- Report: #941873
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: AT&T
AT&T AT&T Could Face Mass Exodus Of iPhone Customers [OPINION] 09/15/12 Internet
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
In January 2007, Cingular Wireless announced plans to change its name to AT&T Mobility, bringing back into prominence a name that had been around since 1885. That same month, Apple announced the planned release of the first iPhone. When the handset arrived that June, AT&T became the exclusive carrier for the device in the United States, a distinction that continued for nearly four years. During the interim, as Apple reinvented the smartphone market, AT&T raked in the dollars. Then something strange happened: The carrier began biting the hand that fed it.
AT&T versus Apple After being on friendly terms with Apple, AT&Ts focus seemed to switch.
First, AT&T initially said no to Apples new hotspot feature, which came with iOS 4. When the company finally did allow it, AT&T began charging customers an extra fee. Plus, by adding hotspot, customers were told they would have to give up their unlimited data plans, which were eliminated for new customers in 2010.
To date, AT&T still doesnt support hotspots on an iPad. Verizon Wireless, the nations largest cellular provider, however, does offer this feature and always has.
Next, the Dallas company decided to stop offering limited (and less expensive) SMS text packages. Instead, AT&T began offering only SMS as an unlimited plan for a flat fee of $20.
Apple introduced iMessage with iOS 5, which gave Apple customers free texting between iOS and Mac devices. AT&T made sure it continued to make money despite Cupertinos new product. The company did this by raising prices and hurting iPhone customers.
The last strange move arose when AT&T announced plans to charge for FaceTime over cellular, a service which is set to arrive next week with iOS 6.
To get this new feature, AT&T customers must subscribe to one of the companys newly created shared data plans, which are more expensive for some customers. As an added whack to customers, this means those with the previously mentioned unlimited data plans will have to switch to gain the FaceTime feature.
The reason that AT&T has decided to charge extra for FaceTime is that the company is convinced that the feature is an add-on. Because of this, its decided it hasthe right to restrict use.
Meanwhile, Verizon (and Sprint) has announced they will offer the video-calling program on any data plan, and not for an added fee.
Verizon: Apples New Favorite? Verizon has always had a far superior voice network compared to AT&T. In fact, Verizons 4G network covers 75 percent of the companys 375 markets, which is slightly more than what AT&T has to offer.
Couple this with AT&Ts strange moves in recent years, and we may finally see Verizon become the preferred carrier for iPhone buyers. And if this happens, it would be the first time Verizon came out on top since it first received the iPhone 4 in February 2011.
As a long-time AT&T customer, Ive become increasingly annoyed at the company I once respected. Not only do I believe the companys latest moves are anti-consumer, but strangely, AT&T seems anti-Apple. And on this, Im scratching my head. After all, if it hadnt been for Apple, AT&T almost certainly wouldnt have been as profitable as its been in recent years.
The best thing for AT&T might be for customers to abandon it in droves, especially as the iPhone 5 begins hitting stores next week. By doing so, the company may finally realize just how stupid it has become and shift accordingly.
Now let everyone know how you feel.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/16/2012 02:20 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/ATT/internet/ATT-ATT-Could-Face-Mass-Exodus-Of-iPhone-Customers-OPINION-091512-Internet-941873. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.