- Report: #599354
Complaint Review: Ecocolors
| Ecocolors 1860 N. Rock Springs Rd.#101 Atlanta, Georgia
Nationwide United States of America |
|
Ecocolors L. Saul Francis, Ecocolors.net Ecocolors highly toxic and carcinogenic chemicals not suitable for human beings Atlanta, Georgia Nationwide
*General Comment: EcoColors
*General Comment: Just curious...
*Consumer Comment: EcoColors Review - Ingredients cause for alarm.
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/02/2010 07:36 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Ecocolors/nationwide/Ecocolors-L-Saul-Francis-Ecocolorsnet-Ecocolors-highly-toxic-and-carcinogenic-chemicals-599354. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Ecocolors
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 General Comment
EcoColors
AUTHOR: SLucy - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, July 03, 2012
I would just like to say that EcoColors is very up front about their use of PPD and other chemicals and they plainly state on their website that the dosage levels are nontoxic, although the chemicals themselves can be toxic.
Also, they do not use ammonia, as listed in the ripoff report. They use aqua ammonia or ammonium hydroxide, which is non-toxic. The resorcinol they use is also non-toxic methyl-resorcinol.
This report makes it sound as though L'oreal suddenly switched their labeling to "all natural" and didn't tell anyone. I think compared to many hair coloring products out there, this one is not that bad. To suggest filing a class action suit against them is ridiculous in my opinion.
You can get good scientific safety data from the skin deep database, data that is far more accurate than the malarkey being promoted here.
#2 General Comment
Just curious...
AUTHOR: Anon - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, September 20, 2011
They were highlighting the fact that quantities matter and that they use much lower amounts of these dangerous chemicals in their dyes than other companies. It struck me as reasonable, although they provided no statistics re: safe levels/studies, etc.
But the report against Ecocolors didn't seem to mention the issue of possible safe levels at all. Are there studies...and what do they say?
#3 Consumer Comment
EcoColors Review - Ingredients cause for alarm.
AUTHOR: NaturallyOrganic - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, August 18, 2011
I have never used EcoColors in my salon, but I have had it used on me before. I didnt notice any adverse reaction, so I just assumed that it was a decently non-toxic product. After looking into the ingredients list, it is shockingly toxic.
I dont understand how companies in the organic hair color market continue to advertise their products as being PPD, ammonia, and sulfate free when it CLEARLY CONTAINS ALL OF THESE! As shown by the ingredients list! Yet they are allowed to market it whatever way they please! They name it "Eco"-whatever and market it to us as safe, for an increased price, and it is the same product!
WE NEED TO BOYCOTT ECOCOLORS AND MASTEY, BOTH COMPANIES ARE GROSSLY MISREPRESENTING THE SAFETY OF THEIR PRODUCTS!!!
You can read more about the horror that is Mastey here, I am sure we will be seeing similar stories about EcoColors soon...
http://www.ripoffreport.com/hair-salons/mastey-de-paris/mastey-de-paris-henri-mastey-29659.htm
STAY SAFE! STAY AWAY FROM ECOCOLORS AND MASTEY!

