• Report: #1066989

Complaint Review: Antonia Moforis

  • Submitted: Sun, July 14, 2013
  • Updated: Tue, May 12, 2015

  • Reported By: Diane — coral springs Florida
Antonia Moforis

Antonia Moforis Toni Moforis, Hand & Foot Co, Antonia Moforis Beauty Dont be swindled by this crook and thief Miami Florida

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Court Order states this Report is false and defamatory

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

 Dont be a victim of the crook Antonia Moforis. She is a con artist and thief. Her fraud's on investors should be aired on AMerican Greed. She is a dishonest person who will steal your money and squander it on herself. Dont be fooled by her beauty products. its a scam to fool investors. She gets the money up front for products then never delivers. Then good luck trying to get a return phone call or email. Toni Moforis is the type of person who would steal from her own family and not blink an eye. She has devastated many investors of their life savings and doesnt have any conscious in the frauds she commits. Even worse her family Stavros Moforis and George Moforis know about her frauds and do nothing to stop her scams  I hope you read this before you become a victim

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/14/2013 08:30 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Antonia-Moforis/Miami-Florida-33324/Antonia-Moforis-Toni-Moforis-Hand-Foot-Co-Antonia-Moforis-Beauty-Dont-be-swindled-by-1066989. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Antonia Moforis

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
0Author 0Consumer 1Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Court Order states this Report is false and defamatory

AUTHOR: Gaspar Forteza, Esq. - (USA)

Editor’s Note:  Ripoff Report Educates Consumers and Legal Counsel on our Court Order Policy in content down below the content of this Rebuttal.  After review of the Rebuttal, please consider reading more information about our Court Order Policy.


The statements contained within this Report are not true, and have been declared to be false, unlawful and defamatory by the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court, in and for Broward County, Florida.  The policy of this website is to nonetheless maintain and continue publishing this information, regardless of this fact. The Court Order may be found at the following address: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByLiK-E5clF1dUJvTVdYMDA2Wkk/view?usp=sharing

To learn more information regarding the falsity of this Report, please contact Ms. Moforis's attorneys:

Gaspar Forteza, Esq., Blaxberg, Grayson, Kukoff, P.A., 25 SE 2nd Ave, Suite 730, Miami, FL 33131, 305-381-7979, gaspar.forteza@blaxgray.com


Editor’s Note:  Ripoff Report has been implementing a new Court Order policy.  We understand that not all Court Orders are created equal.  Default Judgments are typically heard by the judge based on the actual merits of a case.  Generally speaking, Default Judgments are based on one party’s side of the story and therefore the Judge enters an Order for the party that appeared (typically the party that appeared) and assumes that the information presented is the truth without hearing all sides of the story.  Sometimes Courts will enter Court Orders that simply list out a URL link to a particular website and suggest that whatever information is contained at that link is “false and defamatory”.  However, these blanket general orders don’t necessarily take into account facts that are true or statements of opinion which, by their nature, don’t fall into information that can be “false and defamatory”.  Accordingly, Ripoff Report, in order to consider redactions under the Court Order Policy requires more information – typically that the order specifically outline exactly what statements in an Report/Posting are false and defamatory.  Those statements found specifically to be false and defamatory by a court, after hearing testimony and receiving credible evidence, will be redacted in accordance with our Court Order Policy.

The law protects and encourages Ripoff Report to make appropriate edits to Reports posted by third parties. Ripoff Report may use that editorial power to post findings from a court of law about the subject matter of Reports. In some cases, a Court may find that specific statements made by the author of a Ripoff Report are false and defamatory.  When both sides of a dispute appear and contest the facts of a situation in court it is believed that the findings of the court are generally reliable and fair. Out of respect for the courts and the judicial process, Ripoff Report, upon request, may post that kind of finding with special prominence.  In some cases, Ripoff Report may even redact the information specifically identified by the court as false from the original Report. Of course, in order to do that, Ripoff Report needs to see the specific finding of the Court and those findings (meaning the Judgment itself) needs to be self-explanatory, i.e., containing specific identification of the Report(s) at issue and specific identification of the statement(s) that were found to be false in the Report(s).  We often get people who provide us with default judgments, or non-specific court orders, and ask us to consider Report redaction content based on that.  Those types of judgments don’t meet our criteria. In that case, we advise people to post their default judgment/generic court order, and whatever other sort of supporting documentation they have, as a Rebuttal to the Report, and to tell their side of the story.   In order to provide additional guidance regarding Ripoff Report’s editorial policy, Ripoff Report offers the following specific statement.

Policy Regarding Court Orders

The following policy will be applied within Ripoff Report’s discretion and is not intended to be a promise, contract or agreement.  Ripoff Report reserves the right to change or deviate from this policy as circumstances dictate. 

Subject to the statement above, when a Court of competent jurisdiction within the United States has issued a judgment that specifically identified statements of fact contained in a post are false and defamatory, Ripoff Report will generally apply the following guidelines:

If:         The person requesting the relief from Ripoff Report submits to Ripoff Report a court order;

The order is from a state or federal court in the United States;

The order is not against the operators of Ripoff Report;

The order is against the author of the report on Ripoff Report;

The order is supported by admissible evidence, including reasonably corroborated affidavits under oath, that specifically identified statements of fact in the report on Ripoff Report are false and defamatory; and

Ripoff Report has no reason to believe that the order violates the First Amendment.

Then:         Ripoff Report will update the title of the report that is the subject of the court order as follows: “Specific information contained in this report was found to be false and defamatory by a court.  Out of respect for the judicial process, the specific information that was found false and defamatory by the court has been redacted”; and

Ripoff Report will redact the specific statements of fact and replace them with this statement (((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))).   Ripoff Report will also post the Court’s order or judgment as an attachment to the original report. In rare cases Ripoff Report will post the Court’s order or judgment ahead of the original Report, in the editorial discretion of Ripoff Report.

But:                As a matter of policy, Ripoff Report does not redact statements of opinion, nor redact or remove entire postings. Ripoff Report’s objective in redacting a report is NOT to erase the posting, but to preserve a record of how a business deals with complaints and with unhappy consumers, including exposing false postings through reliable and fair process such as Ripoff Report’s VIP Arbitration or hearings in court. 


NOTE:  None of this information should be construed as legal advice and it is highly recommended that you seek your own independent legal counsel to assist you with any questions that you may have relating to the process and/or your options.


~ Ripoff Report Staff




Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?