Complaint Review: Alicia Lyttle, Lorette Lyttle and Monetized Marketing - Internet
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
- Author Not Confirmed
- Alicia Lyttle, Lorette Lyttle and Monetized Marketing Internet United States of America
- Phone:
- Web: http://www.monetizedmarketing.com
- Category: Questionable Activities
Alicia Lyttle, Lorette Lyttle and Monetized Marketing Alicia Lyttle, Lorette Lyttle and Monetized Marketing Are Scammers, Liars and Frauds! Internet
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Alicia Lyttle, Lorette Lyttle and Monetized Marketing Rebuttal
*General Comment: Paul Harvey Version
Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
I knew something was not right about these ladies and I'm totally convinced now.
These ladies are deceptive liars and are using people to try to destroy Stephen Pierce.
Last week Stephen posted a default judgment against Alicia and her company for $3.6 million dollars.
http://www.slideshare.net/KingPierce/stephen-pierce-awarded-36-million-judgment-against-alicia-lyttle-monetized-marketing
While I was shocked, I was more shocked that Alicia took to Facebook running her mouth denying it but she never showed up at court to deny it and that's why he got a default judgement.
What really took this over the top for me and fully convinced me that Stephen was telling the truth was when he said Alicia was the mastermind behind the online attacks and I saw how fast the Salty Droid posted yet another nasty post about Stephen with information that could have only come from Alicia.
So now she's going online to defend it but she didn't respond to the lawsuit or show up at court. WAKE UP PEOPLE! Something is NOT right about this women.
When the droid mentions "Stephen's Ex-Employees" I'm pretty sure those are the people Stephen calls "Alicia's inner circle of misfits" which support her dirty deeds. Has anyone considered that with the money Alicia stole that these other people could have been paid some of it to support her lies? It wouldn't be the first time that's happened in this world.
I have no sides in this fight, but I'm going to call it as I see it. And I'm seeing that Stephen is the one telling the truth and Alicia is a liar.
And unlike many people who think this is a divorce gone bad in public. It's not, it's a case of a women and her family who scammed two corporations out of hundreds of thousands of dollars and she doesn't want the public to know about it.
I suggest people pause for a minute and really consider the facts and revisit what Stephen has been saying. Especially since more negative post as rebuttals are going online which further supports the fact that Stephen said Alicia was behind the negative scam blog post.
Very disappointed as I liked both Alicia and Stephen. Now I love Stephen for having stood through this, continued to give and no one knew he was even dealing with this until now.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/06/2012 05:47 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/alicia-lyttle-lorette-lyttle-and-monetized-marketing/internet/alicia-lyttle-lorette-lyttle-and-monetized-marketing-alicia-lyttle-lorette-lyttle-and-m-923008. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#2 UPDATE EX-employee responds
Alicia Lyttle, Lorette Lyttle and Monetized Marketing Rebuttal
AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()
SUBMITTED: Sunday, September 15, 2013
This is in response to the post which is not based on any facts, but pure opnion that has obviously been tainted by Mr. Pierce and his team. This person has no idea what he is talking about.
First, both of these ladies have no interest in destroying anyone, that is childish, unprofessional and a waste of time.
Also, the judgement that he is claiming he won, he did NOT win, the case was thrown out and nothing awarded (but notice he does not post anything about that).
Nothing was proven in court (as he claims), it was won by default due to lack of filing on her part, but then thrown out.
They were married and worked in the business together, no money was stolen. First, you cant steal from yourself lol.
His business and his life is falling apart and he needs a scapegoat to blame, that is his pattern.
Take some time to look into his background - criminal record pages and pages long. So many enemies its outrageous. Interview any of his ex-employees, they all hate him. Business partners no longer want to do business with him. He is blacklisted on speaking stages and the list
goes on.
On the other hand, the ladies are well respected without any problems, the only person that has a problem with them is him.
This is a divorce gone bad. She left him when he was on a vacation with a mistress (which was one of his students). When a man like him loses control (it was an abusive relationship), he retaliates. He always has to be the one in control and with the upper hand. Women that have been
in abusive relationships, will be able to relate to this, because it is stereotypical behavior.
The ladies in question do not have any interest in what Mr. Pierce is doing and have no interest in destroying Mr. Pierce or his business activities, what he is doing is not of their concern.
Mr. Pierce posted that he won a judgement and it was "proved in a court of law", which is a false statement, nothing was proved in a court of law and
Mr. Pierce did not win any money. Mr. Pierce was awarded based on a default judgement which was thrown out.
Regarding the statement that she went to facebook "running her mouth" is completely ridiculous. She has not made public statements regarding these matters because it is not a public issue and it is extremely unprofessional. She simply tried to clarify in as simple terms as possible, that Mr.Pierce is boasting about winning a judgement based on default, not based on facts, and the judgement was overturned (which Mr. Pierce has
failed to acknowledge publicly). In fact, Mr. Pierce has filed several lawsuits and lost or did not show up to all of them.
Mr.Pierce has hired and fired over 30 employees in a 8 month time frame, hence he has a lot of enemies. No employee needs to be paid to state the truth, although Mr. Pierce has been known to pay employees to say whatever he wanted.
In addition, this is in fact a divorce gone bad, she nor her family did not scam anyone or anything. Her business and her family have an outstanding reputation. Mr.Pierce on the other hand does not, simply do some research and you can see bankruptcies, judgements, civil suits, forgery, bad checks and more.
I suggest the person that wrote this due their due diligence and don't let Mr. Pierce influence and cloud your judgement.
Also, Mr. Pierce was not "dealing with" anything but trying to find someone to blame for his inability in running a business.
#1 General Comment
Paul Harvey Version
AUTHOR: Soapboxmom - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, February 28, 2013
07/22/2012
Amended Judgment
07/23/2012
Mailed def judgment letter to Alicia Lyttle and Monetized Marketing
07/27/2012
Returned Mail Undeliverable
08/01/2012
Returned Mail Undeliverable to Monetized Marketing LLC
08/03/2012
Request for Copies $1.00 / pg
08/06/2012
Original Answer
08/06/2012
Original Answer Special Appearance, and Subject Thereto, Original Answer
08/13/2012
Motion - New Trial - Civil $40.00
Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
08/17/2012
Correspondence
09/21/2012
Plaintiff's Response to Defs Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
09/26/2012
Hearing Special Appearance, Motion to Vacate, Motion New Trial
9:00 AM
09/26/2012
General Docket Entry
Special Appearance/Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. Rulings made on the record. OTBFC.
Roach, John R., Jr.
09/26/2012
Order
01/28/2013
Notice of Nonsuit
02/05/2013
Order on Nonsuit
02/20/2013
Order Granting New Trial REOPEN - OCA
Order Granting Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
