- Report: #848379
Complaint Review: 4th Judicial District
| 4th Judicial District 101 Lacey St.
Fairbanks, Alaska United States of America |
|
4th Judicial District Nicole Schick(magistrate) Clerk Miller, Mediator Jordan, Suprior Court Judge Paul Lyle, Magistrate Harbinson, Judge Mulcahy,and Judge Downes Did conspire to deprive me of a fair trial and subsequent appeal and did attempt to intimidate me into not making these accusations Fairbanks, Alaska
*Author of original report: I only posted the first page of the transcript to show
*General Comment: Make up your mind.
*Author of original report: I'm uncertain what you are asking for
*General Comment: Make the transcript available.
*Author of original report: What are you people idiots?
*General Comment: Learn to count
*Author of original report: Evidence
*Consumer Comment: Glenn,you should move to a warmer climate...
*Author of original report: What kind of American are you?
*General Comment: You should have let your insurance deal with it
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
I filed small claims suit against my neighbor for tresspass by girdling trees which carries a triple damages clause. Nikole Schick who at that time I did not know of was assigned to hear the case. The morning of the case came and a mediator Jordan showed up at court and it was "strongly recommended" that we try mediation. I wanted to cooperate so I volunteered. Quickly it turned bizarre and I broke it off in favor of going to court.
After the case was over it had become clear through outragous statements made by the magistrate that mediation was a scam. That during the break the mediator and the magistrate had spoken probably on the phone. I later deduced it was to confirm that a defense had been planted by the mediator with the defendant.
I had to make a motion after the trial to admit some evidence in picture form the magistrate had given back to me. At that time I ordered a copy of the recording. I was horrified to find the recording had been considerably altered to the point the magistrate had reconstructed the case and she or someone thumped away on a court reporting machine for sound effects while doing the editing. Both security features in the software had been compromised. All the statements which revealed the scam to me were gone and some testimony deleted and time rearranged so that a nearly 15 minute break was shown as 3 minutes. That is the time I say they talked on the phone and it was being hidden.
I hired a private investigator who was able to have the defendant and her witness make affidavits saying certain testimony had taken place. That tesimony was not on the record. I filed an appeal and presented the affidavits, explained that both security features in the recording had been compromised, that Fairbanks has no mediation program and that it was "irregular" for a mediator to be at the courthouse.
The day after I filed my brief a state policeman came and served me with a civil stalking/sexual assault order from the Defendant,my neighbor of 7 years, it was signed by magistate Harbinson, whom I'd complained about her conduct in a case a few years before and Judge Mulcahy. Nikole Schick was assigned to hear that case despite( or because of) my accusing her of all kinds of wrong doing in my notice of intent to appeal filed 2 weeks earlier.
I filed a petition for review on probable cause grounds presenting emails from the defendant to the private investigator threatening to "hurt me in the pocketbook if I did not drop the appeal" also she had filed a bogus animal control complaint and a complaint to enviromental control about a smell from my property within a week. Judge Downes called them "pieces of paper" and denied the petition.
So a hearing was held at taxpayer expense. I challenged Schick so Harbinson was assigned. I hired a lawyer and brought 15 people to court. The defendant called in on the phone and whined so no long term order was issued.
Judge Paul Lyle seemed to drag his feet so I asked for oral arguement which seemed grudgingly granted. I accused the magistrate right there. Judge Lyle even asked (acting as if he did not read my brief) "are you accusing the magistrate of altering the record?" and I amswered, "yes sir". My expectation was that the logical next question would have been to the defendant- is this true? But he never asked. I believed then it was a conspiracy. He didn't ask because he already knew! I began making preparations to leave Fairbanks. 2 months before Judge Lyle's decision was due I boarded a plane to go have some dental work done. While on the ground but still on the plane in Seatttle a man who later IDed himself as "federal agent" tried to provoke me into hitting him even restraining me from getting off. The TSA said well that could have been anyone(if it was me they would have found me).
Judge Lyle ruled against me either dismissing or not even acknowledging my evidence. Meanwhile the clerk had sent me back my exhibits from the small claims which I had come to realize were proof in themselves that the record had been altered. On the record you hear the magistrate recieving the plaintiff's exhibits within 15 seconds of us being called forward. However I had lettered my exhibits all 9 so when the clerk came out to fetch them we had a several minute talk where she explained plaitiff's exhibits are numbered so she affixed the evidence stickers to all 9 and numbered them, then numbered mine to match. Then she handed the stickered copies to the magistate and visited the defendant and numbered her copies to match. This all took more like 3 or 4 minute not 15 seconds. You could see my letters under the evidence stickers.
Also about the time they sent me those exhibits, I bought an antique parts car from an ad. The man I did not know agreed to deliver it. Small talk ensued and he began telling me about a court case he just had where he believed he got the business and that the magistrate had made some key evidence "disappear" and found against him for over $11,000. He named as Nikole Schick. I was astounded.
He made an affidavit stating what I just that and I presented a motion for reconsideration submitting proof positive the record had been altered that 15 minutes had been condensed down to 15 seconds and presented that affidavit.
Judge Lyle said the 15 seconds I believe are important have no bearing on the findings of fact by magistrate Schick and the affidavit in an unrelated case is irrelevant.
I've fled Alaska. The other guy stayed and had his property stormed by the City of Fairbanks removing all his antique cars as "junk" and gave him a hefty cleanup bill ($40k).
Both of us have complained to the FBI and state officials. Nothing has happened. Schick and the gang are still hearing cases.
I'm afraid to return to Fairbanks my home because all that neighbor/defendant needs to do is say I looked at her as she did to get that order and they will be glad to throw me in jail. I am currently in another state trying to expose these people. I have property in Fairbanks and this has cost me thousands. As of today they have not returned my evidence or my bond money that I had to post just to appeal $750- $100 they awared the defendant for "attorney fees" Its been 9 months since the appeal was closed. I have a certified copy of the recording(falsified) and when the clerk did that numbering she also numbered my working copies so I have her writing on my copies to verify my story.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/03/2012 11:34 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/4th-Judicial-District/Fairbanks-Alaska-99701/4th-Judicial-District-Nicole-Schickmagistrate-Clerk-Miller-Mediator-Jordan-Suprior-Cou-848379. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on 4th Judicial District
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Author of original report
I only posted the first page of the transcript to show
AUTHOR: Glenn - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 08, 2012
#2 General Comment
Make up your mind.
AUTHOR: Elf - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 08, 2012
You want me to read the transcript, but then claim you can't provide it and wouldn't anyway since, according to you, it's falsified.
Why tell me to read it if, as you are now claiming, it's worthless?
BTW, anyone with an interest can see the full size scan. With a PC and Chrome one only needs to right click on the image, then select open image in a new window. It's likely the same with Firefox. This is how I was able to see that you skipped the number 6 on your numbering.
Another thing, it clearly states the transcript is not a verbatim copy. It states "Refer to audio recording." See attached screen cap.
This destroys your claim of falsification, since whomever complied the transcript openly admits it's not verbatim and that the recording needs to be consulted for a more accurate record of what was said, and by whom. It's really hard to hold a position that it was falsified when it's clearly not intended to be a verbatim record.
#3 Author of original report
I'm uncertain what you are asking for
AUTHOR: Glenn - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, March 07, 2012
The state uses For the Record software to record the proceeding. There is a 4 second difference between the range duration indicator and the actual elapsed time. Right after the break you can watch the 4 seconds tic away in 1 like the last 10 seconds of a basketball game where they do 100ths of a second. This happens as we went back on record supposedly. Also both the defendant and me the plaintiff are presented on the same channel #2(there should be at least 3 channels- 4 with a jury). I don't know if it was recorded that way. I know it would be easiest to rerecord that way. Either way For the Record lists those 2 features as "security" features and both are compromised. Judge Lyle denied the 4 seconds even though its there plain to see and he ignored the channel, never mentioned it. This is the same Judge Lyle who could have asked the defendant at oral aguement if what I was saying was true but he did not. He could of asked her about the affidavits but he did not. He could have asked why she had 2 replies to my brief after having missed the deadline for filing the first 2 show up one scibbled in her scribble and the other prepared by the Nikole Schick fan club claiming to have heard the proceeding even though I was the only purchaser of a tape on record. He did not. There were witnesses. My exwife and a neighbor I had never met till this, who had problems with the defendant on the other side. I chose not to have them provide affidavits for the appeal because I didn't want to hang targets on their backs. I opted to hire a private investigator to interview the defendant instead. But those 2 still remember what was said. Also, Judge Lyle had a legal duty to "put the record straight" if it had been corrupted. He chose not to even entertain that, despite my motion. If this was such a small insignificant thing why didn't he do his legal duty? I'm not complaining I didn't win, I'm complaining I didn't get a fair trial. The fact that Records were falsified in any degree and /or preparing for my arrival by inviting a mediator when there is no formal mediation program should be sufficient to illustrate things were not "regular or usual." Recently the state has approached the other guy who said Magistrate Schick tampered with evidence and offered to lower his $11,000 to $1,000 but he would have to admit guilt. He told them to take a leap. I didn't think a court ordered judgement could be amended without COURT!
#4 General Comment
Make the transcript available.
AUTHOR: Elf - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, March 07, 2012
If you want me, or anyone else, to read the transcript, make it available. A picture that shows you didn't number your evidence correctly doesn't do anything but prove you didn't number your evidence correctly. Nothing more.
#5 Author of original report
What are you people idiots?
AUTHOR: Glenn - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, March 07, 2012
#6 General Comment
Learn to count
AUTHOR: Elf - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, March 07, 2012
You completely skipped number 6.
That the clerk, or whomever, put the correct number sequence on the pages can't, to the rational mind, be seen as evidence of anything wrong. How long it took the clerk to put the proper number sequence on the pages also doesn't matter. Be it 34 seconds, 15 seconds or five minutes. It's of no matter.
One reasonably prudent person would see the clerk's correcting your numbering error as evidence of anything other than the clerk ensuring your evidence is documented properly. This flies in the face of your conspiracy claim.
#7 Author of original report
Evidence
AUTHOR: Glenn - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, March 07, 2012
#8 Consumer Comment
Glenn,you should move to a warmer climate...
AUTHOR: Ken - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 04, 2012
Let's see, the electric company is against you, the assistant attorney took up their cause due to the "fact" they worked for said electrical company. Your neighbor tied her dog(s) to your tree and got away with it because her daughter worked for Allstate, who paid them from your policy.
Then the mediator and judge conspired against you and had illegal converstaions.
Then the clerk altered the recording of the proceedings and further horrified you.
Magistrate Harbinson then retaliated against you for previous complaints about her contact.
THEN, a "federal agent" tried to provoke a fight with you at the airport.
How long have you been ducking those black helicopters buzzing overhead?
You are certifiable and should be seeking capable medical intervention ASAP.
To put it plainly....YOU'RE NUTS!!!
#9 Author of original report
What kind of American are you?
AUTHOR: Glenn - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 04, 2012
#10 General Comment
You should have let your insurance deal with it
AUTHOR: Elf - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 04, 2012

