The Forelosure Process initiated by California Reconveyance was and remains full of Illegal actions all the way down to Unlawful Detainer and eviction. The SUSTITUTION of TRUSTEE on record names beneficiaries and trustees for the beneficiaries as different parties than whom conducted the trustee sale of our home in Murrieta, CA. They also filed lawsuits for unlawful detainer (ULD) before the legal allowed time had passed under the current laws.
Riverside County Recorder office not only did not catch there errors, but also allowed the new documents to be recorded and the court did not catch the early filing and allowed the lawsuit. In the courtroom for the ULD the court was advised on numerous occaision , in other cases filed by Deutsche Bank that day the ULD was filed 30 days too soon. The Judge did not do anything for the evictees whether or not the suits were illegally filed. Each person testifying before me against Deutsche Bank, the new owner of their home, had been in negotiations with them for more time or to buy the house.
In each occaision , like with ours, the bank strung the people along until the time had run out then refused to call or sign documnets. Each person had paid an attorney to assist. Also wasting money. The Court refused any extra time, and the attorney who showed up was one single attorney whom all of the banks "contracted" yet there was no sub of aqttorney naming this jerk. This guy refused to accept money, refused to ask his employer for more time, claimed he didnt have the entire file and had no authority to offer or negotiatiate anything. So before walking into a California Superior Court it had all been decided.
The bank had executed a documenty allowing us an extra month it said April 26thj 2009, which we had asked for, and signed and the bank signed. Not only did the date get changed by the judge , he and the attorney laughed and said "you meant march not april ", the judge altered the document. This should have been made to be enforced. If the Jerk atty made a dumb mistake how is that my problem , I was asked to sign a doc I read, I agreed to thoses terms. The judge would not listen.
The bank refused to accept our money, yet they claimed we refused to pay a daily rent as their basis for filing ULD . They would not allow us the couple of weeks to get moved, since we spent money on an attorney , and needed to waid for a pay day before we can pay for a new place. We had been told we would be granted a 45 day extension when the attorney named above discussed it with our attorney. They went back on their word and refused to return phone calls . This whole trhing startedout as a Wamu then chase then mysteriously Deutsche Bank claims they were legal owners and entitlled to auction and then bought it themselves.
They lie they show poor ethical behavior and bad faith. The County is inept if the county Recorder fails to check who is on record before allowing these forclosures. Since Wamu is out of business, any trust deeds and beficiaries and their trustee;s MUST BE FILED PROPERLY. If a company or person is not the legal entitled one to act then it should be illegal. I found on county in CO. that reused to accept any former Wamu property Trustee sales for this reason. Class Action anyone against the State of CA and Countyt of Riverside and banks???