- Report: #1127596
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Enterprise Rent-A-Car1161 University Ave W St Paul, Minnesota USA
Enterprise Rent-A-Car Getting Charged Close to $3,000 ,Scammed?!, for Damage I Didn't Do St Paul Minnesota
*Author of original report: Enterprise doesn't care
*UPDATE Employee: Enterprise Cares
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
I rented two vehicles from Enterprise over a two week period in January of 2014, and had two unpleasant experience. The first I rented at a St. Paul, MN location which I returned four days later to the Minneapolis-St. Paul airport location. At the airport the employee pointed out damage to the underside of the front bumper, stating that the molding was missing (it was a white Ford Focus with over 34,000 miles on it; none of the white body/bumper was damaged). I honestly couldn't tell what they were referring to, but I was sure I didn't hit anything and wasn't in an accident. When I told the Enterprise employee at the airport that I couldn’t see the damage, she said, “You’d have to know the Ford Focus to know it was missing a piece.” Then she said noted to herself, "Hmm there's not even a scratch or mark on the front bumper.”
Now I'm the type of person who would have red-flagged if I did anything. [continued below]....
I later received a report from Enterprise’s “Damage Recovery Unit”. I reached out to them and the St. Paul location, and repeatedly told them that I didn't do anything but they informed me I was on the hook, since "they had no prior record of the damage.” Before I got the bill, I remember wondering, “Could the molding have just fallen off the car without me knowing it?”
Then I get the bill... $2,973.36! They had to replace the grill ($566.89), front bumper cover ($410.30), radiator ($261.68), condenser ($183.98), lower engine shield ($147.32) and a host of other things. I was christened into the world of Enterprise’s new profit model — do a quick once over on your way out the door and then do eagle eye upon return. And make the person pay for every last scratch.
When I analyze the possible explanations of the damage I came up with the following:
- I got in an accident and am denying it. This would mean that I am attempting to defraud Enterprise out of close to $3,000, which to me, is pretty criminal behavior. I am not trying to defraud anyone. I didn’t hit anything or get into an accident.
- Someone hit my car when I wasn’t in it. I rule out this possibility because of the nature of the damage. The front bumper didn’t even have a scratch on it. The damage was underneath the front bumper. My guess is whoever caused the damage must have hit something like a high curb. And I’d guess whoever did $3,000 worth damage knows they did it (though I consider the estimate to be wildly inflated; clearly I am being asked to pay for every last scratch on a rental with 34,000 miles on it).
- The damage was preexisting and both the Enterprise location and myself missed it when I rented the car. I included a picture of the car with the $3,000 worth of the damage to it. Looks like someone could easily missed that. They sent me pictures from the estimate. All of the pictures look like someone who is trying to exaggerate the damage.
To me (and any reasonable person) the answer is that the damage was preexisting. We both missed the damage. I have been renting cars for 20 years and I have never encountered this kind of behavior. I have never had a rental car employee tell me to look underneath the car for potential damage, which in this case, they clearly should have done.
You may think I’m being overly suspicious. But it was my second rental car the following week that made we start to question Enterprise’s policies, procedures and ethics. This time I rented from the St. Louis Park, MN location and returned to the St. Paul location (my car was in the shop, hence the repeated rentals). This time I was smarter (the damage report hadn’t come in, or else I wouldn’t have rented from Enterprise at all), and I, as well as the Enterprise employee, spotted damage (several cracks) on the front bumper. I took pictures, and had it noted in the contract.
I returned the car to the St. Paul location a week or so later. End of story right? Nope. I received another damage report in the mail for the cracks in the front bumper. I call them up and told them it was previous damage that was noted in the contract. The employee said, "Oh we didn't have the paperwork so we reported it." Wouldn't you think there is some kind of process where they check the paperwork??? A month later, the matter still isn’t resolved. I had to send them a scan of the contract as well as the photo I took. Really? It’s my responsibility to absolve myself?
Later I had a local employee call me about the damage to the Focus, and he encouraged me to just use my insurance company. He said my insurance company can negotiate for me and will help me. He also said there is a law (or stipulation) where I won’t have to pay a deductible (I have a $1,000 deductible). So then I get a clearer picture of Enterprise’s “enterprise” — hit people up with a huge estimate so they turn to their insurance companies to make it go away. I won't.
If Enterprise recently changed their policy, you’d think they’d be more clear with people up front. Tell people something like, “Please look underneath the car and take pictures inside and out, because we will charge you for everything we find on the other end.” Or, “You’d better get insurance, because we will find damage when you return it. And even if you didn’t do it, we’ll charge you.” They should tell customers to check under the car for damage.
The whole thing feels like bad faith on Enterprise’s part. It should be their business to protect their customers, not their cars.
In short, don't rent at any Enterprise. Enterprise also owns National and Alamo. Don’t rent there either. This is clearly a profit center for them. Stay away.
If you must rent a car, I recommend the following:
- Rent the newest car you can (though my second rental was a 2014 and had damage).
- Take pictures of your car (all over) both when you rent it and when you return it.
- Look closely underneath the car, and take more pictures. Same goes for the inside and even the top of the car.
- Be aware that they will look it over with a fine tooth comb when you return it. Protect yourself.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/01/2014 06:29 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Enterprise-Rent-A-Car/St-Paul-Minnesota-55104/Enterprise-Rent-A-Car-Getting-Charged-Close-to-3000-Scammed-for-Damage-I-Didnt-Do-1127596. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
- Business's (11)
- Lawyers and Law Firms (5312)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Admiralty & Maritime Law (27)
- Agricultural Law (2)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (10)
- Antitrust & Trade Regulation (1)
- Appellate Practice (72)
- Aviation & Aerospace (11)
- Banking Law (90)
- Bankruptcy (380)
- Business Law (232)
- Civil Rights (55)
- Class Actions (30)
- Commercial Law (13)
- Communications Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Construction Law (83)
- Contracts (7)
- Corporate Law (75)
- Criminal Law (668)
- Debtor & Creditor (51)
- Education Law (14)
- Elder Law (77)
- ElectionCampaign & Political (0)
- Eminent Domain (5)
- Employee Benefits (7)
- Energy (0)
- Entertainment & Sports (17)
- Environmental Law (43)
- Family Law (13)
- Finance (0)
- Government (14)
- Government Contracts (2)
- Health Care (1)
- Immigration (482)
- Indians & Native Populations (1)
- Insurance (90)
- Intellectual Property (526)
- International Law (33)
- International Trade (0)
- Internet Law (7)
- Investments (1)
- Labor & Employment (12)
- Legal Malpractice (92)
- Litigation (20)
- Media Law (1)
- Medical Malpractice (13)
- Mergers & Acquisitions (0)
- Military Law (5)
- Natural Resources (10)
- Occupational Safety & Health (0)
- Personal Injury (842)
- Products Liability (21)
- Professional Liability (0)
- Real Estate (361)
- Securities (169)
- Taxation (142)
- Technology & Science (0)
- Toxic Torts (0)
- Transportation (2)
- Trusts & Estates (368)
- White Collar Crime (1)
- Wills & Probate (7)
- Workers Compensation (242)
- Zoning, Planning & Land Use (10)
- Legal Services (32)
- Arbitrators/Mediators (7)
- Automotive Expert Witnesses (0)
- Bail Bonds (0)
- Court Reporters (1)
- Electronic Data Discovery (1)
- Expert Witnesses (1)
- Forensic Experts (1)
- Jury Selection (0)
- Legal Assistants (8)
- Legal Speakers (2)
- Litigation Support (2)
- Medical Expert Witnesses (1)
- Other (14)
- Paralegal (5)
- Private Investigators (6)
- Process Servers (7)
- Translators/Interpreters (0)
- Miscellaneous Business Services (19)