ED Magedson – Founder
Anthoney Vo, california Department of Real Estate2201 Broadway Sacramento, California United States of America
I am the government worker for the state of
Anthony Vo called my friends home at 3:30 Pm and asked to talk to Mary (not real name in order to protect the privacy of my friend)/ Mary filed a complaint about one and half years ago against a female real estate salesperson. Basically, Mary had an appointment with this real estate salesperson
Marys husband was a real estate broker and do not engage in any commercial transaction of real estate at all. Mary filed a complaint against
In stead of focus on the issue, Vo started questioned Mary husbands knowledge on real estate law. Vo asked Marys husband whether or not he practice in real estate or not. I was outrageous to hear the investigator deviated the focus and attempted to set up the trap upon the consumers they supposed to protect
Marys husband was patient at beginning. Then he started to question the impartiality of Anthony Vo. Vo told Marys husband that he was not familiar with CA real estate law. Marys husband verbally protested to Vo that she was not investigating the complaint. Vo insisted to talk on the quality of Marys husbands broker license. Marys husband finally asked Vo whether she has real estate broker license or not. Secondly, can a broker maintain a license without engage in any commercial transaction? Thirdly, can broker without commercial activity still possess common sense knowledge? Vo was not even answered the question
Marys husband then used very strict tone and asked Vo did real estate salesperson have the obligation to present the reasonable offer to the seller? For whatever reason, the phone was hung up from the side of Vo. Vo called back later and insisted to talk to Mary and harassed Mary that if Mary did not cooperate with her, the investigation will not go on. Mary was a simple oriental lady and I have never seen her so angry ever since I knew her
Mary used high tone and told Vo that she was the consumer and Vo was not intend to investigate the complaint and skirted the issue around. Mary told Vo that she originally would let go the complaint. But Vos attitude was very outrageous and decided to continue the complaint
Vo passed the phone to her colleague. The colleague told Mary and Marys husband that there was no sufficient evidence and they decided to close the case. Of course, this is the anticipated result since Vo already made the judgment and they cover each other. Mary told Vo that she would file complaint against her. Apparently, Vo did not care. I assume that Vo probably believe that her supervisor would cover her
I have worked for the state government of
Its the first time that I ever filed rip-off report without even getting the permission from my friend. No wonder consumers have such low positive perception toward real estate professional. Even the regulatory agency representative can not take the impartiality stand. In stead, they played tricks and maliciously entrapped decent consumer like Mary
Vo, you probably dont even know that I am your colleague and I saw you played this kind of game all the time. I will personally call Whitmans campaign office and ask her to put your name on the list for firing once she become the governor of
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/22/2010 12:55 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Anthoney-Vo-california-Department-of-Real-Estate/Sacramento-California-95818/Anthoney-Vo-california-Department-of-Real-Estate-Anthoney-Vo-claimed-herself-the-Deputy-S-643095. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.