• Report: #310584

Complaint Review: Giftcards.com

  • Submitted: Wed, February 20, 2008
  • Updated: Wed, February 20, 2008

  • Reported By:Chicago Illinois
P.O. Box 16527 Pittsburg, Pennsylvania U.S.A.

Giftcards.com failed to provide product and charged for re-issue Pittsburg Pennsylvania

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

On Dec. 18, 2007, I purchased a gift card worth $50 for a nephew, and was promised that it would be received before Dec. 25th. No delivery, and was promised it should arrive by Jan. 1st. No delivery occurred, so I requested that they reissue the card. I was charged an additional $5 for a service. I objected, but was told I agreed to it.

If that is indeed the case, it was not clear and up front. Had I known I was taking such a risk, I wouldn't have proceeded with purchasing the product.

James cappleman
Chicago, Illinois

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/20/2008 04:31 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Giftcardscom/Pittsburg-Pennsylvania-15242/Giftcardscom-failed-to-provide-product-and-charged-for-re-issue-Pittsburg-Pennsylvania-310584. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Giftcards.com

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?