Complaint Review: Davis & Associates - Omaha Nebraska
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
- Author Not Confirmed
- Davis & Associates 1623 Farnam Omaha, Nebraska United States of America
- Phone: 402-341-9900
- Web:
- Category: Attorneys & Legal Services
Davis & Associates James Martin Davis s****.> *Consumer Comment: (Case Won) Wife kidnapping, first degree sexual assault, plus.
*Consumer Comment: Some Lost cases. How many more unpublished?
*Consumer Comment: The Reader
*Consumer Comment: Slot Machine Davis
*Author of original report: James Martin (Slot Machine) Davis
*Author of original report: Alot of money for useless representation.
Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
Hired Davis for an appeal. Once you pay him he is done talking with you, he will not answer your calls. His associates will write your appeal, his office will cover for your past attorneys, by not arguing any ineffective assistance of counsel which is already part of the record and reviewable on direct appeal, even if this would win your appeal! He will only argue what your previous attorney argued at trial if anything. He will send one of his associates to argue this in front of the appeals court.
Davis is a high price crook, he is an ambulance chancer, he just wants to get his picture on TV so he can lure people into his office for help. When he's not screwing your case up, he's down at one of the casino's gambling the hard earned money away you or your relatives payed him to help you.
So if your not a Fireman caught in a motel with a hooker, or a U.S soldier caught sexually assaulting a women, or your case is not an easy way to get him on TV with a quick money lawsuit. He's not going help you so don't kid your self like I did.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/06/2010 10:14 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/davis-associates/omaha-nebraska-68102/davis-associates-james-martin-davis-showboater-only-wants-his-picture-on-tv-3-make-tv-a-579159. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#6 Consumer Comment
(Case Won) Wife kidnapping, first degree sexual assault, plus.
AUTHOR: Omaha NE - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, July 10, 2016
Won Case
STATE of Nebraska, appellee, v. Tyler C. BAIN, appellant.
No. S-14-638. Filed January 8, 2016
A jury found the appellant, Tyler C. Bain, guilty of four felonies stemming from his assaults of his former wife with whom he was living: kidnapping, first degree sexual assault, second degree assault, and making terroristic threats.
The Court, Because the court's procedures were inadequate to ensure that Bain received a fair trial, we vacate his convictions. Because we vacate Bain's convictions and do not know whether the State can prove that a new trial would not be tainted, we do not address his remaining assignments of error.
REVERSED AND VACATED.
Unlucky Women
The Reader | Omaha, Nebraska | James Martin Davis Quote; This year he represented former Bellevue Police Chief John Stacey and former local news broadcaster Michael Scott, which were two high-profile cases. He took both of them to a jury and got a not guilty verdict on both counts.
www.wowt. John Stacey. Allegedly made comments in front of a 12-year-old girl during a tour of the fire station.
www.ketv. Michael Scott is accused of third-degree domestic assault. In her application, the 38-year old woman alleges that during the assault, Scott called the woman's mother, put the woman in a headlock and said, "Tonight was the night I was going to die like O.J. and Nicole."
More Unlucky Women.
Draw your own conclusion. Maybe your Odds can improve.
STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Steven R. BRAESCH, Appellant.
No. S-14-1091. Filed March 4, 2016. Lost
#5 Consumer Comment
Some Lost cases. How many more unpublished?
AUTHOR: Consumer - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, February 06, 2016
State v. Rodriguez, 569 NW 2d 686 - Neb: Court of Appeals James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Lowe, 505 NW 2d 662 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. 1987 JEEP WAGONEER, 488 NW 2d 546 - Neb: Supreme Court 1992 James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Kruger, Neb: Court of Appeals 2012 James Martin Davis Lost
State v. DOLLEN, Neb: Court of Appeals 2009 James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Bacon, Neb: Court of Appeals 2010 James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Abraham, 336 NW 2d 85 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Gay, 778 NW 2d 494 - Neb: Court of Appeals James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Douglas, 468 NW 2d 612 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Putz, 650 NW 2d 486 - Neb: Court of Appeals James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Wiley, 394 NW 2d 641 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Blair, 419 NW 2d 868 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. VanAckeren, 639 NW 2d 112 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. White, 371 NW 2d 262 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Al-Sayagh, 689 NW 2d 587 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Harrison, 378 NW 2d 199 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Drew, 344 NW 2d 923 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Anderson, 511 NW 2d 174 - Neb: Court of Appeals James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Brennen, 356 NW 2d 861 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Bocian, 413 NW 2d 893 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Abraham, 356 NW 2d 877 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
In re Interest of Daniel W., 529 NW 2d 548 - Neb: Court of Appeals James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Ellingson, 13 Neb. App. 931 - Neb: Court of Appeals James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Ware, 365 NW 2d 418 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Keithley, 418 NW 2d 212 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Anderson, 512 NW 2d 367 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Sassen, 484 NW 2d 469 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Morrow, 467 NW 2d 63 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Whitmore, 340 NW 2d 134 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Putz, 662 NW 2d 606 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Senters, 699 NW 2d 810 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Fellman, 464 NW 2d 181 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
State v. Samuels, 289 NW 2d 183 - Neb: Supreme Court James Martin Davis Lost
Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Carman Cartage Co., 636 NW 2d 862 - Neb: Supreme Court Davis & Associates Lost
US v. Razo-Guerra, 534 F. 3d 970 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Cordy, 560 F. 3d 808 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Issaghoolian, 42 F. 3d 1175 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Washington, 197 F. 3d 1214 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Zamora-Lopez, 685 F. 3d 787 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Carrazco, 91 F. 3d 65 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Caballero-Chavez, 260 F. 3d 863 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
United States v. Leisure, 807 F. 2d 143 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Baisden, 713 F. 3d 450 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Walker, 518 F. 3d 983 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Moreno, 217 F. 3d 592 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Chard, 115 F. 3d 631 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Musk, 719 F. 3d 962 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Hull, 606 F. 3d 524 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Davis, 457 F. 3d 817 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
US v. Wright, 340 F. 3d 724 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit James Martin Davis Lost
What are your Odds
#4 Consumer Comment
The Reader
AUTHOR: Nebraska Resident - ()
SUBMITTED: Friday, December 06, 2013
Pay your dues to the advertisement scam and any attorney can call himself a Super Lawyer. Luckily former Bellevue Police Chief John Stacey was fired from his job. Nebraska has a history of not pursuing criminal charges against State and County employee's. Maybe Davis owed former local news broadcaster Michael Scott a favor for past attorney advertisement. If Michael Scott likes beating on women he'll be beating on women in the future.
How would you like to pay Davis his high retainer fee only to sell you down the drain, and to use your case as a bargaining tool for one of his TV spotlight cases? I'm sure he has lost more cases and sold more people down the drain than any other attorney in Nebraska so he could obtain a few winning cases. IF you don't have a TV camera following you around after you've been charged with a crime, don't hold your breath hoping for his help.
#3 Consumer Comment
Slot Machine Davis
AUTHOR: Jen - ()
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 12, 2013
Where's your retainer going?
#2 Author of original report
James Martin (Slot Machine) Davis
AUTHOR: - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, May 06, 2012
Is James Martin Davis working on your case while he's at the Casino? Who does he have working on your case or is he working on it at all?
#1 Author of original report
Alot of money for useless representation.
AUTHOR: Justice watch. - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, August 03, 2011
Prison is no place to go because of a no good attorney!
Related Reports
11:14 AM
02:37 PM
09:53 AM
12:37 PM
01:32 PM
07:53 AM
05:21 PM
06:11 PM
10:16 AM
10:05 AM
New 
Updated Rebuttal 
Photo 
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
