- Report: #1052210
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Andrew Spinnell - deception
Andrew Spinnell - deception295 Madison Avenue New York, New York USA
Andrew Spinnell - deception Andrew Spinnell - deception - attorney Andrew J. Spinnell - deception continues on his website New York New York
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Anonymous Fraud
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Another Fabrication By Philip Seldon
*Author of original report: Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
It has been three weeks since Andrew J. Spinnell was exposed on the Internet as deceiving the Internet community with a twenty-five year old or so photograph of himself in his forties which hardly resembles him when he is 67 years old and is quite unattractive and he has not replaced this deceptive photograph. He persists in this deception - if this is not deception then what is? It's been three weeks since the posting titled "Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud" and the photo remains.
Andrew wrote that he does not engage in deceit and deception and that he is not a dishonest lawyer. Andrew cites his distinguished rating in Martindale Hubbell as demonstrating that he is an honest attorney. This rating is a peer review from other attorneys. Would these attorneys give him this rating if they know that he was disciplined for unethical conduct and was sued three times for legal malpractice and was not insured for at least two of the cases and the he was recently asked in writing if he had legal malpractice insurance and failed to answer?
How many lawyers have been sued for legal malpractice three times?
And would they have voted for him if they knew that Andrew J. Spinnell was reprimanded by the State of Connecticut for unethical conduct?
And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was sanctioned in the amount of $5,000 by Judge Martin for frivolous motion practice in Federal Court?
And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was sanctioned in New York State Supreme Court?
And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was found by the Appellate Court to have not paid his employee's unemployment insurance taxes?
The point is that Andrew J. Spinnell persists in his deception in displaying a photograph of himself on his website www.andrewjspinnell.com that does not resemble what he looks like now. It is a photograph of him from years ago when he was good looking and not like he looks like today at 67 yeas old when he is ugly and in dire need of a cosmetic surgeon.
Andrew J. Spinnell is a very bad man.
I wouldn't use him as my attorney, particularly since he was sued for legal malpractice three times. Nor should you.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/19/2013 09:40 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Andrew-Spinnell-deception/New-York-New-York/Andrew-Spinnell-deception-Andrew-Spinnell-deception-attorney-Andrew-J-Spinnell--1052210. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.