- Report: #950633
Complaint Review: Barend Smidt and Lawyer Andre Voster
| Barend Smidt and Lawyer Andre Voster 7th.Floor,No19, Alley15,Lane23,Section5,
Internet United States of America |
|
Barend Smidt and Lawyer Andre Voster Try to use a Bank Guarantee from Barclays as Aplicat CITY NET INSURANCE BROKERS LTD UK., listed also on EuroClear system. Taipei Internet
*UPDATE Employee: Report: #950633 Complaint Review: Barend Smidt and Lawyer Andre Voster
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
CITY NET INSURANCE BROKERS LTD UK. aren't involved in such kind of transactions they already report that fraud to Interpol.
Be aware of those guys.
They can provide you the documents which is looks as original from the bank and from the Euro clear Bank, but everything is fraud nothing behind.
Be Aware
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/04/2012 03:52 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Barend-Smidt-and-Lawyer-Andre-Voster/internet/Barend-Smidt-and-Lawyer-Andre-Voster-Try-to-use-a-Bank-Guarantee-from-Barclays-as-Aplicat-950633. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Barend Smidt and Lawyer Andre Voster
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 UPDATE Employee
Report: #950633 Complaint Review: Barend Smidt and Lawyer Andre Voster
AUTHOR: Gordon Okamoto - (South Africa)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, January 12, 2013
A bit of history to frame my rebuttal- Prior to the transaction being reported we submitted a financial instrument for monetization to this Trust that said they could perform. After 5-months of excuse after excuse we were finally replied back to asking for our assistance in helping them validate the instrument, when we had already submitted detailed instructions on "how to".. Then, they asked us to put it through the swift system which they knew at the start was not possible. We finally issued them a C&D after wasting 6-months of our time and effort.
We are always willing to consider "second chances", and therefore gave them another opportunity with the bank instrument funding mentioned in the complaint report. It was my decision to give an intermediary broker a second chance at redemption and I accepted his proposal and bank instrument which was then put into our compliance procedure and submission to the same channel we had issued the C&D to give them a second chance also. Sad to say that the broker, William Diehl, submitted falsified documents with a forged signature of Mr Barend Smidt to me, includiing other documents in the package with forged Barend Smidt signatures. This was not found out until later.
Upon our finding out we immediately contact all the parties and circumstances. Winchmore Finance UK Limited saw the opportunity to send the complaint report in what can only be viewed as some form of "revenge" for our C&D of them for non-performance. It seems that one of the hard lesson learned here is that sometimes.as in with William Diehl and Winchmore Finance UK Ltd. don't deserve a second chance. I take liberty by applying one statement made by Winchmore Finance UK Ltd. back to them and to William Diehl. "Be Aware"..

