Exonerate Brock Mardis! Why? The trial court failed to allow evidence that would show the purported victims bias and testimony, through others, that would impeach her credibility.
Staci Gunar [SG]explains that her roommate which she refers to as, Tracy was concernedabout Peters well-being provoking a call from them to Peter Copani just after Tracy documented her proof that she & Brock Mardis had sex the morning of November 10th 2008.. After reviewing the conversation in that phone call, Tracys concern sounds like a hoax, a flimsy cover-up for extorting money from Peter Copani, while holding Brock Mardis freedom as hostage.
What SG isn't telling you is when she, Staci Gunar said, Tracy wants a financial settlement or shes going to press rape charges against Brock! I could hearTracy saying, I might as well get something out of putting up with him all
these years! SG topped her with, She wants to get something for putting up with Brock for all these years. When I said, I wouldn't give you an f--- ing dime! Staci said, Why wouldnt you want to settle it right here and now? You know how lawyers are?
It just may be that Staci and "Tracy" convoluted some vindictive MINDHEALINGMIRACLES.COM, PETER COPANI & BROCK MARDIS CC report-attacks in an elaborate attempt to portray Peter Copani as delusional for the purpose of covering up the crime of extortion and revenge in retaliation for Peters refusing to pay the demanded ransom for a financial settlement? There was a second phone call documented on November 18, 2008 requesting $10,000 cash, and a third call documented November 21, 2008, $10,000 and Tracy also wants a monthly check sort-a like an alimony check! A total of 51 minutes soliciting money documented.
The actions conducted by SG and "Tracy" in my opinion, amounts to perjury, extortion and also several counts of attempted extortion, in violation of Florida Statute 836.05.
If justice prevails a retrial or exoneration for Brock Mardis would be appropriate.
I would think that perjury, manipulation of the evidence, and withholding evidence from the jury would be a crime, but then again, criminals of court caliber know how to manipulate the judicial system to their own advantage.
The following remark from a SG relative in response to one of Staci Gunars hateful Reports complaints sums up the 'roommate' perfectly: my aunt Staci who wrote this [Sj Angur complaint] a low life drug addict who thrives for attention