• Report: #368203

Complaint Review: Dominion Process Servers

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Fri, August 29, 2008
  • Updated: Tue, September 30, 2008

  • Reported By:Toronto Ontario
Dominion Process Servers
2898 Lakeshore Blvd. W. #47 Toronto, Ontario Canada

Dominion Process Servers The promised but failed to execute a simple local process service. VERY RUDE! Toronto Ontario Canada

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Unfair, Untrue and Misleading Allegations

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Unfair, Untrue and Misleading Allegations

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Unfair, Untrue and Misleading Allegations

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Unfair, Untrue and Misleading Allegations

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

I called these guys and paid $100 for expedited service. I gave them the recipients 9-5 office and home address both downtown. They said they would pick it up on Friday afternoon. Of course they didn't show and called later to offer to pick it up on Saturday. By the following Thursday I sent them emails regarding the status to which they never responded. By Friday I called and they had no idea if it had been delivered. I called back and they said they would try and deliver it the following week. The guy ended up cursing at me and hanging up in my face. My court date will slip. I am simply appalled at their total lack of professionalism.

Frederick
Toronto, Ontario
Canada

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/29/2008 02:14 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Dominion-Process-Servers/Toronto-Ontario-M8V-1J2/Dominion-Process-Servers-The-promised-but-failed-to-execute-a-simple-local-process-service-368203. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Dominion Process Servers

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 0Consumer 4Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Unfair, Untrue and Misleading Allegations

AUTHOR: Dominion - (Canada)

At Dominion we endeavor to ensure that all of our customers are satisfied with the results of the services they purchase.

The above report, filed by a dissatisfied customer by the name of Frederick , is, misleading and unfair.

To begin with, we acknowledge that Mr. F did retain the services of our firm to serve legal documents and did pay roughly $100.00 for the service. Mr. F was also aware that, as part of our flat rate fee plan, we would attempt service 3 times and, per his request for expedited service, the first attempt would be within 48 hours of our having received his documents. We followed through on all of our obligations to him.

We attempted to effect service no less than twice at the residential address he provided - unfortunately, no one appeared to be home. We then attempted to effect service at the work address he provided and were told by the company that the person was no longer employed there. We even went back and made a third attempt at the residential address - free of charge - again, no one appeared to be home.

We explained to Mr. F that he had several options in this situation. We offered to provide him with an affidavit of attempted service - this is the most common route following an unsuccessful serve and can be used to ask the judge in the case to allow service by simple regular mail. We also offered to conduct additional attempts at service if he would like to purchase these. This, apparently, was not sufficient for Mr. F who became verbally abusive with our staff and insisted on a refund. We explained that, as we had provided the services for which he paid, no refund was available.

Although we are able to serve over 97% of papers assigned to us, we do occasionally have situations, like this one, where service is difficult or impossible. The simple fact is that sometimes people go on vacation, refuse to answer the door, or, like the present case, we are provided with incorrect information. There is no company in our industry that can or will make a promise that a person will certainly be served due to the simple fact that sometimes circumstances beyond our control arise to prevent it. Unfortunately, Frederick seems unwilling or unable to understand this.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Unfair, Untrue and Misleading Allegations

AUTHOR: Dominion - (Canada)

At Dominion we endeavor to ensure that all of our customers are satisfied with the results of the services they purchase.

The above report, filed by a dissatisfied customer by the name of Frederick , is, misleading and unfair.

To begin with, we acknowledge that Mr. F did retain the services of our firm to serve legal documents and did pay roughly $100.00 for the service. Mr. F was also aware that, as part of our flat rate fee plan, we would attempt service 3 times and, per his request for expedited service, the first attempt would be within 48 hours of our having received his documents. We followed through on all of our obligations to him.

We attempted to effect service no less than twice at the residential address he provided - unfortunately, no one appeared to be home. We then attempted to effect service at the work address he provided and were told by the company that the person was no longer employed there. We even went back and made a third attempt at the residential address - free of charge - again, no one appeared to be home.

We explained to Mr. F that he had several options in this situation. We offered to provide him with an affidavit of attempted service - this is the most common route following an unsuccessful serve and can be used to ask the judge in the case to allow service by simple regular mail. We also offered to conduct additional attempts at service if he would like to purchase these. This, apparently, was not sufficient for Mr. F who became verbally abusive with our staff and insisted on a refund. We explained that, as we had provided the services for which he paid, no refund was available.

Although we are able to serve over 97% of papers assigned to us, we do occasionally have situations, like this one, where service is difficult or impossible. The simple fact is that sometimes people go on vacation, refuse to answer the door, or, like the present case, we are provided with incorrect information. There is no company in our industry that can or will make a promise that a person will certainly be served due to the simple fact that sometimes circumstances beyond our control arise to prevent it. Unfortunately, Frederick seems unwilling or unable to understand this.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Unfair, Untrue and Misleading Allegations

AUTHOR: Dominion - (Canada)

At Dominion we endeavor to ensure that all of our customers are satisfied with the results of the services they purchase.

The above report, filed by a dissatisfied customer by the name of Frederick , is, misleading and unfair.

To begin with, we acknowledge that Mr. F did retain the services of our firm to serve legal documents and did pay roughly $100.00 for the service. Mr. F was also aware that, as part of our flat rate fee plan, we would attempt service 3 times and, per his request for expedited service, the first attempt would be within 48 hours of our having received his documents. We followed through on all of our obligations to him.

We attempted to effect service no less than twice at the residential address he provided - unfortunately, no one appeared to be home. We then attempted to effect service at the work address he provided and were told by the company that the person was no longer employed there. We even went back and made a third attempt at the residential address - free of charge - again, no one appeared to be home.

We explained to Mr. F that he had several options in this situation. We offered to provide him with an affidavit of attempted service - this is the most common route following an unsuccessful serve and can be used to ask the judge in the case to allow service by simple regular mail. We also offered to conduct additional attempts at service if he would like to purchase these. This, apparently, was not sufficient for Mr. F who became verbally abusive with our staff and insisted on a refund. We explained that, as we had provided the services for which he paid, no refund was available.

Although we are able to serve over 97% of papers assigned to us, we do occasionally have situations, like this one, where service is difficult or impossible. The simple fact is that sometimes people go on vacation, refuse to answer the door, or, like the present case, we are provided with incorrect information. There is no company in our industry that can or will make a promise that a person will certainly be served due to the simple fact that sometimes circumstances beyond our control arise to prevent it. Unfortunately, Frederick seems unwilling or unable to understand this.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Unfair, Untrue and Misleading Allegations

AUTHOR: Dominion - (Canada)

At Dominion we endeavor to ensure that all of our customers are satisfied with the results of the services they purchase.

The above report, filed by a dissatisfied customer by the name of Frederick , is, misleading and unfair.

To begin with, we acknowledge that Mr. F did retain the services of our firm to serve legal documents and did pay roughly $100.00 for the service. Mr. F was also aware that, as part of our flat rate fee plan, we would attempt service 3 times and, per his request for expedited service, the first attempt would be within 48 hours of our having received his documents. We followed through on all of our obligations to him.

We attempted to effect service no less than twice at the residential address he provided - unfortunately, no one appeared to be home. We then attempted to effect service at the work address he provided and were told by the company that the person was no longer employed there. We even went back and made a third attempt at the residential address - free of charge - again, no one appeared to be home.

We explained to Mr. F that he had several options in this situation. We offered to provide him with an affidavit of attempted service - this is the most common route following an unsuccessful serve and can be used to ask the judge in the case to allow service by simple regular mail. We also offered to conduct additional attempts at service if he would like to purchase these. This, apparently, was not sufficient for Mr. F who became verbally abusive with our staff and insisted on a refund. We explained that, as we had provided the services for which he paid, no refund was available.

Although we are able to serve over 97% of papers assigned to us, we do occasionally have situations, like this one, where service is difficult or impossible. The simple fact is that sometimes people go on vacation, refuse to answer the door, or, like the present case, we are provided with incorrect information. There is no company in our industry that can or will make a promise that a person will certainly be served due to the simple fact that sometimes circumstances beyond our control arise to prevent it. Unfortunately, Frederick seems unwilling or unable to understand this.
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory