- Report: #794820
Complaint Review: Essintial
| Essintial One Sterling Place
Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania United States of America |
|
Essintial Halifax All work for no pay Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
*UPDATE EX-employee responds: My experience supports original report. 1st rebuttal may be a hoax and/or fabrication!
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Can't really agree with this review.
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This is not a reliable company to work for.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/03/2011 12:55 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Essintial/Mechanicsburg-Pennsylvania-17050/Essintial-Halifax-All-work-for-no-pay-Mechanicsburg-Pennsylvania-794820. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Essintial
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 UPDATE EX-employee responds
My experience supports original report. 1st rebuttal may be a hoax and/or fabrication!
AUTHOR: Field Nation and Essintial UNFAIR! - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, February 02, 2013
I did absolutely nothing to cause these long holds as I most often did not even have the chance. Typically these long hold times would occur waiting for the 3rd or 2nd (and occasionally even the 1st) level operators to even get to my call as, apparently, these operators were busy with other calls. This kind regular overwhelm indicates it is most likely the result of Essintial's personnel management deliberately understaffing its call centers rather than just a series of incidental times of high call volume. I had grown used to these wait times as I was once paid for them along with the rest of my work time.
However, after my final job, Essintial decided to stiff me out of half of the pay (some $200!) they agreed to give me according to their own policy due to "excessive on-site time," identical to the situation that occurred to the original reporter. As a considerable portion (almost half) of the time on the job was spent either on hold or waiting for call backs, I considered this so unfair that I refused any further work orders from Essintial. Further, as Field Nation decided to give me the runaround when I attempted to contact them about the matter, in the end, I quit Field Nation as well.
Further, the rebutter first claims to be a "company owner" and in the first sentence of the rebuttal says that he/she has "been doing a number of jobs for Essintial." Which is it? If somehow it is both, why would this person not explain how he/she came to be in this rare position (possibly indicating a conflict of interest)?
Therefore, I find the original report rings very true according to my experience, and, in fact, I question authenticity of the 1st rebuttal.
#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Can't really agree with this review.
AUTHOR: Chris y - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Friday, September 21, 2012
Platform work is always "interesting" in that you are dealing with multiple company's needs and requirements for documentation. My answer is OVER documentation of the work I do, calls I make to open, close tickets and who I talked to, both on the phone and onsite. It takes a little bit more time (maybe 10 minutes a job), but it pays off with no "push back" on hours and materials billed. Of course, I coordinate materials and travel costs BEFORE accepting the job. No surprises makes the payment faster!

