIMINAL ACTS
AUTHOR: Antigona - ()
SUBMITTED: Saturday, August 17, 2013
POSTED: Saturday, August 17, 2013
GLENCORD BUILDING CORP., and all accomplices CRIMINAL ACTS!
Please make correction : CYCLOHEXASILOXANE - was found in that strange cream in amount of 2,950 ppb.
To better understand the toxicity of the substances found in my stereo digital musical machine, I submit some research about : HEXANE, BUTANE and CYCLOHEXASILOXANE.
HEXANE in amount of 12,255 ppb( parts per billon). The literature said:
“ … The long-term toxicity of n-hexane in humans is well known.Extensive peripheral nervous system failure is known to occur in humans chronically exposed to levels of n-hexane ranging from 400 to 600 ppm, with occasional exposures up to 2,500 ppm. The initial symptoms are tingling and cramps in the arms and legs, followed by general muscular weakness. In severe cases, atrophy of the skeletal muscles is observed, along with a loss of coordination and problems of vision. Similar symptoms are observed in animal models. They are associated with a degeneration of the peripheral nervous system (and eventually the central nervous system), starting with the distal portions of the longer and wider nerve axons….”.
BUTANE-1-isocyanwas found in that strange cream in amount of 4,735ppb.
The literature said:
“….Inhalation of butane can cause euphoria, drowsiness, narcosis, asphyxia, cardiac arrhythmia, temporary memory loss and frostbite, which can result in death from asphyxiation and ventricular fibrillation. Butane is the most commonly misused volatile substance in the UK, and was the cause of 52% of "solvent related" deaths in 2000. By spraying butane directly into the throat, the jet of fluid can cool rapidly to −20 °C by expansion, causing prolonged laryngospasm. "Sudden sniffer's death" syndrome, first described by Bass in 1970, is the most common single cause of "solvent related" death, resulting in 55% of known fatal cases.
CYCLOHEXASILOXANE - was found in that strange cream in amount of 2,950 ppb. The literature said:
“…Toxins may be such things as pesticides, natural gas or gasoline leaks, carbon monoxide, or industrial effluent. Even very small amounts of these can have an enormous impact, particularly if you are exposed repeatedly or for a long time. Toxins may be less obvious, hidden in perfume, carpets or carpet glue, shampoo, shaving cream, aftershave lotion, lotion, cosmetics, detergents, soaps, cleaning chemicals, dry-cleaned clothes, turpentine, various other solvents, as formaldehyde treatment on bedding or carpet, photographic chemicals, unseen mold, etc.
Most of the poisoned people I know personally (several hundred) were first poisoned by repeated incidents of pesticide exposure experiencing acute but passing flu-like symptoms (fatigue, sore throat, upset stomach, fever, earache, headache), but then gradually they became cumulatively ill and less and less able to recover. With repeated exposure a time comes when the taste of the chemicals hang on the tongue, pervade the sinuses and won't go away. Brain fog, dizziness, muscle pain and spasms, joint pain, bone pain and density loss, back pain, wrist pain, foot pain, numb extremities, desensitized hands and feet, fatigue, rock hard body, twitching eye lids, peripheral vision losses, night vision losses, black under eyes, earache, swollen inner ears, ear discharge, sore throat, swollen lymph nodes, swollen belly, swollen head, swollen gums, tooth enamel erosion and weakening, irregular heartbeat, rhinitis, hair loss, deformed nails, rash of several types, hives, loss of libido, impotence, coldness, cold hands and feet, inability to adjust ones internal thermostat, excess menstrual bleeding, amenorrhea, endomentriosis, sleep disturbance, failure to sweat, failure to moisturize skin, failure to moisturize eyes alternating with excessive tearing, failure to moisturize mouth and throat, failure to absorb nutrients from ones food, constipation and smelly gas, anaphylaxis--these are some of the various symptoms of acute and cumulative pesticide exposure.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/20/2013 07:19 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/-GLENCORD-BUILDING-CORPORATION-GISTIZIA-AGRESSIVO-CONSTANCE-CINCOTTA/New-York-Select-StateProvince/GLENCORD-BUILDING-CORPORATION-GISTIZIA-AGRESSIVO-CONSTANCE-CINCOTTA-THE-LANDLORD-TH-1077344. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
- Business's (11)
- Lawyers and Law Firms (5312)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Admiralty & Maritime Law (27)
- Agricultural Law (2)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (10)
- Antitrust & Trade Regulation (1)
- Appellate Practice (72)
- Aviation & Aerospace (11)
- Banking Law (90)
- Bankruptcy (380)
- Business Law (232)
- Civil Rights (55)
- Class Actions (30)
- Commercial Law (13)
- Communications Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Construction Law (83)
- Contracts (7)
- Corporate Law (75)
- Criminal Law (668)
- Debtor & Creditor (51)
- Education Law (14)
- Elder Law (77)
- ElectionCampaign & Political (0)
- Eminent Domain (5)
- Employee Benefits (7)
- Energy (0)
- Entertainment & Sports (17)
- Environmental Law (43)
- Family Law (13)
- Finance (0)
- Government (14)
- Government Contracts (2)
- Health Care (1)
- Immigration (482)
- Indians & Native Populations (1)
- Insurance (90)
- Intellectual Property (526)
- International Law (33)
- International Trade (0)
- Internet Law (7)
- Investments (1)
- Labor & Employment (12)
- Legal Malpractice (92)
- Litigation (20)
- Media Law (1)
- Medical Malpractice (13)
- Mergers & Acquisitions (0)
- Military Law (5)
- Natural Resources (10)
- Occupational Safety & Health (0)
- Personal Injury (842)
- Products Liability (21)
- Professional Liability (0)
- Real Estate (361)
- Securities (169)
- Taxation (142)
- Technology & Science (0)
- Toxic Torts (0)
- Transportation (2)
- Trusts & Estates (368)
- White Collar Crime (1)
- Wills & Probate (7)
- Workers Compensation (242)
- Zoning, Planning & Land Use (10)
- Legal Services (32)
- Arbitrators/Mediators (7)
- Automotive Expert Witnesses (0)
- Bail Bonds (0)
- Court Reporters (1)
- Electronic Data Discovery (1)
- Expert Witnesses (1)
- Forensic Experts (1)
- Jury Selection (0)
- Legal Assistants (8)
- Legal Speakers (2)
- Litigation Support (2)
- Medical Expert Witnesses (1)
- Other (14)
- Paralegal (5)
- Private Investigators (6)
- Process Servers (7)
- Translators/Interpreters (0)
- Miscellaneous Business Services (19)