- Report: #324167
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Direct Buy
Direct Buy1157 San Antonio Road Mountain View, California United States of America
Direct Buy Of Silicon Valley Direct Buy of Silicon Valley WHAT A SCAM Mountain View California
When we arrived home we placed a phone call to Direct Buy of Silicon Valley at 5:10 PM and spoke with the front line operator expressing our desire to cancel the membership contract that we had signed earlier that day. The lady who answered the call instructed us to issue a letter to the corporate offices in Merriville, Indiana to cancel the contract (since the Silicon Valley address was a post office box and not a physical address) . Also, we were informed that the corporate offices is located back East and were closed for the evening, she suggested that we call them tomorrow to get a fax number. The same evening at 7:39 pm, we placed a second call to Direct Buy of Silicon Valley to see if there was a possible way to deliver a cancellation letter to them without having to wait to send one to their Corporate Office in Indiana.
The lady who answered the phone was uncertain of whom that might be and we then waited to fax our cancelation the next morning to corporate.
On December 13th, 2007, my wife phoned (from her work office) the Merriville, Indiana corporate office and was given the fax number of 219-755-6245 where to send the cancelation letter. In addition to faxing the cancellation letter to corporate, my wife faxed a letter to the Direct Buy of Silicon Valley facility at 650-810-1919. Also, I emailed a copy of the same letter to (firstname.lastname@example.org) the Direct Buy of Silicon Valley Customer Service Manager, Jessica (Jessie) Sanchez. .
With no response from the Corporate or the Direct Buy of Silicon Valley office, I called Direct Buy of Silicon Valley facility and the corporate office on February 20, 2008 to confirm our cancelation and status of our refund of $900. I spoke with a lady named Stephanie.
Stephanie asked me what fax number we sent our cancelation letter to and that she would look into it. Stephanie gave me the email address of her manager, Rose (email@example.com) and suggested that I re-send the email to her since she would most likely be the one who handles cancelations. I asked Stephanie if she wanted us to re-send the fax so she would have it as a reference when she spoke with Rose about this matter. Stephanie agreed that would help.
I then continued to do the same by calling Jessica Sanchez at the from the Direct Buy of Silicon Valley office. Since Jesse was not available by phone, I left here a voice mail and sent here an email explaining what had transpired.
Again, with no response from the Corporate or Direct Buy of Silicon Valley office, I emailed out a new letter and placed a phone call on February, 29th, 2008 @ approximately 11:34 AM.
Finally, I received a response email from Jessica on February 29, 2008 @ 2:29 PM.
Jesses response was, I apologize I have not gotten back to you sooner. I did receive your fax copy of the email, however when I compared that to our email logs for firstname.lastname@example.org on 12/13/08 I have all emails except yours. I have all emails prior to 2:35pm and after 2:35pm, again none are your email. We keep all emails for tracking purposes. You mention that you were instructed by one of our representatives to call our corporate office in regards to your cancellation. We would never have referred you to our corporate office as the cancellations are handled directly here at our local showroom. I will have to take this matter up with our owners who are expected back from vacation sometime tomorrow. We will be in touch shortly.
On February 29, 2008 @3:55 PM I also received the following email response from Rose
I did receive the email you referred to and, as indicated in the email the center sent to you today, concluded that this was something that needed to be handled at the center level. I forwarded all of the information to them through our member messaging system which is the normal procedure. Based on the email they sent you today (which they copied me on) they will be in contact with you further on your request.
On March 04, 2008 @ 5:30 PM I received via email form Jesse Sanchez the following
After looking further into your request we are requiring additional information. It is odd that our email system has ALL emails for 12/13/07, except yours. We are requiring some additional information from you. You mentioned you spoke to someone here at our facility. Please provide us with the phone records showing us that call was made and we will more than happy to honor your request.
On March 05, 2008 I responded to Jesse via email: I am a bit taken back by this email response. As far as I was concerned, I after in good faith when I signed up for your service on December 12th, 2007; I also acted in good faith when I attempted to cancel our contract the following day December 13th, 2007. I feel as though I am having to defend myself when I was misinformed by your representatives to contact corporate to contact you corporate offices to cancel my plan. I have furnished you documentation showing that I did email a cancellation letter to your company on December 13th, 2007. Up to this point, I have been patient waiting for your responses in addition to our refund check to be issued. I do not intend to go searching through my phone records to further verify my desires to cancel our contract with you.
I respectfully ask you again to process the cancellation request effective December 13th, 2007 per the documentation already furnished.
Up to this point, I have furnished email to the Direct Buy of Silicon Valley facility the following documents which they have requested: email messages with a return receipt attached, the month of December 2007 phone records showing phone calls placed from my residence to the Direct Buy of Silicon Valley facility.
After issuing these emails, I was ask to come to the facility to show original documents and they would issue me a cancellation of contract and a check for my refund of $900.00. I set up an appointment to meet Jesse at the Direct Buy of Silicon Valley facility on April 2, 2008 between 4:00 PM 5:00 PM. After arriving there, I was asked to wait in the reception area, after waiting for over 30 minutes then I was asked to come back into the facility to show Jesse the original documents. After furnishing Jesse the requested documents she excused herself from the room (with the documents I furnished her) asking for me to remain in the room. When Jesse returned she informed me that she would not be cancelling the contract unless I provided her additional information. The information she required was the phone records indicating calls to their corporate office. I explained to Jesse that these calls were placed from my wifes corporate office (Computer Associates in their South San Francisco facility) and that there were hundreds of lines there that her request was unreasonable especially since I had already furnished her with enough documentation supporting my claims.
Jessie responded saying that without the additional phone records as documentation they will not cancel the contract. I explained to Jesse that I have acted in good faith through this whole process by following their many requirements to cancel. Also, throughout this process, it was clear that I had lost my desire to do business with them especially after how I had been treated. With no response from Jesse, I informed her that I would rather attempt to resolve this peacefully without third party intervention; Jesse said that she didnt take threats lightly. I informed her that this was not meant as a threat; however, I just didnt want to involve others into a situation that should easily be resolved. At this point, I said you dont want a consumer in your facility with a bad experience that might offer negative feedback to others. Jesse then asked me to leave, saying that I was speaking to loud. I responded by saying that I will leave, but keep in mind that they cant have it both ways by holding me to a contract and not allowing me in the facility.
One other thing is that a portion of this contract was financed through a third party company named Beta Finance Company Inc. in the amount of $6,000.00. I have informed Beta Financial of my request to cancel this with Direct Buy and as a result my contract with them should be cancelled. Beta Finance instructed me that the only way to cancel with them is to have Direct Buy furnish them with a letter. I informed them that I was having difficulties with Direct Buy acknowledging my request to cancel the contract I signed with them, and that I am concerned that this might impact my credit rating. Beta Finance informed me that it hadnt been sent to collections yet; however, it is getting close to that point.
Tye Redwood City, California
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/06/2008 11:10 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Direct-Buy/Mountain-View-California-94043/Direct-Buy-Of-Silicon-Valley-Direct-Buy-of-Silicon-Valley-WHAT-A-SCAM-Mountain-View-Califo-324167. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
- Business's (11)
- Lawyers and Law Firms (5312)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Admiralty & Maritime Law (27)
- Agricultural Law (2)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (10)
- Antitrust & Trade Regulation (1)
- Appellate Practice (72)
- Aviation & Aerospace (11)
- Banking Law (90)
- Bankruptcy (380)
- Business Law (232)
- Civil Rights (55)
- Class Actions (30)
- Commercial Law (13)
- Communications Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Construction Law (83)
- Contracts (7)
- Corporate Law (75)
- Criminal Law (668)
- Debtor & Creditor (51)
- Education Law (14)
- Elder Law (77)
- ElectionCampaign & Political (0)
- Eminent Domain (5)
- Employee Benefits (7)
- Energy (0)
- Entertainment & Sports (17)
- Environmental Law (43)
- Family Law (13)
- Finance (0)
- Government (14)
- Government Contracts (2)
- Health Care (1)
- Immigration (482)
- Indians & Native Populations (1)
- Insurance (90)
- Intellectual Property (526)
- International Law (33)
- International Trade (0)
- Internet Law (7)
- Investments (1)
- Labor & Employment (12)
- Legal Malpractice (92)
- Litigation (20)
- Media Law (1)
- Medical Malpractice (13)
- Mergers & Acquisitions (0)
- Military Law (5)
- Natural Resources (10)
- Occupational Safety & Health (0)
- Personal Injury (842)
- Products Liability (21)
- Professional Liability (0)
- Real Estate (361)
- Securities (169)
- Taxation (142)
- Technology & Science (0)
- Toxic Torts (0)
- Transportation (2)
- Trusts & Estates (368)
- White Collar Crime (1)
- Wills & Probate (7)
- Workers Compensation (242)
- Zoning, Planning & Land Use (10)
- Legal Services (32)
- Arbitrators/Mediators (7)
- Automotive Expert Witnesses (0)
- Bail Bonds (0)
- Court Reporters (1)
- Electronic Data Discovery (1)
- Expert Witnesses (1)
- Forensic Experts (1)
- Jury Selection (0)
- Legal Assistants (8)
- Legal Speakers (2)
- Litigation Support (2)
- Medical Expert Witnesses (1)
- Other (14)
- Paralegal (5)
- Private Investigators (6)
- Process Servers (7)
- Translators/Interpreters (0)
- Miscellaneous Business Services (19)