- Report: #18239
Complaint Review: Citifinancial Retail Services; Taft Furniture
| Citifinancial Retail Services; Taft Furniture PO Box 15105
Wilmington, Delaware U.S.A. |
|
Citifinancial Retail Services; Taft Furniture consumer fraud ripoff Wilmington, Delaware
*Consumer Comment: Your suggestion is too little too late...
*Consumer Suggestion: Agree with S and have a suggestion
*Consumer Suggestion: Agree with S and have a suggestion
*Consumer Suggestion: Agree with S and have a suggestion
*Consumer Comment: Sue, don't even try it
*Consumer Suggestion: CitiFinancial Retail Services
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
Kyle
Albany, New York
Click here to read other Rip Off Reports on citifinancial
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/05/2002 10:38 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Citifinancial-Retail-Services-Taft-Furniture/Wilmington-Delaware-19850-5105/Citifinancial-Retail-Services-Taft-Furniture-consumer-fraud-ripoff-Wilmington-Delaware-18239. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Citifinancial Retail Services; Taft Furniture
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Comment
Your suggestion is too little too late...
AUTHOR: Honest Sam - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, January 15, 2007
#2 Consumer Suggestion
Agree with S and have a suggestion
AUTHOR: Lisa - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, January 15, 2007
I would also request a copy of the back of your statement to see the markings of its deposit. Verify the dates to ensure that it was not posted or deposited before they said it was.
As a former Citifinancial customer, I am aware of the 10 day allowance request - and truthfully I am always suspicious when a payment magically takes that amount of time. But that is there disclaimer - nevertheless the onus is on them to prove receipt.
Now, for Sue's comment. The 'financing' is a 'service' and is part of the pricing and payment package that you negotiated with the furniture store. You did nothing wrong and should not be bullied into thinking that you did. A full year relationship is meant to be that - and while you made payments all along, what you did was not out of line. If you had sent it 2-3 days before, sure - but that wasn't the case.
In turn, banking relationships with retailers (Taft) are not siloed efforts that Sue may have tried to imply. Normally, it's a heavily negotiated factor in a multi-faceted relationship. (Mortgages, regular checking, investments, etc). So don't let anyone sell you the line that the bank is not making money. It's all that it's about. There are some services that a bank issues that yield less, but on the long haul, it's a piece of a very lucrative deal.
As for my deailing with CFS...I pulled the plug about 5 months into the relationship. I have found that many of these 'free financing' deals are administratively out of process with how I normally do business - and by that I mean it's not convenient to do e-payments, insist on payment fees to do ebilling or throw in other hoops. Compound that by customer service issues (I suspect offshoring with a rigid script and rules applies here) - and that did it for me.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
#3 Consumer Suggestion
Agree with S and have a suggestion
AUTHOR: Lisa - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, January 15, 2007
I would also request a copy of the back of your statement to see the markings of its deposit. Verify the dates to ensure that it was not posted or deposited before they said it was.
As a former Citifinancial customer, I am aware of the 10 day allowance request - and truthfully I am always suspicious when a payment magically takes that amount of time. But that is there disclaimer - nevertheless the onus is on them to prove receipt.
Now, for Sue's comment. The 'financing' is a 'service' and is part of the pricing and payment package that you negotiated with the furniture store. You did nothing wrong and should not be bullied into thinking that you did. A full year relationship is meant to be that - and while you made payments all along, what you did was not out of line. If you had sent it 2-3 days before, sure - but that wasn't the case.
In turn, banking relationships with retailers (Taft) are not siloed efforts that Sue may have tried to imply. Normally, it's a heavily negotiated factor in a multi-faceted relationship. (Mortgages, regular checking, investments, etc). So don't let anyone sell you the line that the bank is not making money. It's all that it's about. There are some services that a bank issues that yield less, but on the long haul, it's a piece of a very lucrative deal.
As for my deailing with CFS...I pulled the plug about 5 months into the relationship. I have found that many of these 'free financing' deals are administratively out of process with how I normally do business - and by that I mean it's not convenient to do e-payments, insist on payment fees to do ebilling or throw in other hoops. Compound that by customer service issues (I suspect offshoring with a rigid script and rules applies here) - and that did it for me.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
#4 Consumer Suggestion
Agree with S and have a suggestion
AUTHOR: Lisa - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Monday, January 15, 2007
I would also request a copy of the back of your statement to see the markings of its deposit. Verify the dates to ensure that it was not posted or deposited before they said it was.
As a former Citifinancial customer, I am aware of the 10 day allowance request - and truthfully I am always suspicious when a payment magically takes that amount of time. But that is there disclaimer - nevertheless the onus is on them to prove receipt.
Now, for Sue's comment. The 'financing' is a 'service' and is part of the pricing and payment package that you negotiated with the furniture store. You did nothing wrong and should not be bullied into thinking that you did. A full year relationship is meant to be that - and while you made payments all along, what you did was not out of line. If you had sent it 2-3 days before, sure - but that wasn't the case.
In turn, banking relationships with retailers (Taft) are not siloed efforts that Sue may have tried to imply. Normally, it's a heavily negotiated factor in a multi-faceted relationship. (Mortgages, regular checking, investments, etc). So don't let anyone sell you the line that the bank is not making money. It's all that it's about. There are some services that a bank issues that yield less, but on the long haul, it's a piece of a very lucrative deal.
As for my deailing with CFS...I pulled the plug about 5 months into the relationship. I have found that many of these 'free financing' deals are administratively out of process with how I normally do business - and by that I mean it's not convenient to do e-payments, insist on payment fees to do ebilling or throw in other hoops. Compound that by customer service issues (I suspect offshoring with a rigid script and rules applies here) - and that did it for me.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
#5 Consumer Comment
Sue, don't even try it
AUTHOR: S - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, February 27, 2003
#6 Consumer Suggestion
CitiFinancial Retail Services
AUTHOR: Sue - ()
SUBMITTED: Sunday, September 01, 2002
12 months-yes, I FULL YEAR to pay this debt in full without having to pay one penny in interest.
This is a LOSS to the company, because when companies finance retail contracts which are paid in full as agreed (on time), these companies do not earn any income on these accounts.
It seems to me, that you would have had the common sense to make sure your payment was RECEIVED by this company on time, since you did in fact, have ONE FULL YEAR to pay the contract. If you mailed a deposit to your local bank, would you expect them to give you credit for the deposit before they actually received it? (NO!) It is the consumers responsiblity to ensure creditors receive payments in a timely manner.

