Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #214570

Complaint Review: Bidz.com - Culver City California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Nashua New Hampshire
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Bidz.com 3562 Eastham Drive Culver City, California U.S.A.

Bidz.com ripoff When do you win a $9249 USD diamond ring for only $222.20 At Bidz.com NEVER Culver City California

*UPDATE Employee: Damaged Items

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

On September 29, 2006 I won a very expensive item from Bidz.com for very little money. On October 3, I paid for this item.


On October 5, I got a call from Paul a customer relations agent and was told that my item was damaged and could not be repaired, exchanged, nor replacement found with suppliers. Hmmmmm, sounds fishy, doesn't it?
During this converstion, I was told there were two diamonds missing; at the end of our conversation there were four diamonds missing. Hmmmmm interesting!!!

When do you win a $9249.00 USD diamond ring from Bidz.com for only $222.20 USD?

I am entitled to my own opinion, and this is it: Bidz.com did not allow me the right to pay $222.20 for a $9249.00 diamond ring I rightfully won.
If this diamond ring was indeed defective, why did Bidz.com put it up for bidding without inspecting it first?

I find this practice very desceptive, dishonest, and a total RIP_OFF.

Dear readers, I got ripped off by Bidz.com

Bidz.com Auction #15345617

Time Left: Auction is Closed
Winning Bid: 222.20 USD
Compare: 9249.00 USD
Winner: XxXxXxX
Closing On: 2006-09-29 21:10:54-04
# of Bids: 34 (Bid history)


item Ring

material 14K White gold
Contains 58.5% Pure gold

weight 10.0g
~ 0.32oz

gemstone info:

gemstone diamond
The Most Brilliant of the gemstones. Diamond jewelry is Treasured as a symbol of Everlasting Love and Perfection

quantity/ctw 40/1.65ctw
~ 0.330g

shape round

color i - j


clarity SI2 - I1
Eye Clean

origin Imported

Other Information:

gender ladies

ring size US-6.75 / EU-13.85


Carlos
Nashua, New Hampshire
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/06/2006 03:25 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/bidzcom/culver-city-california-90232/bidzcom-ripoff-when-do-you-win-a-9249-usd-diamond-ring-for-only-22220-at-bidzcom-neve-214570. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 UPDATE Employee

Damaged Items

AUTHOR: Felicia - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, October 13, 2006

After lengthy investigation, it was found that items may be damaged during storage, packing or shipping which would explain why it still went up for auction. Luckily, it was inspected before it was shipped and we had the opportunity to notify the customer. Had we shipped the defective merchandise, it would have resulted in a return for faulty merchandise. Either way, it seems, this case would have ended up in a complaint. We do sincerely regret this order was not processed and shipped as usual.

If at all we can ever prevent a customer receiving damaged goods, we will take any steps necessary to correct the situation.

The fact that the compare price (which is NOT a retail price or a reflection of value, *see past posts and our Help section for more info*)was so high is inconsequential. The bottom line was that it was damaged and the rep was instructed to call to keep the customer informed.

If this were a case of shady dealings, we might not have contacted the customer directly, issued the refund and offered no explanation for the reversed transaction. On the contrary, however, an explanation was provided as well as a refund of ALL fees.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now