- Report: #724817
Complaint Review: Arvind Sarin Coppermobile
| Arvind Sarin Coppermobile 12655 N Central Expy, STE 420
Dallas, Texas United States of America |
|
Arvind Sarin Coppermobile Arvind Sarin CEO Co Founder Riped off alot of Application Builders Dallas, Texas
*Consumer Comment: Retraction Written By Author?
*Author of original report: Arvin Sarin CEO of Coppermobile
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This is wrong and it must be stopped!! Where is Justice? How long can these scumbags be allowed to be above reproach?
Do NOT hire this company to build Mobile Applications for you if you value your business reputation in the mobile applications community in the slightest. Coppermobile is a company of Vipers and Copperhead snakes! Just waiting for Americans wallets..
Watch out for these names..
For more on this Report get the inside report here ====> Douchenbaggan | Brutally Honest..
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/02/2011 09:24 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Arvind-Sarin-Coppermobile/Dallas-Texas-75243/Arvind-Sarin-Coppermobile-Arvind-Sarin-CEO-Co-Founder-Riped-off-alot-of-Application-Builde-724817. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Arvind Sarin Coppermobile
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Comment
Retraction Written By Author?
AUTHOR: Anonymous in Dallas - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Monday, October 29, 2012
POSTED: Monday, October 29, 2012I note several oddities about the "author's" retraction that lead me to believe it is not authentic:
1. The author's name is different: Look at the name of the original complaint, and compare it to the rebuttal. Close, but not the same name.
2. The syntax and grammar of the author of the complaint and the author of the retraction differ. This indicates someone other than the original author wrote the retraction.
3. Note that it's titled a "rebuttal" instead of an author followup. The original author would be able to add his own commentary to his own complaint. To participate in the posting, the rest of us must post comments as rebuttals.
3. Nothing noted in the original complaint is without merit. No attorney would tell a client that they should post a retraction that tells consumers how wrong they were and then go as far as mentioning how much they've really admired the staff. If the retraction is written by Coppermobile or its representatives, the mention of an attorney implies culpability and/or a notice to other complainants that we must give Coppermobile chance after chance after chance before they can be sued. That's why a contract is signed: ONE PROJECT. ONE DEADLINE. ONE FEE..
4. The retraction is a blatant turn-around and so grossly overstates the author's sudden admiration of Coppermobile and its staff that the "retraction" further supports my opinion that it is not written by the author.
5. Coppermobile does not suddenly perform and deliver its contractual obligations. The dateline of this complaint indicates Coppermobile somehow erased a lot of client anger between that Monday and Wednesday that they hadn't been able to erase before:
- April 29 - the author bought www.DouchenBaggan.com
- May 2 - author posted their link and complaint to RipoffReport
- May 4 - RipoffReport retraction
#2 Author of original report
Arvin Sarin CEO of Coppermobile
AUTHOR: Douchreporter - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, May 04, 2011
POSTED: Wednesday, May 04, 2011We had judged him and his company without exhausting all possibilities. That decidedly concluded, we reached out one more time to Arvind Sarin and Coppermobile. The result that we received was satisfactory and our differences and miscommunications have been resolved that now we feel as though, we have not been fair to Coppermobile.
So we would like to say to everyone who is reading and prematurely judging Arvind and Coppermobile based on what we have said out of pure frustration. Please do your homework! Do not take our word for it. We would definitely use Arvind and his company again in the foreseeable future for our next project without a doubt.
We are also, very satisfied with our business relationship as it stands today. I recommend using them to my other colleagues and applications developers out there. They can and will come through for your business, do NOT judge Arvind or Coppermobile from the frustrated words of a stressed out post on this site. It just would not be fair to them or your business.
Because you could end up missing out on meeting some really great people and building the application of your dreams. Best wishes to your success!

