• Report: #836570

Complaint Review: Comp Nation

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Thu, February 09, 2012
  • Updated: Thu, December 13, 2012

  • Reported By: Concerned Consumer — Murfreesboro Tennessee United States of America
Comp Nation
331 Premier Ct Franklin, Tennessee United States of America

Comp Nation Mark Filaroski, Mike Adams Ripping off customers is a way of life Franklin, Tennessee

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Please READ THIS. Mark Filaroski

*Consumer Comment: Think again.

*Author of original report: C Nation

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: LIbel

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Mike Adams and Mark Filaroski were owners of the company CompNation.  They mismanaged funds so badly that they were forced to stop doing business.  They currently owe over $300,000 to different creditors that they were doing business with and they have no intention of paying the money.  Also, many of the customers had wire transferred funds to CompNation during the last few weeks of doing business and CompNation never shipped the product.

The reason for this report is that these two individuals have started selling under a different name out of their homes and they are likely to take advantage of unsuspecting consumers, just like with CompNation.  If you get contacted by either of these individuals, contact either the local police or FBI and report the situation to them.  Whatever you do, do not by any means send them any money or place any orders with these two Felons!  You will live to regret it and you will lose money if you start doing business with them.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/09/2012 01:20 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Comp-Nation/Franklin-Tennessee-37067/Comp-Nation-Mark-Filaroski-Mike-Adams-Ripping-off-customers-is-a-way-of-life-Franklin-Te-836570. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Comp Nation

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author 1Consumer 2Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Please READ THIS. Mark Filaroski

AUTHOR: Mark - (United States of America)

CompNation was an international company with no customers in Murfreesboro! This report was filed by an X employee's who stole our customer list to start thier own company. A lawsuit against the original author of the report for defamation, business disparagement, false light we be filed shortly! 

I can be contacted markfilaroski.mf@gmail.com 

Most people that file this kind of report do it to hurt the reputation of a company. I will seek legal action to stop this on behalf of myself. Ripoff Report claims it is immune from liability due to a federal law known as the Communications Decency Act. This law says that websites are not liable for the content posted on their websites by third parties. (The law makes sense to a degreeif every time a person defamed another person in a Yahoo! chat room imposed legal liability on Yahoo!, there would be no chat rooms.)

I also had over 100,000 orders and 10,000 customers that order from us with none of them reporting on this site! 

Please mail me with question or concerns. 

Regards

Mark Filaroski 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Think again.

AUTHOR: Flynrider - (USA)

If the post had been removed, it's unlikely that I would be responding to it.  I suggest you re-read the agreement that you affirmed when you made the original post.  Posts are not removed from this website. 


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

C Nation

AUTHOR: Concerned Consumer - (United States of America)

Due to potential litigation with the company in question, this report has been removed!
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 REBUTTAL Owner of company

LIbel

AUTHOR: MarkF - (United States of America)

To whom this may concern:

This is official notice that Mark Filaroski denies all libel created on Ripoff report.

Misrepresentation is a type of lying or falsehood in which a person says or does something that would lead another person to believe something that is not "in accordance with the facts." It may be intentional or negligent, but forms an
essential element of the crime and tort of fraud if the misrepresentation is made with the intent that the other person would believe it and act accordingly.

CompNation believes this email is in Fact an act of Defamation calumny, vilification, traducement, slander. Mark Filaroski can be reached for comments at mfilaroski@compnation.com

To further this an investigation is under way in order to find the culprit, who has committed libel.  

NON-DISCLOSURE

The protection of confidential business information and trade secrets is vital to the interests and the success of CompNation. Such confidential information includes, but is not limited to, the following examples:

* Compensation data

* Pending projects and proposals

* Computer processes

* Proprietary production processes

* Computer programs and codes

* Research and development strategies

* Customer lists

* Scientific data

* Customer preferences

* Scientific formulae

* Financial information

* Scientific prototypes

* Labor relations strategies

* Technological data

* Marketing strategies

* Technological prototypes

* New materials research

* User IDs and Passwords

*vendors

*vendor list

All employees are requiredto sign a non-disclosure agreement as a condition of employment. Employees who improperly use or disclose trade secrets or confidential business information will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment and legal action, even if they do not actually benefit from the disclosed information.

Eaves dropping notice: Florida and Tennessee.

All parties must consent to the recording or the disclosure of the contents of any wire, oral or electronic communication in Florida. Recording, disclosing, or endeavoring to disclose without the consent of all parties is a felony, unless the interception is a first offense committed without any illegal purpose, and not for commercial gain. Fla. Stat. ch. 934.03. These first offenses and the interception of cellular frequencies are misdemeanors.  State v. News-Press Pub. Co., 338 So. 2d 1313 (1976).

Under the statute, consent is not required for the taping of a non-electronic communication uttered by a person who does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that communication. See definition of oral communication, Fla. Stat. ch. 934.02. See also Stevenson v. State, 667 So.2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996); Paredes v. State, 760 So.2d 167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000).

In Cohen Brothers, LLC v. ME Corp., S.A., 872 So.2d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004), the District Court of Appeal for the Third District of Florida held that members of a limited liability companys (LLC) management committee did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to participation in telephone conference calls with other committee members to discuss continued financing of the LLC, and thus could not hold the committee members liable for
recording the conference calls.

A federal appellate court has held that because only interceptions made through an electronic, mechanical or other device are illegal under Florida law, telephones used in the ordinary course of business to record conversations
do not violate the law. The court found that business telephones are not the type of devices addressed in the law and, thus, that a life insurance company did not violate the law when it routinely recorded business-related calls on its business extensions. Royal Health Care Servs., Inc. v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Ins. Co., 924 F.2d 215 (11th Cir. 1991).

Anyone whose communications have been illegally intercepted may recover actual damages or $100 for each day of violation or $1,000, whichever is greater, along with punitive damages, attorney fees and litigation costs. Fla.
Stat. ch. 934.10.

Mark Filaroski


COMPNATION'S DISCLAIMER: The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information. Although this email and any attachments are
believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by
CompNation for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. Tennessee

This email will be recorded and all coversations with Mark Filaroski will be recorded, previous customers, vendors. There is a reward for any information leading to this activity.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory